You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Off Topic → Man of Steel
Wow. I don't like that Ewing, that Ewing is a bit of a dick.
And that would kill him...
"My Super Ex Girlfriend" had a similar scene. Couldn't find the clip but the final words in the scene are these:
"I'll get you a new one."
"Bed or penis?"
I just got back from the movie, and overall I thought it was an decent movie. Despite it being an origin movie, I felt it presented the growth of Clark in an interesting way that would have felt more stale had it been told in a linear fashion. The first two-thirds of the movie really captured and held my interest, and allowed time to get to know the characters as opposed to presenting them as props for the story to happen to. However, the action scenes felt confusing with the constant motion and lack of visibility as to what was happening, and by the end of the final battle I really didn't care about what was happening.
Overall, I liked the movie but wish the action scenes had been less extravagant to the point of excess. The score by Zimmer was extremely restrained; however, the theme he wrote served the style of the movie well. I appreciated that the style was not dark and gritty, but merely presented Superman in a serious fashion. I don't know if I'd watch it again for sometime, but this movie was a good surprise considering I paid little heed to the trailers and talk in the months leading up to its release.
Well, hmm. I'm only eight minutes in, but I'm starting to think he didn't like it.
Just got back. Good movie.
Things I liked:
- Casting. Pretty much all the parts are perfectly cast. Kevin Costner and Michael Shannon in particular knock it out of the park.
- Direction. Snyder did a really solid job. This should prove to his detractors that he isn't a slave to style and flash.
- Nods. The little references to other DC universe characters were fun and not distracting.
Things that were meh:
- Score. I didn't hate it like a lot of you guys, but it was so goddamn repetitive. I swear Zimmer plays the same snippet of the theme about 500 times. It wasn't as oppressive as his TDKR score, though. So at least there's that.
- Opening Krypton stuff. It just didn't grab me at all. Mostly I was just confused. And since Jor-El recaps all of this to Clark later, you could cut basically all of it and lose nothing of substance.
- Lois. The movie places her in danger in ways that get increasingly harder to buy. I guess this comes with the territory of doing a Superman movie, but it stood out to me.
Things I hated with all my soul:
- The structure. That first scene of Clark flying all over the world should have been joyous. But we know so little about who he is at that point that it just comes across as arbitrary. A linear structure would have given him a much clearer arc, but it's halfway through the movie before adult Clark has any sort of character or personality attached to him. This was a major mistake in my opinion. I'd like to see a recut of the film that puts it in order, to see if the story flows better.
- The product placement. This is the first time that product placement really bothered me in a movie. I mean, did we really need a shot of Faora where a MASSIVE SEARS LOGO is taking up the entire screen behind her? There's way too much stuff like that.
All in all, though, I thought it was pretty successful, even if the plot was a little convoluted.
I was shocked by the lack of slow motion.
Was this really directed by Zack Snyder?
I completely agree. Made a comment a couple of pages back about how all these recent blockbuster movies have our heroes fail to stop millions of people dying. That's not how I would define a hero.
Maybe it's not a conscious story choice on their part, but a result of a little desensitisation caused by the frequency of catastrophic destruction we've seen on the screen over the years, from 2012, Transformers 3, Avengers etc. and the fact that it's all done in computers with nary a practical effect involved - no blowing up a building or model and no actors/extras being directed on a set to be killed.
I suspect that the creative teams behind GI Joe Retaliation, Star Trek Into Darkness and Man of Steel either aren't even aware of the scale of collateral damage in their movies. It's just a wow moment.
I really identify with the last line of that comic.
I honestly don't think it is any sort of warning of trying to wage battle on an epic level brings collateral damage, though it is an interesting thought. Even if MoS was trying to say that, Avengers, Iron Man, GI JOE, Star Trek Into Darkness, Transformers (all seven of them), A Good Day to Die Hard, World War Z, Olympus Has Fallen, The Dark Knight Rises, etc. are not sending that message. Heck, even ROTS had the opening scene that rather than Anakin landing on a runway, they smash through Coruscant's cityscape.
No, I don't really think Hollywood understands collateral damage
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Off Topic → Man of Steel
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.