201

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Doctor Submarine wrote:

The movie is pretty much the book on screen, word-for-word. The events portrayed are the ones that Solomon thought were the most important. And given that the memoir is the only record of Solomon's experience, they had nothing else to go on. So they couldn't add new scenes to really make you feel those years.

Ah, gotcha. I haven't read the book, didn't know it was like that.

202

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Doctor Submarine wrote:

This film has some of the most disturbing things you'll ever see on screen, almost all of them delivered in agonizingly long takes...

...He doesn't give you the safety of a cut. You're forced to watch this awful, awful thing, and what's more, you're forced to feel its duration. This film has "12 Years" right in the title. McQueen wants you to feel it.

Interesting, I didn't think the passing of time was handled very well. Those scenes were long and grueling, but it didn't translate to a lot of time passing. To me it just made a short amount of time feel longer. It felt more like 1 or 2 long years than 12. The way he chose to show the passing of time was with transition shots of willow leaves and cross dissolves between scenes. But I had no clue how much time had passed after each of those transitions. It could've been a year, or a day. There was no dialogue that helped with it either. There were no lines like, "I've been here for 6 years now," or "A few years back Master did blah blah." Text displayed the year in the beginning of the movie but it was never used throughout. The only indicator of passed time for me was that in one scene, his hair had started to gray all of the sudden.

At the end I was thinking, "Well he's free... I guess it's been 12 years then."

Very powerful film, but that part of it bothered me a bit. No sense of time. Also Brad Pitt and his Aldo Raine voice.

203

(68 replies, posted in Off Topic)

204

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

12 Years a Slave

http://mvfilmsociety.com/film/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/12years_a_slave-poster.jpg

Very interesting film. Definitely makes you think twice about slavery.

wink

205

(68 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Eduardo this entire scene:

Mark looks like he's about to cry.

"I like standing next to you, Sean... Makes me look so tough."

206

(68 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Jimmy B wrote:

Predator- 'I ain’t got time to bleed' big_smile

Jinx wink

207

(68 replies, posted in Off Topic)

This is amazing. Count me in.

#WhatAreYouDoingHarry
#WhatAreYouDoingMalaria

Punning all three things at once is gonna be tough...

209

(42 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Yes I know what The Breakfast Club means. But you wouldn't have any idea if the title was all you heard, just like Rain Man and The Dark Knight. And Home Alone 2 is just the second film, but that doesn't make it right!  wink

210

(42 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Apocalypse Now - No apocalypse. Not now, not ever.
The Breakfast Club - No breakfast. No club.
Goodfellas - Seemed like pretty bad fellas actually.
Home Alone 2 - No one in this movie was ever home alone.
Scott Pilgrim vs. the World - Should be Scott Pilgrim vs. 7 people.

Rob wrote:
Doctor Submarine wrote:
Invid wrote:

Although you can change the theme.

I mean, technically you could, but it works so well that why would you want to?

To add sharks, obviously.

Seriously, why was something as silly as debris the cause of the conflict in this film? It would have been so simple to have made it a giant herd of sharks orbiting the earth. Big missed opportunity there. I'm not so sure about this Cuarón guy.

Now all we can do is wait for The Asylum to do what should've been done the first time around. Just like always.

Dorkman wrote:
Sam F wrote:
Dorkman wrote:

No, it's not spinning that fast. There's might only be a few ounces of pull on him, but in zero-g, that's enough.

Though the force would still have to be great enough to keep Sandra from tugging George back toward her without her leg slipping further.

Well, they establish that it is. She tries to pull him in and instead winds up pulling her own leg almost free.


Well yeah, but some of the things they established in the film have turned out not to be quite consistent with reality. I'm just trying to wrap my head around the physics of it all. Probably not much of a point in it though. If it gets to the point where we're trying to determine their exact speed vs. the length of the tether and all the little details I'd say they did a good enough job with it.

Dorkman wrote:

No, it's not spinning that fast. There's might only be a few ounces of pull on him, but in zero-g, that's enough.

Though the force would still have to be great enough to keep Sandra from tugging George back toward her without her leg slipping further. I would guess it would need to be more than a few ounces, right? But really I'd have no clue what the centripetal force would be, especially since it'd probably be really hard to tell what their angular velocity was and agh I don't know.

Haha I think I just need to watch the scene again; and look closely at their initial angle and speed in comparison to the ISS. It doesn't really change my thoughts of the movie either way.

Dorkman wrote:

The ISS is spinning. Gently, but clearly. So the centripetal force is pulling Clooney "out."

Cool! So the scenery around the astronauts was also changing (i.e. sometimes Earth is behind them, sometimes not)? I guess that also means that Clooney let go at the right time and was lucky not to have fallen toward Earth.

I can't wait to get this on Blu-Ray so I can scrub through that scene. I imagine it's a little hard to get a grip on it because the apparent movement of everything in the scene depends so much on the camera's own position and movement.

BigDamnArtist wrote:

Pssh, what are you guys talking about!? This is clearly the best Noah movie of all time...

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/14/Evan_almightymp1.jpg

Oh I beg to differ.

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/513CV32T1EL.jpg

http://25.media.tumblr.com/43c4f794a0da502f3cca6f6d3060af89/tumblr_mhbd0p0IJW1rcl260o1_400.gif

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/sandra- … y-20470890

I like Sandra Bullock a little more now. I didn't know she actually tried to collect her own Razzie Award.

Teague wrote:

I do not understand The Ballistics of Clooney. When he's at the end of the rope, and has to disconnect from Sandra... what the fuck is happening there? They're not in atmo, and they're moving at the same speed. No bouncing, even, if I recall, they're at a totally matched velocity. (With each other, and the space station.) What in God's name is pulling him away from her so strongly that he needs to disconnect to keep from breaking something? (And for that matter, why does he float away?)

I chalked it up to centripetal force, though I don't remember if they were twirling and wrapping around the station at that point. It did feel a little off.

And yes, the 3D was amazing. I normally hate that crap. But this was a spectacle.

219

(11 replies, posted in Off Topic)

5 years ago... wow.

I didn't think the White Council scene dragged on at all, it worked for me. But I did think Azog sucked.

As for Taurolas, I'll bring up an idea I read somewhere else. Maybe Pete is setting up this relationship for Legolas so that he can lose it all to the forces of Sauron in the third movie (i.e. she gets killed), and maybe from there explain how he ended up at Rivendell in the Council of Elrond and why he was motivated to contribute to the fight against Sauron. Might be interesting, but also maybe no.

The second DoS trailer seemed more promising than the first for me. I liked the vibe and there was a lot of interesting stuff, but at the same time there were somethings that made me nervous about it; not the least of which being the fact that every frame has to look absolutely perfect, and a little cartoonish at times. What's with all the Legolas CG?

Also I think one of the bigger issues with this story as a whole so far is Thorin's character. He's pretty one-dimensional and I just can't bring myself to feel for him at all, or most of the dwarves for that matter. As a result, at this point in the story I don't really care if they take back Erebor. Plus, like Balin said, they built a pretty nice life for themselves since they lost their kingdom anyway. Thorin wants the mountain back for selfish reasons and I have a hard time rooting for that. Maybe that greed and selfishness will become more eminent and addressed in the next two movies as push starts inching closer to shove, but I felt like AUJ was telling me to root for people I didn't care for, and against people I didn't passionately hate.

After the first movie I'd say the only characters I'm 100% cheering for are Balin, Gandalf and Radagast. Bilbo too, but not as much. It seemed like his character started to come around by the end of the movie.

221

(83 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Robbie Coltrane as Hagrid
Geoffrey Rush as Captain Barbossa

222

(14 replies, posted in Off Topic)

James Franco comes to mind. Not for all of his roles, but not for just one.

223

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Glorious

http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5474/9699210620_91c55a5f74_b.jpg

After watching the trailer I think I can just catch the last 15 minutes and have a good idea of what's going on. Seems like they told us just about everything but the ending. Not that I really care about it anyway...

225

(27 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Considering that my teen years only ended about 3 years ago, this is a little odd for me to do. It's hard to see it as "looking back" on a stage of my life when I feel like I'm still in the process of breaking out of it. I first saw one of the movies on my list in 2010. So it's hard to have that sort of perspective on it. Alas, here we go.

  • The Two Towers (2002) - I saw FOTR in theaters when I was 10. My brother loved it. I hated it. I probably took 5 bathroom breaks just to get out of the theater. I was incredibly bored and had no clue what was going on. Once I finally got around to seeing TTT, I thought it was awesome. The battle of Helms Deep was one of the coolest things I'd ever seen in a movie, and it got me hooked on LOTR. For the record, I now love FOTR. Gimme a break, I was 10.

  • Good Will Hunting (1997) - Saw this for the first time 3 years ago and I loved it. It might have a little to do with my interest in math. The idea of someone being born with such an amazing ability to comprehend and solve problems that no one else ever could was just really interesting to me. And the movie really made the story feel like something real, like it was something that could be going on in Boston right now. I guess I hadn't seen a whole lot of movies quite like it before.

  • Nacho Libre (2006) - I don't know how many times I watched this movie in high school. I haven't watched it in a while, but it's definitely had a lasting effect on me. I still quote it in everyday conversations.