Update: tried to watch a bit more last night, but only made it as far as their arrival at The Tower of London, and the ensuing moment of "oh fuck..." To be fair I had just come off a full eight hours running around at work.
RedXavier wrote:It's just as bad historically as Gladiator and Braveheart sure, but then it's a boring, incoherent, badly cast trainwreck of a movie with little to no redeeming entertainment qualities.
I think that really sums it up. I mean, Robin Hood is very much like Gladiator, in that it's a purely fictional story where the story takes place around real historical people / places / events. Whereas, in Braveheart and Black Hawk Down the stories are supposed to depict actual people / places / events.
When I saw Braveheart, I knew nothing about Scottish history, and I think I enjoyed it more because of it. Black Hawk Down was a story I was very familiar with when I saw it, and was definitely part of why I didn't care for it.
Since then I guess I've developed this need to see history reflected with some degree of accuracy in film. When I saw Bonnie and Clyde a couple years ago I was disappointed to later read their historical account, and find that in this case, the history was more interesting than the film.
I think a cooking analogy of some kind would work well here, because historical events are rarely very good as films in their "raw" form. You need that bit drama, that something extra to make it more palatable, but it's easy to go too far. It's also easy to get the order wrong. If I order a steak, I might be able to forgive being served a hamburger if it turns out to be really good, but if I'm served a veggieburger, I'm leaving the table.
If I'm going to watch, or ask others to watch, a film that takes place in a fairly well documented part of history, then one of the following scenarios should play out: 1.) If I'm not familiar with that part of history, I'd like to learn something from the film that is based on those historical facts. 2.) If I am familiar with that part of history, don't insult my intelligence.
Granted the whole Richard / John / Robin Hood story is so skewed by popular belief that the chances of even Ridley Scott getting it right were slim, but as an Englishman, I was kind of hoping he'd have a bit more respect for his own history.