Well, that is one great looking fanfilm. Congrats, y'all.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Saniss
Well, that is one great looking fanfilm. Congrats, y'all.
This may be an unpopular opinion, but I think rating a film like this is pointless. I'd be way more interested in reading a review, even as short as one sentence.
Oh yeah, baby, give us some sweet bokeh love.
Which I'd steal while you're not looking. I badly want a full frame camera, it's killing me.
No, but quite frankly I wouldn't have had much time to do so. Don't worry, I'll come visit you buggers one day or another
As some of you may know, I spent a week in Tromsø, Norway around last New Year's Eve. It allowed me to fulfill a dream I've had for years: shooting northern lights.
And boy, what an experience. You've got to see them at least once in your life. No picture or video can show how mesmerizing they are in reality. Gigantic green waves piercing through the sky in seconds, crashing against red and purple hues, light pillars coming from space... I would say I was speechless when I saw them, but it was so unbelievable, so unreal, that me and my friends' actual reaction was to scream. God, what a feeling.
I came back home with 80 gigs of pictures, 5600+ of them. Why so many? I shot many timelapses there, and I have enough material to make a short video I'll publish along with the pictures.
However, I have a load of work at the moment, which means the publishing will have to wait a little. But I'm still opening this thread now because I promised a foretaste to my friends, and I wanted to share it with you guys too:
(click for higher resolution)
(this one I called "The Crack"; tasteful people will know why )
One of the many incredible explosions we had right over our heads. Aurora photography is hard, because there's not that much light to capture, but they can be moving very fast at the same time. This one is a 4" exposure, and it's almost too much already. So, high ISOs (3200 here). I'm glad I have my 60D which can withstand higher sensitivities...
Let me know what y'all think, and if you guys are interested I'll update this thread with the rest when it's done.
There goes another quote for the DVD, Owen.
Quick digging of this thread because two of last year's movies got nominated for this year's VES Awards. The first one is Initium (see post above) and the other one I haven't posted here yet:
I'm so very proud of them all. Currently working on the concepts for my own movie I'll make next year, this is highly motivating to me.
Great. Now I want sushi.
Nice work, MasterZap's son
This homeless guy is weird. He looks like he's 12.
I'll be taking 10 of those, please.
And it's only $30. I really think I'll order one, I love the sounds you can create with them.
Well, I finally got around to seeing it (second last screening, phew). Random thoughts.
The editing is weird. You get these typical epic-NZ-running-on-mountain-ridge shots which last two seconds and cut again to something else. It kills the pacing and fucks up any sense of time scale.
The barrel scene. Ahem. Goddamn GoPro shots. What the hell? I really don't get it. PJ must realize they look awful and have nothing to do in the aesthetics of his movies. The barrel-bounces-on-orcs thing would have been fine and even somewhat funny if the joke didn't go on forever. This is the kind of moments in the Hobbit movies where you feel PJ wanted to make them lighter, more kid-friendly. But the rest goes the other way. Decapitations, burnt bodies... That ain't right for children.
Freeman's acting is... I don't know. I love him in everything else - he's absolutely brilliant in Sherlock. But his typical pause moments that avatar described earlier are weird. There's a very long one when he realizes he trapped himself releasing the barrels into the river. It gets painful to watch at some point. Otherwise his acting is fine and he manages to make Bilbo likeable, but his character doesn't have much weight during the 2/3rd of the film.
The dwarves are fine, I liked them better than in AUJ. The tone is overall more serious, especially when they reach the Lonely Mountain.
I'm still glad whenever Gandalf's on screen. McKellen's acting hasn't diminished a bit since LotR, which is part of the reasons why my favorite part of the movie is Don Guldur (along with Smaug vs. Bilbo). The place looks fantastic, the green grading is a beauty and brings me back to LotR. Granted, there is no suspense as we know Gandalf will be fine. But I like how they bring Sauron into it, building slowly what we know is going to be a gigantic war in LotR. They're making more connections with LotR than the book (supposedly, I haven't read it) does, and I'm fine with it (better than the made-up scenes there only to broaden the Sauron's appearance with the eye turning into his armored body is brilliant, followed by their fight with very neat smoke effects.
As for Smaug... What can I say? He looks amazing, and I'm glad, oh so glad they brought Benedict Cumberbatch on board. His voice is incredible, and gives a great depth to the dragon.
Let's talk CGI, then. Yes, it's everywhere. But it works far better to me than in AUJ (with the video-game-cinematic-looking goblins). Unlike a friend who can't stand Azog's look, I think he looks fantastic. He wouldn't belong in LotR, of course, but in the particular aesthetics of The Hobbit, it's great, and the facial motion capture is wonderful.
Oh, and less fucked up physics too! (except for the bouncing barrel, but let's not go back to that)
I'll take miniature sets and practical effects over CG any day; but most of the movie looked really amazing. I may be getting used to the Hobbit's overall look. I'll never like it as much as I loved LotR's, but it's a start. I accept what PJ is showing us, I accept it's something completely different from LotR.
The only thing I thought failed was the molten gold. I think it's one of the hardest things to make in FX, as molten gold already looks bizarre and unreal in real life. But there are so many close-ups of it, it doesn't work.
The not-so-much love triangle, I don't really care for. It's a "oh well, I guess we're going to go through that" scene. I stop paying attention until it's over, but I'm scared we'll have more of these in TaBA to unfold the story between the three of them. At least we have Lilly's beautiful face to look upon.
By the way, I liked Legolas in a way I wasn't expecting. He's introduced as a big jerk, it's fun. I'm among those who thought the Gimli joke was really funny. Just the right amount of it. I wish the other comical moments were handled as well.
Legolas' bigger jerk of a daddy is quite forgettable, though. The whole elf part kinda destroys the idea that they're pure and perfect and gay. I mean, who have two passed out drunk in the cellar. Wasn't really expecting that either.
Many things have already been covered in this thread, so I'll sum up: I liked this movie enough that I'm ready to forgive his weaknesses. I got to experience Peter Jackson's Middle Earth again, and DoS worked better to me than AUJ did (in an absolute way; I don't believe my expectations were dumbed down or anything of the sort).
I won't be wondering if I really want to see the last film, because I do.
Still have to experience HDR 3D, though.
(on a side note: yay for Stephen Colbert)
I wish we'd had more Tarkin in the OT. Peter Cushing was the most classy of all.
(he wore white gloves to smoke his cigarettes for fuck's sake)
Sherlock S03E02
Loving it. Bring us more.
Dude, this is awesome. Like, really really cool.
(replace "moment" with "post" for better context)
Merry Christmas, everyone. Hope Santa brought you cool stuff (and all kinds of joy).
Me? I got the Cloud Atlas novel, a book about progressive rock history, an astronomy atlas, and some cash.
Also, it'd be great to share what we had for dinner(s). Here's our menu:
Christmas Eve:
- homemade tapenade and hummus / champagne
- foie gras / sweet white wine
- oysters / dry white wine
- lamb cooked with mushrooms and chestnuts / red wine
- various kinds of cheese / red wine
- tarte tatin - a french apple pie cooked upside down / calvados
Brandies and whisky to end the dinner.
Christmas Day:
- Snails cooked in snail-shell-shaped pastry (a local specialty, amazing)
- foie gras
- buttered scallops cooked with garlic and flambé with Armagnac
- lobster tails with tomato and hot pepper
- capon served with girolles (mushrooms)
- cheese
Champagne, red wine, pear brandy.
I wonder if having two dinners for Christmas is a french thing only.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to go die somewhere.
I don't know what to do with this information. It's like Shia doesn't live on the same plane of existence as us.
I don't there's an universal answer to that. To each his own. What would universally define "greatest", really?
I tried to write one when it came out and I don't even know where to start. It's just so broken and confused. Definitely will need to do a commentary.
It's sad because clearly Edgar Wright and I love the same movies and genres, so I think we'd be buds. But I haven't cared for anything he's made since SHAUN, nor understood why others are so up on them.
Can't argue with the fact that it's - at the very least - a bit confused. But I still think Wright manages to tell his story.
The character developments he offers in the three movies feel real - I feel like I can relate to them, and it makes the characters believable. And on top of that, his directing is something I really love. As I said in the Review section thread, I feel safe in his hands.
As for the auto-references, I'll agree it's something one shouldn't overuse. But Wright does it with a kind of humor that not only feels right in the movies, but is also hilarious to me.
I would love a WAYDM commentary of The World's End.
And THE WORLD'S END is awful.
I'd really love to read a full review of this. Genuinely interested.
The Nightmare Before Christmas is perfect because it's as much a Christmas movie as it is a Halloween movie.
Unfortunately I couldn't go see The Hobbit yesterday as I'd planned, so it'll have to wait. Hopefully it'll still be in theaters for a few weeks.
Right now, I'd go with:
#1 : The World's End - instant classic. The Cornetto trilogy is now to be watched on an annual basis.
#2 : Gravity - although I think it doesn't reach Chidren of Men's level by a long shot. It was an impressive movie experience and it made me like 3D, but I thought the character development was weakly built and the movie ended with a tone I didn't like.
#3 : Only God Forgives - you either love or hate what Refn does. I love it.
On the OK level, we have Star Trek : Into Darkness (I'm not a Trekker - yet - and I liked it enough), The Great Gatsby and Machete Kills (but seriously, Rodriguez : Grindhouse 2, please. You're way better at it).
On the not-so-OK level, Kick-Ass 2 (much weaker than the first one, and some - quite literally - shitty jokes) and This is the End (I guess this is just not my kind of humor).
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Saniss
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.