I feel the same way about any story about a natural disaster. People will die randomly, I get it.

It was a fun little movie, and as Trey had said it knew exactly what it was. I'm very curious as to the post production, compared to Asylum films. It filmed last September, yet Trey according to his twitter was still doing shots for it almost a year later. Knowing the air date, was the studio not willing to pay for that work until close to when the money would be coming in?

Well, you see, you respect people more the less you hear from them. Like that Uncle who you loved until he thought you were old enough to hear his theories on Jews. By ignoring Twitter, I still have heroes smile

I think I have only ever seen one person's twitter feed, and that's because it's in a small box on his web comic's homepage.

Just saw an ad for this on scyfi, saying it's airing tonight (Saturday) at 9pm. Is this the movie you mentioned, Trey?

56

(248 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Some updates on Dorkman's Facebook page. He's out and about, with the goal of doing ComicCon next year. There's a picture of him at Benihana.

57

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I admire the fact the members of BMG are disposable. You can't identify any of them, so they're free to fire anyone wanting more money, as well as having a dozen touring versions if they wanted.

58

(7 replies, posted in Off Topic)

What the guy did is great. The doc itself, however, is structured a little too much like a pseudoscience film. The whole them against the art world part is exaggerated if not just made up. They compared works painted 500 years apart and implied the jump in realism was sudden and thus mysterious. I'd love to know if Penn did this intensionally, or if he just relied on the wrong people for his info. Given this was his friend he was filming, more benefit of the doubt may have been given to his beliefs.

Ooo eee ooo ah ah ting tang walla walla bing bang

60

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It must be an expectations thing. I saw it in theaters, and thought it was horrid. That was even without ever playing the games, just taking it at face value. Maybe I could watch it now and enjoy the badness.

61

(985 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Clara has been a companion for too long. I liked how they handled it in the older shows. They'd introduce a new companion just before the regeneration, so the new Doctor had someone tailored to his personality to play off of. Clara is starting to reach Jamie status.

62

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I don't think you can use Cameron as a comparison, as he was writing his films. Piranha 2 was the only time (I think) he was basically doing work for hire. The rest were original projects he somehow got funding for. Even Aliens was a case of talking the studio into resurrecting an old movie.

63

(18 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It's the kind of thing you do if you're from a Hockey city. I'd bet money the writer/director was from the North East or the Chicago area.

To be honest, though, the first trailer I saw that consisted of just that scene was labeled the "Canadian" trailer so I wondered if this was a non-movie scene and the sport would be changed for every area.

64

(18 replies, posted in Off Topic)

An interesting article about the "accuracy" of the movie smile The author is the head of the Skeptic's Guide to the Universe podcast.

http://theness.com/neurologicablog/inde … -metaphor/

65

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/4f/Castle_of_Cagliostro_poster.png

Lupin III: Castle of Cagliostro (1979)

Picked up the new Blu Ray of this last week, for the obscenely cheap price of $15. I'm thinking of posting a review over in that section, see if I can wake the crickets, but I'll post here too.

This is the first film directed by Hayao Miyazaki, who was an assistant director on the Lupin TV series and directed three episodes. Lupin is... well, a thief. A thief, a womanizer, and all around scoundrel. He is also the grandson of the great French thief Arsène Lupin, although this was done without the creator's estate's approval. For a decade or two the character's name couldn't be used outside of Japan, but that deal has expired.

The story? On robbing a casino, Lupin finds all the bills are counterfeit. Not only are they counterfeit, but they are the legendary bills that have been flooding Europe for a century. Deciding to check it out, he gets tangled up with a fleeing bride, and wacky mayhem ensues.

This is a wonderful movie, an influence on future shows as diverse as The Great Mouse Detective and the pilot of Moonlighting. Fun action set pieces, which take one minor mistake and logically snowball them to their obvious conclusion. If you are a fan of the character, the downside is Lupin is horribly out of character. He should be hitting on the young bride like craze, not being all noble and such. The rest of you shouldn't have a problem with that smile

The DVD has the Japanese track with both newly translated subtitles, and the 1980 theatrical subtitles. It also has three dubs: the 1990's Streamline dub (which is well acted but has jokes changed to try and appeal to middle America), the 2000 Manga dub, which added cursing to try and make it more like Manga's other releases, and a non-curse version of that dub. That's the one I'd recommend. There's also a "fan" commentary I haven't listened to yet.

Over all, this is a must see classic. The animation looks incredible, and just seeing a younger Miyazaki doing a comedy with some serious moments, instead of the other way around, makes you wish he had gone in a slightly different direction as a film maker. Mixed some comedy films in with his serious stuff. But, at least we have this.

66

(11 replies, posted in Episodes)

I want to see the new sex scene.

"OK, Kyle, you have to ejaculate in me at exactly 7:56:23 for John to be born! I've set the alarm!"

Naturally, because if it was pointed out nerds would have said "But Max both found then gave away the music box in that film! How could it be here?!?"

Sam F wrote:

Max had a son, not a daughter. Are you sure the girl was calling him Daddy?


Of course I'm not sure. I've only seen it once  smile

I do agree there's intensionally no continuity, and they're treating Max the same way you'd do a new Tarzan or Sherlock Holmes story. It's just been awhile since I've seen the original, and was wondering. Again, that just being a random girl from his past who thought of him as a father fits, assuming I heard the line right.

Finally managed to see this, my cousin and brother in law being the only others in the theater. Very fun. The most interesting aspect was HOW they showed the madness. Quite nice, with no details needed or given. Only the ghost girl calling him "Daddy" (iirc) seemed wrong. Was his kid that old in the first one? I can retcon it to being a girl who adopted him at some point, but that line wasn't needed.

70

(22 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Writhyn wrote:

OK, I understand what some people mean by characters having a personality and, while free-writing, they can behave in ways that surprise the writer.

I get that this is shorthand for "the writer can surprise themselves", but some people go so far as to insist the characters can't be limited by the story. Which is psychotic. The writer created them in his/her head, and they are subject to whatever imagined situation the writer is scribing!
Characters are not people. If they aren't "behaving" then the writer can change them.
Yes, it's important to maintain consistency within a character, but that is the cognitive process of the writer at work.

Naturally, the writer can change the character. However, that's missing the point. If you, the author, set up this complicated plot, with various twists and turns, lots of setup and payoffs, that's all well and good. However, if you then create characters whose personalities you've given them prevent them from following your plan, what was the point? Better to start with the characters, set them in the beginning, and base the twists and turns on what the characters do at each point. You get a much more natural, believable result, with actual people instead of robots.

I'm not sure how much fiction you've written, but when people talk about characters and stories writing themselves, that's how it can feel. It's spiritual claptrap, but it's useful. It's how I can go to bed with one idea of a story and wake the next morning with an entire new point of view on it, with no conscious thought on my part. The work seems to all get done subconsciously, and I have my own silly concepts for what's happening.

I'd recommend the anime El-Hazard (the original seven part OAV, not the TV show). It's set in a sort of Arabian fantasy world. It's also one of the few cases where the dub is actually better than the original.

There's Nazca, set in the old Incan empire, but that's only fantasy if you factor in reincarnation.

72

(22 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Feel free to steal it or pass the idea on. The story I developed around that, done in the form of a diary that someone else would take over, morphed into The Waifs so I managed to get things out of my system. That book isn't first person, though smile

73

(22 replies, posted in Off Topic)

redxavier wrote:

What you don't want to do (IMO) is kill characters just so that you can prove the danger of a situation. When Redshirt 21 steps on an ancient booby trap and is blown to smithereens, you're not fooling anyone that Kirk is going to do the same.

Ever since I was a teen and read 'All Quiet on the Western Front', I've wanted to write a first person story where the narrator dies in the middle. You turn the page, and get "Um, hi. I'm not Dave. See, things didn't go well last night..."

74

(22 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Writhyn wrote:

In my use, "earned" means that it makes sense for the story.

Ah. You probably mean "makes sense for the story you think you're telling". The reader will make sense out of the death, re-interperating the scenes around it if needed. Just remember to never "correct" them smile

75

(22 replies, posted in Off Topic)

A character's death doesn't have to be "earned". It simply has to make some sort of sense, even if only in the "the world is fucked and we're all going to die" way. I did a SF story about former teen soldiers trying to flee the solar system wide civil war. Death was all around them. The key, to me, is not to care what the death does to the reader. It's what it does to the other characters. How THEY react. Let the reader feel however they feel.

This may not work in a TV series, where you want viewers to come back next week, as opposed to a book where they've already bought the whole thing smile

http://www.asstr.org/~Invid_Fan/novels- … the-waifs/