Re: V for Vendetta

Toad in the Hole

This is what I was referring to insisting it was called Toad in the Hole -- which it is -- and that it isn't what V is making -- which it isn't.

This is what V makes:

Egg in the Basket

It does note on the Wiki article that Egg in the Basket is also called Toad in a Hole, as opposed to the sausage dish, Toad in the Hole. So apparently the indefinite vs. definite article makes all the difference. Which is dumb. So I'm gonna stick with Egg in the Basket. And try making it tomorrow.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: V for Vendetta

I recall bringing up the a/the thing on the show.

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: V for Vendetta

i always thought eggs benedict looked like eggs in a basket does here...

Now I know it looks like this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eggs_Benedict

Last edited by switch (2011-06-21 20:55:09)

Thumbs up Thumbs down

54

Re: V for Vendetta

As my granny used to say: you can put all your eggs in one basket, but you can't put all your toads in one hole.

Re: V for Vendetta

Mmmm.  Toad in the Hole.   

But better still, the Scotch Egg is one of the greatest culinary inventions in the history of ever.

Re: V for Vendetta

You people and your ovum. Vile.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

57

Re: V for Vendetta

Trey, you should try my wife's haggis lasagne, followed by her raspberry and lime meringue pie on a ginger-nut base:

yum

Re: V for Vendetta

Dude, not cool. I haven't eaten today.

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: V for Vendetta

Funniest. Commentary. Ever.

Laughing all the way through my chores today whilst listening to this.

not long to go now...

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: V for Vendetta

Great Commentary!!!! Like a well oiled machine....

OK, I don't know who might read this, and I don't know where else to post this, but you
guys were talking about it on this episode and other episodes as well.
I am referring to The Saw Franchise. Most of you say the first movie was good, and that
at lease some of you have seen part 2. And I know that it is made fun of because it
has 6 sequels.
So I just want to say, as of a couple of years ago I was totally on the same page as
you guys. I had tried to watch part 2 and couldn't much past the "needle pool" scene
before turning it off, and simply blew off the rest of the movies as garbage.
Well I'll have you know that my wife, who really doesn't like horror movies has insisted
on me watching all the movies with her, and this started back when only 4 or 5 movies
had been made, so we are talking 7 yrs ago.
So I think that most people, not really caring much for the movies, might not know that
ALL of the films were produced by the same 2 guys and this really gives the movies a
consistency that I would never have thought would be there. Also when the director
of parts 2, 3, and 4 left, the production designer for parts 1-4 directed part 5 and then editor
of parts 1-5 directed the last 2.
This really gave the movies a sense of cohesion that I did not expect.
So as you can tell, my wife finally talked me into having a Saw marathon
one weekend many years ago, and I was blown away by the story.
Right up to the last frame of the last movie, they wrap and fold the
story from the first movie. And, not to give anything away, but most of the
reveals that we see throughout the movies, is that the events we see the
latter movies actually are happening simultaneously with events in the first
and second movies. They do an amazing job of keeping continuity throughout.
Plus the score as also great, IMO.

I just think if some of you sat down and watched them all, that maybe they wouldn't
be made fun of.

Thumbs up Thumbs down