Brian has to do Wedge or else...something...don't rush me...
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by fireproof78
Brian has to do Wedge or else...something...don't rush me...
I would be onboard with that. The Egyptian motif is one of the reasons why I enjoy Stargate so much, as well as the Mummy and things like that.
Or maybe the next Indiana Jones can be him discovering the Stargate
I hate it when people steal my fan fic
(there are no guarantees this post will make any sense)
I personally have given up on Hollywood beyond the idea that they can entertain me. That it's it. Maybe its like Teague and the my expectations are getting adjusted to this phase Hollywood is going through. I don't know.
All I know is, I don't get Hollywood. I liked Amazing Spider-man 2 and it is derided as crap. I found ST Into Darkness enjoyable as both an action vehicle and social commentary and the general consensus is also crap.
Maybe my tastes are dulled by a lack of regular theater going now that I work all the time. I don't know. All I know is, I'm going to see Jupiter Ascending, and I will probably like it. Why? Because why not?
As for hope, I'm always hopeful. No amount of bad films or bad news will ever change that. So, if the new Alien film is another Prometheus, I think I can live with that. Because, odds are, they will try again.
(there are no guarantees this post will make any sense)
Well, now I have to finish my Star Destroyer (not the super one, but still ).
Maybe start the thread and get the working script working?
I think there is plenty of interest, but I really wouldn't mind some collaboration instead of slapping a potentially bad script together
Y wings are the only real fighters that have two pilots (pilot and a gunner).
There are single pilot and double pilot variations of Y-Wings, dating back to the concept art, I believe. Or maybe that two seater Lego set
I have my snowspeeder from when I was younger. It even looks like it got shot down!
Star Trek Into Darkness.
Yep, I revisited it. I'm mildly adjusting my opinion, just due to the pacing of the film. The film can't be bothered to slow down enough for the emotional moments. I still find the characters very interesting, though, and quite enjoyable overall.
6/10
There is a lot out there. I agree with most of the list, though I usually lean towards science fiction adaptations.
Sci-fi: Dune definitely needs a treatment, though I think more of a LOTR style treatment would be appropriate.
Also, would not mind another retelling of Starship Troopers, with the powered armor.
Speaking of powered armor, I think that Halo should get a treatment of some kind too.
For fantasy, I have enjoy many of Brandon Sanderson's work, and think that any one of his series could work well. The Mistborn series could work the best, as it is far more character focused, though the world building could take a while.
Historical-isn't Hannibal supposed to be getting a treatment soon?
No big deal. Just, and I'm amazed to say this, a little too much Star Wars for me.
Any way, back to the Sil
This has nothing to do with the Internet, in all honesty.
Yes, skip Zathura. Kristen Stewart gets frozen in that film (insert your own joke here).
I think Lucas honestly DID try and do other things after Star Wars. They just were flops. Look at the films he produced: Labyrinth, Tucker, Radioland Murders, Willow. If they do better, we don't get the prequels (or, more likely, they are just produced by Lucas).
He did produce "Land before Time" with Spielberg, and that has spawned an incredible franchise. Not sure about the particulars of the money or time frame, but it always weirds me out when my kids watch and I see Lucas' name attached to it.
fireproof78 wrote:As for Episode 7, I think I'm hitting Trey and the Avengers level of advertisement burnout with Episode 7.
Last time I checked, there's been a grand total of one trailer and no other advertising whatsoever. Unless you count every single garbage film "news" site covering every time JJ Abrams sneezes in case there's a clue.
Yep. One trailer. And yet, all the film magazines I have been reading feature a news article detailing it to one degree or another. I'll amend my statement that it isn't the advertisement so much as the furor over every aspect of that trailer.
Yes, I will watch Star Wars VII. Now, where did I put that Deus Ex gif with the guy with the gun. That seems appropriate for my reaction here.
Also, I concur with Tom on the TV show adaptation. Like I said earlier, I think Beren and Luthien would be good film but I think that the rest is too much lore for the general audience.
I agree that it will fade, I just don't think it will fade enough while Chris Tolkien is alive. He was a notorious stickler for details, even with his own father, so it isn't like Jackson is experiencing special treatment.
As for Episode 7, I think I'm hitting Trey and the Avengers level of advertisement burnout with Episode 7. I think Abrams will do a fine job, because it is his one chance at a beloved franchise, and Abrams isn't the only one pulling the strings on it. But, I really just don't need to hear any more about it, but thankfully Sci fi Now magazine did a full cover story of the details of the trailer. So, I don't need to see the film
Glad too. My friend and I are huge Deus Ex fans, but the 2nd one was always kind of hit and miss. I think the world building is fantastic (think it would be a great MMO) but the overall story isn't quite there. But, I'll let you decide
Heh, I've played the first game about a half-dozen times. That is a stone-cold classic! Really loved Human Revolution, thought it was amazing, but have only played the 2nd game once. Remember liking it well enough, but being annoyed by the ending (which really smacked of "getting close to release date, let's just throw everyone into one arena and just let them shoot each other until the cutscene"). But whatever, I got a hell of a deal and I'm looking forward to doing the whole trilogy again!
I liked the second one ok (have it for Xbox) but it left a lot to be desired. Actually, what was interesting, is that the producers hosted a discussion about what they thought they did wrong there. Interesting, but a lot of technical talk too: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGIdYl2oN74
Also, still need to finish up Human Revolution but do like the overall play style and visual aesthetic. The story has been a little interesting but having trouble getting through Detroit PD. Hacking mini-game is a bit hit and miss
When Chris Tolkien passes, I agree it will be a test. Until then, with the disagreement over LOTR, and the frustration with the Hobbit, I don't see him bending to any dollar amount.
My overall feeling on this idea is this-Hollywood is going to tap every idea for every cent it is worth, and LOTR is not completely tapped (yet). So, the Sil will be developed in some capacity-how much, who knows?
Personally, it will be interesting, because the fan base is becoming increasingly restless over the Hobbit treatment, with many more book purists (regardless of movie quality opinion) getting annoyed by liberties taken. Will it make money? Sure, but even people thought the Hobbit was bad, then the Sil will probably be worse. I mean, it could get very confusing for casual fans, and even more irritating for book fans who want all the details.
It honestly would be like if Lucas had made Star Wars, then the Prequels, and then did a movie based upon the origination of the Jedi and Sith. Its detail, history driven tome, that may become inaccessible. I have dubbed this phenomenon "The Dune Syndrome."
Withryn wrote:Mainly I'm just confused why people keep saying the silmarillion is simply not movie material.
Darth Praxus wrote:I agree that, while adapting the whole thing would be death...
This is exactly why. You say "We're going to adapt the Silmarillon", which is roughly akin to saying we're going to make a movie out the encyclopedia. And most people (myself included) have never actually bothered to read the Silmarillon, cause...my gods... so it's just a giant lump of encyclopedia text to them.
Also that thing Prax said about the Tolkein Estate, as far as I know that's still true. Could change in the future, who knows, probably not for a long time though.
Got to back up BDA here in that, in my time on theonering.net forums, it is well known that Christopher Tolkien has no love for film adaptations, and the idea of the Similarion being adapted is not likely to go well.
I would be supportive of a retelling of Beren and Luthien, but I just don't see it happening without a similar living in a shadow of LOTR as the Hobbit (no, this is not a discussion of that film series).
Are we talking book Dune or Lynch's Dune? Because the way I read it was a "Shut up and take my money" type of a moment.
Regardless of the criticism towards the PT, I still appreciate the visuals of the film. I've heard that Jupiter Ascending has quite striking visuals.
Sam F wrote:BigDamnArtist wrote:Holy crap that sounds amazing. Unfortunately the nearest Imax is 2 hours and 200km's of death defying black ice highways away.
What if Ned and Robert had said that about King's Landing?
Each would have lived a long and happy life.
Which, we know, cannot happen in GoT.
Now I must watch it
Knew that was coming
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by fireproof78
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.