826

(956 replies, posted in Off Topic)

AshDigital wrote:

https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/1463949_757108627648560_1900322872_n.jpg

I want this to be Marvel's next One-Shot short so bad.

827

(349 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I think I get the argument. The fact that it's a crow ties it to the Night's Watch, which I'm sure factors into plenty of theories. But yeah, if GRRM was okay with the change, it must not be a big deal.

828

(349 replies, posted in Off Topic)

See, the crow has a beak that's a little straighter, to make it easier to nitpick television shows.

829

(130 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I like all of those interpretations a lot. It's still not what I wanted the film to be, but for what it is, Gravity kicks ass 99% of the time.

830

(130 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Yeah, but the other problem is that Gravity doesn't have a whole lot to say. There's some conception/birth imagery which is interesting but I don't understand what this whole "grand vision about humanity" is that you're talking about. What did you get out of it that I didn't?

831

(130 replies, posted in Off Topic)

bullet3 wrote:

Well, I strongly disagree. It's a beautiful meditative moment, where in this dark void of space when she's at her lowest point, she's able to get comfort and solace from a human being in a completely different culture and language. This idea of humanity as one entity in a universal sense.

It's exactly the kind of scene you would almost never get in this kind of movie, and it gives the movie a greater weight than just being a procedural space movie with no larger ambitions.

I guess this gets back to the idea that I was expecting a much more minimalistic movie, and I got a relatively dense and layered one instead. I'd like Gravity a lot more if it was the former instead of the latter. Because come on, we see this kind of scene all the time. The lone hero, at his/her lowest point, reaches out to someone to spill their guts right before the climactic sequence. It's in Die Hard for god's sake.

832

(130 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Dorkman wrote:

The scene worked fine for me. It's an awkward beat but it's also a human beat, which is what matters. It's not my favorite scene -- that would be the scene where she's trying to detach the parachute while the world ends around her -- but it didn't strike me as false.

I just didn't see the point of it, and if it was a better scene that wouldn't have mattered. Like I said earlier, I don't think we need a scene of her talking to that random guy. Cuaron was kinda jumping through hoops to get some lines in there for Bullock, to give her someone to talk to. It would have been so much bolder to just cut the bullshit and have almost NO dialogue after the first few scenes. All Is Lost did this perfectly.

833

(130 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Wow, that scene actually worked for all you guys? It seemed obviously bad to me. Whatevs. I'm never going to love this movie as much as most people. It's a visual marvel with some cool symbolism. Not the greatest sci-fi movie ever, or even the greatest movie of the year.

834

(449 replies, posted in Off Topic)

fireproof78 wrote:
Doctor Submarine wrote:

They're really pushing this for the religious crowd, I guess. Not a hint of any of the darker elements of the story, especially not those gigantic, six-armed angels.

Well, there was a flaming sword, as well as the concept of the masses being desperate, which hints that there might be a scene of the rest trying to get aboard.

Not really sure what to think of this movie, but I agree that it seems to be a waste of all that talents time.

Oh that's not what I'm saying at all! From what I've read, the film's story is really interesting and dark and complex.

  Show
Noah's whole thing is that he agrees with God, and wants humanity to be wiped out.

835

(130 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Darth Praxus wrote:

I think that scene works precisely because it's so cringeworthy and pathetic what she's doing. When she realizes how pathetic it is and breaks down weeping, it's a very real and emotional moment.

I'm not entirely sure I buy that interpretation, but okay.

836

(130 replies, posted in Off Topic)

redxavier wrote:

Well, I've only seen it the once and didn't notice anything especially egregrious about that scene. I thought Bulloch's performance was pretty great throughout, it seemed like a real, genuine character - her voice would break a little when she raised it and the range of emotions that played out on her face on her journey home and in her eyes was exemplary.

Do you really mean it was awful, or was it actually just less awesome than the rest of the movie?

I really thought it was awful. When she started howling along with the dog, I cringed. A few people in the audience started to giggle, and I don't blame them. I don't think the movie needed a scene where she connects with Earth, let alone a scene this awkward.

837

(130 replies, posted in Off Topic)

redxavier wrote:

To borrow a phrase; Gravity is a perfect movie and if you don't agree then you're Hitler.

Perfect? No. That scene where she talks on the radio is awful. It just doesn't work at all. It's a very good movie, but that scene knocks a few points off for me.

838

(449 replies, posted in Off Topic)

They're really pushing this for the religious crowd, I guess. Not a hint of any of the darker elements of the story, especially not those gigantic, six-armed angels.

839

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

whAT. WHAT. WHAT.

840

(356 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Death Grips just dropped their new album for free. I don't think they're capable of making a song that isn't straight fucking FIRE. This is probably the most low-key song on the album.

841

(10 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Yeah, I was thinking more about Saw with my theory, but I guess the timing doesn't work. A Serbian Film is totally unrelated to American culture, and probably unrelated to this discussion, given your explanation of why it does what it does.

Torture porn is such a weird sub-genre to me. I don't understand why so many people were so excited to go watch Saw movies year after year, and I really don't understand why it stopped so abruptly. You could release a movie like Saw tomorrow, and people wouldn't care. I think once we get a grasp on why it faded away, it'll be easier to understand why it came about in the first place.

842

(10 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I think the "sad song" thing hits the nail on the head. We had just gone through a tremendous tragedy that defied comprehension. In 80s slasher movies, the victims deserved it to a degree. They were reckless, irresponsible teenage jerks. But once we saw innocents die on a massive scale, that idea flipped. The violence got a lot more brutal, and the victims got a lot more sympathetic. It stopped being "horror," really. Saw and Hostel didn't focus on scaring people at all. They wanted to disturb people. Because we realized how disturbing this sort of thing really is.

And now that we're a decade removed from that event, with bin Laden dead, we can go back to getting spooked for fun. Horror movies don't really reflect violence in society anymore, because nothing can top what we've already gone through.

843

(10 replies, posted in Off Topic)

And isn't it funny how this is the second time that a big horror fad has been started by James Wan? He directed the first Saw, and then he made Insidious, which kicked off this whole "low-budget ghost story" thing.

844

(10 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://i.imgur.com/tz8cIlO.jpg

But seriously. Torture Porn as a genre started to explode in a time when America was very angry. And since we couldn't just personally rip out the throats of everyone we hated, we resorted to watching people pretend to do it in movies. That's just my theory, anyway.

Also, it's interesting that the genre has totally died out in recent years. Now it's all found footage and haunted house movies (sometimes both at once.) Thanks Obama!

845

(7 replies, posted in Episodes)

Just finished The Imposter, and I'm with Paul. That accusation really sullied the rest of the film for me. What are we supposed to get out of it? You could cut it and still have a very tense, exciting movie. That bit feels manufactured and irresponsible.

846

(373 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Is there a God? Probably not. Not the omnipotent being that most religions talk about, at least. But if your belief gets you through the day, then more power to you. As long as you aren't using religion to hurt people, I have absolutely zero problem with it.

The extended cut of Philosopher's Stone has about seven extra minutes, and Chamber of Secrets' has about 14 (making it almost THREE HOURS long, which, damn.)

Are you guys doing the extended editions of the first two films? Or is that a bridge too far?

849

(449 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Has this been posted already? Whatever. This trailer is hilarious.

850

(68 replies, posted in Off Topic)