901

(43 replies, posted in Episodes)

The film was very well balanced between all of them. Every avenger had their moments to really shine, even Hawkeye and Black Widow. Favourite moments were Thor holding his hand out for Mjolnir and then smashing Hulk in the head with it, Hawkeye jumping off the building and firing, Iron Man bouncing his repulsor beam thingies off of Cap's shield, Captain America beating up a bunch of Chitauri and then the cut to the cop issuing the orders he had just been given, Banner transforming into the Hulk for the second time, Thor and Loki talking on the cliff, Cap saying "hulk... smash", and I could go on but really need to see the movie again and soon..

In terms of how they dealt with Thor, I felt it was similar to the Hulk. He's very powerful and, crucially, just doesn't stay down. They both ended up being 'ejected' from the helicarrier in similar ways too. I never felt Thor was losing to Iron Man or Hulk, as he would keep getting back up from whatever he'd been hit with. As a huge Thor fan, this made me very happy.

In the other thread, otero commented that he thought Robert Downey Jnr was the star of the show. I disagree and thought if anyone dominated the film it was the Hulk. Everyone talking about the movie afterwards was talking about the Hulk.

If I had any complaint about the film it was the relatively weak opening action scene. There was a moment where I got a little worried. That said, this film masterfully upped the stakes and the action in a way that Thor, Iron Man and Captain America failed, with the peak occuring in the climax rather than earlier (Frost giant battle, Afghanistan and probably train scene, respectively).

I know that that's Buzz Aldrin's on the left. The other guy reminds me of that Ben Foster chap.

904

(24 replies, posted in Off Topic)

905

(44 replies, posted in Episodes)

During the live shows I usually have the movie on in the background, but otherwise I listen at work, in bed, out walking, wherever really.

906

(43 replies, posted in Episodes)

907

(24 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It's a list with the kind of films you'd expect from a critic such as Ebert. I'd argue that these films are all chosen by the mind, rather than from the heart, which tells me that they aren't so much the greatest but rather the most technical/audacious achievements in the 'language of cinema' because Citizen Kane, 2001 and Apocolypse Now aren't perfect. Then there's the whole 'they'll take away my critic membership card if I don't include these' obligatory inclusions and the 'I'll sound really intellectual if I include these ones that 99% of people haven't seen' notables.

Vertigo is pretty great but it's not even Hitchcock's best (and neither is Notorious).

908

(26 replies, posted in Off Topic)

909

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'd never heard of it either and I was sort of interested in watching it, until it showed you the end!

910

(133 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Loved him in Inglorious Basterds as well. He was great in 300 too and had a critically acclaimed role in Hunger.  Hell, I've loved him in everything I've seen (even Eden Lake).

911

(133 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Must... resist... clicking...

912

(219 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'd love to do a commentary (LP or film) but hate my voice too. I wonder if getting a voice modulator thingy and doing it all in a Darth Vader voice would work?

It's so hard to know whether you're going to like a game or not, and here in the UK we're paying about 40-50 quid (which is, what, around $70-80?). Really expensive! Occasionally, you get suckered into the hype only to end up a game like Medal of Honour, a clunky and really poorly scripted CoD wannabe. Nowadays, I usually wait until metacritic has an ample amount of reviews and then skip right to the end and read the 5-6 reviews with the lowest scores. Gaming journalism is shock full of folks telling you about all the bad stuff in a game and then giving it a high score (possibly influenced by the delicate, one-sided relationship between publisher and website/magazine).

One thing I would really like to change in the industry is have a revolution in the fighting game genre, which I used to love but find so utterly boring now as they've not done anything new with it in at least a decade. Wish it could get the 'boxing sim' treatment as seen in the Fight Night games. There's a new UFC game that might go someways in this direction... anyone been able to try it out?

913

(62 replies, posted in Episodes)

The only time I've ever been truly impressed, no, awed by 3D was during the Hubble IMAX documentary shown at the Kennedy Space Center. Specifically the points where you feel that you can reach out and touch the astronaut working on the telescope and when it places you in a starfield. Amazing. It's one of my most cherished memories.

914

(80 replies, posted in Off Topic)

That looks pretty intimidating to me too, but then I've not touched a barbell since I was in my teens (so they're doubly scary). I'm mostly doing bodyweight exercises these days, working on push ups and towards the First Pull Up.

For recovery post workout, I find a stretching session, cold shower, and then a protein shake about 30-60 minutes afterwards does wonders for me. I still have some soreness, but it's not crippling. A few weeks ago I was squatting a lot at my niece's birthday party, picking things up and taking photos, and without any kind of warm-up before or stretch afterwards my buttocks ached for a good 3 days afterwards. It's surprising just how often your glutes and core get used when doing pretty much anything.

915

(62 replies, posted in Episodes)

Apocolypto looks awful in digital. When people are running through the jungle it looks almost like DV. What's more the digital look somewhat undermines the setting. So whilst digital is ok when it's a contemporary film like Collateral (or a sci-fi), I don't think it suits historical films at all.

I'm concerned about the Hobbit for many reasons and the technical element is among them.

Speaking of the generational attitude, my parents have their TV set to the default shop style, so blues are almost white and the contrast is way off. They don't notice it though and they also don't really notice any difference with blurays. I believe it's because their eyes are able to adjust so quickly and things 'normalise' subconsciously. Like when you're watching a teal film, it's not long before the green looks white again.

Hmmm, I watched the premiere for Falling Skies a while back and didn't think much of it. I remember it being implausible (as opposed to unbelieveable) with a very poorly established world (herds of survivors walking along roads in broad daylight?) which made it hard to really take it seriously. Maybe it improves as the series goes on as I felt like it was more of an execution problem.

917

(219 replies, posted in Off Topic)

918

(62 replies, posted in Episodes)

Great one guys. I like this as an 'extended Intermission' and prefer these sorts of general, connected topics  over just talking about recent theatrical releases.

919

(219 replies, posted in Off Topic)

920

(47 replies, posted in Episodes)

I remember months ago thinking that perhaps you'd burn out on doing all the double bill commentaries for so long, as that's pretty intensive to go through every Sunday (and then you added the intermission as well!). Sure, LOTR was an especially long haul but what you'd done previously up to then was pretty exhausting (give or take about 5 hours) and shouldn't be discounted.

It's no surprise to me that you'd want to scale back - though I'm a bit curious as to what the ultimate goal of all this is and what is hoped to be accomplished by moving up the tail. Does DiF want to become a business?

921

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

922

(16 replies, posted in Off Topic)

923

(16 replies, posted in Off Topic)

So today I was in London looking for a new pair of shoes and some fella stops me in a street from his car. I think he's about to ask me for directions but no, it's a car dealer who says he's just sold 3 Bentleys to an Arab family and this buyer didn't want the 2 Breitling watches his boss had decided to throw in as a freebie.

You just know where this is going right?

So because he doesn't like his boss and reckons that the guy will just pocket them (as they've already been 'signed off'), he wants to get rid of them instead and lo and behold wants to sell one of the watches to me. He asks me what I could pay, I say 250 pounds, which he pretty much scoffs at. He's driving a nice expensive car and works for Bentley, which is a pretty prestigious car company, and says it's not about the money but can't really part with a watch for so low a price of its value. So I up the price to 300 and I'm pretty adamant about not paying more. He reluctantly agrees and so I go to a cash machine and hand over 300 quid. He gives me his/a telephone number so that I can contact him to buy him a Jack Daniels, owed to him for the great deal, or to refer him to friends and family who could buy a Bentley. Then a minute or so later he drives off (back to the showroom and his boss).

I know absolute shit about watches and know less about Breitlings (other than they're similar to Rolexes and are expensive), but this guy has a credible story, is friendly and chatty, and asks that I don't put it on Ebay because it might get him in trouble if his boss finds out.

I get back home and have a look on line, because now I'm thinking things over and starting to wonder. Loads of information about Breitlings and replicas/fakes. And I come to a realisation that, fuck, this thing isn't genuine. And worse, the bloody chronograph function doesn't even appear to work. It's a very pretty piece of shit (that I didn't want or need). And no-one appears to answer the phone number I was given, surprise surprise.

So upshot is that I'm out of pocket a tidy sum of money (which I can live with but isn't ideal) and my faith in mankind has taken another stumble, because fuck this guy and his con game. I really wonder about what goes on in peoples' heads sometimes, like you must know you're being a total shit. How does it not kick in at some point to stop? It's one thing to pretend to be a Nigerian prince and get a scam going via impersonal means like the internet or on ebay, but to do a full Mamet on some guy walking along?

Anyone else have similar stories of people being shits?

924

(80 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I've been doing P90X a couple of times recently too - the chest and back one. It's good to have someone to follow in your workout and the trainer, Tony, is fun to watch as well. What I find most difficult is that the exercises get progressively harder during the workout and it can be really hard to do many divebombers or diamond push-ups following regular, military, wide, and decline versions. But equally, it's something to strive for.

But impossible to log in fitocracy. I'm stunned that it includes obscure exercises you'd need to google but neglects things like bodyweight rows, assisted pull-ups/chin-ups, pull-up/chin-up negatives, i.e., common progression exercises to the most basic of all exercises. I figure if you're going to have a database it might as well be a bit more complete.

925

(5 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Going to go for B here. A simply sounds like masturbation.