You chose... thriftily.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Trey
You chose... thriftily.
Whoa. We just became the top story on the front page of slashdot.org. The comments are predictably trollish, but we also got two thousand hits on PinkFive.com in the past hour... and almost 1K in donations in the same time.
So that's nice.
Citizen Kane?
Okay, maybe not - but based on that description, now I want to know wtf that was too.
Figured it was worth a try - all our promotion is peaking right now, Brian and others are at DragonCon helping spread the gospel... gotta do something for the next four days.
But whether we hit that goal or not...
3D Conversion?
That HAS come up, yes.
run while you can, Dorkman...
'cause I figure i can take the 20K and use it to make some REAL money. Can't possibly fail.
So anyway, that happened. Thanks all for your efforts!
Now we're debating our "stretch goal"... something extra we'll do if we can hit a new funding level before time runs out...
We're too close!
I posted about this at my blog yesterday on Storiesonline.net. A day later, we've almost made it. I'll take full credit
Well, I can tell you we did get a pledge from storiesonline.net (Kickstarter tells you what sites your pledges come from, so you can see what's generating the most results).
It wasn't the sole reason for the incredible $5K day we had.... but it helped!
My close personal friend Tysto posted commentaries for the Pink Five saga yesterday. It's— It's not pretty. I've never heard him gush so much.
Well wow. Now we HAVE arrived! Sweet.
$16,469 with six days left on the clock... keep it up, troops. Don't get cocky.
It's that credit sequence that's amazing. How much '80's did THAT show have in it? All of it. All of the '80's.
Oh good lord - I think I know this one too.
Look up Otherworld and see if it's what you're thinking of...
Chalk it up to the world as it was before home video. There weren't THAT many cheap 50's horror movies available to be shown on Saturday afternoon creature features - any kid who watched as religiously as I did pretty much saw them ALL within a year or two.
I think I saw Giant Claw more than once, actually. And I musta seen THEM half a dozen times by the time I was fourteen.
Without looking it up, I'm guessing Invid's is The Giant Claw. At least it sounds like a movie I saw as a kid, and I just happen to remember the title.
Yes. Although I avoided saying so in the description, we are including those rewards with the $50 level, since they don't cost us anything to fulfill.
Ok, I thought Tumblr was a picture thing. Or is that Flickr? Whatvr. Social networking is best left to social people, of which I am not one.
But be my guest - run, fly, be free with your Tumblr activities! I certainly won't tell you NOT to try it.
Well, _I_ haven't, because I've never used Tumblr and don't know what promo images and tracked tags are...
But is that something someone else could do?
Per iJim's suggestion, here's a sample list of possible people to tweet at (Margarine man already took a shot at Grant Imahara, nice one!).
I think it stands a better chance of working if it comes from random folks and NOT us asking for attention ourselves. You might try appealing to some of these folks on a fan-to-fan level - "Hey, have you seen the Pink Five series?" But that's up to you. Personalize as you see fit
Feel free to have at it - if we got a retweet from the GnR guitarist, anything's possible!
@grantimahara
@donttrythis - Adam Savage
@ThatKevinSmith
@DeathStarPR - SW themed comedy twitter with 200K followers
@BadAstronomer - Phil Plait
@neilhimself - Neil Gaiman
@GeorgeTakei
@edgarwright
@simonpegg
@nickjfrost
@wilw - Wil Wheaton
@io9 - major sci-fi news site
@kyle_newman - director of Fanboys
@feliciaday
@pattonoswalt
@NathanFillion - because why the hell not?
...there'd be virtually no guarantee of quality in a system like that.
Unlike the system we have now.
Has anyone pimped Pink Five on the Twitters at high-profile Star Wars fans like, say, @simonpegg, @nickjfrost or @wilw? I don't see evidence of it, but twitter's search engine isn't the best..
A little bit, yeah. But it's a darn good idea and we could do a lot more of it. :-)
We did get a lucky hit by someone posting the kickstarter link and just adding Bonnie Burton's twitter handle in the tweet - so it wasn't even sent TO her really, but still showed up in her feed, and she retweeted it. (She used to run the official SW blog)
Pegg, Wright, Frost, WilW, all great targets... feel free to luv-bomb them. The real jackpot target, I think, would be Grant Imahara. Huge SW nerd, he was even involved in a SW fanfilm kickstarter project himself. if we could get his attention enough to get a RT.... booya.
I think the best trick is to have multiple people do it at various times - then hopefully the tweet will be at the top of their inbox whenever that person happens to log on. Or, if you see somebody like that is tweeting at that moment... fire!
Unfortunately, we realized too late that that kind of "original content" would have been far more profitable...
That clip is fantastic. It's not often you get to hear a leprechaun delivering a royal beatdown.
All right DiF team - progress report time. We're past the halfway point in our 30-day funding window... but not past the halfway point in actual funding.
However, there's a lot of good news here. First of all, we're well out of the "death zone" - half of all Kickstarter projects die with nearly no pledges at all. Statistically, just passing 30% of our goal means we're far more likely to go all the way. Second, funding tends to pick up in the back half of Kickstarter campaigns anyway - people start to respond to the ticking clock.
But even so - we've stalled a bit in the past few days and we need to hit the gas again. There's a direct correlation between Twitter/Facebook blasts and donations - we do the former, we see a rise in the latter. But the thing about Twitter and Facebook posts is that if people don't see them right away, they vanish off the screen. Or they see them and decide to check on them later, then forget. So the name of the game is - keep doing it! (All of MY Facebook and Twitter followers can vouch for how annoying I've been.)
Also, Celebration VI is happening now, and we've got people there working the floor on our behalf. And we're still working to get more writeups on blogs and news outlets, too - these things are especially good because they tend to last a bit longer than tweets, and can go into more detail.
So anyway - anyone who wants to help out, get out there and spread the word (again)! Hell, even though we didn't get a lot of traction from Reddit, we still saw donations from it. Totally worth it.
Don't think you have to limit yourselves to Star Wars-centric zones, either. We got huge numbers from a sound-mixing blog post, and Owen's wacko scoring of a retweet from Gun's N' Roses' guitarist is probably the biggest single pledge-generator we've had. Who wants to try to top it?
Thanks everyone for all the help thus far... now, ready and.... go!
I guess my question really is what prompts people to want to work on fan films rather than developing your own original content?
In the particular case of Pink Five, Amy and I had made about fifty short videos of "original content" already - Pink Five was just another one of them. But guess which one the internet decided to give a damn about. So once we had the beginnings of an audience, we decided to build on it.
But at the same time we were making other projects - for example while making Return of Pink Five we won the Grand Prize in the National 48-hour Film Challenge, and that was an original film. But Pink Five was still the big draw, so we kept going with it.
And it worked - Pink Five got me Ark, which got me Moby Dick (not a great movie, but my first feature-length credit, and that matters) which then led to me selling an original feature script, which got me into the Writer's Guild, and now I've got several projects that are "out to the town" as they say. It's taking a while for those projects to work their way through the system, but it always does.
The reason I've decided to try this push to finish Pink Five now, is because if any of those other projects does get greenlit, I'll be completely absorbed in doing those - and god only knows when I'll have the time to ever get back to Pink Five again.
I don't want the thing hanging over my head for the rest of my life - we're within striking distance of getting it done, and I think the ending's going to be a lot of fun. Then the P5 team and I can get on with our lives. Which hopefully involves working together on those new things, because the P5 videos also secretly served as an "audition" for the entire cast and crew. I'm happy to say that most of them passed the test. :-)
...selling advertising is going to go away as a business model for most things. Only the most commercial things are going to be able to be supported by advertising in the future.
heh, I dunno if you've been on the Internet lately, but....
Only the most commercial things have ever been supported by advertising. Or to a lesser extent, the subscription model as Allison pointed out. The only new development is that eyeballs are now moving to the Internet... and advertisers are moving with them. You can watch a cat video on YouTube and it'll come with a pre-roll and a banner overlay now.
Some companies will make the transition, others will disappear and some new ones will take their place. The game is the same, just the players are changing. The belief that "teh internet will democratize all creativity!" lasted about six weeks, and ended years ago. Now everyone's chasing the money, just like before.
Hulu, for example, offers both models - ad-based for some content, subscription-based for more content. Newspapers and magazines are moving to online models, but only as fast as advertisers are willing to buy ad space to make it worth doing.
The only holdup is that advertisers still aren't willing yet to put money into internet ads as much as the tried-and-true existing venues - because even now the internet as a whole still can't guarantee the number of eyeballs that traditional media can. But some companies (like Hulu) are getting close to that point, enough so that they've started to put money into original content. As is the subscription-based Netflix. But to get their money, you have to convince them that your product will retain their audience... which means it's already exactly like TV and movies have operated for decades. Just with less money involved.
As of today we're still not at the point where an online model of any kind can justify the expense of making The Avengers, or Lost, or anything of that level. Kickstarter seems unlikely to ever fill that gap, either. So the question is - will a Hulu or Netflix ever reach the point where they are greenlighting hundred-million dollar projects? (Or maybe the question should be - how soon will they?)
Wouldn't have worked, then or now. Network tv shows are way too expensive to be supported by the Kickstarter model. A full season of Firefly, conservatively, would cost $40-$50 million, no Kickstarter project has come close to that. Maybe someday, but not yet, and obviously it wasn't an option ten years ago when Firefly was cancelled.
There was a grassroots Kickstarter-like project to keep Enterprise on the air back in the day, too - the effort reached over a million in pledges before the studio said "Look, stop - you're not even close to what the show costs to make. Thanks, but no."
Studios are certainly watching the Kickstarter phenomenon with interest, but aside from the small-potatoes level of funding available there, there are a lot of legal and business issues that will prevent them from operating that way anytime soon.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Trey
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.