1,401

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

This is supposed to be a happy occasion! Let's not bicker and argue about who sexualized who.

We're all adults. Let's sexualize everyone!

1,402

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

The Hulk question is, I think, answered by the end of The Incredible Hulk and what Banner says in this film: he is always controlling himself and so can turn into the Hulk at will, in which case he can point the Hulk in the direction of the bad guys or even NOT smash things, which is what he was about to demonstrate when everyone freaked out that he had picked up Loki's scepter. But if something makes him lose control, he Hulks out involuntarily and attacks it, as he did when Black Widow lied to him again when they were under attack.

Small note: Brian says Cap's shield is adamantium. This version (from his movie) is vibranium. It kind of bothered me that it made a ringing noise. It shouldn't vibrate.

1,403

(180 replies, posted in Episodes)

Oooon the subject of NOT having sex with superheroes.... I greatly enjoyed The Avengers. I think it's interesting that it's basically a mystery without any clues and the B story carries the film until Joss ties the two together.

Also, wow Michael was drunk during this episode. And yet still coherent.

"He was texting me the whole time." Bad Trey!

1,404

(11 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'm pretty sure the revolution was televised. I think I've got it on DVD somewhere.

In all seriousness, when I was in college in 1989, my roommates asked me, "Why do you watch the evening news on one channel and then switch to another network and watch THAT evening news?" And I said, "Because THEY'RE TEARING DOWN THE BERLIN WALL, YOU IDIOTS. THE WHOLE FUCKING EASTERN BLOC IS CRUMBLING."

It was goddamned exciting if you were paying attention.

I know! But I've tried other things that didn't pan out, like the White House website.

And keep in mind that the biggest Web successes had tens of millions of users before they figured out how to monetize them.

MrDudeMan wrote:

What a great world we live in where you can tease someone for not being a nerd. Makes me feel kind of bad for all the nerds that used to get teased in high school

Yeah, I honestly don't think he could identify with something like Revenge of the Nerds. I think the world has just completely changed. Plus, he's the star quarterback AND star pitcher of the our small town high school, so I like to occasionally give him a little shit.

Recently, I asked him what he's doing to create the next Angry Birds or Draw This. Aren't all 16-y-os Web-savvy h@ckerz or whatever? But I also lamented that I myself have no excuse for not being an Internet billionaire. I honestly don't know how I failed at that. I was on the leading edge, man. It's like I lived next door to Sutter's Mill in 1849 and one day went, "What? People are finding gold around here?"

I also once gave him the sobering career advice to become either a cartoon voice actor or a California weather man, the two easiest jobs I could think of—which he brought up again, so obviously he's taken it to heart.

Last weekend, my 16-y-o nephew and his friends asked for help with another school project (I've also helped with an Aztec ziggurat and a video of Zeus taking over Olympus with assault rifles). This time, they needed to record a rap song about the Protestant Reformation.

They chose NWA's classic "Straight Outta Compton".

While only the leader of this group was familiar with it, he also wrote it while the other two just performed verses. I handled the recording and editing, copied and looped the main beat and the two breakdowns, and exported it. It turned out very good, except that it didn't rhyme much and had an unexpected amount of references to high school football.

But the project offered me another opportunity to harangue my nephew for not being much of a nerd. I've ribbed him in the past about how he can't do any computer programming or other nerd stuff, never heard of Mystery Science Theater 3000, and doesn't even know what an Internet meme is. I ask you: what's a geek uncle—or "guncle"—to do?

I feel like Graham Chapman in that sketch about the playwright with the coal-miner son.

1,408

(12 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Landporpus wrote:

This is why I think comedy is or almost is 100% subjective.

Subjective yes. Random no.

But, whether it's broccoli or the Barbarian Brothers, there's no accounting for taste.

I never understood why anyone liked Twister.

Opie and Anthony did good work with Back to the Future. I'd like to hear a commentary from them on Twister.

1,410

(21 replies, posted in Off Topic)

switch wrote:

That extra special guest during the Iron Fist of the Obsidian Sith commentary had me nerdgasm during that episode.

And it wasn't so much that they GOT him (because, remember, he practically invited himself when they ran into him when he was getting an iced coffee. He was like "Hey, I want to see that! I can't find it anywhere!"), but the amazing thing was how FUNNY he was right from the start.

Trey wrote:

Of all the episodes I wasn't part of, that's the only one I regret.

Well, the supervised custody thing only comes around once a year. And they grow up so fast.

1,411

(21 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I didn't catalog IFotOS because it doesn't fit my criteria. It was available from the old DIF site, tho, I'm sure. My favorite bit was the "learn it, love it, live it" stuff from Brian. I still laugh about that.

1,412

(43 replies, posted in Episodes)

Fun discussion, but all these words have long-held definitions, and the new kid in town fits in pretty easily.

Art is anything made primarily to entertain rather than to educate or have other utilitarian purpose. Most art ever made was sold for commercial gain, so that has nothing to do with it. Interactivity has been a goal of artists for decades if not centuries, so that has nothing to do with it.

Therefore, video games ARE art—but that DOESN'T include Pong or computer chess or checkers because those things primarily take their form in order to play the game, which is to say they have utility. But most modern video games primarily take the form they do because that's what the makers wanted for the overall entertainment experience.

By why get hung up on "art"? Why isn't it enough for something to be a fine piece of "craftsmanship"? Craftsmen produce things that primarily have utilitarian purpose but which require artistic sensibility in addition to technical know-how (separating it from a "tradegood" made by tradesmen). Examples are technical illustrations, furniture, fine knives and handguns, and fancy clocks. Even acting is called a craft because it takes its form primarily in service to the overall work of art.

People seem to think that if something is not "art" then it's a dull, mundane tool because the vast majority of things we encounter take their form only in order to work. Being the exception to that is probably the main reason that Apple has so many fans.

I saw this elsewhere and commented that all the disclaimers made it sound like Happy Fun Ball

1,414

(569 replies, posted in Creations)

Don't give in, Kyle! You can almost smell the Brooks Brothers coming off Teague already. One group project, and he's already a faceless suit, demanding people compromise their artistic integrity to meet an arbitrary deadline!

And talk about faceless suits: look at Dave's avatar!

EDIT: Dave has since changed his avatar from a skeleton in a suit to a man in a suit.

1,415

(43 replies, posted in Creations)

Shot of the "supermoon" tonight, Canon T3i, tripod.

http://www.zarban.com/moon-shot-medium.jpg

full size

1,416

(569 replies, posted in Creations)

I look forward to how you guys resolve the right-hand-drive vs left-hand-drive issue and other oddities.

I cannot wait to see the results.

1,417

(24 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://www.zarban.com/synecdoche-yo.jpg

1,418

(20 replies, posted in Off Topic)

In Putin Russia, new boss is same as old boss. Just slightly funkier.

http://www.freakingnews.com/pictures/33500/Trabant-Poster-33796.jpg

1,419

(20 replies, posted in Off Topic)

BDA and I can take a hint, Dave.

http://www.mastermousepatrol.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/www.ipandora.net_.jpg

redxavier wrote:

I know that that's Buzz Aldrin's on the left. The other guy reminds me of that Ben Foster chap.

I think that's Michael Collins. He stayed in the lunar orbiter. Unsung hero.

Guy in the middle... probably trailer salesman.

1,421

(44 replies, posted in Episodes)

Owen Ward wrote:

The sync thing is an issue for me too sad

Here's one way to solve it. Speed up the commentary slightly.
http://zarban.com/playback-speed.jpg

Another method. Slow down the movie slightly.
http://zarban.com/windvd-speed.jpg

1,422

(449 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Bane is after my time, so I have a hard time ginning up any feeling for the character, but this is movie 3 and it's the right time for Batman to be taken down a peg physically after the second movie, where Batman could have been replaced with John McClane—or, for that matter, Thomas Magnum.

/AND JUST WHERE IS MY MAGNUM PI MOVIE, HOLLYWOOD? HAVEN"T YOU SEEN THIS????

http://buzzworthy.mtv.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/bieber-mustache32.jpg

1,423

(198 replies, posted in Episodes)

crowkiller06 wrote:

how about an episode discussing the different studios releasing, and then re-releasing multiple versions of a single movie on dvd/bluray.

I'm actually somewhat of an apologist for double dipping. Here is the scenario I envision...

  • The movie debuts and the studio demands a quick DVD/Blu-ray release to capture its popularity. The cast and crew are exhausted and want to be done with the film and so release whatever they have, maybe without even a commentary.

  • Later, the movie proves popular enough that the studio decides that a special edition would sell well. The cast and crew have had enough time to gain some perspective and are interested in gathering the deleted scenes and behind-the-scenes stuff, and putting effort into other extras, so they release the Collector's Edition or Special Edition. They include a commentary this time or more commentaries if they had one on the original release. Also, if there's some extra blood or boobs or swearing they cut out for a PG-13, they put that back in and call it the Unrated Cut.

  • Later still, the film has retained enough popularity that Marketing is convinced another release would sell well if it offered something more. The director says he would have preferred to do X instead of Y in certain scenes, and they put out a recut Director's Cut with new commentary. Or maybe, if it's an older film, they find lost footage. Or this time they do a full-on Collector's Edition in a special box with a copy of the main character's signature paisley scarf.

Most of the time, I don't think the studio really plans the second or third release. They just sort of find themselves in a position to make more money if they can repackage the movie. If you wait long enough after the theatrical release to do a really proper DVD/Blu-ray with all the bells and whistles (but without the paisley scarf), you've probably missed that window of popularity that you had from the theatrical release's marketing and good reviews and word of mouth.

1,424

(24 replies, posted in Off Topic)

redxavier wrote:

Vertigo is pretty great but it's not even Hitchcock's best (and neither is Notorious).

Well, looks like there's a-gonna be all kinds of fightin' here today....

1,425

(44 replies, posted in Episodes)

Along with the movie nearly always, for all commentators I listen to.

I also listen to a ton of non-commentary podcast content, but that I listen to at +30%. Apparently, I have the patience for movie commentators at normal speed but not for Ira Flatow.

Suck it, Flatow.