Topic: District 9

Sorry about the audio quality here. This is the second week in a row our tried and true setup has resulted in my audio quality being less clean than the other voices, so I'll do a mic and cord check before our next recording. That being said, the whole episode is pretty hot, too, so. My bad.

But, you know. Good commentary. So shut up.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: District 9

Christopher Johannson is somebody I went to college with. Not the alien from the movie.

So that's where that came from.

Carry on.

3 (edited by Matt Vayda 2010-02-16 21:06:25)

Re: District 9

4 (edited by Zarban 2010-02-16 21:25:29)

Re: District 9

A particularly good commentary, guys. I agree with nearly all your points about the film's greatness and weaknesses. However, I find myself in stark disagreement on your broader political positions.

By the end, you very nearly conclude that apartheid is not a bad way of dealing with people you can't get along with. Good luck on the coin flip that puts you in the oppressor tribe vs the oppressed tribe.

Thruout history, the primary reason two groups who cohabitate don't get along is that one of them conquered the other and social stigmas of race or religion keep them from integrating. That's the source of the problem in Israel and was the source of the problem in South Africa, Northern Ireland, and the New World.... That puts the blame on the oppressors. You don't get a pass just by saying, "Well that was kind of a long time ago that we conquered you, stole your land, and forced you into ghettos. Why can't you be civil and stop setting off bombs? This is why we still actively discriminate against you, you know."

And apartheid wasn't established in South Africa until the 1950s, just when the entire rest of the world had collectively come to the realization that we all needed to try to enfranchise disenfranchised groups. So, yes, South Africa was just like America... only 300 years later when they should have known better.

However, for the record, I'm against trying to negotiate with komodo dragons. Those lying fuckers can't be trusted.

Re: District 9

And to be fair, O'Rourke reaches essentially the same conclusion in his essay in Holidays in Hell, I just didn't get around to mentioning that in the commentary. 

He basically concludes the reason Americans were so eager to demonize the South Africans wasn't because their history was unique - it was because - as he archly put it - they just weren't feeling guilty about it "like white men should".

And on a side note, O Zarban, do you live in the Los Angeles area by any chance?   If so, isn't it about damn time you guested on DIF yourself, eh wot?

Re: District 9

I'm not sure to what podcast Zarban listened to, but the points he made, to which Trey agreed, are exactly the conclusions come to in the podcast, as I remember it. Can you pull out some specific quotes where the DIF team came out in favor of modern societies oppressing other ones?

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: District 9

I came back this morning specifically to mellow the harsh a bit. First, I sincerely hope that Roger Ebert listens to this particular commentary. He was the earliest champion of fan commentaries that I know of, and he would really be pleased to find film fans are this insightful and clever. Likewise, I think film makers in general would kill for audiences this engaged with their films.

8 (edited by Zarban 2010-02-17 09:19:23)

Re: District 9

Re: District 9

Trey, I live in Indiana, but I've done a couple of Transatlantic commentaries with Speakeasy by Skype that were a lot of fun.

Re: District 9

Wow. This is fascinating, I eagerly await Gregory's response on this subject.

Where in Indiana, Zarban? I used to live north of Indy.

I think you hit an important and overlooked (by us) nail on the head there, we really wouldn't have anything to say if the filmmakers ever gave us an idea of what these people were like before they arrived.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: District 9

I live in South Bend, where I'm a traveling corporate training consultant.

I didn't mean to take anyone to school or anything, but Gregory asked for specifics. It was fascinating to listen as you first played along with the film makers' game (these aren't humans but they are totally equal to humans) and then tore it apart (maybe they're caste-bound creatures; we don't know). You'll notice that in my comments, I was always playing along with the film makers, but I recognize that it's perfectly valid not to.

12 (edited by Squiggly_P 2011-01-13 21:41:59)

Re: District 9

OK, I guess I hit a nerve in another thread by saying that District 9 has some racist stuff in it, and that the ignorant monkey ghetto-bots in Transformers 2 weren't actually racist. This is gonna be a long-ass post, so I apologize in advance.

First of all, I will say that I was disappointed by District 9 is a number of ways, but it has it's good points - mainly concerning Wikkus, Christopher and his son and how their relationships evolved throughout the film. I will wait until after I get the racism stuff out of the way before I go further into the film as a whole and why it bothered me a lot, but I don't hate it or anything. After having seen it a few times, I just think it could and should have explored some of the interesting culture-clash potential. The reason the film didn't actually do that, in my opinion, was because the writer wanted to put in this allegory and some neat effects stuff instead of exploring his basic concept and taking a more interesting direction.

It's an allegory for apartheid, right? The film takes the idea of segregation and removes the human element from the equation. Instead of these things being black humans, they are a really ugly alien species. Now it's not just white humans repressing black humans, it's all of humanity repressing aliens. I think that's an interesting idea, but if you look at it in a certain way, it's really sort of insulting. These aliens are described as being lazy, shiftless idiots with no direction or motivation to better their situation. They eagerly trade everything they can find for cat food, which gets them high. They go out and steal shit to trade it for
cat food.

There's this one alien that seems intelligent enough, but the rest of them are a basically one step above wild animal.

Now, while I can see the parallels the film is trying to draw, where the people are making the broad generalized statements about the aliens, about how they're all stupid violent idiots who wallow in filth and have this dangerous addiction to cat food that can get out of hand, or they're these naive morons who get taken advantage of and can't help themselves because they just don't know any better, etc. Drawing a line between those aliens and black people during apartheid I feel is just a bit insulting.

You may as well just come out and say that most of the black people in south africa were crackheads who went around stealing shit to get their fix, and when they weren't doing that they were just being lazy and letting their living conditions become terrible because they didn't have anyone intelligent to tell them how to live. The thing about real racism and repression is that people who otherwise would go out and work and do the best they could to try to better themselves, support their families, etc can't do that because they are of a certain group and thus are restricted either by law or by society and that makes it very difficult for them to survive and prosper. These aliens don't really make any attempt to better their situation, and that comes off as a very unsympathetic trait to me and breaks a lot of the racism stuff going on. It turns them into a species of bums rather than a group that I can feel any empathy for.

Christopher just becomes "that one alien" who is different from the others, thus emphasizing how all the other aliens behave in basically the same manner. He's the one smart one, the one that seems to understand what's going on, the one that isn't apparently addicted to cat food, etc.

All of them are the same, except for this one. It's like the movie is just trying to tell me that because I identify only this one alien as being different from the others, that it is actually me who is the racist. Like "Oh, I hate most of them but this one guys is cool..." If I were to say that about black people it would be racist, because black people all behave differently because they're human. But saying that about these aliens seems to make sense to me, because they all actually do act the same.

In a way, the movie isn't really an allegory about racial injustice / equality so much as the film needed that sort of character arc for Wikkus. It wasn't really crucial to the plot or anything. you could have made the aliens quite happy on earth and well integrated, and just had Wikkus be the one asshole on the planet who hated them and he was the one in charge of some aspect of their society or whatever. You cook up some other insane reason for turning him into an alien and his character goes through the same sort of arc, and possibly causes everyone else to suddenly fear the aliens as well, making the event even more significant.

But, you know, it wouldn't have been as 'subtle' as making the film mimic apartheid.

I hope this all makes sense. My brain isn't very good at communicating ideas well with words.

As for Transformers 2 and it's supposed racism...  Making them look like monkeys could be argued as racist ,but their behavior, on the other hand, is totally not. If they didn't behave the way they do, then would the fact that they look like monkeys even matter? If the robots were voiced by white guys who just spoke the way the average white dude speaks be racist? I mean, wouldn't that imply that white people look like monkeys? That's totally racist, right?

I never got why people consider Jar Jar to be racist, either. Is it just because they have a black dude kinda swagger and talk funny to do the voice? I mean, is there some rule that says black people aren't allowed to play dumb people in any media because it would misrepresent their race as a whole? No other race I can think of has that problem. You see white guys play morons all the time. You see mexicans play morons, you see asians play morons... but a black guy plays a dumb guy or comedy relief and it's just racist?

Don't get me wrong, there's some pretty racist shit out there in films, but the transformer twins' behavior can be found in films that have entirely black casts and were written and directed by black people. Suddenly the ignorant ghetto talk is perfectly normal and OK? I mean, it doesn't seem to bother the tons of black people who are there working on the movie, right?

EDIT
I guess what I'm trying to say is that while the portrayals of the twins in T2 relies on stereotypes, you can find the same stereotypes in films that are made by black people, or for black people, or however you want to think about it. I like a lot of movies like Friday and Undercover Brother and Black Dynamite. The characters all behave in stereotypical ways and a lot of the jokes hinge on those stereotypes. I guess it's just the fact that a white guy made T2, or that the rest of the cast is largely white and they're supposed to be comedy relief, so that made it racist? Like Al Jolston making fun of black people? But if you made them human characters in a movie like Belly or Friday or Big Momma's House, they would just be another character. Hell, they'd probably seem more like straight characters when you put them next to someone like Chris Tucker or Martin Lawrence.
/EDIT

Anyway, blah on the racism stuff and back to District 9 and why it angers me:

See, I think the racism thing is a decent angle to take that story in, but I think they missed a whole lot of opportunities to add some depth to it. I think in the end they ultimately wanted to make it an action-type movie. If he had stuck with a more drama / suspense sort of plot he probably could have explored some really interesting things. The kids were a really good idea that they never explored. It bothered me that Christopher's kid didn't consider the planet he had been born on to be his home. Maybe as he had grown on earth he would have hit his teenage years and figured out that he'd been on Earth his whole life. May as well try to make it home, you know?

I would have liked to have seen the aliens here for a longer period of time and seen a couple of generations of aliens and their differences. You'd think the younger ones would be a lot more eager to try to integrate with the human society, and that would have probably made them a lot more sympathetic as characters than their parents.

I would have liked to have seen the story be more of a slice-of-life drama that just happened to be about a couple of aliens and maybe a couple of humans. The film as it is turns me off at the beginning because the characters are all totally lifeless, then it switches out of POV mode and Wikkus' plot takes over and it starts getting really really good, and then they start lining up action sequences for the last half hour of the film, and while there are some nice moments in those, the story went from interesting and unique with a couple of really great characters to genre-cliche predictable bullshit.

For what it's worth, tho, between when the characters stop being caricatures and archetypes up until Wikkus smacks Christopher over the head with that 2x4 in his shack... That's a pretty solid 45 minutes or so of great character building, great acting, great pace, pretty decent action with some nice little comedic bits and some nice dramatic moments with christopher. It's like this really awesome movie that's bookended by stuff I just didn't care for.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: District 9

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: District 9

Just to further Dorkman's rebuttal point above, science fiction stories are usually allegories for contemporary issues rather than literal representations. The prawns remind us of the apartheid, but they're not supposed to be a direct substitute for those under apartheid.

So calling the film racist for its portrayal of the prawns is taking the allegory too far. After all, prawns fly space in ships and black South Africans don't.

Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. - Carl Sagan

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: District 9

Re: District 9

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: District 9

Re: District 9

Next time I watch it I'll take this conversation into account and try to see it from that point of view. When I saw it in the theater I found it hard to imagine a series of events that would have created a situation like the one presented in the film. The movie tries to show you elements that give them some 'humanity', but then like you say, it also tries to make them seem as inhuman as possible.

I mean, I liked it well enough. The ending made me very happy, I love the character stuff in the middle, and the opening set-up doesn't annoy me that much. I will go see Neil B's next movie, cause I think he's a good director. The movie is just 30% questions with no answers, and part of my brain is saying "they couldn't have given answers because those answers would not have made any sense in the world they created".

Thumbs up Thumbs down

19 (edited by BigDamnArtist 2012-04-14 17:49:37)

Re: District 9

I went back and listened to this one the other day cause, well, roto is boring as shit. And I'm still trying to figure something out.

Your guys opinion on aliens has always been (As you've expressed on multiple other commentaries) that because they are ALIEN, they will be so far beyond our comprehension or ability to understand each other. Which I agree with. But then when you guys start talking about the black alien goo that infects Vickus, you guys (And especially Trey) suddenly get hung up on the fact that it seems impossible, and that because you've never seen a human body do that beforem it obviously can't be possible. And to pull a direct quote from Trey, I think, "There is nothing on earth that can do that!"

At which point I just wanted to scream at my monitor, "Yes Trey, you're right, nothing ON EARTH can do that. Thats kinda the fucking point." It's an Alien technology that no human has ever even seen before and it suddenly infects a human. Who's to say it couldn't rapidly alter our physiology. The human body all on it's own can do some pretty fucked up shit without any alien influence.


Also, you guys were talking about the shift in style from the documentary feel to the more filmic feel. And I'm just re-watching it now and that change comes in a lot sooner than I think you think. It actually starts as soon we meet Christopher. The first shot of him with the little dude and yellow prawn digging through the garbage is the first time we jump out of the docu style. And then when we jump back to Vickus it's the docu style again, and when the lab is being raided, everything that isn't Chris is Docu style, but the close ups on Chris watching the scene are very clearly a movie shot.

So I'm sure there's a point to that, but I can't tease it out right now.

ZangrethorDigital.ca

Re: District 9

Re: District 9

Alright, I was just wondering how you managed the disparity (in my head at least ) between those two sentiments. But that makes sense.

ZangrethorDigital.ca

Re: District 9

Re: District 9

24

Re: District 9

I saw District 9 was on IFC this afternoon, so after going back and listening to episode you guys did with District 9, I'm going to try to salvage that magic bean argument about the black fluid.

Trey, could it be possible that the black fluid is not "fuel" in the way we think of it but it is a pure version or some derivative of prawn DNA? The movie established to us that the weapons can only be activated by prawn DNA, so couldn't this apply to other forms of prawn technology such as a spacecraft? Christopher states that it took 20 years to collect that much liquid (which he could've harvested from dead prawns secretly over his incarceration).

This could also explains why after being infected by this liquid that, when injured his body begins to repair itself, it doesn't recognize this foreign DNA. Which could explain the transformation beginning with his left arm and why the transformation seems to not have a streamlined time cycle (since it only seems to noticeably changes after an injury that begins to heal).?

Just throwing it out there.

Thumbs up Thumbs down