1

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

And... what this weekend?

2

(142 replies, posted in Off Topic)

As the one reviewing Apollo 13, I would be remiss if I didn't include that. It's... prevalent. And recurring.

3

(36 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Fight Club

42:28-43:48 Flying bottle discussion, and Brian making up themes.
1:02:54-1:03:39 A stunningly racist joke.
1:09:47-1:10:39 Why Fincher’s allowed his indulgent editing.
1:58:23-1:58:42 Fincher’s relationship with Fox.
2:20:09-2:21:28 A lovely lesson on efficient suicide.

4

(142 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'd be happy to take 18-23. Which is I think Apollo 13 to Watchmen.

Whoops. 18-22, just went back and checked.

5

(142 replies, posted in Off Topic)

When I first started listening, I started with movies I knew backwards and forwards. So, when you started commenting on the bottle in Fight Club - the one Tyler Durden throws, that flies forever and stays at the edge of frame - it brought my attention to something that had always confused me. Around 42:30, going until Brian rambles about nothing and you're all impressed.

Also! The rant in Galaxy Quest (near the 25-min mark) where Tim Allen says, "I need to be at a place in a quarter of an hour," and you guys say, "...Then... what are you doing here, man?"

(Oh, and just a personal great, from the same, but later -- Teague asks, "Brian, is this what Shatner and Takei are doing right now?" And Brian answers, "I hope so. But just those two.")

Anyway. I'll keep thinking.

6

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Also, I don't know if anyone's suggested Saving Private Ryan. It kicked off the recent gritty WWII revival.

7

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

Oooh, shiny. Thanks!

8

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

I hadn't seen Cloudy waCoM, but I watched it preemptively. I loved the humor and its canny lampshading of common disaster/weather/grown up cliches, can't wait for the commentary.

9

(24 replies, posted in Episodes)

I feel like all this talk of moose piss has deftly encapsulated exactly what David Lynch was trying to convey with Mulholland Drive.

10

(24 replies, posted in Episodes)

I will admit, Zarban. I laughed quite heartily.

11

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Shifty Bench wrote:

How would you define a Star Trek movie?

The great mark of a Star Trek episode was a thinly-veiled moral, some sign of deep thought as a commentary on the current social scene. The episode Let That Be Your Last Battlefield (the halfblack, half-white faced dudes) was all about a relavent cultural issue. Star Trek VI (which DiF has already covered) is about the fall of Soviet Russia and racism.

Star Trek IV is about... not pushing humpback whales to extinction, or else an alien probe will punish us? Time travel? Spock learning to swear?

Even Enterprise has its meaningful plotlines. T'Pal with her Vulcan AIDS, etc.

12

(22 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I really love Repo! The Genetic Opera. It's a cheesy musical, and I can't stand half of the songs, but the half of the soundtrack I CAN stand is so fucking catchy. There's fake blood everywhere and Paris Hilton kind of wants to fuck her brother. I don't even know.

Anthony Stewart Head disemboweling people should not be so enthralling!

13

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

It's a silly movie. Its main goal is to make the audience laugh.

That doesn't make it a Star Trek movie.

14

(24 replies, posted in Episodes)

A sentiment that is clearly reciprocated.

15

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

beldar wrote:

http://mos.totalfilm.com/images/2/25-greatest-star-trek-movie-moments-05.jpg

Interesting trivia! The punk on the bus was Kirk Thatcher, puppeteer/producer for the Muppets and creature technician for Star Wars and Gremlins. (I don't know why I know these things.)

16

(47 replies, posted in Episodes)

Then let me say, Cloe, that hanging out with the gang afterward was made awesomer because you were there!

17

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Zarban wrote:

It's pretty much its own Galaxy Quest.

I think at that point they had all accepted that they weren't getting out of these roles in their careers. And they took it out on the fans.

I didn't say they had to be nice to it.

18

(21 replies, posted in Creations)

maul2 wrote:

According to Cameron's original treatment...

But when first viewed, the audience doesn't have the benefit of what Cameron considers to be canon. They can only understand the world based on the exposition in the film itself; Ribisi says, "It's the most valuable, rarest, most sexy substance ever. We want it."

That's plenty of explanation, granted. We don't need an intricate explanation of Unobtainium's impact on Earth to understand that the company is definitely ready to kill for the stuff.

I'm just objecting to the use of the original treatment notes as canon when no one in the theatrical release actually explains its properties. Sorry, maul2.

19

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Darth Praxus wrote:

You guys NEED to do Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan.

Continuing this thought... You could also get through ST IV: The Voyage Home. It's the most accessible for non-fans, stable time loops and research failures aside.

(Also, I've been reading around the forums for a while without realizing that I hadn't registered... lurk much, self?)