Search options (Page 1 of 32)

From the picture I saw, I can't really see an hourglass figure and bedroom eyes. Or the messier hair or bigger breasts that I've read about elsewhere. Are there other pictures that reveal the changes more clearly?

The 'changes' I do see appear to stem more from the transition from 3D CGI model to 2D drawing than a deliberate attempt to sexy her up. And really, that's sexy? Seems to me to be going too far to call this an insult to the character, as if Merida would never a nice dress and not be carrying her bow. Isn't that missing the point of the story, where Merida learns that she has responsibility and cannot always just do what she wants when she wants?

Rahh! Outrage! Loud noises! Because of course, the film itself remains untouched and impressionable girls aged 5-10 are probably, I don't know, going to be watching the film a lot more than they go visiting Disney parks and browsing the princess-themed website.

I'm not so sure I'd consider it objectively worse (especially since I prefer it). And whilst most of the criticism I've heard/read is justified, the Trek 09 has just as long a list of similar flaws. It's just done better more confidently and competently this time around, helped enormously by the fact that it's not a poorly done 'origin' story where the original crew arrive on the Enterprise by various strokes of happenstance as if ordained by destiny (wink wink).

On another note, I did not like the Starfleet uniform hats.

Oh yeah, I was totally, completely and utterly wrong about who Benedict Cumberbitches was playing. It was months ago and maybe no-one remembers my faux confidence, but that was a bad call.

Yeah, I found it quite difficult to find the right time to jump in to say something, and inevitably ended up talking over someone else who had also just started talking or vice versa. No-one wants there to be a moment of silence, so you've got 3 others all eager to avoid that by speaking as soon as the 4th has finished or seems to be. There seemed to be a slight delay too, possibly with my mic, where I would start talking and I don't think you guys could hear until that crucial millisecond too late. I really hate interrupting other people, hence the sometimes rather long stretches where you wonder whether I'm still there! We need a 'want to talk' flashing notification on the hangout

There are things I think of now which I wish I had said, like how the main weakness of The Motion Picture is that the dominant Decker-Kirk and Decker-Ilia relationships replace the core Kirk-Spock-McCoy dynamic and simply aren't as fun, making the film much more dull that it should have been. And to add to this, Shatner and Nimoy are playing their roles with almost deadly seriousness (relative to the other films). Oh well, live and learn. Did any of you take notes? I ended up jotting down my ratings at the beginning but a few times I forgot about something I had thought of whilst waiting to jump in. Did you guys get that?

I enjoyed it, always fun to actually chat with people about something like Trek and putting voices to names, as it were, was great to do after all this time.

So... yeah... moo-moo?

Just got back and loved it. Miles, miles better than the previous. Whilst it does have a couple of 'huh?' moments and it doesn't start as strongly, it has a great twisty-turney entertaining story and hits a lot of good notes (Enterprise dropping through clouds, oh my!).

It's still a lot more whizz bang than I'd like my Trek to be and was possibly more Star Wars than before, and but then I like the Motion Picture. I wish the next movie had that same kind of wonder, at the universe and discovery in general.

Except he doesn't even to seem to be aware that they are commonly called smart phones, or are frequently referred to by their brand name (e.g. i-phone). So he's ignoring all the name changing that has indeed taken place. Further, it's sort of like a guy coming down from the mountains saying that he needs a new name for his car because it has air-conditioning, radio, a sat nav, and a tv and dvd player. It's still a car, like a phone that does other stuff is still a phone.

I don't think there's much to be gained from thinking whether a name is appropriate - that seems to be the pursuit of marketing people when they want to sell you something or, as in this case, want to earn some kind of legacy by coining a new word/term.

I thought the Soloman Kane film was quite good, and did a 'Van Helsing' type character better than this Van Helsing. Which sort of makes me wonder if Huge Axman was right for the role and whether someone like James Purefoy would have done it better.

The only time I've truly liked 3D is when I watched an IMAX show at the Kennedy Space Station, being in a star field or so close to an astronaut I felt I could reach out and touch them was one of the greatest things I've ever experienced.

Still avoiding the trailer, but the poster looks awesome.

I've been writing a similar sort of story about astronauts for the last couple of years and I fear that once I've seen this I'll either abandon it or be unwittingly influenced by it... but I really want to watch this as it's my dream film. Shucks.

Not knowing anything about the franchise, the trailer has me interested. I like alien invasion/'today we celebrate our independence day type' movies so I'll probably see this. If only to see jets flying around in the sky and spaceships doing their thing. The only dodgy thing about this is kids.

I couldn't care less about who wrote the books this is based on, or about their personal politics. Most people we meet in life are going to say or think things that we disagree with, and rummage around enough in any closet and I'm sure we'll find something dumbass, racist, sexist or selfish things either said or done. You can't really be absolutionists about these things, and so you end up being selective with your outrage, or worst, obliviously prejudiced.