851

(95 replies, posted in Off Topic)

So, just got back from the movie. Want to see it again before giving it a proper review (for what it is worth) but I'll give my initial thoughts now.

Wow...sorry, once it hit act 3 it was pretty much a roller coaster ride and that took me a while to get over. The movie did well with the pacing but it hit a sprint towards the end.

Ok, I'll break it down this way.

The good:

-The visuals. Definitely a little more mature feeling, and darker, in places, that felt more like Lord of the Rings, which definitely keeps pace with the tone of the film. VFX is not as noticeable (to me-not a professional) and I liked Azog and the other orcs' appearances as well.

-Smaug and the spiders. Smaug deserves all the accolades he gets as there is not one moment where I'm going "This isn't real." He  has a weight to him with every step and Cumberbatch gives a wonderful intelligence and menace to the character.

-Characters. I am a big fan of well done characters and have my misgivings regarding the Hobbit with such a large ensemble. Well, not all the dwarves get their moments but there are some great characters beats, especially with Thorin. The chemistry between Armitage and Freeman is very strong and there many subtle moments regarding their two characters or moments when they are together.

Legolas and Tauriel is an interesting dynamic to add to the story and while I would not have gone the direction that was done, it wasn't bad. It didn't feel tacked on, like I thought it would, but I'm still going back and forth on it. Bloom and Evageline Lily do well with their parts.

Also, major props to Ian McKellan who has to carry many of his scenes alone and yet demonstrates the great weight Gandalf is having to carry. Again, not everyone's cup of tea, but the Dol Guldur scenes were among my favorites.

-Scope: This movie feels more open and epic, like Fellowship did. There is that Lord of the Rings essence of this being a huge, grand and ancient world that has history. The structures feel more weathered and ancient. Mirkwood has a distinct feel, much more stagnant than the magical and timeless like Rivendell.

-Danger: Definitely felt like our characters were in danger this time and saw a lot more feeling of jeopardy. I had no problems with the physics of AUJ but this movie felt a little more grounded.

Ok, now for the bad.

Length: I am no editor but I am pretty sure I could parse some scenes in this film and still leave plenty to keep it going. The moments were few, but there were a couple that I felt could easily be cut with little to no issue to the pacing.

Bard: The character didn't bother me as much as the info dump we get from him at times. I like his back story but the movie got a little heavy handed with all of the details.

Legolas: Seems to be inserted a little bit too much in this film, and felt a little too much like fan service.


Overall, very enjoyable, and a little more tense, darker tone that I think fans of LOTR will find enjoyable, or at the very least, tolerable.

852

(122 replies, posted in Episodes)

avatar wrote:

How Copyright Law Gave Us Star Wars. Fan-fiction verus remakes versus having to come up with new material...

http://badassdigest.com/2013/12/29/how- … -star-wars

Interesting read and always fun to consider the possibilities.

Honestly, I'm surprised Lucas doesn't try to get it off the ground now.

853

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Doctor Submarine wrote:
BBQ wrote:
Holden wrote:

SEASON SIX ENDING AHOY:

SPOILER Show
He didn't. The Teselecta faked it so River would assume he was regenerating.

REAL SEASON SIX ENDING AHOY:

  Show
After painting themselves into a corner, the writers made up some bullshit in order to wipe away an illogical gordian knot of a plot line.

If you want a show with tight plotting and clever construction, where every seemingly insignificant detail ties into the larger plot and is a setup for something that happens later on...you're better off watching any given episode of Arrested Development. That show does in 22 minutes what Doctor Who couldn't handle in a whole season. DW is goofy sci-fi fun, but its boundless creativity has never really extended to concluding larger arcs.

I was going to say, DW is not exactly know for maintaining continuity when the story demanded it. They truly do follow Nicholas Meyer when he discussed continuity in Star Trek II: Wrath of Khan. The audience does not care about continuity if they are told a good story (I am probably misquoting here, but I could not find the original so take this for what it is worth smile ).

Probably the most self-contained was Christopher Eccelston (and perhaps Paul McGan), with the beginning being the Doctor just escaping from the Time War and in the end, facing down the very opponents he thought were gone. Instead, he keeps facing down the Daleks again and again (again, for production reasons, and nothing due to the story).

Regardless, it is nice to see some continuity (Bad Wolf, for example) but there are truly too many thread lines from both Classic Who and New Who to create a viable, self-contained, multi-layered arc.

854

(29 replies, posted in Off Topic)

^^
I think he might be on to something here

855

(956 replies, posted in Off Topic)

BigDamnArtist wrote:

https://31.media.tumblr.com/7107ef8688733e475cb028935640e53f/tumblr_mxeds7ekEv1ru0os8o1_500.gif
https://31.media.tumblr.com/f0c7718147bc14236397efc133411867/tumblr_mxeds7ekEv1ru0os8o3_500.gif
https://24.media.tumblr.com/d594ba131c39417112da147b5d26079e/tumblr_mxeds7ekEv1ru0os8o2_500.gif
https://31.media.tumblr.com/06faed4d6c3be0fab9fbd74bd1023201/tumblr_mxeds7ekEv1ru0os8o4_500.gif

Shiny! Very shiny smile

Also,

http://ih3.redbubble.net/image.12119243.2563/sticker,375x360.png

856

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I have maintained and still do, that having another Time Lord as a companion, at least for a while, would be an interesting twist, especially given the fact that Gallifrey is still out there. It creates a bit of a different relationship between the Doctor and his home and the guilt he had felt over the Time War.

Regardless, I am interested in the way Capaldi handles being the Doctor and how jaded he can be. The Doctor can always be dark and each incarnation has had his dark moments; some more than others. I think a more jaded Doctor who tries to reconcile all the strife going on in the galaxy and his own personal pain would be interesting, but he can't stay jaded forever.

857

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Doctor Submarine wrote:

*sobs*

Post-Sob Edit:

  Show
You know what I liked about this episode? It didn't have the plodding runtime or the crazily mawkish sentimentality of Tennant's exit. The Doctor goes out saving ordinary people, not saving the universe. That's what it's all about.

Also loved the tying-up of all of Eleven's loose plot threads regarding the Silence. It made his run feel self-contained (50th Anniversary shenanigans aside) and made the ending feel more final.

It moved a bit too quickly in the middle, though. And the deus ex machina at the end was WAY too easy, especially for Moffat. Seriously, that's all you've got?

"So Steven, how does he regenerate even though he's run out?"

"Uh...the Time Lords give him more. I dunno, my brain's pretty much dried up at this point."

  Show
As tacky or simplistic as it sounds, this is exactly how I expected them to get past the 13 regenerations rule. It was established that the Time Lords could grant more regenerations as they did that to the Master in response to needing him to fight in the Time War. Instead, the Master ran off, but the regenerations the Time Lords grant had a built in beacon so they know where he is.

Irregardless, the Time Lords can grant more regenerations, based upon their need at the time. Since Gallifrey has been pushed to another dimension, rather than in the Time Lock. Meaning that they can, somewhat, influence, the universe. So, the granting of more regenerations is something that works in terms of the story and universe, if a bit of a cheap way to give the Doctor more.

858

(64 replies, posted in Off Topic)

That's ok, Yoda. No one likes caroling with me either.

Merry Christmas to all!

859

(649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Hooray!!!

860

(135 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Zarban wrote:
johnpavlich wrote:

The thing that amazes (and angers) me about this whole thing is that Shia keeps apologizing for "forgetting" to credit Clowes, but still has yet to apologize for the act of plagiarism itself.

Right. The Beef is trying to make people think about attribution and not theft of intellectual property. That's why he's copying apologies without attribution. Meanwhile, his lawyer is surely talking to Clowes about how much money it will take to avoid an IP lawsuit.

Shia is NOT concerned about money ("I have to give $10 thousand to one of my heroes? Oh well..."). He only cares about how he can avoid this hurting his career as an actor and film maker AND his ego.

Well, does the adage "There is no such thing as bad press" apply here? I mean, Shia managed to get it to Cannes before this whole thing went down, and now it has create a furor that might not have happened.

Not saying that Shia was right by any means or that the law suit will not do harm. I'm just saying, that in this day and age where people can have short memories, it may work out better than we think.

861

(209 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Boter wrote:

I seem to be far less critical of movie than most of you folk. As I said, I enjoyed Elysium and you know what, I enjoyed Lone Ranger too. Liked Oblivion, Really liked World's End even though it took it a while to warm up.

Not saying you guys are wrong. Just saying I'm glad that apparently I can enjoy more movies.

(Also this probably makes me the enemy or something for paying for and encouraging this "crap". Sorry/notsorry?)

Ewing wrote:
paulou wrote:

Her. Go see Her. Best piece of science fiction in the last decade, easy.

Not according to Jezebel.

Oh great, another movie about a dude who's SO DESERVING OF LOVE but just can't his shit together enough to date a real woman.

Well, that's Jezebel for you. They're like the kind of feminist that most feminists wish would just shut up because really, they're not helping.

Oh, boy. This...I don't see it ending well.

I get where you are coming from, and while I haven't seen it, I totally understand it-based upon my wife's reports.

Yes, Fry is the Master of Lake Town, you got that right (I wanted to reaffirm you after such a tortuous experience wink ).

I don't think Cumberbatch's face really lends itself to being "dragonified" because of his strong and angled lines.

Glad you didn't feel like killings this-I'll take that as high praise big_smile

863

(209 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I sit here, and read this thread and go, "Wow. I didn't watch a lot of movies this past year." Now I know why.

I was not on board with the Lone Ranger, even a little bit, and I am a big fan of Bruckheimer and his work. But, the whole premise has to be done more straight than the execution was, especially with the type of character he is supposed to be. Personally, I would take a "Captain America" approach to it and let it feel more like a Western/period piece than what it turned in to.

864

(34 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Squiggly_P wrote:

I thought he had also narrated The Wonder Years, but apparently not.

No, I believe that Wonder Years was narrated by Daniel Stern, of Home Alone fame.

Didn't know Christmas Story was based on a book (thanks, Trey!) smile

865

(34 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Owen Ward wrote:

I think it's one of those things where I just bought in to the hype too much. Maybe there's some cultural context I'm missing, or it's one of those that works much better when you grow up with it - but it just didn't really hit me as a seminal Christmas movie. I mean, for something called A Christmas Story - it doesn't really get very Christmassy until half of the way through!

For what it's worth though, I was still grinning like a madman by the end of it.

I think there is a bit of nostalgia, but for me, it is because after watching the movie, my dad would tell stories about how that was like his life growing up, in terms of setting and such. For me, it is the association of the two that makes the movie more memorable.

Honestly, Christmas Story reminds me of Sandlot, or Wonder Years, where you have a narration from a point of view of a specific point in time. The Sandlot is the back drop of the story but it isn't the only thing about the story that matters. Likewise, Christmas is the backdrop but the story really is just told from the child's point of view about the events that make up that Christmas.

This isn't to sound pretentious or snooty. It really is a film that can be hit or miss smile

866

(34 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Owen Ward wrote:

I watched both Elf and A Christmas Story for the first time tonight. I found myself really enjoying Elf a lot more than I thought I would, but A Christmas Story didn't do it for me as much.

The list of reasons that The Christmas Story doesn't work for you is very long...it really doesn't work for me save for watching my dad bust up laughing every time he watches it.

That and this:
http://yourpopfilter.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/christmas-story1.jpg

Trey wrote:

I just want to be in the room when that gets pitched to a studio. 

They'd be eating that up and then... "Wait - then what happens?  I see.  Well, thanks for coming in."

Yes, yes. Good luck with that Futurama show of yours...

Sorry, that ending he pitched strikes me as a very Futurama-esque ending

868

(31 replies, posted in Off Topic)

avatar wrote:
bullet3 wrote:

I think this is outstanding. Remember when Teaser trailers could convey the theme of the movie without giving away the whole plot?

Also, this speaks so hard to me thematically. If this is the tone/theme of the movie, how we've lost our exploratory spirit as a society and need to get it back, it could really be an important film culturally.

Bring it Nolan

In the lead-up to Christmas I've spent some gruelling time in the shopping malls and department stores, and noticed that many products are now designed to look 'old', 'retro', and 'authentic' (whatever that means). We're harking back to some glory time (1950s?) Retro radios, retro cameras, retro clothes, retro luggage, etc.

In the past, we used to embrace the future. World exhibitions were about the world of tomorrow. Art Deco was about the look of the future. The future is now out of fashion.

To be fair, that has been around for about 5 years, with surges happening more at Christmas time, but retro style items are always around. I might have notice this from working in retail for so long.

The future is out of fashion, I think, because we do not feel very successful right now, and there isn't a sense of optimism that the future means things will get better. If anything, the fact that we have probes on Mars is not as interesting because that doesn't help me provide for my family any better or increase job prospects or seem to affect the average individual in any more than a marginal way.

"Retro" looks back at things that we know were successful, if to varying degrees. The future is too unknown, too uncertain, to be hopeful about right now.

To tie it back to Interstellar, I can see Nolan's point in that we need to explore, and we have lost that drive. However, that still doesn't inspire me to see that movie...yet.

You know, what is also funny, is that the teaser reminds me a bit of the opening montage of Star Trek Enterprise, with all the historical exploration clips.

Doctor Submarine wrote:
Dorkman wrote:

Also, if soul-crushing despair is your thing, you should watch

SPOILER Show
THE GREY.

Or, if you'd like to simulate the experience, trap yourself in a maze with several hungry wolves, and arm yourself only with the collected works of Nietzche and a copy of "The Stranger" for good measure.

There you go. Man, I couldn't wait for that movie to be over so I could go sob over the futility of it all.

870

(34 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Jimmy B wrote:

In the EE podcast I recommended The Ref starring Denis Leary, it's a dark comedy about a burglar taking a family hostage at Christmas. Kevin Spacey plays the dad of the (very dysfunctional) family

Again? wink

Trey wrote:
Dorkman wrote:

I'm not sure why we're talking about artistic integrity when the article is just about the Tolkien estate getting screwed on the back-end points.

The article talks about Tolkien's family being unhappy with creative changes as well.   

But of course, who'd write an article about an author who was thrilled with a movie adaptation and thought the paycheck was awesome and completely fair?   That ain't gonna get no clicks.  smile

I need to find that story and do some clicks wink

Also, right now is the time when WB, PJ and several other initials are being sued over The Hobbit and profits. I think it must be the season. There is a lot of legal problems going on, regardless of the artistic conflict, so I don't see any other Tolkien films being done. Strangely, I am ok with that. I know many here don't like the Hobbit, and I completely understand Christopher Tolkien's objections, since his father voiced similar ones when animated adaptations of LOTR were being done. CT will always have the books and his father's imaginings but changes to it will never be understood.

I know I am in the minority for liking the Hobbit around here, but artistic variation, especially in book adaptations is just par for the course, in my opinion. If I ever write a book and want an adaptation, I have no doubt that I will struggle with similar opinions smile

872

(34 replies, posted in Off Topic)

My family enjoys A Christmas Story, Christmas Vacation, Charlie Brown Christmas, and the Santa Claus.

Lots of fun and good laughs for the whole family smile

873

(2 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Some people don't know how to make up our minds wink

Congrats, Agent Coulson. You might be the Director some day!

874

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The VFX amazes me, but yeah, the dialogue choices were odd. But, then, I am not a Smith fan as the Doctor.
Personally, I would rather watch Cumberbatch as the Doctor. If we are going to fan fic, then Sherlock is a hidden generation, similar to BBQ's idea, except that the Doctor is playing out the life of Sherlock in an attempt to hide himself.

875

(22 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

Only if the next Bond movie involves zombies does this all come back together.