1,101

(74 replies, posted in Episodes)

I wouldn't read it with your dick, as they say

1,102

(20 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Yoda will now pimp anything for cash

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/cele … 2051827568

1,103

(11 replies, posted in Off Topic)

What a nerve Will Smith has got. Fancy wanting to know what the scene is about. He even expects that it should make sense. How pretentious. It's Men in Black, not Shakespeare.

1,104

(74 replies, posted in Episodes)

All of Rihanna's lines...

http://www.vulture.com/2012/05/read-eve … eship.html

Idiocracy

1,106

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

The DiF dudes were right in their commentary. One of invincible inflatable punching-doll Avengers had to die to raise the stakes for them, reveal vulnerability, and lower the character-count, and Hawkeye is the most expendable with his lame bow-and-arrow. The Dark Ages are over, bro. We've been using guns since the 15th century at least.

1,107

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

Is the cocktail for Hawkeye a glass of water because he's so lame?

1,108

(74 replies, posted in Episodes)

^ This relates to the earlier 'do big loud dumb summer blockbusters get a free pass from criticism?' debate.

Do 'CG effects demonstrations' count as movies? If we spend our money on them, knowing full well it's going to be dumb, do we have to right to wail about them being dumb?

There's also another factor that'll contribute to the future quality of big budget movies - the Chinese box office. The US domestic box office is becoming less important, which means producers will need to pay attention to what plays well in China. The Chinese have been isolated from western culture for so long and therefore didn't grow up with 1980s action movies that we sneer at now. It's all new for them. And if they love their new-found movie diet of cartoon wall-to-wall explosions without dialogue and simplistic good v evil plotlines, then that doesn't encourage sophistication and subtlety, morally ambiguity or self-aware genre references.

If you look at the top 100 all-time on box office mojo, US domestic box office used to be over half of total worldwide gross. Now the current top ten averages about a third, some even have a quarter, and that'll only continue to shrink.

1,109

(74 replies, posted in Episodes)

It's not all a relentless inexorable slide into the abyss. There's another Aliens movie out in a week. And another Nolan Batman movie. And another Lord of the Rings movie this year. What more do you guys want?  wink

1,110

(74 replies, posted in Episodes)

Funny - reminds me of the time an Australian reviewer got stuck into Ridley Scott when he was promoting Black Hawk Down - for the movie being an "America Fuck Yeah" pro-war propaganda piece.

1,111

(74 replies, posted in Episodes)

Lowering our expectations to new depths.
Sounds like it's even worse than Transformers 2 and Phantom Menace

And then something like Avengers comes along and it gets praised because it's not a steaming pile of crap when it so easily could/should have been.

Who knows, if the slides in quality continues, one day Battleship may look like genius, and we hark back in wistful nostalgia.

1,112

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

Thanks for listing the special features. It's a pity the deleted scenes haven't been merged into the movie (e.g. LOTR EE). Some directors don't like to do this, some do.

Here's Charlie Brooker's (of the Guardian in Britain) review of seeing Avengers...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree … experience

1,113

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

MrDudeMan wrote:

The more I think about this movie, the more of a problem I have with the plot. Especially the part where the doctor programs in a failsafe into the machine he used to open the portal, as well as the fact that all the aliens just seemingly died after the mothership got destroyed.

Joss Whedon is obviously a big Phantom Menace fan.

1,114

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

I suppose Civilization is a popular game and you're playing God. -ish. Except you wouldn't play Civilization in God-Mode i.e. where everything always ended up your way all the time. Otherwise you're basically left with Autocad.

I'm just trying to get into Loki's mind to figure out his motivation. If ants are to us what we are to Loki, then I can't really work out what he's trying to achieve. "Look Dad, here's my ant-farm I built myself - it's all mine."

But as Dorkman said, Loki could be just mad, so anything goes.

1,115

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

Ewing wrote:

I don't know why you people are raving about this movie. The Avengers sucked. None of the original actors had a cameo. Actors like Patrick Macnee Ian Hendry or Honor Blackman or even Diana Rigg and Linda Thorson. Shit they even forgot about the 1998 film with Ralph Fiennes and Uma Thurman and Sean Connery.

Don't go see this so called Avengers movie! FUCK THIS SHIT!

Red Letter Media's Half in the Bag beat you to that joke.  smile

http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag/

1,116

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

Dorkman wrote:

That's certainly something we do see in actual humans all the time. We call them sociopaths (and/or Republicans), but even if it doesn't make sense to sane humans, not-sane humans craving power regardless of the cost isn't exactly a magic bean.

I accept that. With a madman/alien/God, anything goes, fair enough. Don't question that it doesn't make any sense because he/she/it is insane. That's fine. But it does add something for the audience if the antagonist has a clear motive that one can relate to. In The Insider, the evil corporate CEO wants to maximize tobacco profits and share price.

But if it's just a psychopath or insane man/deity, it might as well be a hurricane or some other natural disaster that just randomly wreaks havoc.

1,117

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

Dorkman wrote:
rtambree wrote:

Fair enough. He likened humans to ants. How much pleasure would you get if an ant colony bowed down to you?

That Yahweh guy gets off on it pretty hard from what I hear.

But your objection to the idea of an evil guy's plan being to destroy everything is an issue I'm starting to have more and more with big fantasy stories I try to write or develop -- it's hard for me to get my head around what such a tyrant gets from "ruling" over a wasteland and a decimated people. But it's a trope that most people still seem to accept, so if I can't come up with anything more rational I just do it anyway and know it won't be questioned too hard.

Yes, it's related to the problem of heaven. The world's great Abrahamic religions never really go into much detail of what it would actually be like. If you have everything and know everything and there's never any time limits and everything is perfect, then what the hell (pun intended) is there to do? A Charlie Sheen lifestyle... forever?

1,118

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

BigDamnArtist wrote:

But it's not about being the messiah or the savior, or being revered. It's about "I am a god. Shut the fuck and bow bitches."

I'm not saying it's the best plan. But it's Loki's plan.

Fair enough. He likened humans to ants. How much pleasure would you get if an ant colony bowed down to you? I think 7-year-olds get a thrill from waving a lit match around in an ants nest, but you grow out of it by about 10.

I can remember playing Doom (showing my age here) in God-mode and it got pretty boring after a few minutes.

1,119

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

BigDamnArtist wrote:

Honestly. I think that's exactly what Sauron wants. He is the personification of pure evil remember. He wants to be the biggest, baddest and have nothing else in existence to challenge that. It's a very simplistic way of looking at it, but Lord Of The Rings is all about that type of simplistic morality.

Hmm - okay, but what would that be like... after five minutes? Imagine setting up your throne on the Moon... and being all smug that's there's nothing else out there to challenge you.... and you twiddle your thumbs a little bit... check your email (0 messages), flick through a few channels (static), check your favourite websites (404 errors)...wonder what's for dinner...

1,120

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

BigDamnArtist wrote:
rtambree wrote:

By that analogy, if the aliens wanted to rule (rather than just exterminate), then they should hijack the existing political infrastructure. Turn the existing rulers into puppets by showering them with gifts and protecting them from threats (real or perceived), and most of the population will go along with it.  This has been the tactic from at least Roman times, if not earlier.

The aliens didn't want to rule. Loki did. The aliens were merely the payment the other promised in exchange for the Tesseract.

Think of it this way.

Loki=Viserys Targaryen
Tesseract= Dany
Other= Khal Drogo
The alien horde= The Khalasar
Earth=Westeros

That's pretty much the way I read it. Loki doesn't want to subtly infect the human governments. Fuck that, he's a god. He marches in and says this is mine now.

Thanks for cleaning that up. In that case, Loki's best tactic would have been to stay out of the way, let the aliens attack and wreak havoc and then come in at the end and 'save' humanity and be hailed as a messiah. Sort of a real life '9-11 Truther' scenario. I just don't see how blowing up New Yorkers' cars is going to get everyone onside if you're there from the start.

1,121

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

C-Spin wrote:

How much fun is it to rule a planet upon which you are the only living thing?

That kinda bugged me in Lord of the Rings when you see that map of Middle Earth stained by the spreading armies of Sauron and the voiceover saying something about darkness destroying everything in its wake. What's the point of that? That's victory? Sauron sits on the throne and gazes over a devastated, smouldering landscape? Pyrrhic victory anyone?

1,122

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

C-Spin wrote:

Wasn't the whole point of the deal for the aliens to take over Earth so that Loki could rule it, in exchange for the Tesseract, which they can do whatever they want with... IN SPAAAAAAAACE? How much fun is it to rule a planet upon which you are the only living thing?

When the British took over India, they did it by making protection-racket deals with the ruling princes. It was quite efficient and surprisingly few administrators were needed to rule over 200 million people. And most of the army was made up of Indians! Even the Nazi concentration camps had Jewish collaborators.

By that analogy, if the aliens wanted to rule (rather than just exterminate), then they should hijack the existing political infrastructure. Turn the existing rulers into puppets by showering them with gifts and protecting them from threats (real or perceived), and most of the population will go along with it.  This has been the tactic from at least Roman times, if not earlier.

1,123

(39 replies, posted in Episodes)

Thanks for that, Zarban. Was that Paul or Jesus doing the promising? The same Jesus that said He'll return quickly? Technically, the big JC hasn't broken the promise... He just hasn't gotten around to it yet, as in "I'll pay you back"

1,124

(39 replies, posted in Episodes)

Where did Jesus promise the end of all wicked people? Is there a specific quote from a Bible verse?

1,125

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

Humans came up with atomic bombs about 70 years ago. And yet aliens from the future invade with chariots and space-clubs that have to shoot inhabitants individually, possibly the most inefficient way to take over a planet. You'd expect a scaly green finger in an orbiting ship to press a button, deploying 100,000 neutron bombs that wipes out all mammals on the surface of the planet. There's probably an app for that on the alien's smartphone.

This technological anachronism reminded me of Starship Troopers, where we've developed faster-than-light space travel for massive spaceships, and yet have to shoot the bugs with bullets.... individually..... over and over again.