401

(123 replies, posted in Episodes)

Invid wrote:

We used to have special theaters for that...

Those special theaters were also used for arresting people. Remember Pee-Wee Herman?

Nowadays, cosplayers aren't safe either.

402

(123 replies, posted in Episodes)

People do far worse things in movie theaters than texting.

fireproof78 wrote:

Personally, I have always been a fan of the Menagerie as an episode as well as The Cage. It certainly has a different feel to it and Hunter's Pike is far more brooding than Shatner's Kirk. I think I identified more with Pike's introspective way, as I am that way myself.

The plot is suspiciously similar to a Twilight Zone episode ("People Are Alike All Over") from 1960 (with the same actress playing a similar role).

Captain Pike's intellectual and introspective nature must've been an inspiration for the Jean-Luc Picard character of ST-TNG. Even their names sound alike (the actual French word for "pike" is "pique"; it also happens to be a surname).

I knew Blade Runner since I was 10 (I even had a black & white comic book adaptation). Back then, I thought it's horribly boring. Now I'm 31 and it's one of my favorite sci-fi movies. You just have to grow up to appreciate it wink

Notice how Ridley Scott recycled some of the themes (with less success) in Prometheus.

405

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f5/Meet_Joe_Black-_1998.jpg
An interesting premise, but... This story would've probably worked better as a 45-minute Twilight Zone episode (although Twilight Zone wouldn't be able to afford Anthony Hopkins and Brad Pitt).

Wikipedia says someone created a much shorter cut of the movie. Somehow I'm not suprised big_smile

406

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d7/Death_at_a_Funeral_2010_Poster.jpg
I liked the British one (the one directed by Yoda), so I decided to see the American remake. It's not really bad... It's just pointless.

Why the hell did someone decide that a remake was necessary? Do the Hollywood studio executives really think that the "urban" audience can't appreciate a British film? roll

Note to Firefly fans: The original has Alan Tudyk, the remake has Ron Glass.

407

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Faldor wrote:

Has anyone seen the original Norwegian ?

Not me...

TechNoir wrote:

Insomnia is really good, But you may not really guess it to be a Nolan flick, unless you watch Memento right before it. Insomnia sort of feels like the intermediate step between Memento and The Prestige.

Haven't seen Memento yet. I'll have to check it out someday, it'd be interesting to see the whole evolution of Nolan's style.

408

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The visual style and musical score of Manhunter always reminded me of Blade Runner a little. And while I like Blade Runner, Manhunter didn't work very well for me. I have to admit that I'd prefer Red Dragon over Manhunter any day, mostly because of Anthony Hopkins.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7c/Insomnia2002Poster.jpg
A pretty solid movie, but somewhat lacking compared to The Prestige, Inception and the Dark Knight trilogy. It doesn't use the standard Chris Nolan tricks (nonlinear storytelling, plot twists etc.) very much.

Guys, will you ever again record commentaries for episodes of TV shows (like you did with the pilot of Firefly)?

410

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

A 55-year-old Doctor this time... I'm excited.

fcw wrote:

I don't think there is any way the BBC will say: well, he's only allowed thirteen incarnations

Almost anything can be justified with a single line of dialogue in this show.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/HandWave

SPOILER Show
The Daleks were supposed to be annihilated in the Time War, but they've shown up in every new series.

411

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/45/Saturday_night_fever_movie_poster.jpg

412

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

TechNoir wrote:

I liked Scary Movie 3 and even some parts of 4

That's probably because Friedberg & Seltzer didn't write them. Their absence automatically raises quality a bit.

TechNoir wrote:

A Fish Called Wanda - 7/10

It feels a bit stale and rough around the edges from a filmmaking POV, but nothing can take away from the great screenplay, or Kevin Kline's performance. If you like Kevin Kline, definitely see this.

Also check out Fierce Creatures, the quasi-sequel to this.

PorridgeGun wrote:

http://i.imgur.com/5SEh7SZ.jpg

I just saw this for the first time today. What can you say... It's definitely an 80s movie. Chris Plummer is great in it.

413

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

BigDamnArtist wrote:

I ried watching BB once, I got about halfway through and nothing had actually happened

The plot is somewhat messy and not always engaging, but some jokes work well for me.

SPOILER Show
"John Valuk is dead. He fell on his head."
I don't know why, but it always cracks me up.

Anyway... After many years I decided to revisit this:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/63/Good_Bye_Lenin.jpg

To someone who actually experienced the fall of communism (as a matter of fact, it started in my country), this movie is an emotional journey to the past. To the Western audience, it's a visit in a different world. An absurd world of rampant propaganda and grossly incompetent governments. A world that vanished and (hopefully) will never return. But above all else, it's a poignant melodrama with some comedic overtones.

It's a German production, but don't worry - Good Bye, Lenin! is perfecly accessible to any moviegoer (it doesn't require much knowledge about the Eastern Bloc). See it.

Hollywood studio executives would probably relegate this story to the studio's "arthouse" division (if they'd greenlight it at all). European directors usually don't have to deal with this kind of shit - they just get a few million euros of taxpayers' money and shoot whatever they want (public funding, the final cut privilege and "auteur theory" are big in Europe). Usually the results are mediocre, but once in a while this system delivers us a gem like Good Bye, Lenin!.

414

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/ba/Adventures_of_buckaroo_banzai.jpg
I'm not sure how I feel about this flick... It's got some good stuff, but I think there's a small tone issue here. Maybe they should've emphasized the comedic stuff a little more.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d1/Cloudy_with_a_chance_of_meatballs_theataposter.jpg
"Steeeve!" This one is a must-see for every geek, nerd and dweeb. If it weren't for Friends In Your Head, I would've missed this great movie.

415

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Squiggly_P wrote:

I hated all of the Next Gen movies a great deal.

So did Harry S. Plinkett.

I loved that show when I was a kid, and I remember that the first movie was one of the first films I ever saw in a theater that got me really pissed off at how bad it was. I was 14 or 15 at the time.

When Generations came out, I enjoyed it, because I didn't know any better (even the presence of a creepy smiler in the theater didn't bother me). Now it feels like a rather bad two-part episode to me.

First Contact can be enjoyable if you ignore certain inconsistencies. It reminds me of the Abramsverse movies (Brannon Braga could be called the original continuity's Damon Lindelof).

I read the novelization of Insurrection (it's a hardcover in Poland big_smile ) before seeing the movie. It didn't help. The plot is still clunky.

Nemesis tries to rip off one of the previous movies way too hard. In FIYH terminology, it's a "cargo cult movie" - it reuses plot points without a deeper understanding of them.

416

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Shackman wrote:

Just watched Star Trek 2 and 4.

6 (The Undiscovered Country) and 8 (First Contact) are also interesting. 8 is widely considered the best TNG movie.

good stuff.  now, the question is....do i start checking out the odd numbered ones?

All the odd numbered ones are flawed.

1 (The Motion Picture) is a bit slow, it's the 2001: A Space Odyssey of the ST universe (if you like Kubrick's 2001, you'll probably appreciate the visuals and concepts of The Motion Picture).

Most people seem to like 3 (The Search For Spock) and hate 5 (The Final Frontier). The story of 3 feels a little thin. 5 is very campy and the visual effects are really bad for 1989 (they couldn't hire ILM for this one).

7 (Generations) is just mediocre and unremarkable. IMO the ST-TNG series finale that preceeds it is a much better story.

9 (Insurrection) is a weird one... There's some moral ambiguity, many viewers tend to agree with the villains.

417

(25 replies, posted in Episodes)

Another good episode. You earned this.

GENERIC KATIE (moved): Thank you for being so... brave and honest with us.

But you have to see Battlefield Earth, guys. Surviving the whole 118 minutes of this shit should be a rite of passage for every cinephile. "It's like Star Wars, only better."

418

(70 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Wasn't Melancholia consciously designed to make viewers experience clinical depression? Maybe it simply succeeded in your case big_smile

419

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

BigDamnArtist wrote:

SPOILER Show
I think it's part miscasting, but her character is also written horribly. The weird time tripping shit they tried to pull around her makes absolutely no sense when you step back and look at it, and as the seasons went on, it felt like they were just trying to jam and force in more and more twists, without actually bothering to justify any of it, or make any of it make any goddamned sense.

SPOILER Show
It's an interesting concept for a time travel story, but (like most time travel stuff) hard to execute properly. And Steven Moffat just likes to overcomplicate his plots with this timey-wimey stuff... It worked well for "Blink", but his season arcs are a little hard to follow (they probably make more sense on paper big_smile ).

420

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

auralstimulation wrote:

Of the new Doctor Who companions, who's your favorite?

The most interesting companion? Amy & Rory as a couple.

The most beautiful companion? It's a toss-up between Martha Jones and Amy Pond.

SPOILER Show

auralstimulation wrote:

I felt nothing at all at River's departure.

Not many people seem to care for River Song. Alex Kingston isn't necessarily awful, but I think she was miscast here. I'd be interested in seeing what someone else would do with the part.

421

(70 replies, posted in Off Topic)

fireproof78 wrote:

Finally, no one mentioned "Battlefield Earth?" Or is that just universally considered bad without comment?

A truly awful movie (I only managed to watch it whole on my third attempt), but still better than most Friedberg & Seltzer works (these guys aren't even trying to wrap a story around their crude jokes).

redxavier wrote:

Transformers 3. I'm baffled at how this movie ever got released, it's nigh on unwatchable.

I think it's still a little better than Revenge Of The Fallen (it has Leonard Nimoy and no racist robots that "don't do much reading").

The real problem about Transformers is the existence of sequels. One stupid movie about fighting robots would've been more acceptable than three of them (and we're going to get a fourth one). I can still enjoy the first one for what it is, but the sequels are just annoying.

422

(70 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Jimmy B wrote:

Superman IV: The Quest For Peace.

Another unintentional comedy... Breathing in space is just awesomely stupid.

423

(70 replies, posted in Off Topic)

S. Darko (the sequel to the great Donnie Darko) deserves a special mention in the "worst direct-to-DVD disappointment".

Call me crazy, but I think Red Dragon is slightly better than Manhunter. Brett Ratner is no artist, but (on na good day) he can put together a watchable movie. He would make a fairly decent TV director. Manhunter just didn't work very well for me and Red Dragon has Anthony fuckin' Hopkins.

424

(70 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Disaster Movie (a Friedberg & Seltzer "comedy"). It's not really a movie, it's just a series of bad jokes. Even Twilight: New Moon is more watchable.

Plan 9 From Outer Space really is stupendously bad. Bizarrely written and laughably acted; cobbled together from various leftover footage and stock footage. Complete nonsense, but so inept as to be vaguely interesting.

Stupid minds, stupid, stupid! big_smile It's the best unintentional comedy of all time.

425

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Both movies are definitely worth recommending.

ThrowbackSoul wrote:

Speaking of Paths of Glory, does anybody else whose seen this film have a problem with the fact that all the actors (with the exception of the girl singing at the end) are supposed to be French but none of them actually are?

Captain Picard was supposed to be French, but he's as English as they come (right down to his accent and Earl Grey tea). Does that bother anyone? big_smile