276

(209 replies, posted in Creations)

Eddie wrote:

I've said things in private, but let me partially echo Mike's sentiment.  This thing lives and dies (no pun intended) by performance, and I truly feel like the performance Teague gives anchors it.  Watching it again, I feel like the best description I can give of the music is that it feels so organic that it practically leaks out of Max, as opposed to him performing it.  I may be in the minority, but the first song for Gary floored me, and I think its the best song by far.  I was engaged the whole time, it packed a deep emotional punch, and had just the right amount of humor.  I liked it even better the second time.

I told Teague more or less the same thing during our commentary. I love Gary's song. Poor fish.

277

(33 replies, posted in Episodes)

That's a fair point, and with that hindsight, I guess I'm glad I wasn't the one to post this there. smile

278

(33 replies, posted in Episodes)

So, this was linked to on Whedonesque (someone else beat me to it), and the responses to it kind of mirror mine, but I'm nowhere near as harsh about it: There's some unfortunate, revisionist history going on here, coming from a group who don't seem to know much about it in the first place, didn't bother doing research but speak with such passion and authority, it's at least fun and enjoyable to listen to, if nothing else than to instigate some interesting discussions.

Boy, that was a hell of a long, run-on sentence. Sorry. Anyway....

The biggest issue here is regarding Dollhouse. Joss Whedon created that show. Eliza had a production deal with 20th Century Fox. She wanted to work with Joss again, so she invited him to lunch and they were just talking about how this business is all about trying to be someone else for other people and how she's trying to find and maintain her own identity through all that. She had also recently witnessed the struggles and triumphs of former child slaves and child soldiers in Uganda.

As they were talking about all of these things, the wheels started turning inside Joss's head, he excused himself to the restroom and when he came back he said, "It's going to be called Dollhouse and this is what it's going to be about". He then proceeded to lay it out for her and they used some of those points together to build this vehicle for Eliza so she could play all of the roles that she was never able to play before because Hollywood is very narrow-minded and short-sighted.

Dollhouse was their baby. It's okay if you spent a day with that baby and decided the baby was boring or obnoxious and you didn't want to spend anymore time with it. I get that. Dollhouse was a very cerebral show, dealing with very dark, heavy subject matter that not everyone wants to sit down with a big bucket of popcorn and watch/listen to/think about. If I had to rank Whedon's TV work, I would put Dollhouse at the bottom. Not because I think it's terrible. I do like the show, but I don't love it. While most are quick to point a finger at Fox (the network) as the saboteur, I think the problems with the show are more internal and fundamentally flawed and conceptually wonky, but that's a lengthy discussion for another time.

I did very much enjoy this episode, and I'll conclude my thoughts with this, which I copied from my comments posted on Whedoesque about this:

"I feel it's a bit snobby to dismiss what these guys are saying because they're not rabid Buffy or Dollhouse fans. There are Joss fans of all shapes and sizes and colors. Some love all of it, some love only certain parts of it. You can apply that to just about anything.

Beyond that, I would also argue this episode is worth listening to through completion. Once they get past the talk of Whedon's early TV work (and how much of it they haven't seen), not only do they get into what they have seen (Firefly and his feature film work, namely Twister and Serenity), but it's all about how much they totally love it and why. They talk about what makes Joss such a solid, efficient writer.

I've been listening to these guys for a couple years now. So they've not seen Buffy (except for Eddie, who has seen all of that show and loves it) and didn't care for the few episodes they've seen of Dollhouse. Big deal. A lot of people are in the same boat and that's okay. Personally, I'm still interested in what they have to say."

I also feel these comments made by two separate folks over there are worth mentioning:

"Oh, I have nothing against the fact that they aren't fans. I don't like that they make judgements and discuss things they don't know about. And I agree that their discussion gets more interesting after the first 7 or 8 minutes.

I never mind when someone doesn't like something, on 3 conditions.
One: They give it a chance
Two: They have actual criticism or reason behind thier dislike
Three: They don't talk as if they're experts on the subject and why it's terrible after only seeing a small portion (or none) of the work."

2nd commenter:

"Wow, what? Joss didn't know Dollhouse was about slaves until later? And he didn't even create it, it was Eliza's idea she brought to him? I don't have a problem listening to opinions that oppose my own on podcasts - in fact I do it all the time - but this makes me crazy. Get your facts straight and maybe I'll listen to your podcast. I couldn't even get through 4 minutes of it."

279

(56 replies, posted in Creations)

Okay, so do you want to plan for this Saturday at 11pm Eastern/10pm Central?

280

(56 replies, posted in Creations)

Okay, so I'd like to officially do this commentary this weekend (the 24th). Whoever is available that day and still wants to participate, let me know and we'll schedule a specific time.

281

(209 replies, posted in Creations)

Oh, what's this then? http://tinyurl.com/6n2hcqs

282

(209 replies, posted in Creations)

Sad Max is now linked to on Whedonesque. Not sure if it will stay there. I've had issues with some of the Moderators in the past (as well as lately) regarding the "inconsistent" measurements on what passes for "Front page worthy", among other disagreements. Point is, if it's taken down, at least I tried.

283

(209 replies, posted in Creations)

Wait, there's a Firefly reference in one of the songs? Where?

284

(209 replies, posted in Creations)

07:34 in and I'm like, "Oh God, no! Please don't eat Gary!"

Please check it out and enjoy:

http://www.sofadogs.libsyn.com/webpage/-238-drive-2011-

286

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

I think Teague mentioned to me that DiF was happening this weekend, but I'm curious as to the what and when? Today? Tomorrow? And to quote Steve Martin, "What in the hell is it?!" smile

287

(56 replies, posted in Creations)

Okay, so here's my situation: I'm moving soon (April 6th) and there's a strong possibility I will be out of commission for podcasts for a while. My podcast, Sofa Dogs is turning 6 years old on April 2nd. I want to have content to post in my absence, so I'd like to bank at least 4 episodes by the start of April. Due to the lack of movement on the Fast & The Furious commentary, I thought I'd try to make it happen, some time between now (March 11th) and the 31st of March. Anyone who is serious about doing this, and feels they can schedule availability within that window, e-mail me: sofadogs AT gmail DOT com. I can record the whole thing, so all you have to do is show up on Skype with something to say. smile

Obviously, this request goes out to the original party (Teague, Matt Vayda, Dave, bullet3, Zarban, etc.). That should be plenty of voices. Any more could result in Talking Head Syndrome, with folks talking over each other, or not having enough room to get their points in. If there's anyone who just simply can't do it, please give your spot to someone else who wants to participate.

In addition to the reasons stated above, I'm also doing this because I've had this movie on my hard drive for a month now and I'd like to get it off of there. It's taking up 5 gigs of space that could be used more productively. Also, I'm just impatient at this point and feel that if we're gonna do this, then let's do it! DiF's recent LOTR epic commentary has inspired me.

288

(43 replies, posted in Episodes)

Teague wrote:

I can emulate it in text form, I guess. Or it can come up in "pet peeves about your industry," an Intermission style topic that just occurred to me.

That Intermission episode should be called, "Bitching About The Job". smile

289

(56 replies, posted in Creations)

bullet3 wrote:

For clarification, what's 2000 EST?

8:00.

290

(69 replies, posted in Episodes)

For my thoughts on Nolan's Batman films so far, there's this:
http://www.sofadogs.libsyn.com/webpage/ … gins-2005-
And then this:
http://www.sofadogs.libsyn.com/webpage/ … ight-2008-
I know it's basically cheating, but these are more fun to listen to, instead of having to read me repeating myself in a long-winded fashion.

And for fun (while also addressing some issues mentioned in this thread), there's this:

291

(56 replies, posted in Creations)

For those who are confused by military time, 1400-2200 translates to 2:00 PM to 10:00 PM.

Anyway, I can do Monday easy. In fact, right now, I'm completely open except for Thursday night at 9 PM Central (that's 2100, if you prefer). Like Matt, I'll just play it safe and keep my Skype open throughout the day (especially since I don't/can't always keep tabs on when this thread has new posts).

If something comes up, I'll just change my status on my Skype profile or whatever and in that, I'll let people know when I'm coming back. For example, you might see something like this: "Shower time. Back in 30." When I'm available and ready, it'll just read, "One Mile At A Time". smile

292

(25 replies, posted in Episodes)

"Those who exchange cookies for safety deserve neither!"
-Michael "Dorkman" Scott

This needs to be a DiF shirt. Kinda now. smile

293

(56 replies, posted in Creations)

So, when might we try this again?

294

(23 replies, posted in Episodes)

Even for those who liked the film, you'll probably still enjoy this. And for those of you who more or less hated the film, then you'll fucking love it! http://www.the-editing-room.com/red-state.html

295

(56 replies, posted in Creations)

That works out just fine for me. Looking forward to it. See you tomorrow!

296

(56 replies, posted in Creations)

I'm not positive, but I think I'll be available then. I'm going to visit some friends and play board games, while another group films a web series in the back yard. smile However, I think my ride for that won't be picking me up until after he gets off work, which should be around 9:30 PM, Central. I'll acquire the flick later today and let you know in the mean time if I'm good to go on Saturday. smile

297

(56 replies, posted in Creations)

Matt Vayda wrote:

John: Don't worry about it; I may not have been clear enough about it, but I was simply suggesting Saturday as a test, not the actual recording.  A dry run if you were, to make sure everyone's setup will work, get to know each other, etc.

Oh, well that's certainly good news. Glad to know I haven't actually missed out on this.

298

(56 replies, posted in Creations)

Ah, fuck. There's a sci-fi convention on Saturday the 11th, and I'm still undecided as to if I'm going to attend. sad

299

(31 replies, posted in Episodes)

Fido wrote:
johnpavlich wrote:

@Fido - I believe it's on both the DVD and Blu-ray. I remember listening to it when I rented the DVD. Last time I checked, the BD was available on Amazon for $6 or something crazy cheap like that!

DVD just arrived and methinks the commentary was just for the US release as my eBayed one contains nothing  sad.
Shoulda really asked the seller beforehand.. darn it mad
- someones getting a KKBB DVD for their birthday.  big_smile

I completely forgot you're not a resident of the United States. That sucks the commentary is not in that region. I feel bad for you. PM me your e-mail address and all will be right with the world.

You keep your mouth shut, Trey! smile

Gibson wrote:

It really upsets me that these are the choices that girls today seem to be faced with.  Where are the guys who respect her, and enjoy hanging out with her?

If we're talking about Bella specifically here, then you won't find those kinds of guys in Twilight for two simple but important reasons:

1. Bella is a miserable, selfish, uninteresting non-character. As Dorkman so eloquently stated in DiF's Twilight commentary, "If Edward did know what Bella was thinking, he wouldn't like her."

2. Stephenie Meyer seems to have a very immature, narrow-minded and dangerously sexist opinion of young men. You won't find smart, "respectful" men capable of deep, lengthy conversation in these stories because either Meyer herself doesn't believe they exist, or she doesn't have the capability and experience to write about them. Giving her the benefit of the doubt, I assume and hope it's the latter.

Discussions and points like these abound in the Down In Front commentary for Twilight, which is why the more I think about it, the more I'm convinced it's one of my subjective favorites, and one of their objective best. smile