1,676

(8 replies, posted in Off Topic)

"Lord of the Rings" was a game changer, I think. Before that, not only wasn't fantasy really accepted but rarely did they work visually even when they had a budget. Those movies finally did what we at the time all hoped "Willow" would do...

1,677

(20 replies, posted in Episodes)

Not the wiping out part, that I know of smile

1,678

(20 replies, posted in Episodes)

Up to the part where they've just entered the ship. The idea of tests brought to mind an episode of the 80's Twilight Zone where all the kids get intelligent tests, and the smartest are killed so the government can keep the population stupid. It would be funny if the aliens leave these tests to see if humans have progressed to that level, because if we have they have to show up and wipe us out before we become a threat smile

1,679

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

It obviously didn't get the buzz of something like Megashark which Netflix quickly got. Is it bad enough to get an official Rifftrax, which might speed up sales? smile

1,680

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

Looks like Netflix, for now, isn't going to carry Moby Dick. Too bad sad

1,681

(20 replies, posted in Episodes)

Like I said, it came out the year of Goonies and I think the ads just made it seem like a poor Spielberg clone disguised as an Apple ad smile It may have vanished quickly from theaters. I'll probably watch/listen tonight.

1,682

(20 replies, posted in Episodes)

Content!

I was in high school when this came out, and skipped it I think because it seemed like a Goonies wannabe. I had an Apple //c, though, so thought that was a fun touch (once Ebay came along, one of the first things I bought was an old //c portable LCD screen just because I could).

1,683

(8 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Down in Front wrote:

Because it used to be I could feel cool for having eight back-log episodes of Down in Front that nobody else does. Now you can find them in archives on Justin.tv.

humph.

Naturally, the very fact of complaining has told more people about the site smile Luckily I have a slow connection so will just make due with the podcasts.

1,684

(23 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Jeffery Harrell wrote:

I think it's possible that we might've gotten a better set of movies out of the deal if the series of books had been finished, and a decade or so had passed, and then somebody had decided to adapt the story. Bits that were beloved by readers but that had no real impact on the overall plot arc (and no, I can't think of any examples right now, leave me alone) could've been omitted, foreshadowing that was impractical or impossible in the novel could've been tightened up, and the whole finished product-for-the-screen might've been better for it.

I think that's always going to be the case. When you can focus on the entire saga instead of one book at a time, it becomes much easier to cut and arrange the story. Casting also becomes better, if you know where characters are going and not just where they're going to start. You also now know that minor things that otherwise wouldn't get films are in fact needed to make the ending make sense.

That said, at least Harry Potter isn't getting the TV anime treatment. They would have quickly adapted the books until they caught up to the current volume, then created "filler" shows where nothing happens for a year until the next book came out and they could again go back to the plot.

1,685

(23 replies, posted in Off Topic)

DorkmanScott wrote:

Actually it's rather more complicated than that and I'm really surprised that Rowling left introduction of the Hallows and the rules involved until the very last book, when she was so conscientious about dropping hints to everything else prior to that.

Although for some reason the introduction of the Hallows didn't feel as left-field in the movie as they did in the book, for me.

It might be she didn't think of it until then and thus couldn't set it up (the problem with doing long series like this). The movies have the advantage in that they know what's coming and can ease into certain things better.

DorkmanScott wrote:

It's Harry Potter, rewritten from a skeptical angle. Which I love first of all because it makes the point that skepticism isn't about abject denial of things like magic. It's just about an insistence on evidence. When Harry gets his evidence, Harry accepts and assimilates it, even if he doesn't necessarily understand all the implications yet.

Reminds me of what I love about the old occult guru Alesiter Crowley. He was starting his study of "magick" at the same time Quantum Mechanics and such were being discovered, and was trying to use serious scientific methods to explore and unify the various systems. You weren't suppose to take him on faith, you had to do the work yourself and either confirm his results or create your own system based on what you found. He also wrote the holy book "The Law is for All" while in a sort of trance and then found he disagreed with parts of it morally smile

(the now defunct podcast "Thelema Coast to Coast" about the current state of Crowley's followers was hilarious as they blasted those not willing to actually study and apply the proper logic to magick. If a demon doesn't actually show up, the spell doesn't work!)

1,687

(9 replies, posted in Off Topic)

How original? I think at first they planned on basically filming the stage musical Baum wrote, which had lots of dancing girls and little in common with the books. THAT I wouldn't mind seeing smile

1,688

(9 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Agreed. If a different director uses the script and story boards of a classic film, what's the result? Great question! And one we now know the answer to and can more on smile

1,689

(9 replies, posted in Off Topic)

redxavier wrote:

So they spent about an hour maybe an hour and a half (second and third acts) doing this technique? I think that's the problem right there, they overused it. It's a style that sounds interesting on paper, but then you realise that it goes against almost every rule of filmmaking (especially editing). I imagine you were constantly aware of the camera?

Yup. They even had a computer map of the house that came up when they moved from room to room. The main problem is the same one you have when playing the game: you can't SEE anything. It's an attempt to create tension by keeping things just off camera. There's a reason it was abandoned in games for the most part (it's a bitch to fight a zombie who's in front of you but can't be seen because of the camera angle).

I think first person sequences in films are a bad idea, those where you actually see the limbs of the person, but fortunately they're only ever used at a minimum (Doom just has a few minutes, I think Gamer has some as well).

Usually you get that in combination with the character having a video camera on them somewhere (like in Aliens). Again it's a way to keep the audience in the dark where as if they could see the main character they'd know what was coming.

1,690

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

insideoutcast wrote:

Ooh, and TAPS.

When I was in middle school I had this great idea for my big first novel- there's some sort of new civil war in the US, and the Boy Scouts including the troop of our heros pick a side. You have kids in uniform in a war! (inspired by seeing hundreds of scouts climbing all over Old Fort Niagara) Then I see the TV ads for TAPS and figure my idea has been stolen sad Luckily it turned there was little overlap, and eventually my idea morphed into a sci fi story about children soldiers fleeing the horrors of war. A failed self published comic later (two issues drawn, nothing published), and I still think about trying again...

1,691

(4 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Hmm, I'm going to have to check out your podcast. Seeing you're talking about stuff like Tarot cards, would you know by any chance any good Aleister Crowley podcasts? Ever since Thelema Coast to Coast went silent I've had to do without my magick fix smile

1,692

(9 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I was listening to a new iRiff for the first Resident Evil movie (a rather good one by Riff a Brack, worth a buy), and the jokes comparing it to the games reminded me of a Japanese film called "St. Johns Wort". No, I'm not sure about the title either. Two game developers go to a house to map it for use in an upcoming survival horror game, and wacky low budget things happen. What makes it stand out (although it doesn't make it good) is once inside the house it is filmed as if it was an early Resident Evil style game. The cameras are fixed at weird angles, and never follows the action but instead once the action leaves view we pick it up on another camera. It's the kind of thing were your first thought is, "Hey, that's a cool idea!" Your second, after a half hour or so, is "well, I'm glad they did it so everybody knows not to do it again."

Any other movies fall in that category, even if someone in deed didn't learn the right lesson from it?

1,693

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Double feature with Private Benjamin? Two different takes on military comedy just a year apart.

1,694

(51 replies, posted in Episodes)

I was amused that Teague was basically going back to the same sort of questions he asked in Wild Wild West- movie 1 has a, b, and c, movie 2 has a, b, and c, so how can you say movie 2 is bad and movie 1 is good? As if a work of art is just the sum of its parts and everything is interchangeable.

My sister and I also want to see the sequel to this, where the Africans say "hell no" to the Arks and try and fight them off smile

Personally I'm hoping it brings on a wave of animated Yamato releases in the US. They never have given us the uncut TV shows, and even one of the subtitled films was edited a bit. As for the film... it's always possible the Japanese will ask too much money for it to get into US theaters. With luck we'll get a video release.

1,696

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Angela Lansbury sings that song in the stage version available on DVD (though not on Netflix), and I thought it was fine. There's a concert version of the musical as well, which Netflix does have although not for instant viewing. It's not a NICE, musical, to be sure, but "The Worst Pies in London" is suppose to be a humorous introduction to the character.

Yamato Trailer 1

Yamato Trailer 2

Yes, finally, they've gone and made a live action version of the first real "modern" sci-fi anime Space Battleship Yamato, known here as Star Blazers. Given how just about everything else over there has been remade to death, Yamato has surprisingly stayed dead. It originally lasted 3 tv series and a half dozen movies before running out of steam (and audience) in 1983. In the mid 90's they tried to bring it back with a direct to video sequel Yamato 2520, but between it sucking and disputes over who owned the rights it only lasted 4 episodes.

Another attempt involved Disney in the late 90's, as they bought the rights to do a live action Star Blazers film. The producers has the bright idea to use an American ship, which would have been fine, but they wanted to use... the Arizona. Oh, that would have been so wrong... luckily, it never got out of pre-production. (personally I like the idea of turning classic US ships into space ships, as a fleet involving the Monitor, Old Ironsides, Battleship Missouri and maybe the carrier Yorktown would just be fun)

Which brings us to this. The first trailer, if I linked to the right one, is very Michael Bay right down to the Aerosmith song. The second is set to the original music from the show. We'll see where the actual film ends up on that spectrum...

1,698

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

I avoided Sweeney Todd as I'm a fan of the musical. If you're going to cut the songs anyways, why not just do an original take on Sweeney instead of an adaptation? You guys tackling it would force a viewing out of me, though smile

1,699

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

I agree M is great, but it should be done in addition to Metropolis not instead of. Metropolis is not just an incredible accomplishment, but a fascinating failure. Having seen the new uncut print, it NEEDED a good editing even if in the end it just got bad ones. Those are the types of films I really like hearing outside commentaries on, where they can talk about what went right AND wrong.

1,700

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Just noticed the DVD of the "as uncut as we'll ever see it" version of Metropolis also comes out this week, even if Netflix doesn't seem to be getting it in. I hope that also jumps high up your to do list.

(if you assume that the newly discovered clips were the first to be cut, an interesting way to view the film since there's a noticeable quality difference in the footage is to try and guess WHY they trimmed it as they did.)