Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

rtambree wrote:

If one were re-imagining LOTR today, you'd need to include at least one woman in the fellowship, probably a kick-arse woman (maybe Legolas would change gender). And Sam couldn't be Frodo's gardener (i.e. social inferior). And having dark skin wouldn't imply that you're evil. Maybe an Orc would betray his race and help out the fellowship. And maybe some of the pseudo-religious aspects would be toned down.

In other words, it would be Battlestar Galactica?

Posted from my iPad
http://trek.fm

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

Cast nationality breakdown:

At least it's not good-guys = Yanks, bad-guys = Poms

Heads of Rivendell, Lothlorien & Gondor: Aussies
Love interests: Yank & Aussie & Kiwi
Sam & Frodo: Yanks (although Peter Jackson originally intended Brits)
Evil bastards: Count Dooku (Brit), Wormtongue (Yank)
Most of the Fellowship: Brits
Wizards: Brits
Local NZ actors: Besides Eomer, virtually no one with speaking parts

not long to go now...

Thumbs up Thumbs down

103

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

rtambree wrote:

If one were re-imagining LOTR today ...  having dark skin wouldn't imply that you're evil.

I don't look at the Orcs and other beasties as non-White characters, but when watching the films recently the whole thing did come across as very very white. Now I don't know a lot about the world in which the whole saga is based so maybe other continents (that's the term for big islands, right ?!) are populated by non white people - there ARE other continents, right ?! - cos I recall Gandalph(?) saying to a bunch of badies to "leave this land and I won't kill your asses" (or something like that), so the LotR only takes place on one part of the planet, the other parts being all peaceful and full of love+harmoney, right ?! - I really should have read the books by now.

Jason doesn't teleport.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

Sort of related to the Why-don't-the-Eagles-just-fly-the-ring-to-Mordor issue: Do Frodo and Sam earn their ending?

I haven't read the books, but it seems like the Eagles-ex-Machina are a bit of a copout designed to provide a happy ending despite the hopeless situation they've gotten cornered in. Why not just let Frodo and Sam die on the Mt Doom (it would be a downer ending, but the ending we do have is still a bit of a downer with Frodo's metaphorical death and all)?

They've saved the world from pure evil, that's a cause surely worth dying for.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

The reason given was always that the Eagles can't be summoned at will, but they are:
Gandalf calls them on his 'moth phone' on top of Orthanc
Gandalf calls them outside the Black Gate
Gandalf calls them to rescue the Hobbits passed out on the rock

They are his bitches. Gandalf could float Middle Earth Airways on the Gondor Stock Exchange

not long to go now...

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

rtambree wrote:

The reason given was always that the Eagles can't be summoned at will.

Eagles flying into Mordor while Sauron was alive would have been shot down with ballistas, arrows, and evil sorcery.

Warning: I'm probably rewriting this post as you read it.

Zarban's House of Commentaries

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

The best argument against using eagles to fly the ring to Mt. Doom is that Mordor has both an airforce (fell beasts) and anti-aircraft (about a million archers), it would have been an endeavour as susceptible to failure as invading Mordor with an army.

Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. - Carl Sagan

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

I've also heard the explanation that the Eagles just don't really want to get mixed up in the war. They help Gandalf out because he's their buddy, and they show up to help again when all hope seems lost for the good guys because...they're nice, I guess? But they never wanted to explicitly fight for one side or the other. Not sure how much sense that actually makes, but that's what I've been told.

"The Doctor is Submarining through our brains." --Teague

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

redxavier wrote:

The best argument against using eagles to fly the ring to Mt. Doom is that Mordor has both an airforce (fell beasts) and anti-aircraft (about a million archers), it would have been an endeavour as susceptible to failure as invading Mordor with an army.

Are you saying 'one cannot simply fly into Mordor'?

A night-time airborne assault from high-altitude straight down on Mt Doom (like shooting womp rats back home in Beggar's canyon) would surely be less risky than sending in two useless, unskilled, unamoured Hobbits into the heart of enemy territory (Hudson: 'You can count me out').

not long to go now...

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

Doctor Submarine wrote:

I've also heard the explanation that the Eagles just don't really want to get mixed up in the war. They help Gandalf out because he's their buddy, and they show up to help again when all hope seems lost for the good guys because...they're nice, I guess? But they never wanted to explicitly fight for one side or the other. Not sure how much sense that actually makes, but that's what I've been told.

Persuade the Eagles, like the Ents were persuaded. Look Dudes, do you wanna fly over a blackened landscape of smoking stumps? Because if you're not with us, you're against us.

not long to go now...

Thumbs up Thumbs down

111

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

That's the explanation that makes sense to me, too - the eagles aren't pack animals or pets, they're a race unto themselves.   Generally they stay out of the affairs of men, and they don't always come when summoned.     

I always saw Gandalf's trick with the moth as an appeal to the eagles for help, and he seems actually surprised when one shows up.     In the books they also do some favors for Galadriel, but as Tolkien himself once said "The eagles aren't a Middle Earth taxi service."

Another interesting retcon I've seen is that the eagles are just as likely to fall victim to the power of the Ring as any other race.   So Gandalf chose not to ask the eagles to carry the ring.

Of course, I believe the real reason for the eagle plothole is that it just didn't occur to Tolkien at the time.

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

rtambree wrote:

A night-time airborne assault from high-altitude straight down on Mt Doom...

...would still be noticed by the Dark Lord. Even it was almost completely successful but was slightly off course, it would deliver the ring directly to Sauron.

Warning: I'm probably rewriting this post as you read it.

Zarban's House of Commentaries

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

redxavier wrote:

The best argument against using eagles to fly the ring to Mt. Doom is that Mordor has both an airforce (fell beasts).

Eagles v Fell-Beasts: from what we saw in the movie, those Eagles kicked Fell-Beast butt. They might not look like much, but they've got it where it counts, kid.

not long to go now...

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

Zarban wrote:
rtambree wrote:

A night-time airborne assault from high-altitude straight down on Mt Doom...

...would still be noticed by the Dark Lord. Even it was almost completely successful but was slightly off course, it would deliver the ring directly to Sauron.

Create a diversion first. Gondorian archers firing flaming arrows over the Black Gate. Arwen riding nude on Shadowfax up on some safe vantage-point. Ents lobbing stones at Minas Morgul. The Dark Lord won't know where to look first.

not long to go now...

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

Trey wrote:

Of course, I believe the real reason for the eagle plothole is that it just didn't occur to Tolkien at the time.

Possibly. It's just as likely because there wouldn't be much of a story without this 'plothole'. A lot of stories have a 'well if the hero just did this they wouldn't have a problem' element. Except the problem is the story.

rtambree wrote:

Eagles v Fell-Beasts: from what we saw in the movie, those Eagles kicked Fell-Beast butt. They might not look like much, but they've got it where it counts, kid.

The eagles surprised the fell beasts but I wouldn't say they could outlast them in a stand-up battle. Besides, you'd need to bring several eagles (at least 9) to have a chance to get through and with that number you're announcing to all the world that you're coming.

I don't think the eagles would have worked.

Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. - Carl Sagan

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

redxavier wrote:

I don't think the eagles would have worked.

I'm not saying it's a certainty, but given the choice between the two plans, the Eagle option (+ diversion) had more positives than the other option which was the equivalent to sending some kids from the local high school into Nazi Germany and swiping the invasion plans off Hitler's desk.

not long to go now...

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

Does anyone know what the original plan was? (I haven't read the books for ages, so I've forgotten).
Had there not been an Orc ambush at the end of FOTR, were the nine going to sneak into Mordor when the Black Gate was open? Or recuperate at Minas Tirith for a while? I've forgotten what was actually decided at the Council of Elrond. In the movie, Elijah volunteers to 'take the ring' but there was no discussion of how or by which route into Mordor.

not long to go now...

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

Except that sending two hobbits worked. smile

I don't think Gandalf knew exactly how they were going to do it, but I suppose the idea was to sneak in via some means. It was a stealth mission, as evidenced by the fact that Merry and Pippin were allowed to go rather than elven warriors. Further, Boromir and Aragorn were just letting them tag along until they got to Minas Tirith.

Remember too that in the context of Tolkien's world, a bunch of dwarves and a hobbit set off to get their gold back from a mighty dragon. Sometimes the heroes do just leave without a clear and feasible plan. The importance of the Council of Elrond was that something had to be done (not least because Sauron would have attacked that place soon).

The story's saying that you don't need to be a warrior to do something great, and that it's not so much your physical strength but mental fortitude that can get you to the finish line. Frodo, supported by his friend Sam, was the only hero capable of succeeding.

Last edited by redxavier (2012-03-10 17:39:39)

Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. - Carl Sagan

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

Well, that was 13 hours of fucking insanity. But we got three fantastic commentaries out of it, and I had a great time. Well done!

"The Doctor is Submarining through our brains." --Teague

Thumbs up Thumbs down

120

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

Guys, thank you for putting in the hard yards on this, that was pretty incredible to experience first hand.

While I remember, did you get enough donations to cover the mic hire etc? My head is all fuzzy, time for dinner.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

Holy fuck guys. We did it. It was insane, and awesome and amazing. And we fucking made it!

The ultimate thing I haven't been able to get out of my head from today, is hope, like Trey said. With a little bit of luck and the budget of just over the average blockbuster these days, I too could make the fucking Lord of The Rings. And that is an amazing prospect.

I look forward to listening to these again when they're released!

ZangrethorDigital.ca

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

That was fucking nuts and I loved every moment of it.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

So tired. So so tired.

Tomorrow I may do a slobbering thank you post to the folks in the room and who were in the chat; for now, simply, we did it.


clap

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: THE LORD OF THE RINGS

How are they being released, all three on the same day, or one each week?

Thumbs up Thumbs down