1

(22 replies, posted in Episodes)

During an Ice Age, the world's water DOES accumulate as ice at the poles, lowering sea levels.  When the planet heats up again, the stored ice melts back into the ocean, raising sea levels again.  That's exactly how it works.

AI would have us believe that sea levels rose a hundred or more feet - presumably due to ice melt, because where else could the water come from?  And then a millenium later the earth froze... but somehow the water didn't recede again.

This would only happen if the whole world froze at once, a la Day After Tomorrow.  Which is theoretically possible for a few reasons - supervolcano eruption, meteor or comet impact, nuclear winter - some sort of disaster that covers the whole planet in heavy cloud or dust, blocking all sunlight and creating freezing temperatures across the entire planet simultaneously.

Although it's possible the movie had that in mind, it doesn't mention it. 

So at face value the movie seems to be saying "Earth warmed up, sea levels rose.  Earth cooled down, sea levels stayed the same".   Which suggests they didn't quite think their clever scheme all the way through.

Unless the movie is suggesting Manhattan sank INTO the sea, which is also rather a silly idea.

2

(238 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Welp, looks like ST:ID will fall well short of matching the opening weekend of the first one.  Not a bomb, but not exactly blockbuster-y either.  But it's making more than the first one in the rest of the world, so ultimately it shouldn't cause anyone to lose their job.

Data here (but don't click if you're still staying spoiler-free)  http://www.deadline.com/2013/05/star-tr … -and-imax/

Next weekend's results will really tell the tale, but even so, the "what went wrong?" post-mortems are already underway.  Overall this one's looking like a bit of a damp squib - it'll do okay in the end but it's not breaking any records or garnering a lot of raves.  If you actually look at the text of those "Fresh" Rotten Tomatoes reviews, they're mostly pretty lukewarm.

Still haven't seen it myself, btw.  Might later today.

3

(40 replies, posted in Episodes)

http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j92/godgeddoe/obama_applause_gif.gif

4

(40 replies, posted in Episodes)

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view/754962/applause-o.gif

5

(120 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://www.pinkfive.com/images/hifive.gif

6

(67 replies, posted in Episodes)

Why does this keep coming back to the weapons?   That's not what the complaints were about.

7

(67 replies, posted in Episodes)

I think The Bloggess has pretty much the best take on it...

Two uncomfortable truths: New Merida looks a little whorey. Fewer people care about this than you would think.

8

(1 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120421064123/thecabininthewoods/images/4/43/Mordecai-the-cabin-in-the-woods.jpg

9

(67 replies, posted in Episodes)

They also gave her an hourglass figure and bedroom eyes - that was the sort of thing that was objected to, not her outfit.

10

(40 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Survival Odds Low for Paramount Execs After Collapse of Poorly-Constructed Tentpole

11

(238 replies, posted in Off Topic)

A lot of people guess that, but actually - Sulu's clearly holding daisies and it was established in The Corbomite Maneuver that's he's allergic.

12

(238 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://www.pinkfive.com/images/i.chzbgr.jpg

13

(238 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Phil Plait says 'meh'.

14

(238 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Doctor Submarine wrote:

You guys have a very loose definition of what a "terrible movie" is.

Well, even without having seen the thing, I'm confident it's not "terrible" on the scale of Battleship or Transformers.   

I suspect the added outrage may be due to the first one being not-perfect, but at least fun, and a promising start for a new direction for the material.   Promptly followed by a face-plant.   

But it's early yet, too soon to know for sure if we've got another Matrix Reloaded or Iron Man 2 on our hands here.

15

(238 replies, posted in Off Topic)

FWIW, io9 - my go-to site for intelligent genre reviews - is also dispeased at being served reheated fan service instead of a story.

16

(238 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Haven't seen the movie, might see it eventually.  Not feeling much of a need yet.    So I've read all the spoilers because I don't care.   

Although the previous Trek wasn't perfect, what I liked most about it was the rather ingenious way it managed to free Trek from decades of continuity that had made it pretty much impossible to do anything interesting with the franchise.     And I'm still hopeful that JJ will do something similar with Star Wars, because it could use the same sort of canon-ectomy.

But yeah, based on the description of this new movie, it seems like that noble intent has been totally negated and replaced with simply dumping the Lego box of Fan Faves on the floor and reconnecting the pieces in random order.    It sounds like a fanfilm made by someone who's not actually a fan.    (See also Spaceballs, a comedic version of the same problem).

17

(20 replies, posted in Off Topic)

avatar wrote:

Question 3. You're ordering for you and your partner at a restaurant. You say to the waiter... "and [blank] will have the salad". How do you refer to your partner?

"Sweetpea"  is acceptable.  If it's 1912.

http://www.pinkfive.com/images/cal.jpg

18

(396 replies, posted in Episodes)

fireproof78 wrote:

The latter, definitely the latter one...
*doesn't really know*

'kay, fair enough.

19

(20 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I see the point, though.  The "horseless carriage" analogy is a good one, the idea that a new technology is first defined by the old technology it sorta resembles.  But cars don't actually have anything to do with horses, they're their own thing.   You could just as accurately call a car a "wombatless carriage" nowadays.  And "internet" has a better ring to it than "high-speed automatic telegraph", too.

To those of use who lived through the transition, we think of these devices as "phones that got smart". But the "phone" aspect is a minor function of what "smartphones" do now.  How often do they get used for actual voice communication, vs everything else you can do with one?     Even if "smartphone" remains the common name, the "phone" part is gonna need to be defined for younger folk pretty soon.   

You see, son - "phone" meant a device that ONLY let you talk to other people, and you could only use it when both you and the other person were holding interfaces that were hardwired into the wall of your house.   

Geez, Dad, that sounds awful, but I guess you needed some way to pass the time while you were lighting your woodstove, huh?

20

(16 replies, posted in Episodes)

I'd say it was robbed, yeah.   But Phantom Menace and Matrix were locks for nominations, so Mummy and Stuart were basically in a race for third place.   I'd bet they were pretty close in votes.

21

(33 replies, posted in Off Topic)

"Ernest Saves Crichton"

22

(40 replies, posted in Off Topic)

They HAD a third act, shot it, then decided it didn't work and shot a different one.

23

(40 replies, posted in Off Topic)

3D, not VFX.   It's the 3D conversion company they're talking about.

And it does say GROSS thresholds - doing it for NET is a fool's game, but I might take a chance on gross points if the threshold was low enough.  As in, "okay, if you make less than 100 mil global, you owe me nothing".  But it's a pretty safe bet this movie will do better than that.

24

(40 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Interesting Deadline article by a reviewer who's actually seen the flick and thought it was quite good... but speculates whether the bad buzz will take its toll...

http://www.deadline.com/2013/05/after-f … ng-corpse/

25

(23 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://www.gruffrhys.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/dark_star-213x300.jpg

John Carpenter and Dan O'Bannon did it first.