26

(2 replies, posted in Off Topic)

You guys should totally do this again for RLM's The Force Awakens Review.

27

(372 replies, posted in Off Topic)

El Nameaux-Standardon wrote:

Personally, my feelings on them can be summarized as "disappointed". I don't think they're bad (except AOTC) because I am able to watch them and be entertained (again, except AOTC). They certainly don't stack up to the OT in my book and I wish they had been much better. However, I do stand by my opinion that Qui-Gon does actually have a personality other than "stoic"; but if you don't even want to accept the premise that TPM can be analyzed as a movie, then I get why you'd dismiss and not even entertain claims like that.

I'm convinced that whenever people say "PT is okay, but AotC is awful", they're projecting their hatred of the romance, and Anakin's personality, onto the rest of the movie - the rest of the movie being the actual main storyline, and hardly below TPM in quality.

Well I'm not trying to make any claims about the quality, just my own enjoyment of the movie. And while the romance indeed isn't great and Anakin does do a lot of entitled whining, the main reason I dislike AOTC is that I just find it incredibly boring. Like it's just tedious for me to get through. I find that this isn't the case with the other prequels.

28

(372 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It's so fascinating to see the different sides of the spectrum. Over on the prequel forum at TFN, you have people who absolutely love those movies. And on the other side, you have Squiggly's thoughts about them.

Personally, my feelings on them can be summarized as "disappointed". I don't think they're bad (except AOTC) because I am able to watch them and be entertained (again, except AOTC). They certainly don't stack up to the OT in my book and I wish they had been much better. However, I do stand by my opinion that Qui-Gon does actually have a personality other than "stoic"; but if you don't even want to accept the premise that TPM can be analyzed as a movie, then I get why you'd dismiss and not even entertain claims like that.

29

(372 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I get what their point was, but for Qui-Gon specifically I would definitely be able to come up with words like: stubborn, passionate, opinionated, compassionate. For the other examples they gave, like Queen Amidala, I would agree with their point that it's hard to quickly come up with adjectives. But I really do think that there's a fully fledged character there in Qui-Gon. The responses to that question probably depend a lot on who you're asking though. If the sample is biased for people who don't care for the prequels in general (or the whole thing is staged, like it may have been for that review) then you might get responses similar to those from the review. Additionally, he only had one movie worth of screen time whereas Han Solo had three (at the time of the review) and so that may play a factor in what people remember. Personally, I have many criticisms of the prequels, but the character of Qui-Gon was not one of them.

30

(372 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Darth Praxus wrote:

What are those beliefs, though? That's something that comes up in the fan community as well, but I've never heard a good explanation of what exactly makes Qui-Gon a maverick and what he feels so strongly for without bringing in the EU to help. He believes in the prophecy of the Chosen One, sure, but no one on the Council seems to not believe in it, so that's not particularly helpful.

Well I don't follow the EU, but that was the impression I got from just that movie. And when I say "beliefs", I mean more so that he has strong opinions and stands by them despite what anyone says. Here are some examples:

1.) Trusting their fate to some boy they met on Tatooine who has never once even finished a podrace. Despite Padme objecting and saying the Queen wouldn't approve, he does it anyway and suggests that the Queen not even be informed about this. This tells me that he's formulated an opinion about the situation and will stop at nothing to see it through, even if it means keeping the Queen in the dark about this.

2.) Insisting that Anakin be trained. Even though the council says that he should not be trained because they sense danger in his future, Qui-gon insists that he is the Chosen One; he then proceeds to defy the council by taking Anakin on as his apprentice. Even Obi-wan tries to tell him that he's gone too far but Qui-gon is having none of it. This, again, is another example of Qui-gon standing by his opinion and not really caring that other people don't seem to agree.

In addition to having strong opinions, I also think Qui-gon is a "ends justify the means" kind of guy as evidenced by his willingness to deceive the Queen and his use of the Force to make Watto's dice roll in his favor.

31

(372 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Although I found the RLM reviews to be very entertaining and thought they made some good points, I do agree that some of their points are a bit hyperbolic.

One of the points I disagree with RLM on is the "describe Qui-gon without using his appearance or profession". All they could come up with the in the review was "stoic", which I don't think is true. I would personally describe Qui-gon as someone who has strong & passionate beliefs to the point of being stubborn and getting tunnel-vision. I think he was probably the strongest character in The Phantom Menace. That's one that I remember off the top of my head, but I'm sure there are other exaggerated points as well.

Yeah, I liked the film in terms of the interesting characters it set up. But I had major problems with the pacing, which made it feel like some modern action flick rather than a Star Wars movie. I also felt the movie seemed to lose focus once Han Solo came into the picture. Like up until that point, everything was so tight; Luke is missing, Rey finds the droid with the map to Luke, Kylo Ren is tracking them down, and basically the movie seems like it's a race to see which side can get to Luke first.

But once Han Solo is introduced, it seems to veer off course a bit. And speaking of Han, the movie waits 17 whole minutes to acknowledge why Han is even in the movie. Like he comes on board the Falcon and we get no clue as to why he's there, how he found them, or why the story is now about escaping the CGI tentacle monsters. It's only after landing on Maz's planet that the movie thinks we deserve some explanation. Once on Maz's planet, the movie really seems to lose focus. What happened to the urgency in finding Luke? And it also seemed to bit odd to me that Maz just randomly had Luke's old lightsaber. It just seemed like the movie was telling us to not think about it too much and just accept what was happening.

Things pick up again towards the end on Starkiller base but again, the Luke storyline is nowhere to be found. But this part is still interesting due to all the character stuff with Han, Kylo, Rey, and Finn. Overall, I think the film's biggest success was setting up interesting characters that we want to see more of and learn more about. Like I wanted to learn more about Rey's backstory, Kylo's backstory, and what made Luke disappear. But as a film on its own, I just wish it had more focus, less random occurrences, and better pacing. So I still enjoyed it, but I'm hoping Episode 8 is a more intimate and focused film where we can explore the characters more, kind of like TESB but with a completely different plot.

33

(51 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Awesome, will it be on this site or Geeknation?

34

(51 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Would you guys at the Extended Edition also be able to snag Ryan Wieber for a commentary? It'd be cool to hear his thoughts as well since he worked on the VFX for TFA.

35

(51 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I hope this announcement means the return of old friends....in my head.

The super-important question though is: will we get another FIYH podcast for TFA once it's released on Blu-ray???

Are we going to get a FIYH podcast about this movie? Maybe when the Blu-ray comes out? Because that would be awesome.

I've always rationalized it as midichlorians are drawn people who are strong with the Force. And so they can be used to measure Force strength and provide empiric "knowledge of the Force" but aren't what actually determine Force strength. To me, that's the only way midichlorians can somewhat fit Obi-wan and Yoda's description of the Force in the originals. Still, I don't understand why they were even introduced into the prequels to begin with.

39

(50 replies, posted in Episodes)

Has anyone seen this reddit post about Anakin's head morph? I thought it was interesting that the world finally noticed what Ryan pointed out back in 2009.