Thanks, fireproof! You should certainly check out this week. We talked to the team from Zero Room Productions that ALMOST made a Star Trek animated series in 2005/2006.

177

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

Dorkman wrote:

HARRY POTTER IS SERIOUS BUSINESS ZAR AN

Sometimes I wish I could ReTweet forum posts.

This guy is like TVTropes.org only way more annoying.

179

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Jeffery Harrell wrote:

Damn, I'm sorry. I forgot his twits are private. My bad.

He did add me back when I requested, but we should probably refrain from talking about the contents of the tweet here.

Jeff, if what you say about the Apple meeting is true (I'm looking forward to hearing something official out of Apple), then yes, I still agree with much of your blog post.

180

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Jeffery Harrell wrote:

Here's the link, Eddie: https://twitter.com/markraudonis/status … 4821435392 I see now that I look at it that I paraphrased pretty … um … aggressively.

The fact that you got to work under him knocks me out, man. I got a really, really nice email from him last week about something I'd made, and I nearbouts peed myself in excitement.

Okay, I did pee myself. But only a little bit. I covered it up my dumping my nalgene in my lap … which in retrospect was kind of a bad move.

Erm…at least at this point, Mark's Twitter account is private. Did something happen?

181

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Happy?

http://www.macrumors.com/2011/07/07/app … -on-fcp-x/

182

(30 replies, posted in Off Topic)

So apparently Thor 2 is coming in 2013, but without Kenneth Branagh at the helm. Also coming in 2013: Iron Man 3. What do you think, are people going to want to keep seeing sequel after sequel? What I'm expecting is that 'Avengers' is going to be Marvel's jump-the-shark moment, and box office returns are going to start declining afterwards.

183

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Zarban wrote:

[*]Prince of Persia (not terrible)[/*]

Yes, yes it was. It was atrocious.

184

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Ignoring the fact that 'Shake-Speare' was not a filmmaker, the only advantage he has over Michael Bay is that his works are older.

185

(1 replies, posted in Off Topic)

…was actually not a bad movie at all. Kinda Constantine with vampires and werewolves. It's even got Peter Stormare for good measure.

And who wasn't looking forward to the reteaming of Superman Returns' Brandon Routh and Sam Huntington? Me, for one. I had no idea. But they worked really well as a team in this thing.

The girl has basically nothing to do until the very end of the movie. And the whole thing felt very direct-to-DVD, but, in the end. Yeah. Oddly worth seeing. Definitely want to see a DIF of this one.

Did anyone else (I mean, like, anyone?) see it?

186

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Eddie wrote:

I'm curious as to what misinformation there was out there.  My reactions are based on what I've experienced first hand with it.

Eddie wrote:

- No OMF export.  How am I supposed to send cuts to my audio engineer for sweetening if he uses Pro Tools?

Apple wrote:

Can I send my project to a sound editing application such as Pro Tools?
Yes; you can export your project in OMF or AAF format using Automatic Duck Pro Export FCP 5.0. More information is available on the Automatic Duck website: http://automaticduck.com/products/pefcp/.

Eddie wrote:

- No XML or EDL export or import.  Well, guess I'm not sharing projects with users not in my vicinity.

Apple wrote:

Can Final Cut Pro X export XML?
Not yet, but we know how important XML export is to our developers and our users, and we expect to add this functionality to Final Cut Pro X. We will release a set of APIs in the next few weeks so that third-party developers can access the next-generation XML in Final Cut Pro X.

Eddie wrote:

- All local projects, no relinking media.  Well shit, I guess Im not sharing projects with ANYONE.

Apple wrote:

Can I share projects with other editors?
Yes. You have several options for sharing projects. You can hand over just the project file, and the recipient can reconnect the project to his or her own copies of the Event. Or you can send the complete project and Event as a package to another editor. Final Cut Pro X includes options for duplicating, moving, and consolidating projects and associated media to streamline sharing between editors.

Can I store media in locations other than my system drive?
Yes. Turning off the “Copy files to Final Cut Events folder” option leaves the imported files where they are currently located. You can also move the project and associated media at any point during the editing process by dragging the project to another mounted hard drive within the Project Library.

Eddie wrote:

- NO MULTICAM.  Wow, Apple.  You REALLY don't anyone editing sitcoms, documentaries, reality shows, or Star Wars then I guess.

Apple wrote:

Does Final Cut Pro X support multicam editing?
Not yet, but it will. Multicam editing is an important and popular feature, and we will provide great multicam support in the next major release. Until then, Final Cut Pro X offers some basic support with automatic clip synchronization, which allows you to sync multiple video and audio clips using audio waveforms, creating a Compound Clip that can be used for simple multicam workflows.

Eddie wrote:

- CANNOT STORE MEDIA OUTSIDE OF PROJECT.   Devastating.  I guess this hour long long docu series Im doing can ONLY BE DONE BY ME EVER.

Apple wrote:

Can I specify a scratch disk location?
Yes. When you import media, you can specify the Event and the drive where you’d like to put it. You can also specify where you’d like to put your project. In Final Cut Pro X, a project and its rendered media always travel together in the same folder, so it’s easy to move projects between different hard drives and computers.

Eddie wrote:

- No tape capture.  I mean...I ....wow.

Apple wrote:

Can I edit my tape-based workflow with Final Cut Pro X?
Yes, in a limited manner. Final Cut Pro X is designed for modern file-based workflows and does not include all the tape capture and output features that were built into Final Cut Pro 7. Final Cut Pro X does support FireWire import for DV, DVCPRO, DVCPRO 50, DVCPRO HD, and HDV. In addition, companies like AJA and Blackmagic offer free deck control software that allows you to capture from tape and output to tape.

EDIT:

Let me be clear, here. I'm not an Apple apologist here or anywhere else. I think Apple seriously screwed up, as evidenced by all the angry editors on DIF, and on my Facebook, Gtalk, and my RSS reader. They fucked up. Done.

How to solve it? I'm with Jeff.

Long-ass quote here:

Jeff wrote:

Apple, announce that Final Cut Pro 7 is end-of-lifed. Put it back on sale. Commit publicly to continue selling it, and providing direct support and compatibility and bug-fix updates for it, until July 1, 2013. That’s two years, rounded off a bit. Two years is an entirely reasonable time to continue supporting an end-of-lifed product that your customers depend on in their businesses. Come right out and say, bluntly, “We will not add any new features at all to Final Cut Pro. We’re giving it the minimum necessary attention for the minimum reasonable time.” We know how to cope with that. It’s been done a million times in this industry. It’s fine. And it means that anybody who uses FCP 7 now can continue to do so with confidence while they transition off of it. You can even turn it into a marketing opportunity: “We think Final Cut Pro X is the way to go. But we understand it’s not there yet. So consider it as your next-generation NLE of choice, as you make your transition off Final Cut Pro.”

And if you really wanted to be cool, Apple? I mean really revolutionary in the industry? You’d give away a copy of Final Cut Pro X to everybody who has a valid Final Cut Pro serial number. “We value the customers who’ve chosen Final Cut Pro. We want a chance to convince you that Final Cut Pro X should be on your radar. Here’s a code to download a copy for free on the App Store. Please let us know what you think.”

Totally agree. And what's strange is, Apple's done this before, several times. With OS 9 to OS X, with PPC to Intel, Apple managed to transition really well, managing to release incomplete systems while maintaining limited, but crucial support for the old.

I seriously don't understand why they botched this so much.

187

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

FixedR6 wrote:
Gregory Harbin wrote:

That may be true, but I'd rather see an actual response to it rather than something like this. As an interested bystander, it's becoming increasingly difficult to wade through the responses to find what's old, wrong, or overblown, and what are actually legitimate concerns.

As an interested bystander I find this response puzzling. Reading through this thread and the linked blogs gives a clear picture of why FCPx fails as a product for the professional market.

There has been quite a bit of misinformation (probably based on a lot of lazy early reviews) in the thread so far. I was hoping for a reasoned response to Apple's new response to the pro market. Jeff's post did such, yes. But one editor does not the opinion of the entire professional market make.

188

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Eddie wrote:

To be fair, Apple's FAQ does nothing to address real concerns that face FCP houses right now.

That may be true, but I'd rather see an actual response to it rather than something like this. As an interested bystander, it's becoming increasingly difficult to wade through the responses to find what's old, wrong, or overblown, and what are actually legitimate concerns.

189

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Eddie wrote:

Great article here regarding the talking points of apologists.

http://www.selfreliantfilm.com/2011/06/ … -thoughts/

To be fair, that article is written to strawmen making arguments I've heard no one make, and was obviously written before Apple's FAQ was posted.

190

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Happy?

http://www.apple.com/finalcutpro/faq/

191

(30 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Well if you want to hear more from Brian, I'm working to get him on my Star Trek podcast as much as possible. He's already been on one episode. I'd imagine it'd be difficult though for most of these guys to start up their own podcasts, giving the demands of the genre.

192

(17 replies, posted in Off Topic)

maul2 wrote:
Dorkman wrote:

What's the life of the average guy in a world of superheroes and villains? Someone who never knows what the evil mastermind's plot is, he just has to call in the insurance claim when the hero punches Dr. Nemesis through his car.

Weird, I had literally that exact same idea not even a week ago.

Cloverfield or War of the Worlds, but for a story with superheroes/villains? I'm in.

193

(20 replies, posted in Episodes)

FixedR6 wrote:
Gregory Harbin wrote:

Similar to Blade Runner in that respect.

Correction, you *need* to watch Blade Runner. Then you watch it again.

No, I've seen Blade Runner. Several times. This is an educated opinion.

194

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It's a weird day when my Japanese friends start tweeting links from someone I know from DIF….

195

(20 replies, posted in Episodes)

I don't think I've ever actually sat down and watched all of ET. And, after doing a full watch-through with DIF, I don't think I need to.

Perhaps it's just because the Spielberg aesthetic has become engrained in the rest of the culture that I just don't *need* to watch it. Similar to Blade Runner in that respect.

196

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

switch wrote:

I really won't be surprised if they ditched the mac pro and macbook pro line of product...

I'm writing all this stuff down. We're going to check back in two years and see if any of this doomsday stuff happened.

197

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

dkcecil wrote:

Exactly. While the software is working for them now, what will happen down the line? It is an industry standard now but after a few years of zero updates the software will eventually become useless, at least in professional circles.

You seriously don't think that within 'a few years', I mean we're talking about when they're going to require 64-bit apps for a new version of the OS, which seriously is 10.9 at the very earliest, you really don't think that by that time, Apple will have added in the few features that are keeping this from being a full-featured pro app? It's obvious that they rushed this out the door to start selling to consumers.

If all you're worried about is that EVENTUALLY it MIGHT become KINDA HARD to run FCP7 on your NEWEST Mac, then I understand the griping even less.

No, let me take that back. I perfectly understand why people are griping. This is a new, fantastic version of the software, and it seriously sucks that most of the pros I know aren't able to use it. Feel free to keep pestering Apple about the features they need to add.

But don't like it's the end of the world. If FCP7 was working for you the day before FCPX was released, it'll still be working for you the year after. And for all likelihood for the next ten years. There's no guarantee that Premiere (or even less Avid) will even be around in ten years.

198

(37 replies, posted in Off Topic)

maul2 wrote:

Just in case you were interested.

The last time I tried to play this, I was flummoxed by the complete lack of tutorial and the fact that the entire game consists of people yelling at me for not knowing what to do.

Have they…addressed this issue?

199

(9 replies, posted in Creations)

Trey wrote:

And there you have Reason #492 of Why Trey Hates The Internetz.  One un-proof-read press release from The Asylum and next thing you know, I'm listed as the director of a movie I've never even seen.

I'm not sure why this is The Internetz' fault (press releases have been around for a while), but I'm sure things would be a lot less confusing if Asylum put any sort of credits on the trailer or if 'Travis Fort' had an imdb page.

200

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

dkcecil wrote:

We have a lab of 4 video editors that are pissed. They are all using Macs and Final cut.

I'm not trying to be snarky here, but just ask a legitimate question: why are they pissed? Do they think Apple is going to come and take their computer or Final Cut DVDs away from them? The current version of FCPS was used to edit The fucking Social Network. It's obviously not broken. They can use it for the rest of their natural lives, can't they?

Eddie The Eddie Doty wrote:

When FCP 5 debuted its multicam function, THAT was what caused most pro shops to switch over.

I expect that's when you'll see pros move to FCPX. Apple needs to (and I expect will in the next month) do some severe damage control with the professional community. It's not strange that they've been tight-lipped up until now, but it will be odd if they don't make some sort of statement soon about a timeline for integration of multicam and exporting support.

I doubt they'll ever add in an importing tool, though.