I'm likely giving up too much here..but it's out there to find elsewhere so...
I have grappled with manic depression for probably over two decades, and spun out so bad at one point that I went inpatient for a short period of time...and I find the film gives pretty dangerous advice.
One person recovering from a spin out dating another person recovering from a spin out is going to almost always result in two simultaneous and much more dangerous spin outs. The main character being surrounded by his basically insane and subtly, but persistently, abusive family would only compound the problem. Even his therapist is fairly dangerous, and the film doesn't really dive into any of the steps a person would really have to take to pull their life together after a psychological break so intense that it lead to physical violence and involuntary commitment.
The message seems to be that the cure to serious mental illness is to surround yourself with superstitious lunatics, cave into their psychosis, and then get into a dance off with an equally insane person (who he has no business dating, and was manipulated into dating) to cure mental illness...which is offensively oversimplified to.me, as it sets up the main character to have a child with his equally crazy lover before either of them have fixed their issues, and perpetuate the cycle.
(It also avoids looking to deep at the issue that my generation is seemingly abnormally full of 30 somethings crippled by mental illness to the point of moving back in with their parents...but obviously that is beyond the movies scope. )
I'd love to read some early drafts of this thing to see how it became this...thing...it seems more like a madlib than a movie to me.
I hate this movie more than Dorkman hates Good Will Hunting. and would gladly sit on the couch and dice it to fucking pieces if the opportunity presented.
(The exercise is good advice, I will give it that.)
--
One Time @ Bland Camp...