Re: Last movie you watched

Figured it was about time I filled some of the larger gaps in my Brendan Fraser filmography knowledge last night, so:

Monkeybone (2001):

http://tepasmas.com/img/posters/monkeybone.jpg

I loved this way more than it probably has any right too. But here's the thing, you put Brendan Fraser, Dave Foley, dropdeadsexybloodythirstycatwomen, and crazy dream-logic surrealism and the director of Nightmare before Christmas in the same room and there's no way I'm not loving whatever comes out of it, that's just a known fact of the universe. I absolutely loved it, and think we need waaaay more stuff like it.

Airheads (1994):

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/3f/Airheads_film_poster.jpg/220px-Airheads_film_poster.jpg

I REALLY enjoyed this one. Brendan Fraser is great, Steve Bucsemi is rocking the shiiit out of that rocker look, and I didn't hate Adam Sandler like I usually do. When it started out I was pretty much just expecting your typical "unknown rockers want to be famous so by the end of the movie they organize some giant  mission impossible style scheme" style 90's comedy thing...and then it started to do that...and then HARD RIGHT TURN, and suddenly they were right in the middle of a full-on Dog Day Afternoon spoof and I didn't even notice until they were in the thick of it. And once they hit it, they put the peddle to the metal and ride it all the way to the end, it caught me totally off gaurd, and it was amazing.

Definitely reccommended if your looking for a solid comedy that doesn't pander to the lowest common denominator, (Which is a weird thing for me to say about a movie with Adam Sandler in it... ow! ow! okay okay stop throwing things at me, I'll watch Happy Gilmore one of these days). (Also, a half naked Ellie Bartlett...so that's...a thing)

And I actually went to the theater (second run one, but whatevs) for the first time since last year and saw:

Monster University (2013):

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/2a/Monsters_University_poster_3.jpg/220px-Monsters_University_poster_3.jpg

I loved it. I really really did. And I was one of the guys going "W.T.F. is Pixar doing?! There is no way in hell this isn't a money grab." right up til release. But it was great.

Although, through pretty much the entire 2nd and third acts I just couldn't stop thinking about what the "Toy Story has a horrible horrible message and should never be shown to any child ever." crowd would have to say about MU because...

SPOILER Show
...up until about 2 minutes before the credits (And the movie just kinda redirects the message not changes it) the entire message is "It doesn't matter how much you want it, or how hard you work, or what you do, if you aren't born with the looks you should just give up." Which is like WHOOOOOOAAAAAAAHKAY. That's a helluva thing to be throwing in there, was not expecting that. And then obviously they twist it around to "But that doesn't mean there isn't something awesome you can do despite that." in the last couple minutes, but Toy Story does that as well in it's resolution and that crowd still gets riled up. So I'm kinda surprised there hasn't been a larger outcry against this movie. Unless I just outright missed it.

But all that (the spoilered stuff) aside, I loved it, it was a cool take on the whole 80's college movie thing while also being a solid addition to the Monsters universe.

Last edited by BigDamnArtist (2013-08-28 21:52:11)

ZangrethorDigital.ca

Re: Last movie you watched

I haven't actually, I'll check it out.

ZangrethorDigital.ca

Re: Last movie you watched

Happy Gilmore:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/b/be/Happygilmoreposter.jpg/215px-Happygilmoreposter.jpg

I enjoyed it, it was fun, it's definitely not going to be on any of my "top X" lists any time soon, but I can see why it would have the place in pop culture it does.

ZangrethorDigital.ca

Re: Last movie you watched

http://i.imgur.com/OujzWqAl.jpg

BLECH!

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Last movie you watched

http://oyster.ignimgs.com/wordpress/stg.ign.com/2013/05/RIPD-poster2.jpg

Just watched
R.I.P.D. (2013)

MIB with dead people, sounds good in theory, so why didn't work?

Re: Last movie you watched

The New World (Extended) (2005) - 7/10

http://chrisfilm.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/new-world-24.jpg

Perhaps I should have started with the theatrical cut, but the extended cut supposedly helps flesh out alot of character relationships. Unfortunately, as beautiful as this is, it suffers from the same problem as Terrence Malicks recent film "To The Wonder", which is a too meandering style of presentation. What makes "Tree Of Life", and to an even further degree "The Thin Red Line" so great, is that they almost perfectly balance Malicks poetry with actual events and situations.
In "The New World", the poetry takes up just a little too much room for me personally, and particularly some smaller characters, like Bales character in the 2nd half of the film, are unfortunately 2-dimensional.
Still, I'd recommend anyone to watch the first hour of the extended cut, because it is absolutely mesmerizing. It so completely captures the feeling of arriving at the shore of some world you've never seen before, just desolate woods, fields, swamps and nature ahead. The photography by Emmanuel Lubezki  (Tree Of Life, Children Of Men) is stunning with basically only natural light used. Hypnotic does not begin to describe it.


Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol (2011) - 8/10

http://cfile1.uf.tistory.com/image/157C90424FBCD8D1218D48

So I rewatched this a few days ago before the FIYH commentary. I love this movie. If I had to sum it up in one word it would be "Classy". It just has this relaxed aura of "Don't worry, we know what the hell we are doing" surrounding it. The photography is superb, the action sequences are playfully choreographed and the score happily keeps up with them. The actors are having tonnes of fun which shows. The direction has such a steady hand, you can tell from watching the movie that Brad Bird is a guy who is used to thinking through sequences thoroughly, designing them very well both from a plot and from a character point of view. There are so many small moments where characters get to shine. The editing and camera work are world class, again so relaxed, so steady, so classy. The moment where Tom Cruise steps out onto the outside of the Burj Dubai with the camera craning over him and swirling with him as he moves onto the outside of the building... Yep, these guys know what the hell they are doing.

Kick-Ass 2 (2013) - 4/10

http://thecriticalcritics.com/review/wp-content/images/kick-ass_2-still_2.jpg

Swing and a miss. Remember that girlfriend from the first movie? The kindhearted girl who works at the needle-exchange? Ditched with 2 lines in the beginning, over a misunderstanding that could have been corrected with 1 line. My jaw almost dropped at how lazy the writing was. I actually shut it off at that point, but forced myself to keep watching it so I could atleast give it a score. There is such a problem with tone in this film. The first had an honest and thought-through emotional throughline. This sequel forgets stuff that happened 10 minutes ago and doesn't seem to carry anything from scene to scene. It's like the filmmakers only had the script one scene at a time, and weren't privy to the full score of the characters.
Just really superficial and poorly directed. The first film really seems more and more like lightning in a bottle with great direction and almost perfect casting. Just the fact that the original had (the wonderful) Mark Strong as the charismatic villain, and the sequel has Christopher Mintz-Plasse as the evil driving force should tell you how big of a shift it is.
Remember Terminator 3 and the "talk to the hand" moment? The integrity for the characters feels similarly mistreated here. It may be closer to the comic version, but they really should have followed the original in tone and characterizations.


The Dyatlov Pass Incident (2013) - 3/10

http://film-book.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/matt-stokoe-holly-goss-the-dyatlov-pass-incident-01-350x164.png

Blair Witch Project made by idiots with no attention to detail whatsoever. 5 stupid americans go to Russia to investigate and document supposedly mysterious location. They film their journey and events a la Cloverfield. We see a character hold an iphone while filming, and when we cut to their camera POV it has the depth of field and look of a HD 35mm digital camera (blurred background, rich shadow detail, etc).
A character places an iphone on the ground to take a self-shot. We then see the resulting shot which clearly has the camera elevated to knee-level.
There is just too much stupidity here to mention. The script itself is retarded, and every scene is just amazingly contrived or cringe-worthy. The fact that someone thought this would be a good idea just makes it uncomfortable to watch, like watching an oblivious person sing karaoke horribly. You just sort of feel bad for everyone involved. From their end they're making something legitimate, but all everyone else is seeing a miserable failure.


The Lords Of Salem (2012) - 6/10

http://thewolfmancometh.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/the-lords-of-salem-sherri-moon-zombie-face-paint.jpg

Directed and written by Rob Zombie. More like 5.5, but this type of approach to horror I feel deserves some recognition. Woman (Sherri Moon Zombie) is decentant of guy who burned witches, and is cursed to give birth to satans baby. Overall just weird. But sort of beautiful in a disgusting way. Odd and otherwordly. They really tried to make something different. I was never bored, it's like watching a David Lynch film, even though it's weird and odd, it is surprisingly riveting.

Last edited by TechNoir (2013-09-02 12:33:27)

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Last movie you watched

http://www.zarban.com/wp-content/cache/imdb/images/0117060_big.jpg

Mission: Impossible 1, 1996
Better than I remember, because I remember being really disappointed that it wasn't like the TV show. They basically kicked the TV show in the balls by making it an inside job and making Hunt assemble a team of outsiders to raid a CIA computer. Worse, Bond had gone rogue himself in Licence to Kill a few years earlier in '89. Still, the action is solid, and the TGV sequence, altho it gets silly at the end, is pretty thrilling.

http://www.zarban.com/wp-content/cache/imdb/images/0120755_big.jpg

Mission: Impossible 2, 2000
I liked this when I first saw it, even tho it ALSO uses the inside-job trope, because I thought it was hilarious that they remade Hitchcock's Notorious with John Woo action scenes. But it's even LESS like the TV show and even more like James Bond. There's no plan beyond "have sex with the bad guy and give us information," something IMF could have done just by planting bugs in his house. Ving Rhames and the other guy have almost nothing at all to do and always stay on the outside (and mostly in a helicopter). And they're constantly reacting instead of executing an elaborate plan, which is the WHOLE IDEA of the show. The action is still good, but kind of hollow-feeling.

Warning: I'm probably rewriting this post as you read it.

Zarban's House of Commentaries

Re: Last movie you watched

^^ I re-watched MI-2 recently and ya, it's pretty lame. Biggest problem is the PG-13 rating, you can tell they were absolutely butchering some potentially great John Woo shootouts by removing all the blood hits. Also almost nothing happens in the middle hour. I still like it more than MI-3 though, this one is at least memorably bonkers wacky and has a personality, I remember almost literally nothing about MI-3.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Last movie you watched

The Goonies (1985):

http://spielbergfanclub.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Goonies-poster.jpg

I'm not sure what I was expecting to be honest. I had always something of a peripheral understanding of the Goonies as this thing with a pretty potent place in a lot of peoples childhoods and in culture general, but I had never actually really gleaned many details about it. I guess if I had to say anything about my expectations is that I was expecting something more akin to Peter Pan, a group of kids gets whisked into a magical land with strange creatures and pirates.

And it's definitely not that...not that that's a bad thing, it just isn't. As far as I could tell, and this may just be a  side effect of the fact I was watching this on a drive in screen in downtown Edmonton so the sound was echoing off buildings like crazy, but it seemed like 80% of the runtime is kids bickering and/or panicking at the top of their lungs in their whiny little kid voices. 15% is the movie Speilberging it's goddamn brain out, and 5% is actually a fun little adventure. Like I said, I may have to watch this again to see if there was anything actually interesting going on while the cacophony of high pitched yells and screams were slowly turning my brain to mush.

Honestly, I didn't really see much that would have made the Goonies into THE GOONIES that everyone knows and talks about, aside from maybe it hitting a lot of people at just the right time to go pedal to the metal on the full nostalgia button. <shrug> wasn't bad, wasn't great. Moving on.

Not The Messiah (He's A Very Naughty Boy):

http://www.freecodesource.com/movie-poster/51eWvL%2B%2B9-L/-Not-the-Messiah.jpg

Came across this on Netflix tonight, and couldn't resist. It's a concert version of The Life Of Brian written by Eric Idle and John Du Prez, performed by same, with a ton of special Monty Python guest stars and a whole lot of wackiness. The filmed version was a special one night presentation in celebration of Monty Pythons 40th anniversary.

It was damn fun, that's really all there is too it. It was 90 minutes of Eric Idle with a full orchestra and choir, with 4 amazing vocalists as the main characters being entirely silly. And yes, Monty Python can still kick ass and be just as weird and wild 40 years later, it was awesome. If you're at all a Python fan and haven't seen it, check it out.

ZangrethorDigital.ca

Re: Last movie you watched

Goonies hit me at the perfect time.

I was 5 years old and was the kind of kid that watched every movie 100 times over. I've seen it about as many times as I've seen Ghostbusters, Weird Science, Explorers, The Neverending Story and Sheena.

My entire childhood was nurtured on a healthy diet of movies from 1980-1986, basically. So yeah, definitely a healthy dose of nostalgia, for sure.

And at 5 years old, I desperately wanted to be one of the Goonies gang. From the Truffle Shuffle to Data's awesome gadgets to Mikey's accidental kiss with Andy, it opened my eyes to adventure, comedy, pirate treasure and kissing girls.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Last movie you watched

My dad really enjoyed the Goonies, so I grew up with it too. It scared me, made me laugh and had pirates in it. I was too young to get all the adult humor, and I still remember the whole training wheels blowing off the bike and the pirate ship sailing out of the bay.

Since I always loved ships and treasure, it too hit me at the right time. For me, it is just that wonderful sense of adventure, set in the real world. It also has some incredible tense scenes, that still work very well.

God loves you!

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Last movie you watched

The Goonies is one of those films that always makes me feel young. Not out of any sense of nostalgia or cos it's a kids movie but because I'm too young to see what all the bloody fuss is about!  tongue

Extended Edition - 146 - The Rise Of Skywalker
VFX Reel | Twitter | IMDB | Blog

Re: Last movie you watched

The Goonies... I should probably watch that one sometime. For some reason I've never come across it growing up in the 90s. Never on TV here in Sweden, never really heard about it outside of these types of forums etc.

Anyways, a few new films I've seen:



The Bling Ring (2013) - 3/10

http://claralicious.shapemeup.se/files/2013/07/bling-ring.jpg

Based on a true story about, if the movie is accurate, some retard kids who break into celebrities houses and steal shit, then spend the money they stole doing retarded shit, whilst never once having dialogue deeper than "how does my ass look in these pants?" or "Oh my god, is that Prada".
This movie broke my brain. Sophia Coppola has apparently forgotten how to make a movie since the last time I saw one of her movies, the quite wonderful "Lost In Translation". No one expresses a single genuine emotion in this film, I kid you not.

I would try to describe this further, but you just really need to see it. Only don't. I hated every second of every character on screen. Which might have been the point, but a movie character has to have atleast 1 thing that you can identify with to be engaging. This is just completely devoid of social commentary, depth, meaning... I suppose if you can see it for free, see it. To the movies credit I didn't shut it off, though at minute 19 I officially noted that I hated the film, at minute 45 I was wondering when the 2nd act was going to kick in (it doesn't), and after that I was just making jokes whenever a character opened their stupid mouths.

"Atleast it has Emma Watson looking fine and dandy" was my main excuse for watching it. I hated her too. I'd say it was shot well, but it looks like cheap digital cameras, lots of shadow noise and blown highlights even in daylight scenes. So there isn't even that.


Boogie Nights (1997) - 9/10

http://images.static-bluray.com/reviews/2262_1.jpg

Now this is a Movie. 2 hours and 35 minutes just fly by. This is just filled with sympathetic characters, incredible camerawork (some hugely impressive long takes and oners, lots of controlled zooms while also moving the camera), and both drama, comedy, and great dialogue. This could almost be a Tarantino movie at times.
It feels like a celebration of cinema. It feels almost like a celebration of life, friendship, and ambition. Just great. Paul Thomas Anderson is now officially one of my favorite filmmakers after just three movies (I've also seen There Will Be Blood and The Master).


Blow Out (1981) - 7/10

http://www.universocinema.com/RODANDO/IMAGENES/impacto.jpg

De Palma-movie about a soundguy who happens to record something he shouldn't have recorded. Not seen much of De Palmas catalog. This feels pretty "old" in terms of the fairly simple plot. but it makes up for it with focus on characters and a relaxed atmosphere. Very well made, if the summary of the plot above in any way appeals to you this might be worth a watch.


The Secret In Their Eyes (2009) - 8/10

http://torfilm.ru/i/s2/12/5/2/e3173508e3c2e061227598bc02a06682.png

A retired legal counselor writes a novel hoping to find closure for one of his past unresolved homicide cases and for his unreciprocated love with his superior - both of which still haunt him decades later. Won the Oscar for best foreign language film. I can see why. Lots of personality, deep characters and character relationships, perfect blend of humor and drama. Not a dull moment, and superbly acted. In Spanish, but load those subtitles up and prepare for a great film.


The Objective (2008) - 6/10

http://linkleak.se/sites/linkleak/files/screens/theobjective2008dvdripxvidbigperm-lkrg_screen.png

The director of "The Blair Witch Project" makes a film about some soldiers who go to a place in the desert of the middle east where things are said to be happening. Then some things happen.
Honestly though, it is alot better than it sounds. Looks to be made on a small budget, but the acting is quite frankly great. This director clearly knows how to get his actors to just seem like real people, it feels like a documentary most of the time, though this doesn't have the conceit of a camera in the world of the movie. Shot very well on film. Some pretty good effects, some less good.

If you are looking for a straightforward thriller in the vein of Blair Witch Project, that does not in any way annoy or insult, this is it. It captures such a great atmosphere in what looks like completely genuine locations.
Not that much here, but what is here is surprisingly successful.


Contagion (2011) - 8/10

http://www.postimg.com/56000/photo-55292.jpg

Yeah, I love this movie. From the FIYH commentary I recognize the objections Teague raised, but they didn't bother me at all. This might honestly be the fastest movie I've watched. It has such a hypnotic tempo with superb rhythmic music by Cliff Martinez, I barely started the damn thing before it was over. It was also so lovely to watch something so subdued and devoid of emotional drama. We all can picture this movie before we watched it, and to be honest I've seen enough of those for a while. The Mist, War Of The World, etc, etc. I rarely these days feel like I can watch another family encounter the evils of humanity that will slowly tear them down and force them apart.
The brilliance of this movie is that it does just enough to get you invested in the people on the screen, but it also doesn't swamp you with the emotions of the characters. Instead I constantly found myself just soaking in the situations and constantly intellectually thinking about "wow, how do I feel about this, really?", rather than having a more base, reactive emotional "wow, I feel so sorry for that character" response. I don't know, it just managed to engage a different part of my brain than most movies do, and I think it is the same part of the brain that Fincher also reaches at times, which makes the comparisons between Soderberg and him relevant to me, not just because of the look of this film and most Fincher films. Fincher often has this "pulse" aswell, both in editing and music, that makes his movies just so absorbing, also helped by being somewhat clinical and allowing the viewer alot of personal reflection as opposed to overloading you with character emotions.

Last edited by TechNoir (2013-09-06 20:28:18)

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Last movie you watched

[redacted]

Last edited by Saniss (2013-09-06 22:22:58)

Sébastien Fraud
Instagram |Facebook

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Last movie you watched

UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHH.

Also...why is this here? Unless you have some sort of time machine, traveled to the future, saw these, then came back to warn us, or something.

ZangrethorDigital.ca

Re: Last movie you watched

Yes, I just noticed that. Moving it.

Sébastien Fraud
Instagram |Facebook

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Last movie you watched

Beyond The Black Rainbow (2010) - 8/10

http://bigfatfuture.com/supersecret/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/BtBR_02.jpg

I'm not going to describe the plot here. It doesn't matter, you should never watch this for the plot. This film is little short of a masterpiece by first-time director/writer Panos Cosmatos. The pace is on "2001" levels, but this film is incredibly unique, and masterfully atmospheric. If you love 80s music, the 80s "sound", can sit through 2001 and enjoy it, and are interested in photography, this may be for you.
Surreal, oppressive, bleak, hypnotic, nebulus, dreamlike.
35mm film. Absolutely mesmerizing images throughout, with stunning lighting.

The best way to know if this is for you is to watch the trailer. If this makes you giddy like a little schoolgirl, then go watch this movie. Personally one of my favorite movie trailers ever:

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Last movie you watched

http://i.imgur.com/kqMYY2U.jpg



http://i.imgur.com/KDju1ts.jpg



http://i.imgur.com/0OvyOnT.jpg



http://i.imgur.com/wYt5VTg.jpg



http://i.imgur.com/DiBbSAd.jpg

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Last movie you watched

The Secret in Their Eyes sounds intriguing. I am consistently impressed with the amazing films Spain just keeps pumping out.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Last movie you watched

Y'know, I always see love for Romancing the Stone, but I never see it for Jewel of the Nile. Why is that? I always liked that movie.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

346

Re: Last movie you watched

Jewel of the Nile suffers from advanced sequel-itis, it was a pretty blatant cash grab for everyone concerned (except Zemeckis, who passed on the sequel to direct some flick about time travel and incest instead. wink)

Unlike Romancing the Stone, Jewel is just big and loud and expensive and completely lacking the charm of the original, which was one of those whadda-we-call-ems... "perfect movie"s.

Re: Last movie you watched

TechNoir wrote:

Beyond The Black Rainbow (2010) - 8/10

35mm film.

Technically yeah, but it was shot 2 perf.

http://www.panavision.com/sites/default … lained.pdf

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Last movie you watched

Trey wrote:

Jewel of the Nile suffers from advanced sequel-itis, it was a pretty blatant cash grab for everyone concerned (except Zemeckis, who passed on the sequel to direct some flick about time travel and incest instead. wink)

Unlike Romancing the Stone, Jewel is just big and loud and expensive and completely lacking the charm of the original, which was one of those whadda-we-call-ems... "perfect movie"s.

Fair enough. Now you've got me wanting to watch both to compare and contrast.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Last movie you watched

Huh, didn't realize Zemeckis directed Romancing the Stone, weird. I dunno, I remember it being a pretty forgettable Indiana Jones knockoff, I distinctly remember the action being pretty weak, but maybe it warrants another watch.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Last movie you watched

Romancing The Stone is great. It's not an Indiana Jones knock-off at all, it's more sort of 'anti-Indiana Jones' as Jack T Colton practically does nothing except run away. It's a fun film. The sequel, not so much.

Thumbs up Thumbs down