Expectations suitably lowered, thanks. At least it's not like I have to rush through the remaining 2/3rds of the book, considering I have at least a few years before the next comes out ![]()
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Phi
Expectations suitably lowered, thanks. At least it's not like I have to rush through the remaining 2/3rds of the book, considering I have at least a few years before the next comes out ![]()
I'm slogging through the Dance with Dragons audiobook. Can someone tell me that the ending is awesome? I really enjoyed up to Storm of Swords, but then Feast for Crows was slow with a really abrupt end and Dance with Dragons isn't much better. Too many new characters and new story lines that I don't really care about. I get that the two books are parallel and I'm hoping that the "real" ending is in Dance with Dragons.
The book (Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?) is reasonably clear that Deckard is not a replicant, but I think it's been stated that the movie was only loosely adapted from the book. Certainly lots of other parts are rather different too (no electric sheep, the whole Mercerism thing, the other main character J.R. Isidore, most of the plot, and the ending).
Honestly, as far as I could tell it didn't really matter whether the whole lot of characters in the movie were replicants. Certainly they didn't act like humans. To be fair, the book was not much better at making me give a damn about the characters.
I do not love our blurray player. It is slow as molasses and takes more than a minute just to load the menu of most new discs.
But it does show all the pixels.
Curious Spiff and Sabeel want to know which slap was the one DIF found funny? The first one with the glove or the second in the long take?
If I remember correctly, LCC was started back in the heyday of fan films when there was a running trope of "Oh man, not another lame lightsaber fight in a forest. Do something more interesting people!". I think the theory was to gather up all the lightsaber fights in one place, and encourage other fan films for the rest of the year. Also to encourage better lightsaber fights.
Considering that the LCC is now probably the largest producer of Star Wars fan films these days, I think the first part of the theory backfired. On the up side, the fights themselves are much improved.
As for having a sort of "Fan Film Oscars", it's definitely been discussed in many threads. The big problem is the limited number of fan films that come out each year. Fully made fan films can take years to come out, and barely any are made these days. Also, as Teague says, it's hard to come up with rules and judging criteria. "What's your favourite fan film?" is another cliche thread on TFN fan films.
Being Canadian, maul2 is allowed to use British spelling. Being American, Teague is allowed to make fun of him for it ![]()
The behind the scenes about that shot from Tom-Yum-Goong/The Protector is crazy. It's four minutes long because that's how much film they could fit in the camera, and in one of the earlier takes they ran out of film just as Tony was getting up the last stairs. Once more with faster ![]()
I don't know what Zarban is talking about it being dull. It's like watching an impressive performance at a circus. There are no breaks or pauses or cuts around flubs; what you see is what was performed on set. Damn impressive.
I think Kyle's was actually The Life Aquatic, but I don't have a new one in mind. Go Zarban Go!
Trey's answer was correct for mine, so he wins twice. In retrospect, influence =/= bend, and curve would have been better. Either way, the TV series was awesome, but we're only doing movies here.
Brian's turn.
Usually N is a number, so it works if you're talking about the series in general (Journey to the Heavens N), but not so much if you're replacing N with a phrase. The confusing thing is I think you were doing both.
I bet he'll complain about the new characters randomly introduced with some retconned back story the writers dragged out when they were low on ideas.
I remember reading an interview with Alfonso Cuarón where he talked about making Children of Men. Basically he liked the premise, but didn't particularly care for the book. I think he didn't even read it, but had other people read it so they could fill in blanks for him. So he took the 'magic bean' and the themes and the characters (sort of) and made his own thing. He was also not interested in the Human Project at all, which is why the movie doesn't even go there.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Phi
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.