5,401

(44 replies, posted in Episodes)

Resident Down in Front fly on the wall and assistant Matt tried something fancy this week, he put together a list of links to everything we talk about as we go through the movie, be it people, books, or essays.

I want feedback on this - do you guys think you'll ever be happy to have a list like this, or is it a waste of time?

Thanks, Matt!

2001: A Space Odyssey on IMDB
Buy 2001: A Space Odyssey at Amazon.com (no, we don't get kickbacks)

CinemaScope
The Making of Kubrick's 2001 on Amazon. Looks like it's out of print now, but this will get you going in the right direction.
The Lost Worlds of 2001 Same here, but, ya know, were trying.
Doug Trumbull
Dennis Muren

John Dykstra
This week's special guest, Serge Delpierre
Films with opening overtures
Stuart Freeborn
"Footprint in the snow" moment
Soundtrack on iTunes
Ray Lovejoy

Multiplane Camera
Parallax
Ballistic motion
Theremin, as used in film
RP, or Rear Projection as opposed to
Front Projection. Both are used in this film.
POV shot, or Point of View shot

Olivier Mourgue designed the chairs used in this scene.
The whole centrifugal (force) thing, as opposed to centripetal force.
Magic Beans
Pretty sure this is the cartoon Brian is talking about, several are on YouTube.
Space: 1999

George Lucas and our own Trey Stokes attended USC, just to name a few. You can too!
Instructions for the Zero Gravity Toilet
For the full story of the American journey to the Moon, we highly endorse the series From the Earth to the Moon.
The Apollo Program
Italian director, Giuseppe Bertolucci.

Roberto Benigni
The Discovery as one of Wired Magazines Five Awesomest TV and Movie Spaceships, in November 2008.  The Discovery is still cool people.
Arne Jacobsen created the flatware used in this scene.  It can still be purchased today.

The origin of HAL
GLaDOS from the valve game Portal
There are plenty of examples of the Discovery pod in Watto's junkyard, just Google it.
It's Damn Interesting just how long you can actually survive unprotected in outer space.

Why no widescreen?
Margaret Stackhouse's breakdown of 2001. Kubrick approved.
The Hero's Journey
Zeitgeist
Galilean Moons
Slit-scan photography
Some enterprising soul "unwrapped" the slit-scan from 2001.

Cinerama
What does it mean to be Human?

5,402

(44 replies, posted in Episodes)

Glad you enjoyed it sir, and thanks for the feedback. I have less of a story problem with HAL now that we've had the conversation we did on the show, but your post actually makes a clearer point for me.

5,403

(44 replies, posted in Episodes)

We're joined this week by the sexy and knowledgeable man of science Serge Delpierre.

This is another one of those episodes like The Phantom Menace and Wild Wild West (and to a lesser extent Full Metal Jacket) where I went in thinking one thing and my co-panelists blew my mind. Let them blow you next.

5,404

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Trust me, it's not like we've forgotten about the original trilogy, Indiana Jones and Back to the Future. Those are coming, on your face, and will probably make your eye burn.

However, in the mean time, we did do commentaries of Back to the Future, Raiders, Crusade and Crystal Skull on Geekza, in episodes generously being hosted by DiF forumer Zarban.

These are between a year and three years old, and I don't attempt to vouch for quality. But if they'll hold you over, feel held. By us. Just keep an eye out for when Back to the Future comes.







See what I did?

5,405

(23 replies, posted in Episodes)

Sorry about the audio quality here. This is the second week in a row our tried and true setup has resulted in my audio quality being less clean than the other voices, so I'll do a mic and cord check before our next recording. That being said, the whole episode is pretty hot, too, so. My bad.

But, you know. Good commentary. So shut up.

5,406

(18 replies, posted in Episodes)

Oh, huh. Need to re-watch with that in mind. Good call sir.

Thanks, magnificent bastards need love too.

5,407

(5 replies, posted in Episodes)

This is exactly what it is. Go.

5,408

(27 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Thanks to both of you guys for buying merch. As I point out on the Cafepress site, at this point, we're not even making money off of those, we just wanted to make them available.

Is the hoodie comfy? I'm thinking about getting one for myself, all I have right now is a shirt.

5,409

(50 replies, posted in Episodes)

Wow, cool. Thanks for the link.

5,410

(25 replies, posted in Episodes)

We love Eddie, and not just because he's stunning to look at and a tremendous player here in Hollywood. We love him because he can bring the pain, and bring the pain he does.

"Asimovian." He says that shit. Who says that shit? Eddie.

I consider this a good summary of the episode.

5,411

(4 replies, posted in Episodes)

Orgazmo is one of those movies that some of you will not have seen, and it's possible that some of you coming to it fresh because of this endorsement won't like it. And to be fair, that's completely reasonable.

After all, this is a movie about sex, it's NC-17, it was very low budget, and it was made in the nineties; everything about it is dirty. The reason we here at Down in Front like it is...well, everything about it is hilariously funny.

This week our guest is Jeff Schubert, the host of the popular web show FilmNut (open in new tab) and actor in a little movie called Orgazmo, which I'm sure one day we'll get around to doing a commentary for. Oh snap, we're doing it right now.

Let me apologize up front for a poorly mixed intro, it's a little blown out, and that's a bummer on an episode as special as this one. I'm going to do my best to see that that never happens again. That being said, enjoy the wonder of Orgazmo.

5,412

(9 replies, posted in Episodes)

Uh, The Phantom Menace?


/this is not a serious comment

/in the event of a serious comment resembling this, stay calm

5,413

(1 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Hey, cool. People on the movin'-pictures box.

5,414

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

If we were to do Big Lebowski, I'd want to do it with Adam Bertocci, but it's totally possible. I actually haven't seen the whole thing.

Back to the Future is definitely on its way, and I'm sure we'll get to The Fifth Element in short order, too.

5,415

(18 replies, posted in Episodes)

This movie blows my freaking mind.

Excellent non-linear storytelling. Nikola Tesla. Andy Serkis. Magic. Drowning women. It's like they read my MySpace and made a movie just for me.

Eddie swings by for a little sex on the podcast, and we have an excellent discussion about the works of Christopher Nolan, the merits of the one-piece-of-screenwriting-magic, and about - well - magic.

Enjoy.

5,416

(4 replies, posted in Off Topic)

You go first, I'm gonna play it safe and see what everyone else says.

5,417

(19 replies, posted in Off Topic)

@DorkmanScott

I read your reply last night before I fell asleep, remembered having something to say, but now I'm exhausted of the conversation. I think we're all on the same page anyway.

5,418

(19 replies, posted in Off Topic)

However, even granting you that "filmmaking" and "storytelling" are interchangeable terms, I still don't think that it's a "failure...on every conceivable level." The CG was good. The cinematography was good. The production design was good. I can "conceive" of a lot of other ways that it was a fine film, and therefore -- according to our new definition of "filmmaking = storytelling" -- a successfully told story in a number of ways.

This appears to suggest you think CG, cinematography and production design a good story make.

I know you don't think that, I'm just saying. This paragraph is not helping.

5,419

(19 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Uh, no. Your exact wording was that it was a "failure of filmmaking on every conceivable level."

I've never had a problem with the FX accomplishments in the film. Whatever I said when I was drunk at 3 a.m. notwithstanding, my first impression was that the story was an awful mess and most of the visuals were awesome.

Not to get into a semantics argument, but I wouldn't classify the statement you're quoting as one that includes visual effects. Filmmaking as an abstract is storytelling, in my mental dictionary. There's room for shades of gray, but any other definition starts replacing pieces of what filmmaking means with CGmaking.

I think it's perfectly solid filmmaking and, as I've said on several occasions including in this thread, the film I saw in theatres before AVATAR was 2012. You want inept storytelling? 2012 is the jackpot, and it's almost as long as AVATAR to boot.

We've been over this, but I had fun with 2012. I don't think it's an excellent movie, and I recall more than a few moments of bad science, but I was actually more involved with the plights of those characters than of the folk in Avatar. There could be a dozen reasons why, so I'll call that incidental, but I didn't have a problem with the story of one and did with the other.

It may well boil down to the hype. Neither was the movie it should have been, but 2012 didn't tell me it would be.

5,420

(19 replies, posted in Off Topic)

We are now, walking out of the theater Dorkman was all AOTC-jaded.

"It was good! It was good! Yoda fought and...and...it was good! Shut up!"

Bastards. I'm just ahead of the curve.

5,421

(19 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Saw it again today, had the same problems with it. Uninvolving story, a bunch of characters whose opinions and outlook never change (it also occurs to me, the audience has the same thing going on - we're never given a reason to see two sides to anything, it's very unilateral) and a bunch of vague stakes resulting in more questions than answers.

It is what it is, I know. Just sorta sad. I see this the way you guys saw Wild Wild West.

Me with WWW, ya'll with Avatar: "Hey, this movie's effects are awesome, and....I like it! Yeah, I think this works!"

Me with Avatar, ya'll with WWW: "The effects are good, but you're not imagining how good this could be if it was just...better."

Things that stood out to me this time include the score, which seems to either be mocking the plight of the characters or over-indulging it at every - single - turn, and Michelle Rodriguez literally painting war paint on her chopper when she attacks the fleet, completely making a target of herself in what would otherwise be a wise, stealthy situation. Also, Sigourney's Na'vi avatar has a human nose, not a Na'vi nose. That's why she looks weird.

The last thing I noticed is that a lot of the problems in the movie resemble the sort of problems you get in another situation - where an expansive book has been adapted to a movie, and certain shortening changes had to be made to make everything fit. The sidekick scientist guy's whole "I resent you for being Mr. Lead Na'vi, aaaaaand now I don't anymore!" two-minute episode,  the backstory of Jake Sulley and his brother's actual qualifications, the state of Earth (and by extension, why unobtanium is important), the lack of compassion on the part of anyone but the specific Na'vi scientists and chopper lady.

There's also, wait for it, absolutely no externally redeeming quality to the Na'vi, as characters. They're total douchebags. They're in touch with nature, and the humans are apparently really, seriously evil, so that's how the movie plays out...but this goes back to what I was saying. Jake Sully is the only character with mostly-an-arc, and you could argue the pilot chick has kind of an arc as well (I wouldn't - she never seems like "one of them" in the movie, she's always compassionate), and the audience is in the same boat as the rest of the characters, with no multi-layered insight into the proceedings, a very confined sense from beginning to end of what's subjectively happening and how to feel.

In a stronger film, we'd decide to side with the Na'vi. (And that wouldn't be fucking hard to write, humans are literally destroying their home.) We'd witness someone on screen make some sort of a decision they weren't always going to make. We'd see why the humans decide to up and attack them, as opposed to keep trying peacefully - and sort of understand it.

We'd also see why the Na'vi are so important, aside from being innocent. We'd see a gentle one, or see one of them save the proverbial cat with a human. (Don't tell me Na'vi chick saving Jake's ass counts, she does it and then gives a completely unresolved explanation for why. "You have a strong heart?" So fucking what? Do weak-hearted things get to die? What do you even mean? You look fake sometimes, shut up.)

Anyway. Avatar. Be psyched for the Down in Front.

5,422

(19 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I really like that definition of exploitation film. I'm not sure if I'll adopt it, but I'd like to bring it up in a future episode and see how the other guys feel about it. At the very least, I like it for this conversation; if we're going to go with that definition, then Avatar definitely qualifies.

I saw the flick with several Down in Fronty people, so they all know my feelings on it. To summarize, clearly the accomplishment of the FX team - in terms of quantity and quality - is what's to be celebrated here. Walking out of the theater, I complained to Dorkman and the others that the movie 'amounts to a failure of filmmaking,' which I may revisit upon future viewings. Every sub-angle of my complaints can be traced back to a script that felt like student work or a second draft, and that felt clunky and awkward even for Cameron.

That's all for now. I'm killing time at the airport on my phone, and this has  taken ten minutes to write.

5,423

(1 replies, posted in Episodes)

Hey folks, Teague here. Sorry for the delayed release of this and of Nightmare (and for the lack of PAL versions for both!), this past two weeks has been absolutely non-stop for me, and attempts to get things done on time have been thwarted.

There will be PAL versions for both as soon as this weekend, perhaps sooner if anybody wants to volunteer. It's a simple process, all you need is Audacity and the NTSC versions.

Anyway. Gremlins. I was unfamiliar with this one, and so I'm unfit to tell you about it. What do you want to talk about?

Gas prices, huh? Yeah.

5,424

(5 replies, posted in Episodes)

I feel owned.

5,425

(5 replies, posted in Episodes)

An amazing little movie, just in time for the holidays.