Khan's weakness: plastic tubes.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Xtroid
Khan's weakness: plastic tubes.
The Room is something special...
If only there WAS an upcoming Avengers movie. The Ralph Fiennes/Uma Thurman version had such potential, and completely blew it. Last Airbender is to Dorkman as The Avengers misfire is to me. Grrr. GRRRRR.
Oh yeah, The Avengers... what the hell was that all about? Talk about a movie that didn't work at all...
Ditto. Lifeforce is jaw-droppingly wacko, but it has a lot of genuinely funny/twisted and scary moments. I'd rather watch an at-least-they-tried-something misfire like Lifeforce than yet another rehash of Pirates of the Caribbean or Transformers, etc.
Also, Lifeforce is probably the only chance you'll ever get to see Patrick Stewart kiss another dude. (At least that I'm aware of.)
And there's Mathilda May...
Haha, I love Lifeforce.
Leonard Maltin sums up my feelings on the film perfectly.
From people who should know better? Transformers 3. I'm geniunely shocked at how this got to release in its current state.
DEEP WANG.
Ugh.
Highlander II: The Quickening is a good contender for the worst movie ever made. Is there a movie more incompetent than this one? It's like Ed Wood with a big budget.
man, i'm waaay to lazy to count how many votes each movie has... but i want to see avat-err i mean airbender ( for teague ) get shit on more than any movie in this world
The Last Airbender is the most uncomfortable, mind-boggling, overstuffed, overcrowded film adaptation I've seen since David Lynch's Dune.
And this chick's hairstyle... did Shyamalan really not notice this?
1. Airbender
2. Batman Returns
3. Unforgiven
4. Transformers 3
5. Who Framed Roger Rabbit?
6. Battlefield Earth
Personally, I really would've preferred if the whole movie took place in the future, and they were getting into crazy adventures there, maybe travelling into space, doing cool things.
I think the biggest problem with BTTF2 is its depiction of the future... where there are flying cars, hoverboards, and even Jaws 19... and the clothing, damn. It's the '80s version of the future. I'm sure back in 1989, audiences were blown away by this future, and some might even have thought that this is what the world would be like in the year 2015. But now days the futuristic sequences are just outrageous and cartoony... the film is severely dated because of them. The first BTTF doesn't have this problem. It shows a very real era... the '50s. You believe it. It works. The 2015 stuff in BTTF2 doesn't... it's complete fantasy.
My biggest problem with the movie is that it portrays Dracula as this tragic, brooding eurotrash crybaby. In the novel, there is nothing sexy about Dracula. He's a stalker, a rapist, and a predator. Mina isn't seduced by him, she's assaulted and in the end, uses the mental bond he forms with her to lead her husband and Van Hesling to his lair so that they can kill him. I wonder what the odds of Hollywood ever making a movie about a woman who is victimized by a vampire and works to destroy for revenge him instead of cuddling his head and wanting to bone him...
Coppola's Dracula is a good looking, but disorganised, movie. The acting is peculiar... especially the British surfer dude, oh god...
and one particular scene that scared the f*ck outa me. Just thinking about it gives me the creeps, though I wonder if it would have the same effect on me if I saw it now.
This?
And I should love Watchmen. But I hate that movie.
I love Alan Moore's book. Snyder's adaptation was appalling.
Great, another movie about walking!
I expect there to be no chemistry between Bale and Hathaway at all.
If you guys are gonna do Westerns then I suggest this 'masterpiece'.
Xtroid wrote:Unforgiven is ok.
Hmmm, I see your point.
It's been awhile since I saw the film... I remember being impressed by the direction and the acting, but not the story. Maybe I'll have to watch it again... with DIF.
I'm not going to say the Nolan Batman films are brilliantly written -- the "you either die a hero" line makes me want to scream, too -- but I do watch a lot of movies and they are certainly in Sturgeon's 10% of not-complete-crap.
I can't stand the dialogue.
I believe it was Teague who complained about the writing in the Spider-Man movies and that the characters didn't talk like real people, saying what they're thinking all time, etc. Well, I have the same complains about Nolan's Batman films. The characters in those movies don't seem like real people to me... they seem more like puppets for exposition. I don't believe in any of the characters.
It's also amusing that the author seems to be using the Tim Burton Batman as an example of a better "take" on Batman, I gather he wasn't around for the Batfan outrage that erupted at the time, when it was announced that the director and star of Beetlejuice were going to do Batman. Come on, Michael Keaton? Really? And the director of PeeWee's Big Adventure? Get out!
"Fans of the Batman franchise complained when they heard of Michael Keaton's casting. However, no one complained when they saw his performance" - Alison McMahan, The Films of Tim Burton: Animating Live Action in Contemporary Hollywood.
And then when it came out, and the "true" fans saw how cartoony it was - oh, the horror!
Uh? Fans loved the film when they saw it in 1989. It was Batman finally portrayed seriously and dark. Keaton & Nicholson nailed it... as well as Danny Elfman whose theme for the film became "The Batman Theme." The 60s tv show was now a thing of the past. Nobody walked out of the film, complaining that it was "cartoony"... it's a comic book movie!
Thank God for the Tim Burton movie because it was so extremely darker than anybody had seen Batman before in any kind of mass media. - Bruce Timm ("true" fan), co-creator of Batman: The Animated Series
http://gothamalleys.blogspot.com/2011/0 … ovies.html
"While today the movie isn't shocking with its dark tone and approach, and the Gothic macabre and some camp is more lighthearted, one must remember that before this movie the only superhero movies were the 1960s Batman TV series, Superman movies ,Flash Gordon, Supergirl and Disney's Condorman. All very colorful, lighthearted and family friendly movies. Batman was the first superhero movie which showed a gun pointed at a child, charred corpses, implied sex scene, implied torturing and its visual results (Alicia) and even visible shotwounds to the face. It's impact and influence was felt instantly, when it was followed by such superhero/comic book movies as R rated The Punisher, much darker than expected TMNT and Darkman."
What impressed me about Nolan's Batman is that it takes such a cornball idea so darn seriously and still makes it (mostly) work. Batman Begins I can take or leave, but Dark Knight is one I can watch repeatedly (and have) and enjoy it, all somehow without thinking "bat-man... what a silly premise". To me, that's quite an achievement.
I'm the opposite. I watch Begins/Dark Knight and all I'm thinking "this is just silly... this is not believable." I don't have that problem with the Burton ones because those movies don't try to rationalize the irrational and justify the premise of Batman into reality...
I'm more impressed with a comic book movie that resembles a comic book in terms of tone and visual impact... that embraces the fun, goofy, fantasy while still taking itself seriously.... like Burton's Batman. Actually, Burton's Batman films takes themselves very seriously, more so than most superhero movies, like Iron Man. You can almost call the Iron Man movies comedies. One of the disappointing aspects of Iron Man 2 is how they handle Tony Stark's alcoholic problems. It's a big deal in the comics but it's barely an issue in the movie... it's pretty much played for laughs.
Nolan showed Batman as a deeply damaged character
Burton did that, and much more impressive I must say... Burton acknowledges that Batman is f*cking insane. Nolan portrays Batman as just another well-meaning do-gooder in a suit. It's too bad, because Bale knows how to play crazy... http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0144084/
Ironically enough, Burton's version of Batman would have fit in the more drab Nolan universe (let's face it, if a guy dressed as a bat popped up today in New York or Los Angeles kicking mugger asses, he'd totally have a few screws loose to say the least), while Nolan's more traditionally heroic Batman would have been believable in Burton's stylized comic book world...
Just came across this long interview between Colbert (out of character) and Niel De Grass Tyson.
There's a hilarious discussion about the scientific accuracy of JJ Abrams' Star Trek and a rant about Titanic by Tyson.
"And you drop it into the core of a planet and it turns a planet into a black hole? I thought that's kinda cool!"
lol
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Xtroid
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.