Miss having friends in your forum? We've migrated over to discord! Many of the threads that started here years ago continue on in a new setting. Come join us!
I believe it means that out of the vast and expansive pool of actors out there and in the world the casting director found the perfect person to play that role. So therefore in my opinion, if they literally found "the guy" then they found the PERFECT actor for that role. Which means both Simon Pegg and RDJ (as Tony Stark) are the perfect examples for this thread. Because anyone else cast in those roles would instantly make you go, well why the hell didn't they get Simon Pegg or RDJ for this one? (Respectively)
Doc is right. Peggs best acting is a guy who is little insecure and "lost". Like he does in Shaun of the Dead and in Paul. Hot Fuzz is excellent movie but I think because the satire is so spot on. My favorite of the three but Pegg is acting fine because he is good actor. I just think more natural role to him is Shaun or Graeme. Actually he is good in new Star Trek too.
Fine then, I guess I'll just frakking post it in here again.
"I cannot believe I watch the whole fucking thing. Discuss.
PS. On a side-related note. You guys seem to say "we're not judging on filmmaking or cinematography (Zetc etc) because this is a choreography competition". But I seem to notice a LOT of people wanting to do that type of thing, and I know personally that I've always been turned off by the strict choreography focus of the LCC. So why isn't there a version of the LCC designed around short films, either fan filmy or not. Or am I just a decade late for the whole concept?"
PS. On a side-related note. You guys seem to say "we're not judging on filmmaking or cinematography (Zetc etc) because this is a choreography competition". But I seem to notice a LOT of people wanting to do that type of thing, and I know personally that I've always been turned off by the strict choreography focus of the LCC. So why isn't there a version of the LCC designed around short films, either fan filmy or not. Or am I just a decade late for the whole concept?
Wow... so basically what I've gotten from this conversation is
Switch: "I've got the audio from iJustin if you guys want it to capture Treys awesomeness" Teague: "Thanks but we need the audio from iJustin to fix the commentary." Switch: "Well yeah, I have the audio...right here. Do you guys want it?" Dorkman: "Well we'd need to get the audio off iJustin if we want to use it." Switch: "Well yeah, I have that, you guys want it or what?"
Don't, they're interesting in their own way I guess, but if you felt that way about the original you definitly won't dig the sequels.
EDIT: I'm curious how you identify Cube as an "action-flled" movie, when in honesty there is very little action and I thought it was pretty obvious they were going for a psychological thriler-esque, "let's watch these people go insane" type movie
hmmmmm.. I've never ever watched ANYTHING of the Muppets.
This makes me sad....
Teague wrote:
Watch The Muppet Movie, it's a very good place to start.
This makes me happy
QFFT.
On another note, just watched Cube again. You guys really need to get around to doing that one. Although if you're just going to rape it like everything else I love, perhaps not.
Edit: Question...why is it even in the title at all? Just let the title be the title, and put the unpause point in the description. Why clutter up the title with unnecessary info? Keep it simple and clean.
You know what else might help? Listing the movie title of the clip somewhere on the screen. Not only does it provide important context and info for those that might be unable to make out what they're seeing (either due to an unclear picture like me, or maybe it went by too fast), it also might get someone curious to check out a title they've not seen before (What the hell was that? Wait, they made a remake of The Blob?! Was that SHAWNEE SMITH?! Awesome!).
This.
Although I disagree about the video being to cluttered and dark, I thought it was stylish and cool and considering the video isn't the point of it, it's just there to provide a sense of reference and something to look at. I think having the video clip with the title of the movie would be the best solution.
It's the unpause point in each ep, so you can time it right. Or just skip right there, if you're THAT kind of person
Oh..huh, k, I get it now, but Holden, you might want to put that somewhere on the site, cause apparently neither me or fixed knew what the fuck it was.
Also, if you're going to do it, it should be on all of them, it threw me off only seeing it on a couple of them; like "wtf is so special about these ones?"