2,701

(569 replies, posted in Creations)

Disney's already secured the rights to turn it into a new land at California Adventure featuring a 4D ride film.

paulou wrote:

Segodzilla

Am I the only one who thinks this sounds like Godzilla turned into a really stereotypical french poet or something.

"I am 'ow you zay segodzilla."

2,702

(39 replies, posted in Episodes)

Squiggly_P wrote:

Now I wonder what would happen if you gave Tarantino a superhero movie...

My brain just melted a bit trying to comprehend this.

Paulou wrote:

Give me as many movies as possible of Ruffalo and Downey hanging out in a research lab punching the clock. No superpowers, no action. Just them being smart and researching and uh, contentious respects.

This. Just this all over the place. I want it on the walls, on the ceiling. EVERYWHERE.

2,703

(569 replies, posted in Creations)

fcw wrote:

To be fair, crashing the aircraft carrier through that fleet of cruise liners was pretty awesome too.

Well of course, I assumed this was implied.

I'm still sad that that entire cruise liner convoy subplot had to be cut out, it really was great. I'm not sure I'll ever be able to get that cover of Convoy that NIN did out of my head.

2,704

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

2,705

(569 replies, posted in Creations)

You'd be surprised how little difference there is between 4 million and 5 million ducks when it gets put on film. If he had to spend it anything, he should have spent it on practically blowing up at least another aircraft carrier. You know one is good, but 2 man. That's something special.

2,706

(569 replies, posted in Creations)

Zarban wrote:

This IS getting a theatrical release, right? I mean, the budget for my alligator/wolf hybrid transformation effect alone was staggering. I'm eager to recoup that.

SO. FUCKING. EXCITED.

I mean the buzz about that scene has been everywhere. Although I guess that's what happens when you have to farm out to 3/4s of the VFX houses in the western US and Canada

2,707

(15 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m39dm8hyx21qe31lco1_r1_500.jpg

  Show

Zarban wrote:

It's funny that you say that, because from a cinematic point of view, they don't even meet for ages and their storylines hardly cross until then.

Yeah, in the book we get a huge amount (Relative to the movie) of back story for lisbeth, we meet her mother, we find out why she is as tortured as she is, which plays into the whole theme of the entire piece which is the abuse and hatred of women (In swedish the book is literally titled "men who hate women"), she has a lot more interaction with Armansky, and he has a whole thing with her. And then once Blomkvist does meet her, her skills are used more... effectively and more often, and like I said last time. And plus their relationship gets developed waaaay more than it does in the movie. The only reason Blomkvist actually solves the case is because of Lisbeths skills and contacts. And she is also the only reason wennerstrom gets taken down, but that point plays out pretty much the same as the book.


Zarban wrote:

I can see that, but I would say to the author, "If it's not about the cleverness of the mystery, then don't make it a locked-room mystery. Make it an ordinary disappearance." Because the motivations are screwy. Why try to confide in the kindly uncle and then disappear and never contact him again and reassure him that you're okay? Why never expose Martin anonymously?

I would argue that, while it's not about the cleverness of the mystery, it is about Vanger Corp, and meeting and exploring this warped and twisted family, and the paranoia that Vanger has had to live with because the only logically explanation for Harriets death is that one of the family members that was on the island did it.

And to the second half. I would say, she was a 15 year old girl. She was terrified and traumatized. The only reason she went to Vanger was to try and get out, but then Anita filled that role. I completely buy the idea that she thought the only way to be safe would be to completely and entirely disappear (And I'm sure Anita did nothing to dissuade that idea). And then when she was safe, all she wanted to do was to forget. So she did, and she left the Vangers behind and lived her life. If she had just outright contacted Vanger, Martin would eventually find out, and she would no longer be safe because Martin would make a point of finding her; so she sent the flowers thinking those would be the assurance he needed, but of course he read it the wrong way and assumed it was the killer taunting him.

As for exposing Martin anonymously? How? She has no proof. Martin is the head of Vanger corp, granted not nearly the empire it was, but he still has some clout. No one is going to go bust down his door and search the house because some anonymous tip said so. And there's no guarantee they would even find anything, Martin has been doing this entire life, he knows how to cover his tracks and clean up after himself. Hell, he has dinner guests over while he has victims in his torture room. The dude knows what he's doing.

2,709

(956 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m3kkdfxLQZ1qa0uujo1_1280.jpg

2,710

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

Looks like we won't have to wait til the weekend for that billion dollar mark.

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=3443&p=.htm

Have you read the book Zarban? Just wondering.

  Show
I think one of the problems I had with the movie is how much they make the mystery the main story. In the book it's much more that Blomkvist is the main story, and the mystery just happens to be one of the main things that's happen to him for most of it. And the romantic entanglements and then eventual Lisbeth (Who is teamed up with Blomkvist super early in the movie, which I get from a story angle, it's just something that struck me watching it), and his whole rivalry with Wennerstrom play much stronger in the book than the movie, and I think the movie suffers for it.

The twist...yeah, another thing that when I was watching got a total...wtf?! Because it's...while not entirely different from the book, it is changed in a direction that made me go, "alright that makes no gods damned sense". In the book, Anita finds out about what her father was doing and her brother is doing to her, and sneaks Harriet out in her trunk the day after, Harriet assumes a copy of Anitas identity and movies to Australia. There she eventually marries into a large farming company and eventually ends up running it (I think I have that right, either way she ends up running a large farming company in Austrialia). So when Blomkvists figures out that Anita snuck her out, he enlists Lisbeth and her...freinds, to help uncover where Harriet is living now. So basically he confronts Anita saying "I know whats up" and Anita phones Harriet saying "Shits going down, stay cool.". They track the call and Blonkvists flies to Austrialia to meet her. We get her whole story there, and she agrees to fly back. And eventually ends up helping run Vanger corp, while also expanding the company with her company in austrailia.

The whole way it works in the movie just feels out of left field. Granted the general concept is still roughly the same, but the way it plays out in the books feels very natural, where as in the movie it feels almost like a Deus Ex Machina that he just happens to know where Harriet is after the whole spy thing fails

But I would still argue that the very conventional ending is the point. It wasn't any grand master plan of some amazing serial killer that smuggled her off the island. No it was her sister that loved her and wanted to see her safe from her brother and father, so she smuggled her out in the trunk of her car. In the end everything about this story is about family. Whether it's a family that rapes together, or a family that saves each other.

2,712

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

Dave wrote:

I wonder where Odin was while his kids lay waste to America? Honestly, patents these days. Never would have happened if they'd had a damn good clip around the ear instead of being sent to the naughty step.

I think they briefly address that, when Thor lands on the plane and comes in, Loki has quick line about how "Odin must have had to summon up a lot of ju-ju juice to get you here."

It's something like that, basically it's assumed that Odin had to manually send Thor across the barrier, and it nearly put him a coma, or something like that.

2,713

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The Sarcastic Fringehead
Also known as the OMGKILITKILLITWITHFIRE!!!
Also also known as the, "Well, we always knew the predators had to descend from something."

I love underwater life so a couple more.


I'm in awe that a relationship this complex and harmoniously beneficial just emerges naturally in the wild.


The shots from inside the swarm just don't look real, it's stunning.

And one of my personal favorites.

Zarban wrote:

The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo was not what I was expecting. It was good, but I expected more of a thriller aspect, with some chases and a bit of action. Instead, it was kind of a straight up mystery and ended up leaving me with the feeling of an episode of Murder, She Wrote that had been rewritten for HBO and stylishly produced.

Spoilers for TGWTDT

  Show
I very purposefully didn't watch the film until I had read the books. (I still havn't had a chance to watch the swedish version, so I can't compare there) But the film felt very brief, idk, the best way I can describe it is anorexic. The bones are all still there, but there's no flesh, no meat to it. The movie never really bothers or cares to show us what Lisbeths deal is outside of the whole rapey thing. Almost all of the romantic aspects of the characters are entirely excised; Berjer and Blomkvist are only really a thing mentioned in passing, and thats only so that the ending of the book could be shoehorned onto the end of the movie; and Cecilia is simply a non entity. Essentially everything of any real substance, character wise, was pared down to it's bare minimum needed to allow for the beats that needed to happen to solve the case.

At the end of the movie, I didn't actually feel anything, the movie had never really given me anything to care about. It had just sort of laid itself out in front of me like a case file, just a series of names, dates and pictures. And while it's a great metaphor, it's not great for a movie. And which is the complete opposite from how I felt when I finished the book.

2,715

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

But as soon as he was actually on board he was free range. So that can't be right.

And now I can't stop thinking about freerange hulks.

I'm curious what your issue with it is.

And I think the guys like it...it's been a while for me too.

Weird I thought that's one of the ones we loved.

I guess I'll just have to sit over here and love it all by myself.

Xtroid wrote:

Mars Attacks >>> Independence Day.

Really? Huh. I like Mars Attacks, but I'd put them closer to even than anything.

Sweeney Todd is great because all Tim Burton had to do was be Tim Burton. The music and everything were already there, he just had to goth it up (Although if you know anything about the actual show...not much more than what was there) and make it. I love Sweeney Todd (The musical, not Burtons specifically), and the only reason I'll watch Burtons version over a broadway one is Johnny Depp and HBC. And the fact that it's wrapped up in a nice little package of a movie.

Although Squiggly, you forgot Big Fish, which is probably even closer to normal movie than Ed Wood. And just to get it out of the way, I love Big Fish with a passion. Easily my favourite Burton movie.

And although it's not perfect by a long shot, I did enjoy Corpse Bride.

2,719

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

Zarban wrote:

We're all adults. Let's sexualize everyone!

I approve this message.

2,720

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

Dorkman wrote:
BigDamnArtist wrote:

My god. You honestly believe it doesn't cut both ways.

It demonstrably doesn't.

What a charmed life you must lead. Never having anyone hold you up to a gold standard the media shoves down our throats, that no living man can even hope to match. And of course we all know that it's impossible for something like that to drive a man to have low esteem, or even gods forbid an eating disorder. Because they're stereotyped as being strong and in control, so it's impossible for a man to be weak, right? That's how this works, right? Just like all women are sexual objects only here to stared at and used?


You can sit there and be snarky and dismissive all you want, but that doesn't change the fact unrealistic portrayals of either sex in the media, cut both ways. (And yes, by the guys of the Avengers being these unattainable perfections of what man should be, they are being sexualized. And same goes for Black Widow...except about women...yeah. It's that simple.)

And back to point. In the Avengers image, Black Widow has her particular assets on display because that's what the media believes all men want women to be. And the guys are shown as dominating and powerful because that's what they believe all women want men to be like (And every girl I've talked to about the movie has not proved that wrong yet.)

2,721

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

My god. You honestly believe it doesn't cut both ways.

So yeah, I'm walking away from this.

2,722

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

Dorkman wrote:

You're right, there isn't one. The men are dominant and powerful and the women are comparatively weak sexual objects there almost solely as eye candy.

You seem to be under the opinion that portraying men as dominant and powerful isn't sexualizing them.

There's a reason a market for those books exist. It's to fantasize that they are the ones in his arms, being rescued, wooed, whatever. To be lost in the powerful arms of a strong man.

Please explain to me how that is any different than the millions of guys out there thinking about Scarlett's ass.

2,723

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

http://www.trashionista.com/images/2008/01/08/ladyofwinter_bg_042.jpg

Long flowing hair. Check.
Flexed, bulging muscles. Check.
Overly dramatic lighting. Check.
Pose that screams I'm trying to be cool. Check.

The only difference I'm seeing is that the novel covers all have half dressed women fawning over the man. Is that what it takes for something be considered sexualizing the male form?

From where I'm sitting, Captain Americas suit is pretty tight. So is Black Widows. Hell, Hawkeyes in a tanktop.

By your own example of romance novel covers, the men and women are very clearly displayed differently. The man is meant to be commanding, in charge, dominating. Check for the avengers. While the woman is letting a little something show, if you know what I mean. Also check.

I don't see how there is any difference.

2,724

(11 replies, posted in Off Topic)

That's the weird thing though, I didn't actually understand any of it at the time. Like I said, it was just this thing, that everyone said was really bad and I could tell because everyone was so horrified, but just a thing standing in between me and my cartoons when I was sick. And only as I grew up that the horror actual became real.

Anyways, new story. This one probably won't be interesting to most of you, but it stands as a high (incredibly low?) mark for me, as it contains a record that still stands to this day. Also this might come off a bit angry towards a certain person, but trust me it's not unjustified.

So, first year at VFS, about 4-5 months into the program we get this project. 13 shots, horror film, 3 minutes. So. One of the guys in our class had this idea to do a full sci-fi epic with it. And me being, well, me, decided that would be awesome, and I manage to get a few other guys interested and we team up. We spend the next week or so convincing our instructor to let us do it. He finally gives in. So we spend a week or so (The week right before a break) brainstorming ideas and coming up with a story. So I feel we have some good ideas going around, but that we need to have a script locked before the break so we could launch straight into preproduction and production right away (It was maybe 4 weeks from deadline, from when we got back)...and they all agree, the guy who created the group says he can do it, no problem. 4 days later. Nothing, despite his constant assurances he was "working on it". So break comes and he has nothing. So I say fine, screw that,... and I spend a couple days over break writing the script. No big deal for me, I enjoy doing it, and it's not like I had anything better to do.
We get back from break, I have script in hand, the rest of the guys love it...he puts up a fight. So I spend the next few days fighting with him about it, while also trying to put wheels in motion to actually get the fucking thing made.

Now some info. Our team was 5 guys. 2 afx guys, 2 3D guys and a sound guy. 3 of them were awesome and one of them was me.

Anyways. So I start stressing out, trying to find actors, get costumes together, building 3D models, texturing, yada yada you know the drill. Finally we find some actors, one is awesome and I still know him to this day, the other not so much, but beggars can't be choosers. We do the shoot (Full greenscreen btw, with one of the actors in full makeup), on a greenscreen set that was was too small. The shoot goes off well for the most part...until we get the footage back. Someone *cough* not naming names *cough* who said they knew "everything about the cameras", had left the gain on high. And if you don't know anything about cameras...basically that meant the footage was grainy as FUCK. Meaning virtually impossible to key. So anyways. Myself and the other 3D guy are pumping out renders, we had an entire lab and a half running our renders for nights on end. And we're passing on our renders to the afx guys (well guy...a certain man decided to not really be in the picture at this point). All this time the sound guy has been collecting recordings and effects and doing a seriously kickass job.

So in our short, we have some holographic displays, like you do, and a certain...ahem...person, was supposed to be in charge of half of them. Well needless to say 3 days before deadline he finally has something to show me. I say fine whatever chuck it in there let's go (This will make sense soon).

So a week before deadline comes (Again only 4 weeks earlier we had nothing but a script) and we barely have a movie. So I sit myself down and start working...for 5 days straight. I go to classes in the day, go home and work, shower go to school work, stay all night, go home, work, shower, come to class. For a week. Part of this was stress induced insomnia as you can imagine, part of it was an overwhelming passion to make this work. By the end of the week we were all staying there all night. We finally, finally got our final render out 15 minutes before the class it was due and being presented in. I was fried beyond anything I had ever before or have ever since experienced. So I hand over the dvd and crash in a chair.

It plays, and everyone loves it. I'm happy. I'm seeing spots...closest I've ever gotten to hallucinating btw. I tap out and head home (70 minute train ride...that just about killed me) get home and crash for 26 hours (It was the weekend, don't worry).

Now about that hologram my dear comrade "designed" and "created" from "scratch". A couple months after the project was done and I'd managed to repress most of it. I decided to watch, Iron Man of all things. And I noticed a remarkably familiar item. Needless to say I was pissed, but by then it had sort of become common knowledge this was not even remotely out of character for him, suprise suprise. So I didn't even bother.

So that's the story of the most intense film-making experience I've ever had. Oh and if you're wondering, the film in question is here: (I know the copyright thing might come around to bite me in the ass eventually, but I'm not doing anything with it and it's just sitting there and it's not going anywhere, I think you'll see why. But it still sucks):


(Yep, it's horrible. but remember, this is pretty much the first real movie I ever made. And we did it in 5 weeks, with effectively 4 guys).

So in conclusion, I used to be even more fucking insane than I am right now. Of course, without that I never would have gotten the taste of blood for directing and I'd probably be a very different artist than I am now. So there's that.

2,725

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

Remebered a couple things,

First off, props to Black Widow for actually out psyching the god of trickery and mischeif. I mean....damn girl.

Secondly, props to Joss for not doing the mushy last minute I love you between Tony and Pepper.

Thats really all I had.