Pages 1
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Movie Stuff → CLOUD ATLAS review by Dorkman (possible minor spoilers)
Great review, man.
Do you think this is the sort of thing we could do a commentary for? Would it basically be an unrelated three hour conversation?
Consider me convinced.
Couldn't agree more. It's my favorite film of the year as well.
I listened to the Cinefantastique podcast on the movie, and at the very least it sounds like a good adaptation of an un-filmable book. The story there was told out of order, and you jumped from time period to time period with no idea of where you were until you figured it out from context. The only real complaint was the movie cut between segments too fast, that there was no time to laugh at a joke or cry at a scene because you're sent to another story with a different mood before you could really react (this came from the one reviewer who had read the book)
Great review Dorkman. I wish I could agree with you, but I'm glad you loved it.
Here's my problem with it. Yes, the editing is extremely impressive and they pull that aspect off, no question.
However, to me, the whole movie comes off as empty and pointless, and the primary reason is this:
For the most part, each individual story is like the "Surrogates" of its respective genre.
We get the most generic and uninteresting mystery story (an evil corporation? way to stretch those narrative muscles), a pretty generic sci-fi blade runner ripoff (with a protagonist who does almost nothing except get dragged around by the badass hero who has pretty much 0 characterization, a story about a white guy freeing a slave which makes him feel better about himself (which plays out exactly to the letter like you'd expect).
Even the stories that could potential be more original and interesting, like the far future one and the escaping old people one, are greatly undercut by the lack of runtime. Plot points get dropped all over the place (the mobsters from the beginning of the Cavendish story who completely vanish, Susan Sarandon suddenly showing up at the end without even a scene of the two re-uniting).
And it's totally understandable to me that this is simply an unwinnable problem you run into by trying to cram 6 stories in 2 hours 40 minutes. My contention though, is that this either needed to be a mini-series, or they should've made some hard choices and cut 2 of the storylines and fleshed out the other 4.
The fact is that as outstanding as the cross-cutting is, aside from being interesting on a theoretical level, it all goes to waste because the stories are mostly generic, forgettable, and uninteresting, like watching rough story outlines before the writers put in any of the interesting details or quirks that would've made them unique.
And that's a damn shame, cause I really wanted to like it.
I will say, my favorite part of the whole movie was the shitty Tom Hanks film dramatization of Cavendish's story, that put a big smile on my face.
I'm trying to kind of describe why the movie didn't work for me, but to be honest I can't really place it. I just feel like the individual story payoffs are really unoriginal and weren't doing anything for me. I mean you've got Hugo Weaving as a hitman, going up against motherfucking Keith David, and you don't even give me a proper showdown between them, and just have him get killed in a really lame "girl-power" moment. I think that's another big problem, this movie is extremely broad with both its themes and lots of the dialogue. I am so over seeing characters tell other characters off about how bad slavery/oppression is while emotional music plays in the background. The whole thing feels like a 15 year-old's version of an empowerment film, pretending to be important without any real depth to it (I felt similarly about V for Vendetta for what it's worth). And I hate the design of the "sub-conscious" character in the far-future segment, such an on-the-nose and unsubtle way of getting that idea across. At the end, I walked away feeling absolutely nothing.
Part of the problem might be that I saw Fish Story a week earlier, loved the hell out of it, and really felt like it hit all of these same ideas and story beats in a much more fun and original way.
Great review, and I do hope you guys do a commentary on this because I also thought it was an excellent film. It was probably the first film with such a long run time that I never felt for a moment dragged on. I also agree with Doctor Submarine in that the film isn't 6 separate stories but one unified one. For me it worked well, I enjoyed seeing how the characters were related as well as seeing how the stories changed in the different time periods.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Movie Stuff → CLOUD ATLAS review by Dorkman (possible minor spoilers)
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.