476

(26 replies, posted in Episodes)

The van broke the movie for me. I spent most of the movie in the theater asking myself dozens of questions about the van. How did they get it to work but not any other vehicles? How and why did everyone on the freeway manage to get pulled over to the side enough for the van to get by? Why wasn't the van affected? Because it was off? Broken? If the van was affected and that mechanic fixed it, why could no one else figure out the problem? How could a jet liner crash and explode around their house without either destroying the house or the van? How was the news guys van and gear also working, even though they seemed to have witnessed these things first hand? The army guys all had vehicles as well. It's not like they took out all the vehicles, right? Why didn't anyone else's car work?

And then other questions popped into my head, like:
- If the aliens need people to make their blood-plants grow, why do their weapons utterly obliterate this resource and only this resource?
- If the aliens' weapons evaporate humans, where did all the river bodies come from, and how did they all end up in the river all at once? Did the aliens happen by the worlds largest canoe river tour or something? It's not like they all fell off a cruise liner or something, since they're floating down a kinda medium sized river.
- Was the splinter significant? Is the idea that the human body would just naturally push the splinter out supposed to be some kind of foreshadowing of the earth finding some way of 'pushing out' the alien invaders? Or was it just to demonstrate early on how fucking annoying this character was going to be throughout the entire film?
- When the aliens start coming over the hills while they're boarding the river boat, why does everyone desperately try to get onto the large, slow-moving and highly obvious target instead of just running away in random directions?
- If the alien vehicles were already here, as implied in the film, then were they responsible for creating life on this planet? Is this their method of colonization / terraforming a planet? If all of this is true, then were they somehow forgetting that whole "evolution" thing and the possibility that their method would most likely create a variety of interesting forms of life that would kill the shit out of them? If they didn't create us, but rather just planted the ships in preparation for their invasion, then why the hell didn't they just invade in the first place?
- Why the hell would you walk around an alien planet that was teeming with life without some sort of protective suit or clothing of any kind? Why the hell are aliens always nude in general? I would wear ten layers of armor-plated Hazmat suits if I was assigned surface detail on some alien planet. I don't care how breathable the atmosphere is.
- Why did it take some random survivor to point out the fact that the alien ships were vulnerable? In fact, why the hell would they not shoot at it if it was just sitting there leaning up against a building? Why would they stop shooting at it at all? They are alien trying to kill us. Shoot at them. It may look like the aliens called a time out to catch their breath, but they aren't allowed to do that. Shoot at them.

The kid should have died, but even if he had, the movie still would have bugged me a lot. I consider this to be one of Spielberg's worst films, though not from a technical level. He's always great at all the shooting/editing/effects/scene-construction stuff. Even the basic story isn't that bad. There are just too many moments in the film where something will happen that makes me say "wait...  I thought that that couldn't happen" or "wait... How come they don't just do this?". The van / vehicle stuff is all I can think of when I watch this flick.

477

(17 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Doctor Submarine wrote:
Dorkman wrote:

What's the life of the average guy in a world of superheroes and villains? Someone who never knows what the evil mastermind's plot is, he just has to call in the insurance claim when the hero punches Dr. Nemesis through his car.

*immediately starts writing*

There's a comic called "Powers". If you haven't read it, do so. It's about a couple of detectives who don't have powers who are in charge of dealing with powers-related homicides. I don't even like superhero comics, but I pick that one up when the trades come out cause the writing is so awesome. They're gearing up to shoot a pilot for the FX network. It will be the best show ever.

The book isn't set in any particular universe, so there aren't any familiar superheroes in it and they use that to their advantage. It's probably the most clever take on super powers I've ever seen.

I would vote for a non-blockbuster flick for the suggested story, tho Woody Allen wouldn't be my first choice. Maybe Duncan Jones or Oliver Hirschbiegel. Also, someone give Oliver Hirschbiegel a decent script so he can make a flick over here and get rich and famous and stuff, please. Thanks.

478

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'm going to see this movie when it comes out because I actually have a thing for bad movies. That said, I do also like watching shit blow up, and this movies does look like it'll have a lot of awesome stuff-blowing-up shots. I can see why these films make so much money. I just wish the people who make Transformers their meat and potatoes could get so excited for a movie like Children of Men or The Prestige. I believe this is due to the fact that explosions are pretty easily identifiable as awesome, while drama and acting probably all looks the same to them. Alas.

Also, I will give Bay credit for actually blowing up real shit in his movies. I suspect, tho, that he only does it because he himself wants to see giant fireballs throwing cars around on his set. He really is a connoisseur of explosions. A great chef knows what great food tastes like. Great art can only be created by an great artist who has spent years honing his skill. If explosions can be great art, then Micheal Bay is such an artist.

479

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

I don't like to throw this word around because it gets overused on the internet, but I don't think anyone on hand would disagree:

This recording session was epic.

The shawshank episode is clearly the best you guys have ever done.

480

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

The part with the mouse. Totally didn't need that part, anyway.

481

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

Yeah, this is gonna be a 6 hour block of DiF...

... YAY!

482

(12 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Thank you for reminding me of My Cousin Vinny. Just watched it on netflix. That movie is great.

I guess I should add a few more that haven't yet been mentioned yet. Trying to keep thinking of overlooked flicks, but it's hard to come up with good ones.

Ed Wood. Overlooked film from the mid 90's by Tim Burton starring Johnny Depp. It's not really a biopic since it's heavily fictionalized, but it definitely gives you a good idea of how totally surreal Ed Wood's reality was. It's also a flick about film making, which may or may not make it more relevant to this forum.

And speaking of comedies about film making, Living In Oblivion is another that isn't widely known about. Steve Buscemi wrote, directed and starred in it. It's about a director trying to finish a film while the entire cast and crew seem hell-bent on making his life a living hell. Pretty much equal parts goofy antics and "it's funny cause it's true" type comedy.

(sorry if there's an ad before that...)

And now for one that's so obscure that you're probably lucky if you can find a copy of it in any way shape or form on the planet because as far as I know this film toured a few festivals and art house theaters and then failed to get wide distribution in any way shape or form. I speak of Colin Fitz Lives!. The story goes like this: in the mid 90's, this guy named Robert Bella decided he was gonna make a movie. I dunno if he was inspired by Kevin Smith or not, but the guy made the film by maxing out his credit cards to the tune of $150K. He made the film, it toured in festivals, won awards, became a hit at Sundance and the guy went from nobody to promising comedy director overnight. Unfortunately, the offers he was getting for distribution wouldn't give him enough money to cover his expenses for making the film, so he ended up not taking any of the offers, going flat broke and sleeping at night in a rented mini-storage unit curled up around the canisters containing his awesome film.

I saw this flick WAY back in the late 90's when it was still doing the festival / arthouse circuit, and I remember liking it a lot. The trailer I have below this sorta makes it out to be a wacky, goofy, sophmoric sort of dumb comedy, but the film I remember was pretty dark and was more dry comedy than zany antics. Anyway, for the last decade or so I've been waiting for this damn movie to come out on DVD or something so I could have a copy. Turns out that this Robert Bella fellow finally managed to pay off his personal debt and has struck a deal with IFC to release his film in a Video On Demand format. It's $20. I'm currently downloading it. I can only hope that it lives up to the memory I have of it. Anyway, here's a trailer, but I do believe it's trying to sell the film as something that it's not. Once I download it, assuming there's not some ridiculous DRM involved, I'll watch it and attempt to cut a trailer that better resembles the darker comedy tone I remember the film having.

EDIT: Colin Fitz Lives is ok. You can tell the guy was going for a Kevin Smith type of dialogue through most of the movie, but the actors weren't up to the task. Not bad, tho. It's not gonna make you laugh out loud or anything, but it's got some decent scenes.

Don't buy shit from IFC's little webstore, tho. It's got DRM that prevents you from using any player but their own, and their player is fairly crap. Play, pause, stop and not much else. No option settings that I can find. Kinda crap way to sell your movies. They should strike a deal with Netflix for rentals and just sell DVDs.

483

(37 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Just joined the group. I'm down for some TF2...  though I have to re-re-re-download it first.

484

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Have you guys seen the bit Conan did on it? http://teamcoco.com/video/conan-editors-love-final-cut
I could have sworn there was some other software that they announced at the same time that was getting the same sort of design "adjustments", but I can't find an article that confirms this. Meh.

On an aside, since we're talking about editing software here, have any of you tried Lightworks? I know it's not on mac, but it would be interesting to get some opinions from people who are familiar with other pro-level editing apps and who actually know what they're doing.

I only ask because it's one of the few editing apps within my budget (effectively zero) that 1) runs on windows and B) is targeted at people who want to do more than post vlogs on youtube.

485

(12 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Swimming with Sharks
Black Dynamite

I'm really fond of Dirty Work, but no one else likes that movie. I guess it's something of a guilty pleasure. I just like Norm MacDonald too damn much.

I could probably do with some suggestions as well, cause what I listed is pretty much the extent of my comedy knowledge, save for Mel Brooks and stuff like Airplane and Hot Shots.

486

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

Invid wrote:

Haven't seen the new War of the Worlds, so this will be interesting. It is one of those cases where I agree with massive changes to the book- the whole idea was to show how an alien invasion would be "now", so it makes sense to always update it to reflect modern conditions. Not that I wouldn't mind seeing a GOOD period adaptation.

The part with the alien invasion is the part that a lot of people - myself included - have a hard time getting over, not to mention a few other things that prevents the movie from making sense.

I don't have E.T. either. I dunno if my rental place will have it. I should probably just buy it...  It's probably $5 at walmart...

487

(30 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The Last Airbender. That should have been such an awesome movie. It's a testament to Shyamalan's skill as a film maker that he was able to suck anything interesting out of that thing in the transition from show to film. The only explanation I can think of is that his goal was to make it unwatchable.

488

(9 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I almost watched that a while back when netflix was aggressively insisting that I would love it every time I logged on. "Dude, you are so gonna love this movie. We think you'd rate it like 4.5 stars. You HAVE to watch this." But the description sounded so dull, and there are very few documentaries that manage to keep up a decent pace for a couple hours and don't resort to padding and shit, so I never watched it. But since you guys said it's good, I watched it.

And now I don't know how to feel. As a documentary it's fucking amazing. The content in the movie makes me feel really bad about saying anything positive about it, tho, cause I'd honestly rather the thing had never had to get made in the first place.

489

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

We need some Nic Cage. 8MM. Con Air. Lord Of War.

If you're gonna do LOTR, then just do one of them. I don't think there's sufficient crap to talk about for 9 hours worth of commentary on what is effectively one movie. The only thing that really amazes me about that movie is the amount of effort it took to keep the various scales of the characters looking right. Child doubles, complicated camera rigs, crazy set construction and forced perspective, etc.

490

(10 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I loved Super 8 as well, but yeah, it's got some weird problems in the writing that you could have fixed really easily. The only thing that really started to bug me were the jump-scares. Good lord there are a ton of those in there.

The part of the story that matters is the part about the parents and their kids, and the monster story is secondary to that and really sort of supports it. I mean, the kid likes this girl, but their parents hate each other, so they want to keep them apart. The monster steps in at that point and physically takes her away. The two fathers have their talk in the car and confront their guilt and anger right before the kid's scene where he stops running and confronts the monster.

The monster is building this machine that will apparently collect all the little cube things, but he's also wasting time killing people. In the scenes where the monster attacks people it's initially just collecting parts for it's machine, but then it's distracted by some human and takes them or kills them. I guess the scene with the kid was supposed to make it realize that it should stop wasting time and take off. The two fathers spend the movie ultimately defeating their own goals, which is to have a positive relationship with their kids, because they're too preoccupied with being pissed off at each other and feeling sorry for themselves. They take their selfish emotions out on their kids in the same way the monster takes it's own selfish emotions out on the humans in town. Overcoming selfishness is something of a theme in the film, as the fat kid has to deal with it as well.

I wanted to facepalm when the locket thing happened, but later I met some people who actually didn't get the whole "letting go of the locket" thing, so I guess the movie is riding that fine line between being your typical summer blockbuster and being subtle, though subtle isn't the right word.

I also thought the 8mm film was going to play much more into the movie's plot.

Overall, tho, it's probably the most fun and upbeat movie I've seen in a theater in a while. Too many action flicks are just so damn dark and depressing. Also, those two main kids can fuckin act. Pyro kid was funny. I liked how scenes with a bunch of people would often have multiple conversations going on at once. I'll probably see it again in the theater. Unfortunately, as I was being shoved through the exit door of the theater by the dicks behind me the kids' film started playing, so I didn't get to see more than a couple seconds of it. Wish I had just kept my ass in my seat.

491

(59 replies, posted in Episodes)

Strange Days got borked up again, didn't it?

EDIT:
This seems relevent: The Mindscape Of Alan Moore

492

(77 replies, posted in Episodes)

On a totally unrelated note, if you guys haven't seen it, you should watch "Find Me Guilty". It's not amazing or anything, but I'd say it's probably Vin's best performance and kinda proves that the guy can act.

493

(11 replies, posted in Off Topic)

haha, wow. I've never seen that episode. I'll have to see if it's on google video or netflix.

I was gonna mention Blade Runner as well. The scene with the snake salesman was clumsy in the older edits, but the latest cut makes that scene work a lot better. And speaking of anime, Warriors of the Wind is a pretty well butchered version of Nausicaa, but even the full cut of the movie feels like they ran out of time or money and couldn't finish some stuff.

There are a lot of movies that just feel like the editor cut out any sort of pauses in the dialogue and action. As soon as someone stops talking they'll cut to the next scene, or they'll do it the instant an action sequence ends. Eragon was like that. A lot of bad action movies are like that, really. Not really cutting things out, but cutting things way too close together.

494

(77 replies, posted in Episodes)

Not just that, but wasn't this supposed to be the first in some kind of trilogy or something? They still talk about making another one. At the end of the flick he is now in control of the most powerful army in the universe. Assuming the next movie isn't about the sudden arrival of some interdimensional space demons he has to fight with his new army, where do you go from the end of this movie?

495

(77 replies, posted in Episodes)

Teague wrote:

"I wonder if Vin Diesel wearing goggles will reflect photons well enough that he could be exposed on film alongside other actors." "Before we do anything, we should make a tightly plotted little survival thriller to test it out."

That could be the case. Vin Diesel only reflects photons if he wants to.

When I was 15 or 16 I was bored one night and was surfing around late-night cable TV to see what I could find. I ended up bumping randomly into Fellini's "La Strada". Some goofy chick who was acting all weird about her hat started getting bullied by some big oaf guy. I left it there for a minute just to see what the hell was going on and ended up watching the whole thing and having my feeble little teenage mind blown. My idea at the time of what a good movie was supposed to be was stuff like Star Wars and Jurassic Park and Die Hard. I never really got into Fellini after that, tho La Strada is still one of my favorite flicks, but becaues of that movie I ended up finding Kurosawa and allowed myself to watch older movies like "M" and "Breakfast At Tiffany's", which are both also favorite films of mine now.

A year or two later I got into anime with Akira, and eventually discovered "Grave of the Fireflies" (in a theater at a film festival, no less), which blew my mind again. Grave is my favorite film without a doubt.

La Strada showed me that movies could tell these really simple stories without any special effects or action sequences, yet they could be just as exciting and absorbing in other ways.

Grave of the Fireflies taught me that you could use a movie to eviscerate a theater full of grown adults and make them all sob uncontrollably like little babies.

And Return of the Jedi, for the record, was the first flick I ever saw (or at least remember seeing) in a theater.

497

(84 replies, posted in Episodes)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v611/Squiggly_P/Doc_Vest.jpg

Wait, didn't Zarban die at the end of the last page?

498

(17 replies, posted in Episodes)

I saw this in the theater and was amazingly perplexed at how much I liked it compared to what sort of reviews it was getting and what people were saying about it. I thought it was a great parody of sorts to all the various "constantly too dark but with tons of neon" superhero flicks that had been coming out at that time, and just funny if you're into comics in general.

Actually, if you go back to the so called "golden" age of comics, you find a LOT of characters that have the same sort of super powers that these guys have. "Brick Bat" was a guy who dressed up like a bat and threw bricks at people. Why? Cause it's a cool sounding name, I guess. The Shoveler and Carmine The Bowler would have fit right in with that era of super heroes.

There's actually a site that has info for a lot of those old abandoned crap characters, and the best part is that they're all so old now that they're public domain and you could make your own comics or movies based on these guys if you wanted to. Public Domain Superheroes

But yeah, I liked this flick. I wouldn't want to watch it all the time, but once every few years is good.

You know what's weird as hell, tho. This morning I woke up and went outside for a cigarette and was thinking about the movie I saw a couple days ago, "Super". I started thinking about all the various superhero parody films and this one popped into my head. I thought "Hey, I should add that to the DIF suggestion thread, that would probably be an interesting flick to talk about, given the cast, the recent spurt of superhero parody flicks, etc." So I clicked on the DIF book mark and look what pops up. If I had been drinking anything it would have resulted in a beautiful spit-take.

499

(84 replies, posted in Episodes)

As long as the second and third pages have Zarban in them, I'll read em. He's just so fun, it's worth reading a crap thread if he's in it.

500

(18 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I worked at Blockbuster and used to love it. I mean, yeah, stupid customers suck and all that, but I had so much fun doing it. Especially when you get to fuck with those very same stupid customers.

I was into crappy B-movies even then, and the store I first worked at had "Gator Bait: Special Edition". Some shitty 70's sexploitation flick. The front of the box touted that this special extended version of the film featured "the uncut and unrated prison rape scene!" As a result, every time someone brought a special edition version up to my register I'd say "Oh, man, you're gonna love this version of E.T.:The Extra Terrestrial! It's got the fully restored prison rape sequence!"