"Largely." You get the chemo patients, I get the stoners who bullshit their way into a weed card. Who has more folks?
I know four people, completely incidentally, with no medical problem and a weed card. I don't know anyone in chemotherapy, much less someone in chemotherapy with a marijuana license.
And if I did know someone in chemo who also had a weed card, I'd still know the other four.
I should clarify. Naturally the effects of marijuana can be beneficial to someone in pain, but the legislative entity "medical marijuana" is largely bullshit.
EDIT: I checked, because now I'm curious.
The assertion that all medical marijuana is headed for seriously ill patients is misleading. Statistics from the California Branch of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) shows that a survey of Californians reports the top three reported uses of medicinal marijuana: 40% Chronic Pain, 22% AIDS-Related, 15% Mood Disorders
The largest fraction is people with "chronic pain," which encompasses a virtually limitless number of real and conveniently subjective medical problems. Then there's AIDS, hard to fake. Then "mood disorders," another field surely ripe with legitimate cases, but largely subjective.
Just in the stated numbers, up to 65% of licensed marijuana users got them because they told someone something was wrong with them. Compare that to, say, AIDS or chemo.
I maintain, as apparently everyone else does, that weed should be legal. I just don't like people using "medical marijuana" as their argument - because it doesn't apply to the overwhelming majority of Prop 19 proponents. "There's no reason for it not to be illegal" is a better one.