926

(5 replies, posted in Off Topic)

12 months ago I'd have told you the industry is fucked and movies as I used to love them are dead.
However, shit like Battleship bombed, and now we're into this amazing 6 month stretch of risky, violent, mid-budget R-rated films, and I'm thinking there's hope again. If in a 3 month span I can go watch The Master, Dredd, Looper, Cloud Atlas, Universal Soldier Day of Reckoning, 7 psychopaths, Django Unchained, Flight, Argo, and Zero Dark Thirty, either its a ridiculous fluke, or someone in Hollywood is on the same page as I am.

And that's without even looking at some of the more ambitious stuff hitting next year, like Elysium and Gravity. If Hollywood keeps making good films, people will keep coming out to see them (at least some of them), and we don't have to worry about TV destroying the market.

Nothing beats "Heart of Darkness" in my book

Ya, I never approached it as a Final Fantasy movie, just as a "realistic" all-cg animated sci-fi film, which fell on it's face really really hard.

Squiggly_P wrote:

If you've not seen the second one, you should. It's part remake and part sequel, but it hits the perfect balance of horror and comedy. The first one is almost straight horror and the third one is almost pure comedy, but the second one is just right.

I still like the 3rd one best for the comedic Monty-Python meets Big Trouble in Little China action-adventure vibe (and what is probably the last large-scale use of stop-motion in a live-action film), though they're all quite good for different reasons.

Oh man, so I'm rewatching Final Fantasy Spirits Within, and I'll be damned if that's not one of the weirdest wide US studio releases I've ever seen. Just everything about it is so uncanny valley and wrong. This would be an interesting one to have a DIF commentary on I think, because it was definitely ground-breaking and paved the way for polar express/beowulf/avatar, but at the same time it's so bizarre that they went out of their way to invent all of this tech for such a lame story/characters.

It's funny, cause I remember being absolutely blown away by the visuals when I saw it in theater's 10 years ago, but it doesn't at all seem that impressive watching it now. The worst thing by far is that they pretty much ripped off real celebrities for the look of the characters, but then got different celebrities to voice them.

There is nothing more disconcerting than hearing Alec Baldwin's voice coming out of Not-Ben-Affleck: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-haFZNyyzntQ/TljfRUHDZDI/AAAAAAAAAVA/-YVJ7Q2ixLI/s1600/FFSPWI+Gray.jpg

Xtroid wrote:
fireproof78 wrote:

So, a random bit I heard on the radio is that Arnold Schwarzenegger is reprising his role as Conan the Barbarian in the "Legend of Conan."

Crom!

Best news I've heard in forever. Conan fans have been hoping something like this would happen for damn near 30 years now. Wondering if this will at all be based on Milius's unmade screenplay King Conan.

Watching Conan the Barbarian for the first time recently, while a lot of the movie doesn't hold up and is pretty silly, there's also some really great film-making at play, a real understanding of how to approach a mythic story, and the score is fucking outstanding. It's pretty clear watching it that something like Lord of the Rings would never have happened if it wasn't for this movie.

I just think it's not ultimately important whether the movie we see is the one he's writing. It's a story about a man grappling with his moral code vs the constraints and expectations of the genre he's writing in. I think people's familiarity with Adaptation is messing with people's expectations, because they recognize a sorta similar setup and then instantly expect the rest of the movie to neatly do the same thing in terms of Meta structure. I personally don't think every screenwriter meta-commentary story has to neatly wraparound like that, and I don't think they were really going for that in this movie. Its inherently a more playful and less realistic comedy that's messy and plays around with structure. I'd say if anything it's closer to the Big Lebowski or Kiss Kiss Bang Bang.

See, I couldn't disagree more. The movie  they sell in the trailer looks like a silly, play-it-safe studio comedy. Instead, he starts with that premise and uses it to deconstruct the genre, and critique the audience's need for a violent resolution.

It's actually very similar to Inglourious Basterds in this way, which would make sense, because that's why I love that movie, and I know you've mentioned before that's the reason you don't like that one.

Also, I fucking LOVE that they prominently feature Olga Kurylenko as an important character in the posters/trailers, she gets introduced like she'll matter, then immediately murdered 2 minutes later.

934

(25 replies, posted in Episodes)

It was just for sale on blu-ray for like 7 bucks on amazon

935

(25 replies, posted in Episodes)

I just want to say people should really check out 28 Weeks Later. I need to re-watch it, but I remember at the time liking it quite a bit more than 28 days. It's kind of an alien to aliens jump, where it turns into more of a heavy action film, and I really love that not only do the characters have to try to survive the zombies, they have to fight and survive the military. It's really cool to me to suddenly have a sniper shootout in a traditional horror film. Also, it's one of the earlier good leading roles for Jeremy Renner, years before Hurt Locker.

936

(39 replies, posted in Episodes)

Seeing that is making me realize the inherent problem with this series.
The most compelling part is when he doesn't have the suit (first 30 min of Iron Man 1).

Like more than anything, I think the most interesting thing would be to see him lose the suit, and then have to take on all the bad-guys without his tech, because then he'd feel vulnerable and be against all odds.

Whenever he's got the suit it's like a movie where the main character has cheat codes, cause he's basically unstoppable and has an endless supply of weapons and gadgets to destroy everyone with, so it's hard to keep the tension up.

937

(4 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

I see what you're saying, but I would argue that story construction is typically one of the least original parts of most movies. How many films are about a hero's girlfriend getting kidnapped so  he has to assault the villain's compound, face off with the villain, and rescue her at the end? That's like 20% of all movies, and there's lots of good ones in there.

Story structure is about using the best layout to tell the story you're trying to tell, and for this kind of story, I'd say this was the best way of structuring it.

The hard part of writing is the details, and it's the weird details and connections this movie chooses that make it so unique.

938

(4 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

So with the big 100 million dollar multiple-connected-storylines Cloud Atlas coming out this weekend, I decided on a whim to check out a little seen Japanese film from 2009 called "Fish Story" that had a kind of similar sounding premise, and had gotten rave reviews from online reviewers I trust.

And I fell in love it.

Enough so that I would say you should go watch it on Netflix Streaming right now, especially if you are someone who is passionate about music or the power of music.

http://www.lostturntable.com/public/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/fish-story-record.jpg

The year is 2012, and a comet is headed for earth. The US mission to stop it (cleverly referencing Armageddon) has failed, and the earth is doomed to destruction in 5 hours. However, while the rest of the world flees for the hills, one record-store owner believes everything will be OK, and that the key to earth's survival lies in a long forgotten punk rock song from the 1970s, the titularly named "Fish Story". The movie will flash back and forward through time to show how this might be possible. Suffice it to say, though the movie cleverly leaves out key information throughout the first half, rest assured that by the end, the movie connects the dots in an extremely satisfying way that left a big smile on my face.

The key to this movie I think is the upbeat, storybook tone. In our cynical times, it's so rare for a movie to come out with such a positive, celebratory message. It feels more than anything else like a really cool fairy-tale you might tell some-one to inspire them to be creative, and the ultimate message, that even the most doomed-to-obscurity creative projects have the power to change people's lives is extremely uplifting to me.
Seeing this punk band that's ahead of their time and overlooked by the public, and the idea that fuck it, they're going to make music the way they want to, and maybe it will reach somebody one day, really resonated with me.

Also, it doesn't hurt that the titular song is pretty damned awesome, both tragic and upbeat, and with strange lyrics that become hilariously awesome once you realize their origin.

Ultimately, I can't really describe the experience of Fish Story, I suspect it'll either work for you or it won't.
All I know is it's an awesome, creative little original story that manages to feel epic despite what was probably a pretty small budget, and the message and attitude of the movie really resonated with me.
I hope people give it a chance and like it.

Also, it's twice as short as Cloud Atlas, just sayin.

939

(25 replies, posted in Episodes)

That discussion about an earthquake hitting during a DIF commentary is making me imagine a found-footage horror film starring the DIF crew trying to survive a disaster in LA, and then desperately wanting such a movie to exist.

While it's definitely not a good movie, I don't think the politics or message are problematic. I have no problem with a military porn movie that glorifies soldiers and is unambiguously behind what they do. Given that literally EVERY single other war or military movie nowadays is about how the CIA are evil, and how the government and military are corrupt and out to get you, it's almost a subversion to have an 80s style "lets kill all the evil terrorists" movie.

Where it fails miserably is as you said, the complete and utter lack of story, characters, or acting.
Some of the delivery's are just so absurdly bad.

I do think there's some cool action beats, I like the whole boat rescue and assault on the compound early on, and I think the interrogation scene is very well done as well (apparently the guy was a real military interrogator, given fake information about the fake bad guy, and told to carry out a real interrogation on him).

But ya, it's a pretty big failure overall, kinda watchable once as a rental but that's about it.

Ya, while the sequel is pretty lame, I unabashadly love the original Johnny English. Some great gags, and John Malkovich is really entertaining as the villain.

And man, I'd forgotten how damned good that theme song is.

942

(64 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I guess all the Torture and Iraq War parallels did the trick

943

(12 replies, posted in Creations)

Ho...lee..shit. Goddamn that is beautiful

944

(91 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I hadn't thought about it that way....that's interesting.

I guess my question would be why does he have to be a threat NOW? Isn't it a more interesting dilemma if he seems just like a normal, innocent kid right now, but will grow up to be terrible later? I guess you'd more easily side with younger Joe if that was the case, but I'd say a better way to balance it would be to SHOW some of the terrible things this kid's done in the future. Right now the movie makes him dangerous in the present but tells you almost nothing about what he's done in the future, I think it would work better if he was innocent in the present but we saw some of the terrible things he's doing later.

This will be a fun one to re-watch with adjusted expectations.

945

(91 replies, posted in Off Topic)

My objection isn't with the 2nd Magic Bean as a principle, it's that to me it seems totally pointless for telling this particular story. The moral argument of whether it's ok to kill someone who will do bad in the future does not require giving the kid super-powers. You could make the exact same movie and take out the TK stuff with some minor tweaks here and there. It's a clear case of putting something in that he thought looked cool when it doesn't really serve the story he's telling, just clutters it.

946

(29 replies, posted in Episodes)

Awww, I have a real soft-spot for Pandorum. I love the concept, love the ship design, love where the story goes. If it didn't have such shitty over-editing and out-of-place martial arts, it would be a bit of a b-movie classic.

947

(19 replies, posted in Off Topic)

One of my favorites is this awesome short from a few years back, some really great dogfighting and robot action. Wish Pixar did stuff like this. Even more impressive, this was done basically almost entirely by one guy, I believe this short got him a job at Weta.

948

(29 replies, posted in Episodes)

For comparison purposes, if you want to see how far Anderson has fallen since the mid 90s, I give you this fight from Resident Evil 4:

.
Marvel at how literally the entire fight is done in gratuitous slo-motion for NO REASON.

949

(29 replies, posted in Episodes)

Ya, this is his best. His Death Race remake and Soldier are both also pretty watchable.

950

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Thanks for the link, watched it. I think the footage is pretty crazy, but I HATE the use of narration through the whole thing. I wish they'd just play the raw footage and audio more or less uninterrupted. It basically ruins it for me, cause the narrator is so goddamn on the nose and has to explain what everyone is feeling and what is completely obvious from the footage, just distracts and takes away from the event.

That's why I like the history channel one so much, it's just ambient music and sound design over raw footage.