1,276

(47 replies, posted in Episodes)

I came to King late, partly thanks to picking bad examples for my first exposure. I tried the novel Tommyknockers, and bailed after one or two hundred pages. Next I got some audio versions of both King and Lovecraft short stories. Unfortunately, after a great reading of The Rats in the Walls I tried the King story which turned out to be a remake of that tale. So much for King smile

It wasn't until The Drawing of the Three came out that I gave him another chance. There was a great review of The Gunslinger in a magazine, so I picked up the audio version read by King to listen to on a trip. Ended up finishing it before I even left, so went out and bought the tapes of him reading the second book and I've been a fan ever since. Not everything is good, but when he's on, he's on. Bag of Bones is excellent, especially read by King.

1,277

(102 replies, posted in Off Topic)

vidina wrote:

As for Green Lantern... Well, that shit is just weird any way you look at it. A guardian of the universe that uses a ring that replicates any object in green glass-esque material? WTF.

I did like the origin story for that they adapted in the recent direct to video animated anthology. The first four Lanterns were given rings that were to be used like powerful laser beams, but even they weren't really enough to fight off an fleet of space battleships. All was lost, until the geeky, not that strong librarian who had been chosen realizes that since the beams are controlled with your mind, the mind gets to determine what the beam can do. Thus, the "constructs" smile

Those constructs have always been an issue. When Bruce Timm and friends did the first season of the animated Justice League, they downplayed them, but as time went on they loosened up and had fun with the idea.

1,278

(37 replies, posted in Episodes)

That's still the fantasy world. We never get back to the "real" world until the end.

1,279

(21 replies, posted in Episodes)

Lots of aliens/monsters would have been better left only seen once. The more you bring them back, the more the writers feel they have to expand on them, and the less effective they become. Doctor Who is full of this kind of thing, both original and next gen. The Angels, in the episode "Blink", are fucking awesome. However, it only takes one more story with them (written by the same author) to already have them talking and with a personality. and ignoring the rules already set up. I'd be willing to bet we see some allied with the Doctor at some point...

1,280

(21 replies, posted in Episodes)

bullet3 wrote:

I disagree, and I personally really dislike the trend of making movies that "just lead up to the really good part" so we can have a great sequel someday maybe. There's no reason you can't use the story as a jumping off point and just make something more cinematic and interesting, or just find a different book to adapt.

Or you could find a different movie to watch smile

In most of the cases with these adaptations, the first book held up well enough on its own to justify the sequels, so theoretically a movie just based on it should work. Sure, the later books might have most of the fun stuff, but you have to leave something for the rest of the franchise. That said... it's not uncommon for an adaptation to combine two or more books of a series. I was very amused to see how the Horatio Hornblower movie, scripted by the author of the books, managed to combine the first three novels into one film.

1,281

(102 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Gregory Harbin wrote:
Invid wrote:

When a film or series was basically created around a specific actor, there's no point to a remake.

Tell that to the Coen Brothers.

Haven't seen The Ladykillers, but from what I understand they should have been told that before doing it smile True Grit was a book adaptation, and anyone could have played the John Wayne role.

Or Stephen Soderbergh.

One group of cool actors can substitute for another group of cool actors. I'm referring more to cases where a role is created to fit an actors abilities perfectly, rather then the actor being cast into a role that fits them.

1,282

(102 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Landporpus wrote:

They Live always struck me as something that could be a very cool remake.

Yeah, you could have fun with that. Have it star some MMA fighters smile

Also I wanted a good and funny reboot and/or homage to the original pink panther films, because the crap that
Steve Martin did was unforgivable.

When a film or series was basically created around a specific actor, there's no point to a remake. Best to pick another actor and create something new around them, than to try and cram them into someone else's vehicle.

1,283

(198 replies, posted in Episodes)

That sounds like something more suited for the first DIF of a TV episode. I have to assume Terra Nova will get a quick DVD release over the summer.

1,284

(47 replies, posted in Episodes)

I'm assuming you guys were watching the same full frame version I was. If so, the helicopter shadow in the opening would have been matted out for the wide screen theatrical version so was most likely a "fuck TV" error more then anything else.
Also... no Hong Kong Phooey references? There's no way Scatman Crothers should have gone down that easily with his mad fighting skills!

1,285

(198 replies, posted in Episodes)

A panel topic that is always fun at conventions is, "How Not to Get Published", all the things you should do to make sure your manuscript never makes it out of the slush pile (the joke being the authors giving the talk don't want competition). You guys could do similar episodes: how not to get cast in anything, how not to get funding, etc.

1,286

(32 replies, posted in Episodes)

johnpavlich wrote:

I recently revisited Time Bandits for a weekly movie review podcast I do, and I just don't understand why some people love it so much. I find it clunky, meandering and not that funny. Also, it's one of those movies that just ends, leaving the main character alone, homeless and not really having grown or learned anything from the "adventure" of the movie.

Which is the joke smile

Yes, there's the heavy-handed message of materialism being bad ("Don't touch it! It's evil!"), but nobody actually learns that or benefits from it in the end. It's just something the movie keeps telling us.

And it's not something the movie probably believes, either smile I will agree it's not for everyone, and may have been better at the time in context then it is now. I'll have to pull out the DVD. It's probably fair to ask what you think of the Monty Python movies, as this is a logical next step in that style.

Dorkman wrote:

On the other hand, if you know the script has problems and you can't figure out how to fix them, and the point of giving it to that person is to get a new perspective and maybe some new ideas for solutions, then of course that's perfectly valid and a great reason to seek a second pair of eyes.

I would also imagine it's also reasonable to show it to someone to see if in fact there's a reason to bother fixing any problems. Knowing when to abandon an idea has to be an important skill to have.

Which, the house where I do most of my fucking, or the house that is fucking that barn over there?

For topics that really get you guys in a grove, at the 30 minute mark just have Teague stop the conversation for a moment, play the end theme, then play the intro again and continue the topic.

As for topics, an all Trey stories episode would be fun. Maybe one with all the names replaced by, say, Dusty and Buddy to draw from an old George Carlin bit.

1,290

(7 replies, posted in Off Topic)

When first discovering the podcast, I did pass on any film I really had no interest in watching. Especially those that you really have to see unspoiled to get the full effect. Once I was caught up, however, I eventually went back and just watched them with the commentary and said screw giving the film a chance smile

About the only time I had reservations about listening to the commentary of a film I liked was Avatar, but that didn't stop me from giving it that first listen.

http://www.shortpacked.com/comics-rss/2011-09-29-bluray.png

1,292

(13 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Depends on how fast you rubbed them together.

1,293

(23 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Faldor wrote:

Woo and Hoo! TNG is getting a blu-ray release next year and it sounds like they are recompositing the original model shots rather then doing a half hearted CG replacement!

It's the fact they kept the original model footage that I find amazing. Makes you cry all the more that all the Babylon 5 CG data was erased, making any updating of its FX to match the HD live action footage too expensive (as well as screwing later TV movies over)

1,294

(56 replies, posted in Episodes)

The interesting thing is, the idea of an afterlife really came late. Originally, you worshiped gods so they wouldn't kill you. Add the fact the local King/Pharaoh said THEY were god, and you had a real, practical reason to sacrifice that goat that had nothing to do with imaginary friends.

1,295

(102 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It would be interesting to adapt the original books and not the cartoon. Those, from what I understand, are social satire (one reason everyone is named after their job). Also, ALL they say is "smurf", making the international version much easier to create smile

1,296

(56 replies, posted in Episodes)

There's a difference between not believing and rejecting, at least for me. I don't believe Diet Mountain Dew tastes good, but as I've never even had it I'm not going to reject the idea out of hand smile

1,297

(56 replies, posted in Episodes)

Brian Finifter wrote:
Matt Vayda wrote:

In my experience, atheists tend to be fairly well versed in religion, sometimes more so than theists.


That's why we're atheists.

Not always. However, many of us didn't de-convert easily and as faith faded really tried to research and find some aspect of not just our religion but other religions that made sense. Those who never really questioned don't bother doing that. Thus, an atheist probably knows more about both Islam and Mormonism then either a Muslim or Mormon, even if each knows their own faith better then the godless one. We had to learn enough about every religion to reject them, where as they only learned enough about one faith to believe.

(atheists who reject certain religions out of ignorance, I have little respect for)

1,298

(20 replies, posted in Episodes)

Nobody mentioned it in the episode, but the original Howard the Duck comic book is a important lesson for all you creative types out there. Before he was given his own title to work on, the creator stuck Howard in the background of another comic he was working on for Marvel on a work-for-hire basis. Part of the contract was that Marvel owned everything in that book. Therefore... they successfully claimed they owned all rights to the character and the creator lost control of it. It was one of the events that launched the whole movement for writers and artists instead of publishers to own their creations.

1,299

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

I kind of like the advice to new writers given, I think, by Larry Niven: If something is keeping you from writing... let it.

1,300

(12 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Just realized, this news means you guys really have to do Prince of Darkness soon smile