I have a soft spot for ZERO EFFECT. Tonally the movie doesn't know what it wants to be, but there's some good stuff in there. It was Jake Kasdan's first film.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Rob
I have a soft spot for ZERO EFFECT. Tonally the movie doesn't know what it wants to be, but there's some good stuff in there. It was Jake Kasdan's first film.
It's nothing reading a few YouTube comments threads can't fix, Zarban. Your faith in humankind should drop to normal OMFG levels in no time.
If Filmspotting has a problem it's not that it's pretentious*; it's that it's a bit staid. The old co-host, Matty, was more lively and had a better sense of humor than Larsen (who seems like a genuinely nice guy, nothing against him). Adam and Josh are almost too nice, or maybe it's that they're nice in the same sort of let's-agree-to-disagree kind of way. Now if one of them was a nice fella and the other had a more acerbic personality, that would be a more interesting dynamic to listen to. Thus the best shows these days are the ones where someone else comes into the mix (like Michael Phillips).
* They seem pretty down to Earth to me. They're jolly, plus with the "massacre theater" and top-5 lists and other diversions, it all feels purposefully light-hearted. Pretentiousness is basically phoniness, trying to come off as more sophisticated than you actually are. I don't get that vibe from them.
I mean, in a police interview concerning an on-going investigation, why would those two detectives waste time listening to Cohle and Hart prattle on about shit that has nothing to do with their case?
They'd prefer if Hart and Cohle weren't always so discursive, I'm sure. Their little exasperated sidelong glances sometimes reveal as much.
The "official" reason for the interviews seems to be that these new detectives are taking on a once closed but now re-opened case, which was formerly Hart & Cohle's case. Thus the new guys want to know everything that went on during the original investigation, and they want to hear it from the horse's mouth. "We're particularly interested in how Cohle worked the case," they tell Hart early in the series. I'm definitely no policeman, but it makes sense that the new guys on the case would want to know anything and everything Hart and Cohle remember. Especially if they consider one of them a suspect, since the more he talks the more locked in he is to a particular version of events.
Grizzly Man
What is it about this man's thick German accent that drives bears to murder?
I understand T-bone Burnett--Mr. Llewyn Davis himself--is handling the music for the show.
The credits are cool, definitely.
It being a miniseries rather than a standard TV show, I'm guessing the connections between some of these things are going to be made clear in the home stretch. Right now we're about halfway home. Midway through a first viewing of PULP FICTION, you're sitting there going "So, what the heck was all that business at the beginning with the two British people, and what does it have to do with anything?" A perfectly valid question at that point in time. The correct answer to which is "Keep watching."
At this point, I'd almost go so far as to say that the central mystery in this mystery is not "Who's the killer?" but "What the fuck happened to/between Cohle and Hart and just how much are they each trying to hide in 2012?" The latter question interests the two black present-day detectives who interview Cohle/Hart as much as the former question. (I like that the black detectives stand-in for we the audience in many ways, but they're also kind of mysterious and distant to us. Often it's hard to tell what tree they're barking up.) I really enjoy how Marty seems to be the same arrogant prick all these years later, but Russ has gone off the deep end, long hair and tallboys in the afternoon.
My girlfriend believes the story will end with Cohle and Marty reuniting for one last case and going out to catch their man. I don't know about that. That's too trope-y, it seems to me. Everything about this show indicates that this is the kind of story in which maybe the bad guy gets away with it.
We could...buy Trey a BOAT?
It was Steadicam. The operator should get some kind of special medal.
That's the stuff.
It wasnt done in one shot simply for the sake of doing it in one shot, either. That's what I got off on. It wasn't a gimmick. At that point in the episode, it was simply the most effective way to tell the story and bring us into the moment-to-moment experience of Russ. The focus is on the action. IOW, it's not one of those one-shot takes that implicitly asks us "How cool is it that we're doing this in one shot, y'all?" It's entirely serving the action, what's going on.
These are really funny.
Yeah, colloquially people tend to understand "theory" to mean something like "someone's unproven explanation they dreamed up for something." A scientific theory is not that. They hear evolutionary *theory*, then, and it sounds like this tenuous thing, one "theory" among many.
It's also worth noting that science is competitive. If a particular finding is published, scientists all over the world can benefit in numerous ways if they're able to discredit/disprove/add to that finding. There's a whole range of findings that could theoretically call evolution by means of natural selection into question. Every creationist and/or I.D. "scientist" in the world can do this. All they have to do is come up with some actual science -- replicatable findings in put out in an established, peer-reviewed publication. They'd be instantly famous. So far, crickets. They publish their "findings" in their own journals precisely because the work would never stand up to proper scientific scrutiny.
Sun goes up. Sun goes down. Never a miscommunication.
That's all their is to it.
My favorite PSH scene is "the skeptic scene" in THE MASTER. Lancaster Dodd is holding forth about "the Cause's travels into the past" at a lavish soiree held in his honor. A man starts interrupting and asking challenging questions. The tension builds until it boils over, then turns in an even more surprising direction. Hoffman navigates the the scene beautifully. Very few actors like him.
Of all the embarrassing Newsweek covers, and there have been many, that might be my favorite. I love that SIGNS is presented as Exhibit B in the case of him being "the next Spielberg." That film would be Exhibit A in my counterargument that he's not.
Gosh that's funny.
The last five minutes of this latest episode was simultaneously the coolest and the weirdest thing I've seen so far this year.
Someone needs to compile all of the McConaughey character's musings into an anthology. Or make some motivational posters. Well, I guess tumblr is already on it...
Around these parts we call that "bringing your own concrete."
A warning label styled like a road sign that goes on movies: "WARNING: B Y O C"
Hear, hear.
I was so on board with this show 10 minutes into episode one. I had high expectations, which so far have been met.
By now it's an old refrain, but McConaughey really is awesome. Harrelson too.
I think a lot of mystery-genre television actually doesn't execute mystery storytelling very well. TRUE DETECTIVE is doing something cool in that the characters, their relationships and backstories, are sort of a mystery too, in addition to the central whodunnit. The going back-and-forth in time doesn't at all feel forced. Really impressed with this show so far.
EDIT by mod to hide spoiler until the rest of you see All Is Lost which you should
Would have been nice to have done that for everything else discussed here that needed it, like Gravity.
Yeah I just realized that reading this thread again. Sorry man.
I would hope there's near-universal agreement here that, when it comes to what is and is not clinical depression, there's a difference between the opinion of a qualified mental health clinician and the opinion of, well, whatever we are. A bunch of guys who saw a film. It'd be interesting to hear what an actual psychiatrist thinks about Ryan Stone.
But like Trey suggests, it's less important how we'd characterize her problem and more important that we recognize that she has this problem. She goes from sleepwalking thru life since after her kid died to getting a second shot (rebirth) at living life zealously and joyously (more like the way Kowalski and that other dude seemed to live life). If you get that, then you've gotten the film, irrespective of whether you feel Ryan is clinically depressed or not.
I get why he's so angry. If I were an Oscar-winning screenwriter and someone leaked a first draft I'd entrusted to him/her, a project I was excited about, I'd be pissed the fuck off too.
This is a minor point, but it's come up here and there. If you've ever seen him interviewed, it seems to me Alfonso Cuaron (and Jonas for that matter) speaks English extremely well. He simply speaks it with a thick Spanish accent. Which can make it seem to native speakers like he doesn't have full command of English. But if you watch the above clip, it's pretty clear he speaks English with more perspicacity than most Americans. So the notion that there's somehow a language barrier, and that that accounts for the as-you-knows etc., might be a stretch.
How great would it be if "Silent Space Version" was Jonas Cuaron's new prog rock band?
What irks me too is that I'm betting there's some amount of audience overlap: hoity-toity people who felt "disgusted" by TWOWS but couldn't find a spoon big enough for them to gobble down the bullshit that was MR. BANKS. MR. BANKS is the movie that left me feeling like I wanted to take a shower, not TWOWS.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Rob
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.