376

(44 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Modern works can fall into public domain if there's no one who can make a legitimate claim to them - due to neglect or lack of heirs, or sometimes even just a screwup.   For example, for bizarre arcane legal reasons some episodes of the Dick Van Dyke Show are public domain but most aren't.  Night of the Living Dead is public domain because they didn't put a copyright notice in the credits (the law at the time, but not any more).   It's a Wonderful Life is sorta half-public-domain (but not entirely because the story it's based on is still under copyright.)

On the other hand, Disney (and most conglomerates) not only carefully maintains their copyrights but as said above, have won legal battles to extend copyright on their valuable properties far past their original expiration dates.

btw, I just filed the copyright papers for Return of Pink Five Volume Three yesterday - so it's my death +70 years before any of youse can get your meathooks on it.  Ha HA.

"George, you've got to ring that bell by midnight, or the angels will lose their wings and Satan will rule the Earth!"

378

(44 replies, posted in Off Topic)

You know what the word "most" means, right?  Cool, thanks.  wink

379

(262 replies, posted in Episodes)

True, it was one of the very few movies this year that I allowed myself to look forward to.  And there was so much about it that was great...

but....

sad_tennant

380

(44 replies, posted in Off Topic)

However, re-scanning the originals would certainly mean dust-busting and color-correcting them all over again - they didn't make a perfect OLD version and then add FX to it, they started from the original footage and rebuilt or repainted a lot of it.  So as GL said, the SE process didn't result in a perfect version of the original movies - only a spiffed up Special Edtiion. 

So - putting together an all-original Blu-Ray that is something more than just a rescan of an old dirty print would be a project almost on the scale of the Special Editions all over again.   If I was a Disney exec, I'd be hesitant to fund that sort of effort without some pretty serious market research evidence that it'd be worth it.   

Most of the people who would even sort of care about that are nearing retirement age now (hi, how are ya?).  I believe the in-house term for us at Disney is "dead people".

381

(44 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'm not so sure - there has to be enough demand to make doing it worthwhile.  One of the first things Disney did was pull the plug on the rest of the 3D conversions of the old stuff, presumably because they didn't think it was a good investment.

There's a big difference between creating and marketing a release, and just licensing some old property in your vault to someone else (a la Rifftrax) who will do the marketing and releasing.   The first is a risk, the second is pretty much pure gravy.

Disney's focus is on the new movies - the old ones are already available in every format that ever existed.  I don't know how motivated they'd be to put together yet another re-release. 

"It's like the version you already have - just with less stuff!"

382

(44 replies, posted in Off Topic)

My guess would be that George Lucas was an actual human who was embarrassed by the Holiday Special, and so as long as he controlled the rights, he kept the Holiday Special out of the public eye.

Disney, on the other hand, is a corporation that will happily sell anything to the public if the public will buy it.

383

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Plus, a gabillion hours of commentaries!  smile

Well, it's just that I spent many months in Korea and something like 50% of the population's last name is either Kim or Lee.   So, just an educated guess.  smile

Fun Fact: The Korean version of the expression "like looking for a needle in a haystack" is "like going to Seoul and asking for Mr. Kim"

"Hey George, is it cool if we change the three-eyed crow to a raven?  That won't ruin anything, will it?"
"Oh... they're not the same thing?  Oops."

Martin is a consultant and occasional screenwriter on the series himself.  Anything they've omitted from the books is pretty much guaranteed NOT to be critical later.   

Even without the above, it's not fair to accuse the writers of deliberately pissing off fans by citing a tiny change in something you thought was important.  I'm not sure how many people know there's even a difference between a crow and a raven at all - I didn't until I wiki'd it just now.  smile

You know nothing, John Kim.

388

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Been catching up on animated features lately, just got around to this one...

http://www.pinkfive.com/images/post/monsters.jpg

... which turned out to be another trophy for Dreamworks' "we're still not Pixar but we're getting pretty good at this" shelf.

Had no expectations going in - well, except maybe one:  I was really confused by the amount of time the movie spent introducing Susan the giant woman... until I finally realized she was the main character

This was something the ad campaign and trailers had taken great pains to hide, so I was genuinely surprised to find out that Monsters Vs Aliens is actually a tidy little female-empowerment story.    Pretty much by-the-numbers, but at least they did it (even though it clearly scared the marketing department).

There are several nicely staged action scenes - imagine a cartoon Independence Day that's sometimes played almost seriously - a decent supply of good jokes, and not too many pop culture references.  Most of the setups and payoffs would make Blake Snyder smile - a couple of minor subplots do sort of just stop without really resolving, but it's not particularly noticeable.

One quibble: All the "monsters" are '50s B-movie archetypes, which I love - Bob the Blob, the 50-Foot Woman, the Fly (in this case the mad scientist accidentally crossed himself with a cockroach), and a variation of Mothra... but then there's the "Missing Link" character - who's clearly modeled on the Creature From the Black Lagoon.  Which is a fine idea, except his monster-ness doesn't ever get used for anything interesting. 

Like, you'd think maybe him swimming would be important to the plot somewhere, but it isn't.  Mostly all he does is walk around and punch things.   You know... like the Creature from the Black Lagoon didn't.   It's as if he was supposed to be the Teenage Wolfman until they got a C&D from Universal and put fins on the character model at the last minute.

But that really is a quibble, since I'm a '50s monster movie nerd and all.  Overall, I thought MvA was a fun little flick, very self-aware of its tropes without beating me over the head with them.  If you haven't seen it, it's a perfectly pleasant way to spend 90 minutes.

389

(373 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Pretty sneaky of God to build a whole universe that seems to run on testable, repeatable laws when it totally doesn't.  What's His deal?  Is he trolling us?

390

(373 replies, posted in Off Topic)

So, clearly God does NOT want us to eat pineapples.

391

(68 replies, posted in Off Topic)

See, Kurt's close friends like me call him "Ken"...

Look, a kitten!

392

(68 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Tombstone's another "badass moment" goldmine.  One of my faves is Ken Russell slapping Billy Bob Thornton around.  "Go on - skin that smokewagon and see what happens."

I dunno if it worked as well for the listeners at home, but the ending of Howard the Duck - where Brian gave his closing argument while Teague provided musical underscore - almost caused me to rupture my pancreas due to suppressed laughter.

394

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Winona Ryder's dad in Heathers ("why do I smoke these damn things?") was played by Bill Cort, my father's best friend in high school who then went out to Hollywood and had a great "that guy" acting career.   The first day I arrived in L.A. to start college, it was Bill who picked me up at the airport.

I think Heathers is great anyway, but seeing Bill always gives it a little extra spice for me.

/cool story bro

395

(473 replies, posted in Episodes)

Yep. Learned to type on an actual typewriter, so the double-space-after-period habit is pretty solidly entrenched. Sometimes I even go back and edit them out, but not that time. :-)

396

(68 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I always liked this moment from Men In Black.   It's a different kind of badassery, but still counts.


I still think we completely nailed it with that idea.  Instead of the ending we got, imagine power-hungry Charlize and her demented robo-head half-brother taking off in an alien ship full of gooey death and daddy issues and heading back to Earth.

I want to see that sequel.

398

(45 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Lol, Ash - we should hang out.

399

(45 replies, posted in Off Topic)

There's a similar moment in Sahara - after their desperate improvised plan turns out to save the day, Steve Zahn and Matthew McConaughey say "There's NO WAY that should have worked." 

A lot of things in Sahara don't work, but that line is gold.

Hummingbirds aren't real.  RON PAUL 2012