I like the adaptation show idea. Game of Thrones would be a good example of adaptation done right, and I, Robot would be....the other thing.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Eddie
I like the adaptation show idea. Game of Thrones would be a good example of adaptation done right, and I, Robot would be....the other thing.
Unforgiven is ok.
Hmmm, I see your point.
I'd love to hear Trey and Eddies take on Sergio Leone and his spaghetti westerns!
While I'm flattered that you want to know my opinion on it, I'm not sure my take would be worth your time. I've seen a lot of Leone's films, and I have a passing respect for Spaghetti Westerns on the whole, but it's not a genre that tickles my fancy. I would be down to commentate Leone's Once Upon a Time in America (Director's Cut) but I'm certain I would be the only one to do that. Around hour 3 Teague would have formed another kidney stone, and everyone else would be at Poquito Mas wondering what they should commentate on next week.
I love everything about this video.
We are woefully behind on Westerns, and I think Unforgiven is as good a place to start as any.
As I just IM'd Teague (name drop!) I look forward to this.
I'm still waiting for our six month long celebration of Bruce Dern, Dern In Front.
I get what you're saying, and again, mileage varies. Fr me, it wasn't the absence of a story, just the sheer directionlessness of it. Let me ask you this, though. If his awesome friends don't come to help, in the scenario crafted by Favreau/Theroux how was he going text out of it? Yes, Marvel wanted Avengers in there, but they didn't specifically dictate the manner with which those elements are introduced. The way I've been told Marvel handles this is by presenting the writer with a list of things that have to be satisfied. It's up to the creative team of each film how they want to incorporate it. At the end of the day, Jon and Justin wrote that film, and made the decisions with how Tony Stark interacts with those wacky friends of his. Maybe your issue is with the Avengers stuff, but I still think it falls to Jon to make that stuff work, and I think it's certainly possible to do so.
Mileage varies, but the first red flag for me was the toxicity level reveal in the first 5 minutes. Second one was the congressional hearing at the ten minute mark. Third was the Monaco sequence. The issues pile was gathering long before any Avengers made the screen. In fact, if you know nothing of the characters, than you wouldn't know ScarJo is an Avenger until the scene where Nick Fury appears, which is over halfway through the movie. If little bothered you before that, awesome. But in my mind the Avengers was the least of that movie's problems.
I got to sample it over the weekend, and I was very impressed by what I saw.
WIsh I had been on this one. I used to train with Joe Rogan quite a bit, and while I love the man, he is an absurd conspiracy theorist.
Steven Spielberg and Brannon Braga's producers fees dwarf that of Benioff's. Also, the vfx budget on Terra Nova is huge. Benioff has even said prior to going into produuction on season 2 of GoT that he had no idea how they were going to afford their VFX needs on their budget. Theonly criticisms that GRRM has had of the series is that the budget doesnt allow certain scenes to be realized a certqin way. He uses the Boar hunt in episode 6 as an example. In the book, the boar hunt is 100 men on hoarseback with tents set up. In the show, it's King Robert holding a spear while walking through the forest with 3 other people.
For the record, Terra Nova is MUCH more expensive than GoT. thrones is a lesser known cast, with less vfx, and less expensive producers.
Yeah, Dorkman, as he is wont to do, beat me to it and leglocked the correct. My reaction at reading those changes nothing to my criticism: that does not properly articulate specific problems as much as it expresses preference over the interpretation. I'm very familiar with the Batman lore, and have seen every interpretation of it on screen. I don't see how you can look at the Nolan films and not see that the SPIRIT of the Batman character, as as been distilled through 80 some odd years of publication, has translated better than any other attempt. Is it perfect? No, and nor can it be. But the films are enjoyable and crafted with a lot of thought and care.
I can tel you that when Grayson hits three, he will get a steady diet of The Muppet Show on DVD. Equally important is Sesame Street, which had muppett crossovers from time to time. I was that age when I started watching both, and it instantly connected. Same with my nieces and nephews.
I can't stress the importance of Jim Henson's creations on my life. I taught myself to read at age 3 by watching Sesame Street regularly. I always felt like Walt Disney was this wizard who lived to create this magical empire. It was okay that he was dead, because I had Jim Henson, who was as brilliant in my mind as Walt, and he was going to be the caretaker of my generation. I was 12 when he died, and that was the first time where I was deeply saddened by the death of someone I did not know. It really wasn't until Pixar came along that I felt like something was at least attempting to fill that gap.
Makes sen, if they are going in the direction I think they're going. If you're familiar with Bane, you get what I'm saying.
We discuss Shane Black quite a bit in the upcoming Iron Man 2 commentary. We will discuss Nolan quite a bit when we go screaming through the Batman filmography, though I will say its not enough to just say "Nolan's batman is badly written," you have to be a bit more specific if you make that claim. The notion you propose that comic books and superheroes is inherently unrealistic is a bit of a straw man, bordering on ad hominem. Is Maus, the only comic to ever win a Pulitzer, unrealistic because it anthropomorphizes mice in lieu of holocaust survivors? Technically yes, but I would submit that it gets at a deeper truth. This is to say nothing of comics like Pedro and Me, Don't Go Where I Can't Follow, Daytripper, Pride of Baghdad, and Strangers in Paradise which portray relationships in as real of a way as any other medium. If you don't cotton up to capes and cowls too much, I understand, but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.
...and by the way, as a new father, can I just say what an awful expression that is?
The mere mention of either Yogg-Soggoth or Noir-Month will bring about the absolute end of the world.
Heh, don't just wish me luck. YOU'RE doing the score.
Well we fucking did it.
Thanks to a last minute push, we exceeded our 10000 goal and will head into per production soon. A surprising number of forum members donated and I can't thank you enough.
Disclaimer: I am totally Eddie
Dorkman has it mostly right. The thing to keep in mind is that there is not one docu/reality series on the air that doesn't have some kind of trade out with some company for something. For instance when I was working on Real World 9, we had what we call a "trade out" with Snapple and Dr. pepper. Cast got free beverages, and we just simply had to show them drinking it several times a season.
I bring this up because the main reason we blur logos is to not piss off the PAID advertisers by allowing logos on that have no trade outs. A recent, famous example of this is on John and Kate. When their marriage was in its death rattle, John went out and got an endorsement deal with Ed Hardy. He swaddled himself in a cocoon of douche whereever he went, including and especially taping days for his show. Except, surprise, he didn't clear it with TLC, so my good buddy John spent most of that summer turning John Gosselin into a blurry cloud.
Zero budget filmmaking I'd love to sit on. Making a movie for nothing that actually got retail distribution was how I broke in.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Eddie
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.