One of my least favorite of the Best Picture nominees. The Melies stuff was great, but everything that happened in that train station was pointless and boring.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Doctor Submarine
One of my least favorite of the Best Picture nominees. The Melies stuff was great, but everything that happened in that train station was pointless and boring.
Yeah, the Batvoice never bothered me at all. So he changes his voice as part of the disguise, so what? Batman doesn't talk a whole lot anyway, not when he doesn't have to at least.
The only plot holes I can ever find have to do with the Joker's actions. He claims that he never has a plan, but everything always manages to work out in his favor somehow. A few times in the film, his powers of perception become a bit unrealistic. However, that said, I don't buy it when people claim the film is "riddled with plot holes".
I don't think the movie spends enough time on that plotline for that argument to be made. It's there, I can see where you're coming from, but them movie doesn't make it prevalent enough.
I'm hard on this movie a lot, but I recently rewatched it and, yeah, it's not a bad movie. It's well made, well acted, and, well, just plain entertaining. I had a little disdain for it recently, but I think that's because I've watched it too many times. I mean, I've practically got the thing memorized. It's fair to say that I've gotten a bit sick of it.
Some stretches of the plot involving the Joker bug me a little, but I'm willing to overlook most of them. Overall, it's a excellent, if flawed, movie.
Also, I'll throw this in about the director. The thing that Trey (I think?) says about Fincher, how his movies have a cold piece of steel in place of a heart, I'd say about Nolan. This is a man who made an blockbuster action movie that was ultimately about corporate politics. His movies aren't meant to be felt, if that makes any sense. And that's not a bad thing, either. Just an observation.
Additionally, you guys should do Begins around the time Rises hits in July. #obvioussuggestion #hashtagsoutsidetwitter
Huh. That got me thinking. I don't remember when, but Trey once made the comment that Batman has no arc in The Dark Knight. "In Batman Begins he becomes Batman. But in Dark Knight he's just Batman. He's Batman at the beginning and Batman at the end." That's reflected in the titles. Dark Knight is the only title of the trilogy without a verb, and the only one (so far, at least) where Batman doesn't change as a person. Maybe Batman will develop as a character in Rises.
Aw hell. I can't make the Dark Knight commentary OR the Best Picture Intermission? Talk about a shitty day.
Oh well. In that case, I'll leave my ranking of the Best Picture nominees, best to worst.
1.) The Artist
2.) Moneyball
3.) The Descendants
4.) The Help
5.) Midnight in Paris
6.) War Horse
7.) Hugo
8.) Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close
9.) The Tree of Life
I don't think that every story needs to follow conventions. Go for it, it might turn out interesting.
This is Daisy. Despite being a chihuahua, Daisy acts more like a cat than any dog I've ever seen.
When curled up into a ball, she is a little smaller than your average frisbee.
I just had a thought about this movie. Why is "inception" so difficult? Advertising executives have been doing it to millions of people for decades now. People try and perform "inception" on you every time you watch TV, and a lot of the time they succeed.
Just got done watching Take Shelter. I highly recommend it. It's extraordinarily suspenseful and it has some great performances. The last 25 minutes or so were alternately heartbreaking and tense. It's like someone took the word "dread" and said, "Let's make a movie that's nothing but that for 2 hours."
I've been poking around for the script, but I can't find it anywhere. Does anyone have it?
I haven't heard the commentary yet, but I'm kind of iffy on Kick-Ass. I like a lot of things about the movie, but I feel like the ending didn't grow naturally from the beginning. They feel like different movies.
"Mind boggling" is probably the wrong phrase. My point is that I was really blown away by it. It didn't take any shocking turns, but I believed that it could have at any moment, which made the whole thing really tense.
I'm trying to see it from that point of view. I'm trying real hard here. But I can't. I can't see someone not enjoying the climax of this film.
As an action climax, of course it isn't as "epic" as audiences are accustomed to, but this isn't that movie. This is a pretty small flick, and the final battle is appropriate for this kind of movie. Also, the brief shot of Matt looking at the statue was necessary for pacing. If it had just been, "All of a sudden, there was a spear through his chest!" it would have happened too quickly and the impact wouldn't have been the same.
As for the final scene, it's called a denouement and I thought it worked well. You can't just have a big final battle and then immediately cut to black. Hell, even Ryan Vs. Dorkman 2, which is literally nothing but fighting, had a few moments of quiet at the end before they rolled credits. I thought the final scene was a very nice cap to the story.
So that's my rant. I guess I'm really invested in this movie. It's a smart exploration of teenage angst through a comic book lens.
I'm intrigued. Please, explain.
Filmspotting just started a spin-off called Filmspotting SVU (Streaming Video Unit), and the first episode is on the Filmspotting iTunes feed right now. I highly recommend it. It's a nice change of pace from normal film review shows, and the hosts have great chemistry.
I thought that The Grey was a mixed bag. I understand why people liked it, but it just didn't do anything for me. There was this weird, uneven mix of philosophy and wolf-punching. Both elements were great alone, but together they didn't quite mesh.
No, but it does feel like someone watched the Prequels and said, "Yeah, I could do that better." It's exactly what everyone wanted out of the Prequels. We see someone fall to the Dark Side, and his reasons are understandable and relatable.
If you've seen the film, imagine this. What if all three Star Wars prequels followed the structure of this film? I think it would have made for a much more engaging series.
If there's an argument to be made against this movie, I'd sincerely like to hear it.
Someone posted that video on Twitter, and I honestly thought that it was a parody or something. And then I saw that it was from the official Star Wars YouTube account. I was sad.
Holy fucking shit, you guys. This movie blew me out of the water. It's better than anything I've seen in months. It's a great example of storytelling that more movies should use. Every story beat feels right. Not a single scene (that I can remember) rings false.
There's a point in this movie where I thought to myself, "This movie could go anywhere. Anything could happen. I have no idea what will happen next." There is a tiny group of movies out there that made me feel that way, and Chronicle easily goes on that list.
My mind is still settling down (the climax is mind-boggling), so I can't get all my thoughts out, but you should really see this movie. And don't look up anything about it beforehand, if you can. Don't read the Wikipedia page or anything. Trust me, you don't want to get spoiled on anything.
I'm seeing it. I'll tune out the story and watch the pretty 3D pictures.
My new "Doing Things" album is the Girl With the Dragon Tattoo soundtrack. It's both energetic and weirdly calming.
Love it. Love. It. If there's another thing like this, I will take part without question.
Huh. Well now I'm interested!
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Doctor Submarine
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.