Other random movie thoughts include for October "The Ring" (one of the view horror films I have actually seen), as well as Sahara.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by fireproof78
Other random movie thoughts include for October "The Ring" (one of the view horror films I have actually seen), as well as Sahara.
Made it through a season of Breaking Bad. Meh. It didnt really interest me. The pilot of Game of Thrones was the same for me.
Maybe i only enjoy animated shows. Oh well.
This is for you:
A random comic about kit-bashing starships:
A bit long but worth it
Here's a thought-seeing as how they have rebooted Conan and Arnold is back in to movie making career mode (serving California but in a different way) why compare the two?
That's one of the best things about Game of Thrones actually, the series deceptively starts off as a semi-traditional fantasy story, with clear characters the audience categorizes as "good guys" and "bad guys", then proceeds to gradually reveal and grow them until the categories are flipped. One of the things I'm most looking forward to in Season 3 is seeing how some of the villains from Season 1 redeem themselves and become heroic protagonists.
Maybe I should try to read the books first because my initial experience with the pilot left me pretty much unsympathetic with any of the characters so I didn't really get in to it.
But, I am glad that it exists and that fantasy TV series do well
fireproof78 wrote:Dave wrote:Hnnnngh!
Cyanide tablet?
No that was blood leaving his brain.
Right, I often mistake the two.
Thank you for clarifying
fireproof78 wrote:I always loved the fact that there is a glossary in the back of the book. I wish more scifi books did that.
My father refused to read any book that needed that, at least with regard to invented words
It was a thing for awhile. It also brings up something brought up at a convention panel long ago. An author asked the audience WHY they bought things like the later Dune books Herbert wrote (which I actually liked). Someone stood up and said readers have learned all this detail about fictional universes, and wanted to keep reading something that made use of it. The more complicated the universe, the more they needed to keep reading new stories to keep from feeling like the effort was wasted.
Which is why I find it funny that so many people criticize a glossary and yet Dune books keep coming. I agree with you that the incredible world built (similar to Middle Earth) and having more stories allows that world to expand even more. I actually am glad that Brian Herbert has decided to continue on and his Dune prequel books are very well done.
It doesn't work in the Star Wars prequels because only lip service is paid to the politics. It merely states a political intention, but neglects to develop either the background to the argument, or the argument itself. And without a social or financial argument at its heart, and at least two sides to that argument that you can understand (and actually make sense), it's just a half-baked idea. And I find that a poorly communicated/told political story is one that breaks down more noticeably than others. I had similar misgivings about the politics in 300 (see that thread).
If you pick up a random Star Trek episode, you'll find it did this much better, where often within its 45-minute running time it will present a commentary about a political topic. And it does it well because it lends credibility to both sides of the discourse.
In TPM, the taxation of trade routes alone isn't interesting, but it's also nowhere detailed enough to make it interesting. That the motivation of the villains remains vague and seemingly at odds with their desires also hinders its effectiveness as a driving plot force. Why would a Trade Federation block trade? It's just thrown in there but never developed beyond being mentioned a couple of times. Worse, the whole manner of its dealing in the senate is laugable, and stretches plausibility to the extreme because we can't see how this political organisation can ever function. Remember, the senate cannot even agree that Naboo is blockaded, and yet it allows a vote of no confidence regarding the 'non-existent' crisis. What? Did someone even read that twice when they wrote it?
When you create a make-believe world with its own political institutions, demonstrating that they make sense and work is vital. And that requires a fair amount of thought and research in the writing process.
I agree, red, and that is well written. A thought occurred to me and I'll throw it out here for consideration. Anakin becoming Vader was inevitable the way the prequels are written. He could have been in Starfleet, or the Alliance from Firefly or any other scifi world and Vader is inevitable. Because of that, the politics have no bearing in the prequels, like you said, because they are just window dressings for the big event (as the DiF panelists expounded upon in their commentary).
So, Politics in Sci-fi can be done, could even be done in the Star Wars universe, but only if the system makes sense?
Agree? Disagree?
Just read an article regarding GI: JOE-Retaliation and I am actually getting a little more excited about it, with a new director, many new actors (including Dwayne Johnson and Bruce Willis) as well Ray Park coming back as Snack Eyes.
Its interesting that the movie is only making passing references to the original but the other than that it is a new story.
fireproof78 wrote:... not sure what to think...
Hnnnngh!
Cyanide tablet?
fireproof78 wrote:New photo of Zoe Saldana featuring an apparent new take on the uniform-not sure what to think...
Into DarknessIt's a diving suit
Figured that out after the last trailer :) Thanks
I am still excited but personally think that the general reaction will depend largely upon the acceptance of Kirk and crew in this new time, being different because of it and facing off against different villains. I had a thought about Trek 09 and people's hatred against that movie and I think it has to do with Nero and Kirk and Spock. If
there is acceptance of their motivations and behaviors in the film, then my experience has been that they enjoy the movie. If not, then there is only frustration and anger at the movie.
If Harrison, Kirk and Spock lack any chemistry at all during the movie, it will get the same ill feelings from fans like Trek 09.
I think technically that would qualify as a blooper reel, but I'm not picky.
And since when am I captain? Don't make me captain, I'll pull one of those "Hey, watch this!" stunts and sink the whole damn ship. I mean, I'd blame Teague of course, but still, probably not a good idea.
Because it had to be said
Dune is religion. And, yes, the politics is easy to understand. It's feudal families back stabbing each other. All else is gloss. Everything the reader really needs to know is set up in the opening scene (kid may be messiah, family going into danger willingly because they think knowing the danger limits it). As for the success, the first movie flopped, and the TV versions had more time to deal with the politics (I haven't seen them). There's also lots of action (poisonings, the attack, etc). Really, I don't think of it as a "political" story, at least in the book version.
Fair points, though there is a lot of politic in there as well, especially the concept of kanly, loss of fief and the need for the Sardukar (Imperial Troops) to be hidden in Harkonnen uniforms due to the Emperor's needing to stay out of the House fighting. But, these might be details I didn't understand when I was younger and had to take time to get. I always loved the fact that there is a glossary in the back of the book. I wish more scifi books did that.
The success I referred to was largely the TV mini-series since they were able to at least get a sequel out of the deal. I highly recommend watching at least the first Dune series, though it is about 6 hours long so pace yourself. It is at least divided in to the same three sections as the original novel so it has natural breaks.
fcw wrote:Should I be surprised that none of the remaining Star Trek movies are in the list?
Nah, just an oversight on my part. I fix it now.
happiness
Though even just a general discussion of the evolution of the franchise, from original to Abrams would satisfy me as well.
Also, looking forward to any of the Pirate sequels as well as
I am too. That got my enthusiasm back up
Thanks for sharing
Now on fireproof's shopping list:
1. Artemis Project
2. Headset with microphone
*my wife will think I'm crazy*
Take any normal movie about politics that works, put them in funny outfits. If it still works, the answer is "yes"
I think most of the problem is related to the one Teague had with Dark City (except this time justified): with a SF tale, you first have to understand the background before the politics become interesting. Unless the tale can be broken down to its most basic components (they must do THIS to stop war!), politics often IS local and doesn't translate well. This is true with foreign films, and is going to be even more true in a fictional universe. In both cases most viewers will just follow the character arcs and ignore the actual political details.
Then why the success of Dune? Is the Dune political system that easy to understand?
On the surface, it is not.
You have the balancing effect of the Imperial House and the Landsaraad (the Council of all the other Houses), and the Spacing Guild, which has a monopoly on space travel.
Compare that to the Star Wars Old Republic government which is a massive Senate and the Supreme Chancellor and the Court system (referred to, not seen).
Is it not as well define as a system?
Babylon 5 had tons of politics going on (both Human and alien). It worked... at least for me.
Stargate SG-1 had some as well.
I like SG-1's political maneuvering, especially when O'Neill became leader of the Stargate Command. But, I think SG-1 was more easily to relate to because of the military elements.
I'm bumping my own thread to ask a question of the scifi nerds out there:
In the Phantom Menace Commentary our brave panelists discuss politics in space and how it doesn't work for Star Wars, much to the fans horror.
However, the Dune novels explore politics in great detail of a galactic empire, including many different organizations, houses and armies. Even in the movie adaptations, the politics of the situation are never denied but explored as each side vies for position.
This may be an oversimplification, but can political scifi, like Dune, work, even in screen adaptation?
And I want to play too...
I'll put you all on a gimble set up and we'll make a movie...
'
So I finished watching season 2 of Game of Thrones and fuck I just don't get why people love this show. No, it's not terrible but God damn what's with all the love for this show? I could talk about problems with that show all day, (and I might) but if I was one of the first people to see it, I would not expect people would like this show, let alone love it. So please someone tell me what's up with this?
I'm with you, sir.
While I can agree with bullet3 as to the technical aspects of the show, it doesn't make it interesting or enjoyable for me to watch. Granted, my familiarity with the show is only with the pilot of season 1, but I'm sorry-these are terrible people in the middle of some nasty business that I do not want to be part of.
Its not hatred so much as I am done with distopian worlds. Not to derail the thread, but Battlestar Galatica hit me the same way, though that was later on in the show.
First of all, yes I was watching Robocop when I signed up. It and the first TMNT movie were in heavy rotation for me as a child. That, plus seeing candyman at age 9 and Seven in theaters at age 11, made me who I am today. Which means most of my girlfriends have asked my parents what the fuck.
This is one of the best intros I have seen read
Good on you sir, good on you. Also, way to score 6 points on your first post
^^
Wait for it...
Wait for it...
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by fireproof78
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.