Topic: Most remakes make me puke!

Thats right! most remakes make me feel like drinking industrial strength paint stripper and shots of nail varnish remover as good measure..  take The 2007 hitcher with Sean Bean in.. dont get me wrong i like some of Sean Beans films like Essex Boys. He rocked in that.. but come on, you've never been beating Rutger Hauer's  murderous hitch-hiker in the classic 86 hitcher flick. The film didnt need remaking. It looks as good today as it did back in 86.

And here is another.. 2010 Karate Kid. I watched that, and thought to myself "right id rather drink shampoo for a week, than ever watch that again. Cobra Kai's never die baby! viva la 1984 style! it still holds up today, so why bother making it again.. we love Bananarama blasting out in the background "its a cruel, cruel summer!" let me tell you, it has been a cruel summer since i watched the remake. Ill take the crain kick and Mr Wax on... wax off. Wax on... wax off Okinawa bad boy and crazy John Kreese any day of the week over the 2010 garbage. 

Banzai!

They're only noodles Michael.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Most remakes make me puke!

Well I didnt really see the need for them to remake Edge of Darkness.

Extended Edition - 146 - The Rise Of Skywalker
VFX Reel | Twitter | IMDB | Blog

Re: Most remakes make me puke!

Because Mel Gibson needed a career boost.


But a lot of remakes are actually great. The new Dawn of the Dead, Scarface, The Magnificent Seven, The Departed, 3:10 to Yuma, The Blob, both Solaris remakes...

"The Doctor is Submarining through our brains." --Teague

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Most remakes make me puke!

I still say The Thing is one of the best remakes ever.

I doubt I'll be able to say something similar about the prequel.....

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Most remakes make me puke!

Doctor Submarine wrote:

Because Mel Gibson needed a career boost.


But a lot of remakes are actually great. The new Dawn of the Dead, Scarface, The Magnificent Seven, The Departed, 3:10 to Yuma, The Blob, both Solaris remakes...

Scarface is interesting.  DePalma's version is probably exactly what Hughes would have made himself in 1981.  And after crime evolves some more, and the extremes are even greater, Scarface should be remade again.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Most remakes make me puke!

The Footloose remake makes me want to vomit into my own mouth. This is one of my favourite films and from the trailer it looks like they've turned it into another one of those craptastic Step Up flicks.

Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. - Carl Sagan

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Most remakes make me puke!

Good: Battlestar Galactica. Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

Bad: Conan the Barbarian.

Somebody name an Ugly.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Most remakes make me puke!

You imply that there's only one.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_film_remakes

Go crazy.

"The Doctor is Submarining through our brains." --Teague

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Most remakes make me puke!

Would you consider Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans a remake / reboot? Because it's awesome.

The Thing is barely a remake, really. It's got the same basic idea going on, but the original flick was just another dime a dozen campy monster movie with a few interesting twists thrown in. Carpenter took the idea and actually made it scary. Both of them are kinda sorta based on At The Mountains Of Madness. The Thing prequel actually has me really pissed off, because Universal axed Del Toro's ATMOM project, but went ahead with the Thing prequel, which is basically a variation on ATMOM. I guess the budget is a lot lower, but still. Annoying.

What about Airplane? It's a comedy remake of a dramatic film. A lot of the dialogue is word for word from the original. I liked Airplane, too.

Also, I kinda liked the new Karate Kid flick. It should have been called "Kung Fu Kid" and it could have been darker than it was, but as a family film it was pretty damn good. Way better than I had expected it to be.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Most remakes make me puke!

Squiggly_P wrote:

The Thing is barely a remake, really. It's got the same basic idea going on, but the original flick was just another dime a dozen campy monster movie with a few interesting twists thrown in. Carpenter took the idea and actually made it scary. Both of them are kinda sorta based on At The Mountains Of Madness.

I'm sure you meant to say http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Goes_There%3F

And although The Thing From Another World may look like just another run-of-the-mill '50s monster flick NOW, it wasn't - for its time it was one of the best of the genre, which is why it's still remembered.   But the fact that it looks shoddy to modern eyes is exactly the argument for the Carpenter remake, which is also now a classic.   

As to whether the latest remake was worth doing, well... doesn't seem like it, but I haven't seen it yet.

Last edited by Trey (2011-09-22 01:15:12)

Re: Most remakes make me puke!

Trey wrote:

I'm sure you meant to say http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Goes_There%3F

And although The Thing From Another World may look like just another run-of-the-mill '50s monster flick NOW, it wasn't - for its time it was one of the best of the genre, which is why it's still remembered.   But the fact that it looks shoddy to modern eyes is exactly the argument for the Carpenter remake, which is also now a classic.   

As to whether the latest remake was worth doing, well... doesn't seem like it, but I haven't seen it yet.

WOW. Hah, I had no idea they were based on a book. I read ATMOM back in the day, and the similarities between it and The Thing got me to assume that it was loosely based on it. It's got a lot of the same elements. Scientists in Antarctica that discover some kind of alien creatures that flip out and go on a rampage and kill everyone, it's got the antsy dogs, The creatures are so strange that the characters basically lose their minds just by seeing them... I kinda figured they couldn't get the rights or couldn't afford to make that particular film, so they just took the basic idea and did their own thing.

Now I know...

And, yeah, I just don't have the context for the film. I saw The Thing first, and have yet to fully sit through Thing From Another World.

I'll have to see the prequel as well, tho all it has to do to not piss me off is to not do the same stuff they did in the original. No spider-heads, no mutant dog monsters, no blood-testing-thing-attack scene, etc. I think the problem with most reboots / sequels / prequels / etc is that they keep referencing the originals. The Star Wars prequels, for instance. The new Planet of the Apes flick. Was there anyone who didn't groan when that stupid "damn dirty ape" line popped up in there? I mean, yeah, we all think the original was good, we know you're making a sequel to that movie, but we're watching this movie now. Give me a new line for this movie.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Most remakes make me puke!

Mountains of Madness and Who Goes There came out at about the same time, and there is a similarity. Carpenter definitely was influenced by Lovecraft's story with the whole Norwegian camp (in MoM, they lose contact with an arctic camp just after they dig up these 6 foot tall things. When they investigate they find it trashed and the humans and dogs slaughtered, apart from one of each which have been dissected).

I love a quote attributed to John W. Campbell, author of Who Goes There, upon seeing the premier of the first movie: "It's a great film. Maybe someday they'll make one based on my story."

I write stories! With words!
http://www.asstr.org/~Invid_Fan/

Thumbs up Thumbs down