Re: The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug teaser trailer
fireproof78 wrote:Doctor Submarine wrote:I don't want Legolas back at all. He's not in the book, and he's only there for fanservice. Which is fine, whatever, bring him back for a cameo. But don't distract from the main storyline with some sappy romantic subplot between him and Elf-vangeline Lilly. A subplot which, by the way, looks to be wholly lifted from the Aragorn/Arwen story from LOTR, with the elf chick's father warning her not to go gallivanting off with the handsome rogue.
Wait...what?
Um, Thranduil is Legolas' father, not Tauriel's.
I don't think it distracts, and Legolas may not be in the book, but given the time line of events he should be there. That is Jackson's whole point, to flesh out the story with things that were happening as the Hobbit happened. The White Council, Azog are all technically things that don't happen in the book.
Yeah, but the White Council and Azog were awful additions to the first movie. Well, maybe not Azog. He was a pretty shitty antagonist, though. I get that you need one for the first movie, but surely they could have come up with a more interesting motivation than "KILL DWARF WHO CUT OFF MY ARM BECAUSE RAWR." And the White Council scene was fun in theory, but on screen it just dragged on and on... So you see why I'm not interested in seeing what Legolas was up to while Bilbo was on his quest. At this point, I barely care about what Bilbo and the dwarves are doing, and now Jackson expects me to get invested in another subplot? Fuck that.
Well, your mileage may vary (and obviously does), but I found the White Council and Dol Guldor parts very interesting in terms of fleshing out the mythology, and seeing Saruman in a different light.
Azog's motivation never bothered me because it is explained in the film well enough to satisfy me, at least.
I get why you don't care for it, and I'll grant that Tauriel is an annoying addition, but I have no problem with Legolas being there. Also, as for my own point of view, I don't see Legolas as one subplot, Thranduil as another, Bard and Beorn another and another. I see as characters participating in a much larger drama that unfolds with greater and greater consequences. So, I don't need to be as invested in each individual subplot, as I am already invested in the characters and the development of the world.
Hope that made some sort of sense...