51

(32 replies, posted in Episodes)

His 90s output is most definitely better than Ridley's.

That being said, it'll be nice to see that retro-future production design again, if they don't chicken out and update all of it. Like, I almost wish they'd lose the Aliens and just make a different genre set in that universe.

Give me space Die Hard with the Alien/Blade-Runner design-work.

I think pre-Elysium this might've been worth getting excited for, but now I'm not sure I see it.

I just don't see what is left to tell with these characters and these creatures. You're not going to top the 1st two films. His concept art looks like awful 90s Aliens fan-fiction too, so that doesn't help either.

I'd much rather a completely fresh set of characters in a completely new story inspired by that design aesthetic, than going back to the well and making something that will at best feel like a pretty good re-tread of stuff we've seen before.

How depressing is it that every single "visionary" filmmaker that's come out of the gate in the last decade has been dumped onto working on a franchise film sequel or reboot. Blomkamp, Drew Godard, Rian Johnson, Gareth Edwards, Duncan Jones.

54

(32 replies, posted in Episodes)

I hate that Top Gun is the go-to movie when people think about Tony Scott, and that he gets written off based on it. That was a gun-for-hire movie he did to break into hollywood, and Jerry Bruckheimer is far more responsible for the content than Scott is. And for what it's worth, Scott directed the hell out of it, it looks amazing.

But the stuff that's really representative of his work is his 90s output, which married ultra stylish, flashy visuals, with good scripts and performances. Look at the casts he worked with, giving great early roles to James Gandolfini and Viggo Mortenson, making Denzel a star. And he wasn't complacent either, when people like Michael Bay started ripping him off (without any of the art, or moral center, or restraint), he kept pushing his style further and further to see how experimental he could get. This makes his filmography post Spy Game fascinating, because nobody else would take 100 million dollar R-rated summer movies and do the kinds of crazy experimentation he did with editing, double-exposures, hand-crank (and doing it all on film, not digitally in post). He finally went too far on Domino, but you have to admire that he was pushing to see how far you could take that stuff.

Basically, you don't have to like his movies, but it's extremely reductive to say he was just a lazy gun-for-hire, I'd kill for more Tony Scotts right about now to inject a little style into our blockbuster landscape.

55

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I agree with that sentiment to an extent (particularly with non-documentary filmmaking), but you've also got to qualify for the situation here. Like, I sincerely doubt that a filmmaker risking being arrested for abeting an enemy of the state was in any position to fly 100s of lbs of camera and lighting gear to Hong Kong. It seems ridiculous to knock someone risking their life to document something that crazy with almost no time to plan for not doing elaborate lighting setups.

56

(32 replies, posted in Episodes)

In-before anyone else, here's the ultimate version of the blade runner soundtrack, wonderfully mixed into an awesome 2 hour piece of ambient 80s retrofuturism:

Great commentary guys, very good analysis and perspectives from all. Glad you came around on it Teague.

That being said, I will not stand for this flippant dismissal of Tony Scott, one of the best populist directors we ever had. For my money, Tony is the more consistent of the 2 brothers, and has made more overall enjoyable movies (that always look amazing). Ya, he never swung for the fences and made an Alien or a Blade Runner, but True Romance, Crimson Tide, Last Boyscout, Spy Game, Man on Fire, Deja Vu, and Unstoppable are all awesome movies and that's not a filmography to sneeze at. Even his weaker stuff like Enemy of the State, Top Gun, and Domino is better and has more personality than anything big-budget coming out today.

57

(27 replies, posted in Off Topic)

On that front, I still dream of someone making a mega-budget movie about the Battle of Kursk, the largest armored tank battle in history. 3 million soldiers, 8000 tanks, 35000 artillery guns, and 5000 airplanes. Pure madness.

58

(27 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Rendezvous with Rama is dead in the water by all accounts. They were trying to make it with Fincher for years and couldn't get it off the ground. Maybe post-Interstellar doing well and if Foundations is a hit on HBO it could happen one day.

A lot of these are more likely to end up as premium cable adaptations, I really think that's going to be the next big wave we see. Game of Thrones has shown epic budget fantasy can be done on TV, Westworld is coming this year and has a great chance of being amazing, Foundations will be next. If those work, it wouldn't shock me to see HBO doing a massive-scale adaptation of Dune in a couple years.

59

(15 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I don't agree. Yes, big budget original film-making has been dying a slow-death for the better part of 20 years, and is almost completely non-existent now. Which is exactly why I'd argue it's increasingly more important for the rare movie like this that does get made to be a successful one. It's not a coincidence that Interstellar came out in the same release window that Gravity was a breakout hit in a year before it, and this year The Martian is going to hit at that same time of year. If Gravity was a failure, would The Martian have even been green-lit? Studios look for any excuse to say no to an unsure project.

Guardians of the Galaxy was successful, but it's based on a comic-book. If Jupiter Ascending was awesome and a breakout hit, the narrative might've been that people want to see cool ambitious projects on screen that show them things they haven't seen before. With it bombing, the takeaway for the execs will be that Guardians was only a hit because of the Marvel effect, and they'll just double-down on the comic-book adaptations.

I love the little independent genre flicks as much as anyone, I can't wait to see Ex Machina, but its a bummer if we're basically relegated to seeing those types of movies on VOD, which is increasingly where they are getting released (unless you happen to be in NY or LA).

Is Interstellar going to be the last epic-canvas original sci-fi story? I certainly hope not.

60

(15 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Interesting write-up on what went wrong and how this even got green-lit in the first place:
http://deadline.com/2015/02/jupiter-asc … 201369053/

Like I've said before, I can't knock these two for their ambition, but I don't give them a pass for it either. If you're gonna spend 200 million on your original wacky ass sci-fi movie and are given final-cut (?!!!), you'd better damn-well make sure you get it right. They have terrible taste in performances and dialogue (honestly the warning signs are even there in the 1st matrix in a couple scenes), and no amount of sincerity changes that. The end result of all this is going to be a dozen original sci-fi movies by young filmmakers getting rejected/cancelled.

61

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It's funny that when you put it in the context of the movie landscape, it's light-years better than anything else out there. When was the last blockbuster where people bleed gratuitously when they get hit, tight story pacing, good writing, economy of storytelling (they can't afford to use sweeping CG shots for no reason, so they make each of them count).

Wouldn't shock me if this is HBO testing the waters for eventually doing the series finale as a big summer movie release a week ahead of the TV broadcast.

62

(149 replies, posted in Off Topic)

You have to just burn through XCOM. It will consume your life for 100 hours, and then suddenly when you're done, you'll never have the urge to play it again.

63

(23 replies, posted in Episodes)

Completely lost it at the Jaden Smith iphone tangent

64

(262 replies, posted in Episodes)

Everyone talks about how Snipes was a nightmare to Goyer on set, but I can't blame him. Every decision Goyer was bringing to the table was a terrible idea that shit on the previous movies, no wonder he was pissed off and just got high all day to get through it.

65

(262 replies, posted in Episodes)

Blade 2 is one of the all time greats in my book. Find me another comic book blockbuster that's willing to push the violence and nightmare creature designs that far. It feels edgy in a way these kinds of movies never do, the action is great, the cast is fun, everything about it works (except for 1 really bad CGI fight).

Blade 3 is utter garbage. It's the Itchy and Scratchy and Poochy skit personified. Lets take all the characters people love and completely sideline them in favor of a new team of HIP YOUNG market-tested ipod using protagonists. Everything about that movie is like a concentrated dose of hipster 2000s bullshit, it's infuriating.

66

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Aliens was my favorite movie of all time for the longest time. That's changed over the years, but man is it an awesome piece of work, absolutely insane given the budget. I will say, on last viewing, it suddenly wasn't clicking for me the way I remembered, and all the marine banter started to feel uncomfortably close to some of the bad writing in Avatar. I'd like to give the Theatrical version a shot (I've basically always watched the extended), because as much as I like the sentry gun sequence, I do think a shorter run-time helps the movie, and that 1st hour in the extended cut starts to drag.

It does shock me how 30 years later, pretty much no-one has come close to matching the level of intensity of the final hour in Aliens. Video-games have imitated it to hell and back, but I can't think of any movies that have been able to match that relentless "everything is fucked we need to run" level of pacing and pull it off. T2 arguably, parts of The Descent, The Matrix maybe? Nothing feels like it matches up. That's crazy to think about for a movie that cost $16 million

67

(13 replies, posted in Episodes)

Kind of gratified that Hobbit got snubbed, I feel vindicated about hating that visual aesthetic.

No cinematography nom for Interstellar bums me out a bit, but that's Birdman's category to win anyway.

And Desplat getting nominated against himself for best score is pretty hilarious. It makes we wonder, has anyone ever been nominated for 3 different movies in the same category before?

68

(13 replies, posted in Off Topic)

To be fair the rest of the police academy movies get progressively more kid friendly, and I can attest to growing up with 3-6 on in regular rotation

69

(13 replies, posted in Off Topic)

As someone who grew up with hard-R rated action films since age 6, I can say I both had a way more fun childhood as a result, and grew up into a normal well adjusted adult. I don't see the value in sugar-coating violence, and unless you're a crazy person, I would think you grow up with a certain sense of morality, and are able to separate fiction from reality.

And besides, most AAA videogames are way more violent than anything in these movies, and everyone's playing those, so it's not like you're really protecting them from anything.

70

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://chantrellposter.com/images/products/large/105.jpg

Watched a 1969 Alain Delon flick I'd never heard of before called The Sicilian Clan. Interest peaked as the late 60s early 70s are basically the golden era of French crime films, with this sandwiched neatly between Le Samourai and Le Circle Rouge, and I was right. It's terrific, looks gorgeous (the blu-ray transfer is great), has an all star cast, a wonderful Ennio Morricone score, and very elegant 70s film-making.

If there's a knock against it, it's that this feels like a bit of a big budget cash in on a genre and actors who were becoming extremely popular internationally. So you have 3 big name leads, and a pretty predictable heist story that goes from Paris to Rome to New York in a way that feels sort of similar to what we see now with movies suddenly going to China in the 3rd act to rake in the foreign dollars. 

That being said, while it's not as raw and restrained as Le Circle Rouge or Le Samourai, for a big budget version of that kind of movie, it's still really awesome and retains that cool genre vibe.

71

(10 replies, posted in Episodes)

avatar wrote:

Did you guys mention the 300 sequel? Just like the Sin City sequel, it featured Eva Green's obligatory breasts (it's in her contract), but no one cared either way.

For what it's worth, the 300 sequel is vastly better than the original (which is really terrible in retrospect), mostly thanks to Eva Green completely stealing the movie and being an awesome over-the-top villain. She's like the female Gary Oldman at this point, she just fucking goes for it 110%.

72

(24 replies, posted in Episodes)

For Interstellar, I would also say, if you didn't see it in 70mm Imax, you can't judge the effects work. That may seem harsh, but having seen it both ways, there's just no comparison. The experience of Interstellar with the full vertical framing was way superior to anything in Gravity for me, even if Gravity was doing much more technically sophisticated things. Yes, the blackhole/workhole sequences are CG, but they've also got model and full-scale practical ships and robots, not to mention actually throwing massive clouds of dust around, filming in Iceland, etc. That stuff goes a long way. Ultimately, whatever the mix of practical and cg was on Interstellar, the end result is breathtaking and I don't see it losing the oscar. Remember, it's not just purely about tech, it's how it's applied to convey an experience.

Edit: Also, no way in hell Hobbit will win anything. Those movies are incredibly ugly, and still despite all the tech look like fake video-game cut-scenes half the time

73

(10 replies, posted in Episodes)

I don't think Under the Skin is a masterpiece, but it is an extremely visceral experience and really worth watching (with a good sound system). The beach scene still fucks me up. I think it drops the ball with a half-assed ending that it doesn't earn. With a better last act it could've been an all time great film.

That being said, there's nothing like it getting made these days, so it's a massive breath of fresh air.

74

(10 replies, posted in Episodes)

The Guest - The all around best action movie of the year, with great performances, music (an amazing synth soundtrack), comedy, pacing. Imagine a more fun, less self-serious version of Drive, and you get the picture. A total throwback to classic John Carpenter and Terminator-era James Cameron. It hits blu-ray in January, and you are seriously missing out if you don't give this one a watch.

The Raid 2 - in case you missed it, at a minimum it's a must-watch to see a master-class in action film-making, there are sequences that are better than anything I've ever seen done in the genre, and will ruin all other action movies for you. As an actual movie, it doesn't hold together unfortunately, but the highs are so damn good.

Interstellar - Seriously, it's still playing in IMAX, go see it the way it's meant to be seen. I'm baffled at some people's indifference to this movie. It's beautiful, it's ambitious, it's pro-science. Don't wait for video.

75

(3 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Nope, it's surprisingly alright. Still real dumb, but watchable. Which is a trend for director Jaume Collet Sera.
Check out Orphan, his badass "evil child" movie with Vera Farmiga for a similar surprise.
Also his last movie with Neeson, "Unknown", is also a solid action flick.