Topic: Cosmos 2.0 with Neil deGrasse Tyson
Calling all science nerds.
What do you think of Neil deGrasse Tyson's new COSMOS series?
How's it compare to Carl Sagan's original?
I've seen the first two episodes, and it's not bad. I thought it might be like the History Channel / Discovery Channel / National Geographic channel shit that passes for factual content, but Cosmos is classy, restrained, and a treat to look at. [Americans, why are there so many crap documentaries on H2, etc?)
The evolution episode was somewhat defensive (engaging with all the Christian nutjob arguments) but that was to be expected.
And they resisted the temptation to endless repeat the meteorite that killed the dinosaurs. In fact, they didn't show it at all in the section on extinctions. Nor spectacle on what life looked like in Titan's lakes.
The DNA animations were a bit 'sparkly-glowy', but well done. The theme music is non-distinct (the original Cosmos had a great soundtrack). The historical animation of Bruno in the first episode was a surprising in-your-face to the Catholic Church.
The Titan sequence looked great.
I wrote to Neil deGrasse Tyson about 2 years ago urging him to resist the producers' pressure at Fox to dumb it down, and he was nice enough to write back and assure all that they had free reign. Must be Seth's influence.
Good to see some call-backs to Carl Sagan's original series occasionally too.
Looking forward to more episodes. Not that science nerds will actually learn anything new, but it's nice to see it all packaged in a glossy well-produced way. The roll out to 170 countries is amazing distribution. I wonder which countries ARE NOT getting it.