2,176

(2 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Whenever I hear a name like "Pirate World" I always think "what would it be like if the entire world was populated with pirates?" How would they conduct trade? Would pirate law be any worse than historical law? What would pirate literature be like? (I know, I know, lots of Rs.)

"Carpet World" is my favorite. Imagine an entire planet completely covered in a thick, shag-carpet like vegetation. No trees. No deserts. The carpet goes right down the beach and under water along the bottom of the oceans and lakes.

Has somebody already written a story like that?

I imagine a world like that would have lots and lots of snakes.

And golf courses.

-------------------------------

No. I am not high right now.

2,177

(3 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Don't be muscling in on my Nigerian prince deal, man. I'm about to sell him my car just as soon as I can wire the shipping and handling fee to his chosen shipping company.

2,178

(5 replies, posted in Creations)

Altho Tron has plenty of faults, the cool thing about it is how it is both hi-tech and operatic at the same time. This piece shows that off. Really cool—and really well played. I've listened to it three times in the last couple of days just for the heck of it.

2,179

(1 replies, posted in Creations)

I made this. It's a Scrooge/Jack the Ripper mash-up.

Merry Christmas.

2,180

(111 replies, posted in Episodes)

I blame the Navy Seahawk helicopter co-pilot's Navy submarine helmsman twin brother for not calling him and explaining everything.

2,181

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Brian Finifter wrote:

Just finished Book of Eli. Interesting flick, let's do it.

Damn, you're smooth. Do you have to be wearing a smoking jacket to deliver a line like that?

2,182

(56 replies, posted in Episodes)

In my practical experience, I watch NTSC video and slow PAL commentaries down to .967 using Windows Media Player  (View > Enhancements > Play Speed Settings), which maintains the original pitch. Regardless, the aforementioned variables—including the occasional computer stutter and need to pause for short breaks—make it necessary to resync from time to time, so sync lines and direct references are helpful.

YMMV. I'm as obsessive about sync as you're likely to find. I have no significant troubles with DIF.

2,183

(111 replies, posted in Episodes)

A terrible camera phone? pimp

2,184

(9 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Invid wrote:
Zarban wrote:

Oh right, right, right. Anything that's been optioned and not produced needs to come down. But the article specifically says they're targeting all scripts they own, not just unproduced ones.

Which I call being consistent.

A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds. *

I think that scripts that have been made into movies have almost no market value. The studio is never going to make any money selling those words in that form. However, allowing them to be freely available is advantageous for the studio because it helps the writers, directors, and producers who will create their next blockbuster. The last thing Hollywood needs is to hide the sacred secret of how a good screenplay is structured.

Imagine if Tim Burton read scripts of produced movies. He might learn to tell a winner from a dud and save you from paying for another Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. smile

Not to mention it saves you from paying lawyers to sue some poor schmuck of a writer/webmaster who hasn't got a nickel to his name....

/back to the grindstone to try to knock out The 101-Foot Geisha before Christmas

2,185

(9 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Oh right, right, right. Anything that's been optioned and not produced needs to come down. But the article specifically says they're targeting all scripts they own, not just unproduced ones.

Fox has been stupid about stuff like this for a long time, tho. I got a cease and desist letter in 1996 because I had a website with, among other things, one page each that had Simpsons and X-Files wallpaper and icons that I created. Paramount, on the other hand was apparently unconcerned about my Indiana Jones page. And likewise the BBC about my Blackadder page—with fan script.

Speaking of which, I've got to get back to my latest Asylum spec work—5 Faces of Death: Sharktahedron!

2,186

(9 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I don't understand Fox's motiviation for suing script sites. They can't imagine they'll sell an extra 10,000 copies of a movie to screenwriters, directors, and producers who really just wanted to read the script. It feels like make-work for lawyers who are telling their client, "That's your IP out there WILD on the Internet! It's out of CONTROL!"

Seems like they'd have a better return-on-investment case for suing Bollywood film makers.

2,187

(12 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I've made some changes that I'll try out for a while. I think I still want a page that lists all titles somewhere, but now the front page features an alpha index and the most recent commentaries, with posters.

2,188

(12 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I've found a way to group titles under a letter and then create a page for each letter. Then I can create fancy letter icons for the front page. I'll play around with that and with simplifying the left column. It'll be easy to undo if I want.

2,189

(12 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Thanks for the feedback! The site is almost 3 years old now, so it's no surprise that it's due for an overhaul.

It's not practical for me to classify commentaries by style or video format, since people don't self-report consistently. It wouldn't be too hard to separate iRiffs and Rifftrax from others, tho, which might be helpful.

I think making the front page a gateway to commentaries by first letter of the movie title is a practical way of simplifying it. I've been thinking of ways to do that for a while now.

I'm not a huge fan of tag clouds myslef, but it is a compact and common way to list the most popular entries by type. Maybe I overestimated people's interest in Tim Burton movies vs John Hughes movies vs Arnold Schwarzenegger movies. I could just leave them for the All Tags page and keep only the commentators, turned into a bulleted list of top commentators by output.

This gets me thinking. Thanks!

2,190

(12 replies, posted in Off Topic)

This forum seems a little slow lately, so I'll make a request....

I just listened to the Commentary Track Stars commentary for Die Hard, and they give a nice shout-out to the House of Commentaries at the very beginning. However, they say specifically that the front page is hard to navigate. I'm probably the number one user of my own site, and I naturally think it's easy to navigate, but the front page certainly has grown very long these days. I have one of those fancy mouses with a free-wheeling scroll wheel, so I can easily scroll thru hundreds of titles; and I have the search-on-typing feature in Firefox turned on, so I often just start typing the name of the movie I want and go right to it.

Does anyone else have an opinion? Any ideas for improvements? Max suggests that the news category should be the front page, but that seem counterproductive. To me, the news section is almost superfluous; it's mostly for me to track my own changes and additions to the site. (I have posted these questions there, tho.)

I don't think that displaying the newest entries on the front page (like a regular blog) is much use, since freshness isn't very important in a commentary. But I can't think of any other way of organizing the site. Maybe alphabet links to separate lists by letter? (A page for all the titles that start with numbers, a page for all the titles that start with A.... B... C...)

I don't really think there's anything wrong with the site. But my professional work is corporate communications and training, so I'm well aware that 1) not everybody thinks the way I do and 2) one complaint doesn't necessarily warrant design changes. Still, I'm certainly open to suggestions.

For that matter, do other people on this forum USE the House of Commentaries? Or do you mostly just listen to DIFs because you're a fan of DIF? I know that iRiffs creators use it because the Rifftrax search system is not very good.

EDIT: I should note that my traffic is close to 100 unique users a day, so I know that it's useful to some people. I just don't get a lot of feedback on it.

2,191

(5 replies, posted in Creations)

In a jungle, it's called jungle fever. And in the ocean, it's called ocean notion.

Just helping out.

/currently contemplating recording an ocean notion for my nearly-finished Asylum screenplay called 10 Tentacles for Sister Sarah *

* It's neo-western sea monster nunsploitation

2,192

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Michael is my favorite again!

/fickle

2,193

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Down in Front wrote:

I'll be in Memphis, Brian will be on the east coast, and Dorkman will be...

He'll be gaying things somewhere, I guess. I really don't know what Dorkman does.

Chinese restaurant, right? Isn't that where those people go on Christmas?

2,194

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

DorkmanScott wrote:

Bwahaha.

We're going to want to set the date a few months in advance so we can figure out schedules and hype it up, and anyone who wants to read the books to prepare (I probably will do so) will have ample warning.

QFWTF? I thought you were going to do this around Christmas. I don't have time to wait months. My affections are fickle.

Eddie is my favorite now!

2,195

(20 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Invid wrote:

You probably would have liked it better with a framing sequence, like in The Wizard of Oz where we find it was a dream where as in the book it was real. Maybe we discover it was a grandfather telling the kids what he did during the war. Or a fake title card where we learn this is from a recently discovered un-produced 1942 script. Because that's what I think this is, a war time movie where the actors get to win all the victories the actual military at the time isn't doing yet.
(haven't seen the movie yet, just going by the reports)

WoOz didn't actually need the frame story, because the twister explains the travel to a magical land where anything goes. I hate movies where it's all a dream anyway; if it's only my point of view that's skewed, then there's no point to the story. It's like making a movie about an optical illusion. "Oh, the lines really ARE the same length."

However, your idea of a lost script is 100% better than QT's no attempt at explaning or even foreshadowing at all. Personally, I would prefer some sci fi explanation, like Pitt and crew stumbling across a scientist who explains that the Germans just exploded a "probability bomb" or something in hopes of changing their chances of winning the war. "Says here that without the in-- indoosed time anom-- anom-a-lee, the Allies would win the war in 1945 and Hitler would shoot himself in his bunker in Berlin. Jesus, the fuckin' Nazzis blew up the FUTURE! You know what this means, boys? We gotta win this war any way we can!"

/Suddenly contemplating a new Asylum screenplay for 10 Vainglorious Bastards.

2,196

(20 replies, posted in Off Topic)

DoctorSubmarine wrote:

How did you feel about Kill Bill? That description fits it perfectly, but Kill Bill is better received by most people.

You mean something happened in a movie that didn't happen in real life? Unheard of!

Kill Bill is great. It has a stated morality--the Bride kills those who betrayed and tried to murder her. That's a great anti-hero--a character who does things that are illegal and perhaps even immoral, but who is nevertheless sympathetic and perhaps even admirable. I didn't get any of that from Brad Pitt.

Re: reality... my suspension of disbelief becomes more strained the closer the work of fiction approaches yet differs from my personal experience without an explanation. Go ahead and use your magic beans, but you have to have a character explain "These beans are magic; here is what they do" even if that's done really casually and subtly with a lot of ellipsis that relies on (for example) the viewer's cultural understanding of fairy tales.

It would be different if the film was called "What if...?" or featured a radio report of the Germans carpet bombing Washington, DC. That sort of thing would signal that all bets are off and raise the tension at the end. It would make us wonder, "Wow. What was it that made this history diverge from ours? Was a weird, glowing briefcase involved?" Something like that could have been really cool.

2,197

(20 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Astroninja Studios wrote:

I LOVE the Milk Farmer's scene, and it stands my favorite in the movie. ... The slow burn of tension works perfect with the Milk Farmer, but goes a few beats too long in the German bar.

As for your assertion that films are either Art or Not Art, I call shenanigans.  Alien is art.  Aliens is Art.  Citizen Kane is art.  Birdemic is art.  Godfather is art.  The Room is art.  It may be bad art, but that is completely subjective.

I love all the scenes not featuring Brad Pitt. It's not that I don't like Brad Pitt, but--and I know I've said this here before--he's in a Sergeant Rock comic book movie, and Sergeant Rock was mostly pretty stupid. However, the bar scene could have used a trim.

Regarding art, you've got yer high art, yer pop art, and yer commercial trade. What fits where is largely subjective, but I guarantee there are plenty of film makers happy to tell you that they do not make art. They make commercial films, and that's fine. For the most part, I don't need to be more enlightened about the human condition.

/Well along into my new screenplay for 911: Dial M for Mega Snake

2,198

(20 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I just didn't understand what it was about. Why were the Americans acting evil and succeeding at everything? It was like Death Wish except Charles Bronson doesn't just shoot street thugs, he tortures and mutilates them. And they didn't kill his family; they're just petty criminals. And no one really tries to stop him. And the main villain who really actually is evil has no idea who Bronson is until they meet at the end, and then they make a deal. And then Charles Bronson pretty much welshes on the deal.

It was just a weird, totally amoral revenge fantasy dreamed up by a 9-year-old. "And then... they kill Hitler!" Um. How do you square that with the history books? "What? Hitler is dead, right?" Right, but we know this isn't how he died. "I haven't read any history books. I'm only nine."

2,199

(52 replies, posted in Episodes)

Jeffery's rewrite is great, but he's also right that you absolutely need Shia to be integral to the story. Gregory's take on who is what is slightly better. No kid would want robot toys that transform into a locomotive, a turbine generator, an ICBM, or the Large Hadron Collider, but we might need some other alternatives to the Pentagon and the Utah Jazz. We obviously need an iPhone and a PS3 and whatever else kids think is cool. Jet boots or something. Electric toothbrush, maybe. Kids still think that's cool, right?

But if the Autobots are hiding from the big bad Decepticons, why would the Autobots kick ass when the Decepticons arrive? Maybe... the Allspark has been carried to earth by Bumblebee and Shia has found it and befriended Bumblebee, bringing Shia into the story and giving the Autobots the advantage they lacked in the prolog.

And Megan Fox is still the superhot chick. Only this time she isn't orange, okay? Seriously. Can we address this?

------------------------
It's important to note that I was 19 when Transformers (and GI Joe and also Australian rules football) was on TV, and I only watched it one time when I was sick and hopped up on four cold medicines.

2,200

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

To be honest, it's quite possible that the kids won't like Lethal Weapon. It was so influential and yet so... modest in scope... that they may feel like it's just so-so. It was the buddy-cop odd-couple comedy that launched a thousand ships, but Danny Glover ain't no Helen of Troy. Mel Gibson did turn out to have an Achilles heel, tho...

The truth is that Eddie Murphy did it better, first.