1,676

(27 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Like I said in the other thread, I have basically a dead zone in my mind of most of my childhood through to high school about films. More specifically films that had any "real" impact or lasting impression on me. I just don't have any. Even movies I have grown to love over the past couple years haven't really had any impact on who I am now, I guess they're too new to me to really have a deep effect.

I didn't paticularly care about movies growing up, they were just things I watched and then got on with my life, nothing actually stuck with me. If I'm going to be completely honest there are 2 book series that affected me more growing up than any movie every did. Harry Potter, and The Hitchhiker's Guide to The Galaxy.

If there is ever to be anything that I could claim influenced and shaped who I am today it would be those 2 series.

But that's not the name of the game, so going by what other metrics I have left, my main movies through my teen years through to a couple years ago (I'm 21, 19 wasn't that long ago) would have to be.

1: Hellboy 2 (2008)
2: RENT (2005)
3: The Nightmare Before Christmas (1993)

1,677

(34 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I've been racking my brains since the Wizard of Oz comm thinking about this, and I've come to the conclusion that I didn't "like" movies growing up. Which is a weird thing to say i guess. But when I think about my childhood I don't have very specific things that jump out at me as being hugely influential (I have 2 specific movies that I remember watching a lot, George Of The Jungle and Space Jam, which were 2 of the only VHS's we had in the house growing up, but they only jump out because I continue to actively watch them).

Otherwise I don't actually remember anything from that era, and as I'll say in the other thread after I do this, that dead zone continues until High School. Obviously I watched movies as every kid does, but I didn't latch on to anything in any meaningful way that actually influenced me then or had repercussions on who I am now. The entire concept actually feels weirdly alien having thought about it so much over the last couple days.

I'm kinda not really sure how to feel about this, I don't know if I just have a really horrible memory of that time or if I just didn't have anything that affected me like y'all seem too. I kinda feel a little empty about the whole thing hmm

So yeah, anyways, like I said, going by the only metric I have (repetition of watching) I have to go with:

1: George of The Jungle (1997)
2: Space Jam (1996)
3: The Phantom Menace (1999)


Yeah. When I was a kid I watched the living SHIT out of the Phantom Menace. Sometimes it would just be looping in the background 4or 5 times a day. But I don't have any cool stories about memorizing every line or anything like that, it's just a movie I watched a lot when I was a kid, and then I grew up.

This thread is making me kinda depressed, I'm just gonna stop now.

1,678

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

1,679

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I haven't actually, I'll check it out.

1,680

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Figured it was about time I filled some of the larger gaps in my Brendan Fraser filmography knowledge last night, so:

Monkeybone (2001):

http://tepasmas.com/img/posters/monkeybone.jpg

I loved this way more than it probably has any right too. But here's the thing, you put Brendan Fraser, Dave Foley, dropdeadsexybloodythirstycatwomen, and crazy dream-logic surrealism and the director of Nightmare before Christmas in the same room and there's no way I'm not loving whatever comes out of it, that's just a known fact of the universe. I absolutely loved it, and think we need waaaay more stuff like it.

Airheads (1994):

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/3f/Airheads_film_poster.jpg/220px-Airheads_film_poster.jpg

I REALLY enjoyed this one. Brendan Fraser is great, Steve Bucsemi is rocking the shiiit out of that rocker look, and I didn't hate Adam Sandler like I usually do. When it started out I was pretty much just expecting your typical "unknown rockers want to be famous so by the end of the movie they organize some giant  mission impossible style scheme" style 90's comedy thing...and then it started to do that...and then HARD RIGHT TURN, and suddenly they were right in the middle of a full-on Dog Day Afternoon spoof and I didn't even notice until they were in the thick of it. And once they hit it, they put the peddle to the metal and ride it all the way to the end, it caught me totally off gaurd, and it was amazing.

Definitely reccommended if your looking for a solid comedy that doesn't pander to the lowest common denominator, (Which is a weird thing for me to say about a movie with Adam Sandler in it... ow! ow! okay okay stop throwing things at me, I'll watch Happy Gilmore one of these days). (Also, a half naked Ellie Bartlett...so that's...a thing)

And I actually went to the theater (second run one, but whatevs) for the first time since last year and saw:

Monster University (2013):

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/2a/Monsters_University_poster_3.jpg/220px-Monsters_University_poster_3.jpg

I loved it. I really really did. And I was one of the guys going "W.T.F. is Pixar doing?! There is no way in hell this isn't a money grab." right up til release. But it was great.

Although, through pretty much the entire 2nd and third acts I just couldn't stop thinking about what the "Toy Story has a horrible horrible message and should never be shown to any child ever." crowd would have to say about MU because...

SPOILER Show
...up until about 2 minutes before the credits (And the movie just kinda redirects the message not changes it) the entire message is "It doesn't matter how much you want it, or how hard you work, or what you do, if you aren't born with the looks you should just give up." Which is like WHOOOOOOAAAAAAAHKAY. That's a helluva thing to be throwing in there, was not expecting that. And then obviously they twist it around to "But that doesn't mean there isn't something awesome you can do despite that." in the last couple minutes, but Toy Story does that as well in it's resolution and that crowd still gets riled up. So I'm kinda surprised there hasn't been a larger outcry against this movie. Unless I just outright missed it.

But all that (the spoilered stuff) aside, I loved it, it was a cool take on the whole 80's college movie thing while also being a solid addition to the Monsters universe.

1,681

(21 replies, posted in Episodes)

So what 4...5 years?

I don't know what you guys are talking about, I laughed my ass off.

1,683

(62 replies, posted in Episodes)

Mr. Pointy wrote:

Funny how these three ages us, Space Jam? You're not old like me.

Lol, I get that a lot around here tongue

1,684

(956 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://31.media.tumblr.com/73c03c33d936cb526d93487ad10a96dc/tumblr_mrkypue1gy1qdg6sho1_500.jpg

1,685

(62 replies, posted in Episodes)

Good man tongue

If I were to play by your rules I'd definitely throw in The Emperors New Groove and Osmosis Jones.

1,686

(62 replies, posted in Episodes)

fireproof78 wrote:

However, to list three would be Emperor's New Groove (I can watch that one again and again), Star Wars (the original) and Princess Bride, with George of the Jungle edging in there.

Wait, now I'm confused. I thought the 3 movies were the pinnacle ones from our childhood, TENG came out in 2000.

1,687

(62 replies, posted in Episodes)

George of The Jungle (Brendan Fraser one), Space Jam and if I had to remember a third one, it would maaaaybe be Toy Story (or Disney's Robin Hood). We didn't really have a lot of movies around when I was a kid.

But hey, I watched the shit out of George of The Jungle and Space Jam.

1,688

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://www.blackfilm.com/read/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Pain-and-Gain-10.jpg

Uh oh, I think we know who's getting kicked out of the Cool Guy Club at the next meeting. For shame.

1,689

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Rewatched The Croods last night (on the job, what can I say), and having the chance to sit down with it again, I think I may have been a little flippant with my remarks last time about the story. There's no denying that on paper it is a very by numbers sort of family fare, but it WORKS, it works DAMN WELL. And I was thinking about it, trying to figure out why this works so well when so many others don't, and all I could come up with is that The Croods does it unironically and sincerely. They don't try to sneak in all those little nods to the audience and self aware bs that seems to be all the rage. It just commits to the story it's going to tell and then does it, and does it good.

And weirdly, that kinda feels refreshing. There's none of the weird little plot twists of whatever that the filmmakers felt they needed to add to make it "fresh" or "modern", it embraces what it is and puts all it's effort into doing it awesomely. And it felt good.

But yeah, otherwise, world design is still amazing, Belt is still cute as hell and for some reason the audience felt the need to start cutting large amounts of onions right around the end of the movie, not sure what was up with that.

Still a thumbs up, and definitely a little higher than I gave it credit for on first viewing.

1,690

(47 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Niiiiiiiiice. I've seen that one before (oogie), but you can never see it enough.

I'll redirect things a bit with a mashup of epic proportions.

Interesting tidbit: The performer who plays Kate Monster in Avenue Q also plays the patient in Scrubs' My  Musical.

Teague wrote:

But, since I'm a fair person at heart, here. Have a girl being a ball of cabaret sex. Have the girl.

Teague. Have a read through of my first post in this thread tongue I'm hardly one that NEEDS the girl tongue
*cough* *cough*

But thanks, I needed a bit of Kitt in my life tonight.

1,691

(47 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Teague gets it. This guy right here.

Also Teague, you need this:

I do find it amusing that a character that is designed and intended to be entirely androgynous can evoke such deep rooted sexual attraction.


Speaking of sexual attraction, I've been on a bit of a broadway kick again tonight, and Bebe Neuwirth I want to have your babies!! Oh my god, this woman is a goddess. (I've always loved her, but it needed stating in as bold a manner as possible tongue ) (Skip to 1:25 for Bebe)

1,692

(47 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Spoilers contain performances of Cabaret, you'll have to make the judgement call of how SFW that is.

So I recently found out that Michael C Hall used to perform in the revivial of Cabaret as the emcee, and immediatly went and sought it out, because my gods, and found out that there were actually quite a few familiar faces that had their run as the emcee. So here we go. All performances are Wilkommen from Cabaret. (unfortunately the video recordings aren't the best, but they're still entertaining as hell)

Michael C Hall

SPOILER Show

Neil Patrick Harris

SPOILER Show

Alan Cumming

SPOILER Show

John Stamos

SPOILER Show

Adam Pascal

SPOILER Show

Personally in this little showdown I have to give it Michael, that's some serious commitment right there. Love it big_smile

And unfortunately for me, but mostly Brian I would think, somewhere out there in the universe there is a recording of Lea Thompson as Sally, but I can not for the life of me find a copy. Most unfortunate.

1,693

(27 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Heh, I read the first couple WAAAAAAAAAAAY back when I was just wandering through the library looking for something to read in early high school. I remember like little flashes of imagery from them, not a ton. I dodn't think they were really too bad at the time, but I'd have to revisit them to have any legit opinion on them.

1,694

(27 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It does kinda sound like something you might find in a Tekwars novel or something come to think of it.

1,695

(62 replies, posted in Episodes)

The Bobby Mcferrin bit Teague was talking about. I don't agree that Bobby is making this up on the fly, this is totally a bit he has in his repertoire. But either way, it's amazing!

1,696

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/52/Oz_-_The_Great_and_Powerful_Poster.jpg/220px-Oz_-_The_Great_and_Powerful_Poster.jpg

Oz: The Horrible and Mind Boggling

Alright, I knew this one was gonna be bad, but boooooy howdy did it ever blow harder than I ever imagined. This one actually makes an interesting counterpoint to the Croods that I talked about in my last post. They both depend heavily on me buying into this really wacky and wild universe and letting that carry the bulk of the weight. And where the Croods succeeded in that, this failed HARD. The problem is that at all times it feels like it's screaming "LOOK HOW COOL IS THIS!! OH MY GOD IT"S SO WEEEEEEIIIIIRD!! DON"T YOU THINK?? IT'S SOOOOO COOOOOOOOOOLL!!"all while trying to shove pages of crayon scribbles and glitter as far into my eye sockets as possible. It suffers from the same problem as Burtons Alice In Wonderland, that tried and failed to do the same thing; it overuses it's digital-ness and so everything very quickly becomes this same monotone digital smear across the screen that fails to hold any attention whatsoever.

The...erm..."acting"...and I use that term incredibly loosely was so overdone and...just bad. I lack the synonyms to properly express it, it was just painful to watch at times. I'm pretty sure everyone thought it was supposed to be awfully charming, but it's like no one even cared. When the characters aren't trying to be some variation of charming they are so completely overdone as to be completely laughable (Literally at the transformation of Mila Kunis' character, I literally burst out laughing, threw my hands and in the air and said "I'm out".

The digital characters felt about as lifeless as the environments did, again just adding to that digital smear accross the screen, not really making themselves known, but not truly blending into the background either. They were just kind of there and apparently I was supposed to care about them, but...eeeh....not so much with the that.

It's been said before, but I'll say it again, James Franco is usually great and can carry a lot on his shoulders, but in this either the weight was too much or something. My main problem with his character is that he such a MASSIVE dick to everyone indiscriminately and without cause. It's like the screenwriters/Franco (Cause I know half that shit was improv) got a one line character description and had to run with it: "Is a massive dick but then later isn't, kinda." Even up til the end his an asshole: Spoilers for the end, but trust me you don't care.

SPOILER Show
So he gives presents to everyone, and instead of being cool and giving something thoughtful or respectful, he gives the trumpet player guy this demeaning, ridiculous little smiley face on a stick, and tells him he should smile more or some shit. SERIOUSLY MOVIE!!?? So you have your main character go through all this shit learning that people are more than what they are on the outside, and then at the very end you have him pull shit like that? I hate this guy, I literally hate this man, he's an asshole and should have died.

Ultimately the movie just fails on every front it tries. It's just bad. i can't even say it's pretty because after 30 seconds in Oz everything blurs together and I just wind up feeling like my eyes are at some sort of paint flinging orgy or something. And yeah, just bad... horrible. Adds nothing to the Oz universe and is just 2 hours of an un-entertaining mess.

Honeslty what hurts more than ANY of that... we have James Franco, Mila Kunis and Rachel Weisz, threee incredibly talented and gorgeous people, all on screen together. And it's....this. Ugh.

I'm just gonna be over here in the corner crying.
.
.
.
.

So BDA...tell us how you really felt.

1,697

(27 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://sunwindsolar.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/SOLARCAR.jpg

EXT. Roadside - Day

The solar powered car slowly rolls to a stop, the radio pumps out LIFE IS A HIGHWAY.

Driver 1- DAMMIT JERRY! What did I tell you about the radio! These things only put out enough to juice to keep the wheels rolling, that's IT!
Driver 2- Oh gees, I know, but can't we just like throw another solar panel or two on there, you know how anxious I get without driving music.
Driver 1- No JERRY!! We only produce what we use to power the wheels! THAT'S IT!

1,698

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

drewjmore wrote:

Huh, I never realized, poster looks fine to me. Wiki poster substituted.

From what I've been able to tell, it works fine if you've visited the image before and it's already buffered on your computer , but it doesn't work if someone is trying to load it through the hotlink for the first time.

At least that's what I've been able to see through my experimentation.

1,699

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Alright, everyone, just gonna put this out there because at least half of the posts on here do this. DO NOT LINK POSTERS FROM IMDB. They do not work, you cannot embed them.

And if you still insist on doing it, please at least say the name of the movie in your post, so we all know what the heck you're talking about and can go look it up ourselves.

Thank you.

1,700

(27 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Invid wrote:

...file this alongside perpetual motion proposals (which this almost is, with its claim to generate more power than it consumes)

Not really seeing the connection. I could strap a big enough solar panel array to a model train set and it would produce more power than it uses. All it means is that there's a shit ton of solar panels on the roof of that thing (Assuming Musk isn't talking out his ass about that whole thing).