You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Trey
everyone who doesn't hate its guts will watch it a dozen times.
That's actually a pretty fair review.
I dunno if I would want to see it a dozen times, but I might be tempted to see it another time - if only to see Tom Cruise sing to Malin Ackerman's ass again.
/nope, not kidding. This movie is genius.
But don't watch The Sting II!
Noooo. Likewise avoid "Butch and Sundance: The Early Years". Both are ample evidence that lame sequels to great movies are not a new phenomenon.
Watched Butch Cassidy and the Sundance kid, and it is indeed an excellent Western. Really sharp script, beautiful cinematography, Newman and Redford kill it.
Indeed. Now run, don't walk, and see The Sting. Redford and Newman again, same director too. Completely different movie, but just as great.
Well, I may be alone on THIS one, but I've just seen the first movie of the summer that I actually enjoyed.
I knew nothing about Rock of Ages going in, other than seeing the trailer (in front of several other movies that I did not enjoy). And I was a little biased against it because I knew it was gonna be an actual musical, rather than a movie about music. It took a few minutes for me to get on board with the musical format, which is inherently surreal and can be hard to do well. But once the movie got rolling, I was in.
Your mileage may vary, depending largely on how much you love/hate '80's rock. But if you're okay with that, then see Rock of Ages in a theater with a good sound system.
The plot's nothing to worry about, if you've ever seen a musical you already know the plot. But they performed the ritual just fine, I thought. There are a lot of hot girls, a lot of singing and dancing, a lot of saturated color and smoky spotlights, a funny monkey, and for some reason I didn't even hate Russell Brand. And Tom Cruise was having fun, and I had fun watching him have fun.
I actually can't remember the last time I was in a theater where we, the audience, actually laughed at funny things in a movie. With every movie I've seen in a long while, the best we could do was give that sorta grunt that means "I recognize that as something resembling humor." With Rock of Ages, the crowd actually laughed. Many times. And at least half of them stayed to the end of the credits, at which point people applauded. It was kinda shocking.
Apparently the movie's not doing too well in its opening weekend, but this one might be a word-of-mouth movie that hangs in for a while. I hope so.
Well, we know who the movie says made us, and the 'why' part I'm fine with not having an answer, or getting only vague ones. People ask that question all the time. It's the other 5,000 questions in the movie that bother me.
Same here. Religious people give their gods a pass all the time "God moves in mysterious ways", etc. Even in the secular world, "Act of God" is a legal term meaning something that no one could foresee or prevent - and it's usually something awful. I'm not a religious person, but I'm of the opinion that if you really could ask your "creator" what the deal is, you might well get an answer you won't like, or even understand.
For me, the movie dealt with that whole issue in the brief exchange with David about why humans created androids and he gets told "Because we could." That's what I think the movie wanted to be about, maybe in some former draft. Almost all of the characters wanted to meet their Maker because of some personal goal - enlightenment, knowledge, profit, immortality... and watching a variety of interesting characters go about seeking those different goals is a perfectly workable frame to hang a movie on.
Except... they all went about it by doing a lot of silly unmotivated things, and meanwhile there wasn't a single branch of science that didn't get misused and mangled, which was painful. And in the end, the one character who seemed to have learned something ("We were SO WRONG") then sets out to do the same thing again. Ptui.
If there's any common theme to the Alien series, it's "leave that thing alone and go home". There's a character in each movie who says something close to that, and they're always right. In Prometheus, Geologist Soccer Hooligan Hudson says it, and he's right... but then everything he does after that is inexplicably stupid, just like every other character. Double ptui.
TV aspect ratios are now totally different than any film ratio ever used.
Actually, they're only a little different.
16x9 equates to a 1.77 ratio, and 35mm movies are 1.85. So most movies fit almost exactly on the newfangled 16x9 screens. That's WHY screens are 16x9, to match modern movie format. In the same way 4x3 standard definition tv's were formatted for 1.33, which was the movie standard until the '50's.
Movies in 2.35 do still either need letterboxing or pan and scan to get the entire picture onto 16x9 screens. But not all movies are 2.35, it's usually just used for "epic" kinda movies with big landscapes etc. Many movies are just 1.85 - there's no reason to shoot a Jennifer Aniston romcom in uber-widescreen. For example, closeups are a pain to compose in 2.35.
So comedies and dramas - or any movie that's more about actors acting than scenery - will be shot 1.85, and work fine at 16x9.
One of my fave Futurama jokes evar was a little throwaway gag where Leela finds Fry listening to gangsta rap and says "You can sit here listening to classical music all you want, but..."
I think it looks great.
/obligatory
The contents of Trey's Tweety Feeder do not reflect the opinions of @downinfront or Twentieth Century Fox.
Not sure I get why it's weird to discuss new movie releases... that Ebert guy used to do it on the teevee all the time. Other folks still do.
Unless you mean it's weird the way WE do it. That I can believe.
So Red Letter Media is... all of us?
My semi-mod powers only allowed me to correct the spelling of this thread title. The rest I left as an exercise for the reader.
Jon Spaihts' only writing credit is that Darkest Hour flick. Haven't felt the inkling to see that one...
I have. Would it shock you if I said that Darkest Hour has some nice action setpieces, interspersed with some extremely sketchy science talk?
Spaights also wrote Passengers, which was number one on the "black list" a few years back. The description said it was about a guy who wakes up to find himself the only conscious person on a sleeper ark ship. Considering we were getting ready to make Ark at the time, I was curious (and worried - it seemed like everybody was doing arkship stories all of a sudden).
So I got hold of a copy, and it's actually an interesting premise ruined by... wait for it... a lot of extremely dumb science. The descriptions of how the arkship functioned were insane - you'd never design a ship to do any of those things... unless you needed it to do those things to service your shaky plot. It even had my least favorite trope of all - the "ship's computer" was damaged and malfunctioning.
Passengers never got made (yet) though Keanu Reeves was attached to star for a while. But because of its notoriety, Spaights became a go-to guy for "space" screenplays. Sigh.
My biggest gripe about Prometheus (biggest among many) was the Old Weyland subplot, which contributed nothing to the movie. I think it was in the non-spoiler thread that someone asked why hire Guy Pearce to do the whole movie in not-very-good old age makeup... the only explanation I can think of is maybe that "viral video" TED talk is actually a deleted scene, intended to add another level to the "if we can create life, we're like gods" theme that I think the movie was trying to go for, sorta. It's a pretty elaborate scene to just be a bit o' viral marketing, but I'm just guessing.
But damn, it sure is a pretty movie to look at.
Yesterday's bomb threat kept the theatre closed until evening... so I'm going out now to finally see the rest of Prometheus.
After reading the reactions of folks here who already saw the whole thing, hoo boy - I'm even less eager to see it. Now I feel like I'm going to complete some court-ordered community service.
Well, I just saw half of Prometheus - the theater was evacuated an hour into the movie because there was a bomb threat at the FedEx next door. Fun.
Got a come-back-anytime ticket that I might use tonight... but I have to say that although the movie is pretty as hell, I'm not exactly dying to find out what happens next. Nor am I eager to sit through the first half again - as I said, nice visuals, but every time a character tried to talk all sciencey things got painful.
In fact, at the point the movie stopped, several sets of characters were doing supposedly sciencey things that made no damn sense at all - gee, I wonder if they're gonna trigger something bad happening? Wait, don't tell me...
I think anyone who has seen Terminator has at some point tried this as a username on forums though.
Yeah, I know it. It's on Pico.
I tend to read more non-fiction than fiction (my recent marathon burn-through of all the Ice and Fire novels notwithstanding). My preference is usually science or history... or science history. In that zone, some recent reads that I recommend:
The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks Fascinating story of the first human cells successfully grown in culture, they are still being grown today even though the original (unintentional) donor has been dead for more than sixty years. If you could pile all of Henrietta's cells ever grown onto a scale, they’d weigh more than 50 million metric tons. These cells have made millions for pharmaceutical companies... but until the author of the book set out to trace their history, her family never even knew it.
The Eerie Silence deals with Fermi's Paradox - i.e. if life in the universe is supposedly so common... where the hell is everybody? Examines many possible explanations of why decades of SETI hasn't turned up a darn thing - from maybe there really ISN'T other life in the universe, to maybe we're still not smart enough to even know what to look for.
And any of Mary Roach's books: Spook (about the search for life after death), Bonk (about sex), Stiff (about all the weird things we do with cadavers) and Packing For Mars (about the issues involved in long-term space travel) are well worth a read. All full of bizarre info and - the way Roach writes - funny as hell.
EDIT: Meanwhile, Lit-o has reminded me Lost City of Z and Zombie Spaceship Wasteland have been on my "gotta get those" list for a while now. I shall remedy this forthwith.
That's a problem with Teague and his incessant issues with updating search tags
So, not so much a bug, more of a Tugue.
Soylent Green — the sci fi film that helped define dystopia paranoia
Not to mention giving us one of the most well-known catchphrases in pop culture. Even people who've never seen the movie know the catchphrase (unfortunately).
But yeah, it's a very respectable list... except I agree that Cars 2 does sorta stand out as maybe-not-so-essential-after-all.
We could go on adding movies forever of course - but me, I see a rather sizable hole in the 70's which I would recommend filling with:
The Sting
The Exorcist
Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid
Jaws
Close Encounters of the Third Kind
EDIT: Gaah, this is like eating Pringles - but seriously, the list is also missing at least two Planets:
Forbidden Planet
Planet of the Apes (the original, o'course)
Haven't seen Where Eagles Dare in a very long time, I vaguely remember liking it. Should probably revisit it.
My personal fave movie based on an Alistair MacLean novel is The Guns of Navarone. And in that same sort of genre, The Dirty Dozen and The Great Escape both belong on the "movie literacy" list, too. (I didn't check to see if they've already been mentioned. If so, then I'm just agreein')
Another doc well worth watching (and currently on Netflix streaming): Cave of Forgotten Dreams. Werner Herzog may be a bit "out there" in his approach to the material, but the topic is fascinating.
While I'm at it, same goes for Grizzly Man.
Roy Scheider is in this? I'm in.
P.S. That truck is carrying crates of unstable dynamite that are leaking nitroglycerin.
Suspenseful flick.
William Friedkin's criminally underseen Sorceror, seriously track down a copy of that, it will pummel your soul. I still have no idea how the fuck he shot some of the stuff in that movie without killing everyone involved.
I hung this poster on the wall of my dorm room at USC before I ever saw the movie. People would see the poster and say, what is that movie about? And I would say, I have no idea.
But every time I looked at that poster, I started to imagine what the movie could be about. Because seriously, WTF could have happened to lead to a scene like this?
I did finally see the movie and loved it... and recently watched it again and it mostly holds up. That Tangerine Dream soundtrack, not so much.
And I still have the poster.
But this reminds me that I have a lamentable gap in my own film viewage - I still haven't seen Wages of Fear, the original film of which Sorcerer is a remake. *runs to check Netflix*
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Trey
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.