376

(11 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Doctor Submarine wrote:

Because Mel Gibson needed a career boost.


But a lot of remakes are actually great. The new Dawn of the Dead, Scarface, The Magnificent Seven, The Departed, 3:10 to Yuma, The Blob, both Solaris remakes...

Scarface is interesting.  DePalma's version is probably exactly what Hughes would have made himself in 1981.  And after crime evolves some more, and the extremes are even greater, Scarface should be remade again.

377

(102 replies, posted in Off Topic)

There are a handful of ways to look at this. 

I think the guiding principal should be, generally speaking, to remake BAD movies that have great premises.  It can range from basically phantom editing (Sunshine, sans the Sun Zombie, or circumcising the last 25 of A.I.) to total reworking.  Michael Bay's The Island could very easily, and with little effort, be a brilliant story and film.  It never explores the ideas it flirts with fully, and the bad science can be fixed without changing the story.

And it would be a waste to spend 50 million to remake Sunshine just to take out a zombie.  You'd need an additional, stronger thematic reason.  But when you start changing the themes and mood of Sunshine, you lose the parts that make Sunshine great.  So movies like Sunshine and AI are in an un-remakeable  position.  Curse the filmmakers for not getting it right the first time and move on.

I'll tell you where I think coming close to direct remaking could work - Comedy.  Dirty Work and Mystery Men are the prime examples.  They're close to being perfect, but Dirty Work has some major flaws in pacing, editing and execution.  A good director who isn't Bob Saget could have made gold of that film.  It's a mean version of Ghostbusters, damnit.  Shouldn't fail.  And Mystery Men just suffers from being flat.  It feels lifeless.  It's so well written it overcomes the director.  But what if it had a good director?  But since a comedy is supposed to make you laugh, you can remake something almost shot for shot and I think the audience will forgive you.  Provided its funny the second time around.

Reinterpreting can be fun, but it's mostly child's play IMO.  I haven't really thought about it, but it seems taking an original story and transplanting it into a VERY different mold is interesting.  I don't pretend to be a Bill Shakespeare expert, but I read Hamlet a couple times.  And people tell me that Lion King is totes Hamlet n shit.  And I can see where someone would say that.  Good results.

To Teague's point on directors getting the same script - look no further than Fail Safe vs Dr. Strangelove.  The scripts are almost identical and were released within spitting range of each other. In plotting and premise, no difference.  Shows you how important interpretation is.

So yeah.  I'd love to see The Island remade.

378

(37 replies, posted in Episodes)

Maggot1300 wrote:

its not perfect but i like this movie.  not sure if i really want to hear this commentary as previous comments don't give me much hope of an unbiased viewing (the pans labyrinth one still irks me)....

we'll see tomorrow at work i guess

If it means anything, I was gleeful with anticipation that they'd finally give Snyder the dressing-down he deserves.  No luck.  I don't think anybody is walking away from this commentary happy.

379

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Let the Right One In (either version) might be a good conversation.

Aside from that, I also vote for Scream (not a great horror movie, but an interesting screenwriting/genre examination), Halloween, Evil Dead.

And YES.  As said johnpavlich suggested; stop teasing us and unleash Trey on Pet Cemetery 2.  Please.

380

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Dorkman wrote:
iJim wrote:

I wanted to edit on FCP because they edited Episode 1 on FCP, man!

...What? No they didn't. Version 1 of Final Cut Pro was released in April 1999 -- they didn't cut the movie in the month before its release (though it would explain a lot).

The prequels were done on Avid. The first major motion picture to be cut on FCP was COLD MOUNTAIN in 2003.

World view: shaken.  Not sure how I'm getting through the day.

381

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The only reason FCP appealed to Eddie's 90% to begin with was because of the trend-setting 10%.  That was the case for me, anyway.  I wanted to edit on FCP because they edited Episode 1 on FCP, man!

In retrospect, a well financed, poorly received sequel shouldn't be such a surprise.

382

(22 replies, posted in Episodes)

This is great.  "You go back to your old internet posts and you say 'fuck me.'"  A deep truth right there.

383

(25 replies, posted in Episodes)

Incoming non-sequiter youtube video....

It's assumed that everyone has seen the above.  But why risk it?


The link below is the one I mentioned in the show (won't embed for some reason). His dog becomes too ashamed to be a part of it at 0:55.

I clicked the link and was told the video is malformed.  Much like David's stick.

384

(30 replies, posted in Episodes)

What made the first movie fascinating to me as a kid was the science.  The movie was a springboard into the books.  The ideas in Crichton's novels had legs and were a point of intellectual/scientific reference for me up to the age of around 17.  Sad as it is, I got a lot out of it.  The meaty ideas are hardly touched on in the JP1. 

Ideally, JP2 would have been a reboot with directing and screenwriting reigns handed over to, of all people, Christopher Nolan.  Not much of a fan but he is perfectly equipped to craft a Jurassic Park sequel I would like to see. Lofty theory and debate and moments of dinosaurific consequence.

Since that will never happen, Spielberg's King Kong cum Dinosaurs works well enough.

385

(44 replies, posted in Episodes)

I absolutely loved this episode.  One of the best podcasts yet.  Everyone sounded like they had a good time watching it and there were some really funny lines.

Also, I can't remember where (because Tarantino will talk to anyone with ears), but I've heard QT say he has created two movie universes.  One for Pulp and Dogs and one for KB, Death Proof and maybe Basterds (not sure which universe that is).  He describes KB and Death Proof as the movies that Jules, Mr. Pink, Vega, etc see in theaters.  I guess its the same universe, one just subsumes another.