526

(538 replies, posted in Creations)

Zarban wrote:
Tomahawk wrote:
fireproof78 wrote:

what if Tom did his dialog in Norwegian? Would that seem odd to then add subtitles or would it work?

Neither of the lines really work in Norwegian, and also; not happening.

http://clickboothblog.integraclick.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Oh-my-god-cat-shocking.jpg

omg it's impossible to express evil thoughts in norwegian...

Well, it was just a thought. Not trying to put anyone on the spot here  hmm


Carry on, gents

527

(538 replies, posted in Creations)

paulou wrote:

I have not been able to be a part of this, but I'm very happy it is happening.

Seconded. This is an amazing group of people.

Also, just throwing this out there-what if Tom did his dialog in Norwegian? Would that seem odd to then add subtitles or would it work?

Sorry, just random thoughts here.

528

(11 replies, posted in Off Topic)

avatar wrote:

The NSA is building a super data storage centre in Utah that'll store everyone's phone & internet traffic. Backing up movies/TV should be simple by comparison.

Indeed.

Really, I don't know why we are worried. Torrents will out live us all and the NSA will documented everything.

529

(11 replies, posted in Off Topic)

That's just what the government wants you to think wink

I will freely admit to being a bit of a hoarder in that I save things for years because I think I might need them some day. Given the way we weep and cry over the loss of information at the Library of Alexandria burning or other such tragedies, I'm inclined to say save it, at least writings and movies and such.

And even there is no long term "plan" for saving media (save for an old salt mine) many schools have created databases of material for online libraries. So, I imagine it is only a matter of time before a larger database is created to preserve knowledge.

530

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Ok, that was pretty impressive. I have no familiarity at all with the character but it was a lot of fun.

531

(538 replies, posted in Creations)

Dave wrote:

Be gentle with me, Mildred.

http://www.tvcream.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/george2.jpg

http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/84/8457a776e7176512b486c51a76246836f35b141c2c29fcbed74ad65d7d25e1a2.jpg

532

(262 replies, posted in Episodes)

Invid wrote:
Sam F wrote:

I just rewatched the original a few nights ago (never saw the Burton remake). I think they'll need to make some big changes in the next one in order for it to work for audiences today. In the original, Heston thought he was in a far off solar system the entire movie, even though there were humans and apes and English. That worked okay in 1968, but they can't get away with that nonsense these days at least without giving him a decent theory behind his thinking. I'm interested to see where they'll go with it.

I've always been interested in seeing them try and adapt the actual book smile

Do a movie based on a book?

https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/6400919552/h5500550D/

533

(538 replies, posted in Creations)

Zarban wrote:
fireproof78 wrote:

Looking amazing, everyone!

Good job to everyone, especially to your actors, Zarban. Very big troopers on this one big_smile

Looks like a blast, and that you all are having fun.

So, did Teague shoot a fight of his own while he was there? wink

You hit the nail on the head, Fireproof. Teague and Jim asked about the temperament of the kids, and I said they would have a lot of patience and take direction well, which they did, but I did not anticipate a grueling 10+ hour day for them. I'm afraid I sometimes insisted on moving on instead of exploring another variation in order to keep things moving. I had less patience than the kids did.

Teague and Jim worked out a couple of lightsaber exchanges on video, as I recall. Maybe that will be an extra.

(The kids really want a blooper real, but honestly there were hardly any bloopers. Just some flubbed lines, robes caught on branches, and one lightsaber bonk.)

Well, when you want to get stuff done, it's easy to feel the need to move on.

Also, I wish any of my fan film projects went half as smoothly. If only i still had those VHS tapes wink

Still, very exciting and can't wait to see more!

534

(538 replies, posted in Creations)

Looking amazing, everyone!

Good job to everyone, especially to your actors, Zarban. Very big troopers on this one big_smile

Looks like a blast, and that you all are having fun.

So, did Teague shoot a fight of his own while he was there? wink

Cotterpin Doozer wrote:
fireproof78 wrote:

Also, how does one do battle with a spelling bee? Has Michael Bay been contacted?

Sharpen your vocabulary, and shred your enemies to ribbons with a vicious tongue-lashing. Or just hit 'em in the head with a really big dictionary?

I have one of those. A really, really big dictionary.

536

(538 replies, posted in Creations)

BigDamnArtist wrote:
fireproof78 wrote:

I should have gone with a Gungan chariot race.

Are the Gungan's strapped to the wheels? Are there spikes on these chariots? Laser spikes? Does the race take place in medium high thorny brush?

I have so many questions.

I was thinking they would be pulling the chariots and be motivated to run. I'll leave the rest to you.

BigDamnArtist wrote:
fireproof78 wrote:

  Show
Richard Armitage is having a death scene. I'm sorry, but I've grown attached to him, as Thorin, and think that his performance will bring me to tears. Same thing with Fili and Kili. Sorry, I'm not as desensitized because I don't watch GOT wink

SPOILER Show
Well... not to drive this nail to hard on the head. But GoT ain't the reason I ain't gonna feel anything when those characters die. It's because when I was reading through your post I literally had to stop for about 5 seconds before I remembered which one was Thorin, and I'm still only maaaaybe 30% sure I know which ones are Fili and Kili.

And I'm probably an oddity in saying this, but I'm not one that goes "BRAH TOO MANY DWARVES BRAH", there's tons of ways it could've worked, but every time I watch either of the Hobbitses all of the Dwarves are either cardboard cutouts or whoopie cushion delivery vehicles. Hell compared to the LOTR trilogy the fact that there are ONLY 14 characters that I really need to care about (Plus a couple ancillary ones like Bard I guess) should be a relief.

I'm sure that in the moment those scenes will have some impact on me but only in regards to whatever internal to that scene trickery and acting ability is going on, not in any real sense of loss of the character.


And that's completely fair. I'm not one who demands that you feel or respond in a particular way to a film.

But, I have grown rather attached to many of the characters, including Thorin, Fili, Kili, Balin and Dwalin. I like them and want to see them succeed. I guess that is why the films work for me, but don't work for others.

538

(19 replies, posted in Episodes)

Part of the character for Tony to play was the idea that he was not Asian (I think. Will have to revisit BTS extras on my DVD) but was attempting to play an Asian, or other ethnic group that wasn't his own.

Beyond that, I just thought he was permanently stoned. But, the character is such a quiet, likable character, that you could put many different backgrounds to him and it still works. Much in the way that Trek fans would add in back story to their favorite characters.

539

(538 replies, posted in Creations)

BigDamnArtist wrote:
fireproof78 wrote:
Zarban wrote:

DEWBACKS AND GUNGANS

No wait A PODRACE

A DEWBACK RACE!

To rival Ben-Hur!

You and I have very different ideas of how exciting a Dewback race would actually be.

Keep in mind this is what we're talking about here:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-DaLPEwcbg9o/UAGMjpiCdCI/AAAAAAAAA4A/0F0PIcCZUO8/s1600/dewback3.gif

Now... this guy on the other hand:

http://drnorth.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/vlcsnap-84245.png?w=584

That's a race I wanna see.

This is true. I was just combining Zarban's suggestions. I should have gone with a Gungan chariot race.

Teague wrote:

I am in the sky.

At first I thought we were still dealing with crazy Teague ramblings and was going to post this:

http://37.media.tumblr.com/206c701e3af099d5b64305769c1b21d0/tumblr_mz9b9ioGRU1qdcj2wo7_250.gif

However, I just remembered that he said he was taking an airplane to Zarban's secret lair, so we will just wait for the GPS coordinates wink

BigDamnArtist wrote:
fireproof78 wrote:

And probably very depressing too.

https://i.imgflip.com/almjm.jpg

I get your point, but there are going to be some pretty emotional scenes in this film.

  Show
Richard Armitage is having a death scene. I'm sorry, but I've grown attached to him, as Thorin, and think that his performance will bring me to tears. Same thing with Fili and Kili. Sorry, I'm not as desensitized because I don't watch GOT wink

541

(538 replies, posted in Creations)

Zarban wrote:

DEWBACKS AND GUNGANS

No wait A PODRACE

A DEWBACK RACE!

To rival Ben-Hur!

redxavier wrote:
Dorkman wrote:

I have to laugh at "defining chapter" just because the Battle of Five Armies is the part most people forget is in the book at all. If you read it as a kid you remember Riddles in the Dark, you remember Smaug, and then you re-read it as an adult and go "Whoa, there's a whole battle in here!"

I wouldn't entirely agree with this, as a child the battle was memorable for me because it was the thing that prompted all the factions to rally together once again and it featured a few reinforcements and turning points.

It's not especially long or detailed in the book though.


To me, that's interesting, because the same could be said about the Battle of Pelennor Fields in LOTR. In the book, it is a battle, but it is not the exceptionally long, drawn out battle as presented in the films. The battle in front of the Black Gate is far more important in the book, but does not quite get the same treatment.

I will be curious to see all the factions come together and all the animosity that will show up too. It will certainly be a fun ride.

And probably very depressing too.

543

(538 replies, posted in Creations)

Teague wrote:

"Always can do B-Roll."



Y'know?


(Sorry. The answer to your question is "totally, if you have any!" ...but, in my head, that answer came in the form of the coda to a seven-year-old William Shatner tune.)

(It made sense when I wrote it.)

(Look, it was just in my heart at the time, and now I'm explaining myself to you savages.)

Sure, Teague, it all makes perfect sense. Please, tell me more about the Shatner in your head.

http://37.media.tumblr.com/a2016ce523ff14c6828522e0067a1576/tumblr_mzhbiw8Kh31rfqimyo2_250.gif


Also, a documentary would be cool. The snowball only gets to stop when I get action figures!

Faldor wrote:
fireproof78 wrote:

*is still the only one here who liked the Hobbit*

fireproof™ -- Liking films so you don't have to!   smile

That's me! And I use to tease my friend about liking B horror films. Who's laughing now?  tongue

Also, how does one do battle with a spelling bee? Has Michael Bay been contacted?

*is still the only one here who liked the Hobbit*

Can't wait for this movie big_smile

Darth Praxus wrote:

^Except it seems to be missing a certain titular figure.

You're right-where are the 5 armies? wink

547

(85 replies, posted in Episodes)

Doctor Submarine wrote:

I had a professor who offered a spirited defense of Batman and Robin which really informed my views about "plot holes." The idea is that People call Batman and Robin a bad movie because they point out "flaws" without taking into consideration the film's tone. If The Dark Knight took itself less seriously, people would be whining about all the "problems" with that film too. Batman and Robin is the only Batman movie that's aware of the inherent silliness of the concept, and it's the only one to embrace that silliness. I think it came up when someone in the class pointed out a "flaw" in some movie and she said, "Did you ever think that maybe that 'flaw' is there for a reason? Or maybe that 'flaw' fits into the larger context of the film?" In other words, you can't hold every film to identical standards in this way. If nothing else, it's the most boring way imaginable to look at movies.


That's fair, but perhaps some movies require more forgiveness than others. I am far more forgiving of films that many are critical of, such as The Hobbit, Attack of the Clones, Chronicles of Riddick, among others because of the tone or story. Heck, on Movie Mistakes, Lord of the Rings films are among the top ones for mistakes. They are also my favorite films of all time.

Even one of my favorite TV shows, MASH, has a plethora of mistakes or flaws that I notice. One scene I can recall vividly is in the showers, and a character yanks on the water chain, and the whole prop falls apart. It's brief, but I notice it. It doesn't diminish my enjoyment of the episode or that scene. I laugh and move along.

For me, it is the same thing with all these different criticisms  on the Internet. I laugh and I move on. I'm not looking for serious analysis, because that isn't what the film is about. The larger whole matters more to me. As you have probably noticed, I am an ardent defender of Star Trek Into Darkness, because the tone and themes of the film are ones that I believe are important. That is not an opinion that is shared by many.

So, CS is something that I don't take seriously. I don't regard it as film analysis, and I don't look to it for telling me a film is bad. I have other sources for that. If other people take it seriously, then that is something I cannot help. I simply express my opinion, and let it fall were it may.

Also, I will disagree and maintain that the Adam West Batman movie is far more aware of the silly nature of Batman, and embraces it fully. It is a more enjoyable film, in my opinion, because of the tone of the film. Batman and Robin was perhaps less successful because it tried to bridge the gap from Batman Forever, a more serious and brooding take, and the campier take in Batman and Robin. But, that is a discussion for elsewhere.

548

(87 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Spoilered because it deals with an upcoming movie so costuming is pictured. However, Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson was asked to play patty cake with a two year old fan, all while in full buffed out mode as Hercules.

I definitely have a soft spot for children, but I also love the fact that he took the time to sit down and play with her. It's too cute.

From his Twitter feed:

When a 2yr old asks HERCULES to play patty cake on set.. well.. he plays patty cake

  Show
http://img2-3.timeinc.net/people/i/2014/sandbox/news/140804/the-rock-600x450.jpg

549

(85 replies, posted in Episodes)

C-Spin wrote:

I get that that's not CinemaSins stated intention. But Jp12x specifically said, "there is often a correlation between high or low counts and good or bad movies (in my opinion of movie enjoyment). It's just like the audience % on RottenTomatoes. It suggests there may or may not be something you won't like."

And I'm wondering how it can function in that capacity for him when the count is inflated by things that are just intended to be jokes. Hell, I forget the specific example, but I saw one video where they called something cool and THAT counted as a sin too.

I don't entirely agree with Jp12x's opinion regarding the higher sin count being associated with poor films. The Matrix got 85 and Batman and Robin got 122, so there is not, to me, some set correlation between higher sin count and film quality. Heck, even films like "The Room," get artificially inflated counts just due to bonus rounds and different counts and things like that. So, not sure, like you said, how you get meaning because of the multitude of jokes.

http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/46/4688668e4138abc21361f6bde1e21598bf0d18751fb011bd6d638cb06d94e6ec.jpg

It's comedy and I like the longer movies and higher score counts because it means more jokes. It is just like wanting WAYDM to do things like Twilight, Spiderman series, Star Wars prequels, Howard the Duck and Batman and Robin because they are, generally, regarded as poor films and are ripe for mocking. CS, and others, just happen to do it in the most superficial way possible. I find it enjoyable, but your mileage may vary.

550

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Invid wrote:

Jodorowsky's Dune


I won't speak to the technical side of this documentary, as it is your simple follow the story of the history of something with talking heads. However, that story is fascinating. It focuses on this rather crazy director who wanted to do a movie based on Dune without bothering to read the book. In fact, while someone obviously did indeed read it, Jodorowsky himself seems to have missed the actual message of the book, substituting his own. My sister commented that it seems the unmade movies tend to be more brilliant than the ones which make it onto film, and that seems to be the case here. I can't see the thing working, although it would have been a fascinating train wreck. If I have a criticism of the documentary, it is that there are no dissenting opinions. All interviewed love the director, although his son basically said he was abused a bit while "trained" to play Paul.

I will mention this quote, which takes something said on WAYDM in a slightly different direction:

"When you make a picture, you must not respect the novel. It's like you get married, no? You go with the wife, white, the woman is white... you take the woman, if you respect the woman, you will never have a child. You need to [makes a ripping sound] open the costume and to... To rape the bride. And then you will have your picture. I was raping Frank Herbert, raping, like this! But with love, with love."- Jodorowsky

Wow. It sounds really interesting and now I want to watch it. However, I think I can add in my own dissenting opinion, because I have a great deal of respect for Frank Herbert, and have read his biography as well as many of his quotes.

I find Jodorowsky's opinion fascinating, but kind of odd at the same time. Not sure how to explain that and hopefully watching the doc will help...