(I guess this short rant isn't worth an entirely new thread.)

Nobody here has commented on this year's Oscar nominations yet, so I'll be the first one to acknowledge the elephant in the room: FOURTEEN fucking nominations for La La Land.

I don't hate La La Land. I enjoyed for what it is: a nice little musical with pleasant, but not very memorable, songs. But FOURTEEN nominations? Seems like the Academy fell for the same Jedi Mind Trick once again. The central theme of this movie ("a love letter to Hollywood" AKA "look how awesome we are") simply screams award bait. Will anyone remember La La Land ten years from now? I suspect it will become the new Shakespeare In Love, Benjamin Button or English Patient - a half-forgotten footnote. Also, just a few years ago, a movie as impressive as Cloud Atlas got nothing. The Academy needs fresh blood, 'cause those old white men are stuck in the fucking past, like a cat chasing the same old laser pointer all his life.

The question I'd like to ask our resident industry professionals is: do you think that this is going to change anytime soon? I wouldn't know, I'm just a random idiot on the Internet. What do you think?

127

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/67/Film1951-TheThingFromAnotherWorld-OriginalPoster.jpg

Better than most 1950s sci-fi movies, but still one of them. My biggest complaint is that there's no real sense of danger (the threat is undermined by the "gee whiz" '50s attitude and the fact that the monster is compared to a freakin' carrot).

The John Carpenter remake remains one of the greatest body horror movies (next to Alien and Cronenberg's The Fly) and a timeless classic. The original can only exist in the era it was made.

128

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Prometheus had me totally fooled on my first viewing (its beautiful imagery is quite seductive; the only stupid thing I noticed was the "that system has a sun" line), but subsequent viewings and the DiF commentary have revealed many problems.

Alien: Covenant can still salvage this franchise, but the script must be really solid. Ridley Scott can take care of the visuals (he was always great in that department), just don't let him screw up the story.

129

(50 replies, posted in Episodes)

130

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Yup. Pitch Black is the only installment that works. The whole attempt to make a franchise was a huge misfire.

I imagine that David Twohy was thinking of the Alien and Aliens dynamic when writing Chronicles. But instead of opening the universe up (like Jim Cameron did), he went overboard and changed it completely.

131

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/2f/Dark_fury_cover.jpg

An animated short that was supposed to bridge the gap between Pitch Black and The Chronicles Of Riddick... and failed at it.

There's no story to speak of. No attempt was made to soften the transition between the lived-in Alien-esque world of Pitch Black and the space opera universe of Chronicles. Riddick delivers some (supposedly) badass lines and does some (supposedly) badass things, but they're not nearly interesting enough to successfully fill the 35-minute running time.

Some character designs were apparently recycled from Peter Chung's Animatrix segment. Do all his characters look like that (I've never seen Aeon Flux)?

An utterly forgettable and unnecessary piece.

I went to see again.

The first half felt a little flawed (sort of disjointed) - it could use a rewrite. I was worried that R1 is gonna turn out to be another Godzilla 2014 (a totally dry, humorless movie with uninteresting characters that didn't work for me at all), but Krennic, K-2SO and the final battle redeemed it for me.

Star Wars isn't special anymore; it's become just another franchise owned by a big corporation and we have to live with that. Just like the MCU, the SW movies are gonna be a mixed bag; it would be extremely hard to avoid it. The spin-off movie series was created to try different tones and sensibilities and that's what we've got with R1. I'm moderately satisfied with the movie, though it's definitely not flawless. Anyone who hates it can wait a year for the next one - there's always gonna be a next one wink

A final note: The most ridiculous piece of criticism I've heard somewhere is "R1 sucks because it canonizes the prequels by using Jimmy Smits". Dude, the prequels were always canon. I agree that they're awful, but they're canon and there's nothing we can do about it tongue

Plinkett has made a short video...

...and a follow-up.

Trey wrote:

Now I really regret that DiF the podcast is over, because it'd be fun to autopsy this one.

Any chance for another reunion (like the Extended Edition commentary for TFA)?

134

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The only 2016 installment finally aired.

SPOILER Show
The rumors got me worried that Who tries to stay "relevant" by exploiting the superhero movie craze, but the actual episode felt more like an affectionate homage to the genre.

What I liked most about the special is the lack of Christmas nostalgia that was a little overplayed in some of the previous ones.

Overall, "The Return Of Doctor Mysterio" was OK, but not mindblowing.

Any thoughts?

While CGI Tarkin didn't bother me much, I found Leia's face a little unsettling. Not as disturbing as the Yoda puppet from The Phantom Menace, but still creepy.

136

(248 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It's awesome to have you back, man.

137

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

138

(2 replies, posted in Off Topic)

All I can say is that Poe's law is strong with this one  yikes

139

(18 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Yes. I bought several flash drives this year and they're all USB 3.0.

140

(156 replies, posted in Episodes)

Sam wrote:

Any chance of a 1 year later one-off reunion? Perhaps for The Force Awakens?!

The Extended Edition commentary for The Force Awakens featured some of the DIF/WAYDM regulars (it served as a quasi-reunion).

Despite that, I'd also love to hear a new commentary (for any movie) from the guys.

The Plinkett review is finally out.

142

(25 replies, posted in Episodes)

Jim Cameron has been bitching about the graininess of Aliens for years (he even mentions it on his DVD commentary). This article (written in 2010 before the Blu-ray release) has an excerpt from a 1996 publication describing how the film was transferred to laserdisc. It surely puts the issue in a new light.

143

(85 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Faldor wrote:

maybe if Voyager had come out in May 1995 we'd still be talking about it?

That depends on whether it would still have Neelix and the Kazon  tongue

144

(85 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Yay! It's the 50th anniversary!
http://www.qcait.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/spock-1.jpg

145

(33 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Really sad news.

A few years ago Chris asked me for some Polish translations for his online novel. I'm glad I could help.

We'll miss you, man.

146

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b1/Run_Silent_Run_Deep_1958_Poster.jpg

A 1958 submarine thriller that still holds up. Although Robert Wise focused mostly on character drama (some of which must've inspired parts of Star Trek: The Motion Picture), he also delivered some great practical effects (including impressive model work and some shots of a real submarine) that don't look very dated even today. Overall, a very solid entry into the underwater warfare genre.

Every work of fiction involving an obsessed ship captain owes something to Moby Dick. The Asylum must've had a circular inspiration involving Run Silent, Run Deep when they put Ahab on a submarine.

147

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/80/The_Good_Dinosaur_poster.jpg

This movie's thin, mediocre story (almost reminiscent of a Winnie The Pooh movie) suggests that it was meant to be aimed at the youngest kids, but the few moments of pretty intense violence

SPOILER Show
(most notably the beetle decapitation scene)

seem to disprove that theory. The end result just feels incoherent and pointless. Pixar's writing staff really screwed that pooch (maybe their best guys were busy writing Inside Out or transferred to Disney Animation Studios to make Zootopia; both are immensely superior to this dud).

To sum it up: I found it the least enjoyable Pixar movie to date.

148

(85 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Teague wrote:

I totally missed the

  Show
Sulu is gay

thing, if that's real.

It's real.

SPOILER Show
He's shown with his boyfriend/husband and their daughter

149

(85 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Sometime before the premiere of Star Trek Beyond I made my peace with the Abramsverse. I decided to try to enjoy those movies for what they are. And the latest one proved to be enjoyable indeed. Here's a bunch of thoughts:

SPOILER Show
The plot (and story) is rather straightforward, which isn't necessarily a bad thing in itself. My biggest complaint is that it's another story focused on a villain who hates the Federation and wants to attack it with a superweapon (we've seen too much of that already). And the villain's motivation feels pretty weak, maybe just as weak as it was in the previous two installments.

Ridiculous promotions given to youngsters have become a standard trope of the Abramsverse. This time they're trying to promote a 33-year-old Kirk to Vice Admiral. Ugh.

The new uniforms look much more attractive than the disappointing grey dress uniforms we got in STID. The U.S.S. Franklin is a fairly credible 22nd century starship design, but its weird registry number (NX-326) doesn't sit well with me. The Yorktown starbase looks pretty cool too; it's basically a spherical version of Elysium. I didn't notice any of J.J.'s lens flares, which counts as another "look & feel" improvement. Since it was a 2D screening, I can't comment on the 3D effects.

Finally, after 50 years, we got a human gay character; however, Sulu's gayness is a bit problematic, since ST-TOS gave us a few hints that he's straight. It's the 23rd century (and he's supposed to be from San Francisco), so we could just assume he's bi. Overall, I think the issue was handled pretty nicely.

Movies 2 and 12 have Khan. Movies 3 and 13 show the destruction of the Enterprise. It's like poetry - they rhyme tongue

To sum it up: it's another Abramsverse movie. Don't expect something like Gravity, Interstellar or The Martian (we should've gotten a hard sci-fi movie in the TNG era; Picard's crew was perfectly suited for that, but that opportunity was wasted). If you don't mind another space adventure with a villain, go see it.

150

(27 replies, posted in Episodes)

The Director's Cut of Khan (the version for which this commentary was recorded) is coming out on Blu-ray for the first time.

Two reviews:
http://trekcore.com/blog/2016/06/review … ut-bluray/
http://www.thedigitalbits.com/item/star … ors-cut-bd

Apparently they corrected the colors YET AGAIN. The tinting in previous releases was very noticeable (the first DVD looked pink, the DC DVD was brown and the 2009 DVD/BD gravitated towards blue).